![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/766\/2019\/10\/evangelical-atheism.jpg\")
<\/p>\nOne of the texts that I regularly use in my ethics classes is a collection of essays and interviews that have been posted over the past decade on\u00a0 The New York Times\u2019 \u201cOpinionator\u201d blog.\u00a0 In several of these interviews Gary Gutting, a professor of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, explores the topic of whether belief in something greater than ourselves is rational with several contemporary academics whose work intersects with such questions.<\/p>\n
One of these interviews is with Louise Antony, a professor of philosophy at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. She is the editor of\u00a0Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life<\/em>\u00a0and represents the hardcore atheist position among Gutting\u2019s six interviewees.<\/p>\n In response to Gutting\u2019s query as to why she is an atheist, going beyond the agnostic position that we cannot know whether God exists or not to the more definitive position that one\u00a0can\u00a0know that God does not exist, Anthony explains:<\/p>\n When I claim to know that there is no God, I mean that the question is settled to my satisfaction. I don\u2019t have any doubts. I don\u2019t say that I am agnostic, because I disagree with those who say it\u2019s not possible to know whether or not God exists. I think it\u2019s possible to know. And I think the balance of evidence and argument has a definite tilt. . . . The main issue is supernaturalism\u2014I deny that there are beings or phenomena outside the scope of natural law.<\/strong><\/p>\n I must confess that I found much of the following conversation to be tiresome and spinning its wheels in bottomless intellectual ruts. Antony will only accept a specific type of evidence\u2014that which can be verified within the parameters of the laws of nature. The theist makes a serious mistake when she or he agrees to play the \u201cdoes God exist?\u201d game by these rules. In truth, Antony\u2019s belief that \u201ceverything is the product of mindless natural laws acting on mindless matter\u201d is as much an act of faith as the theist\u2019s belief that there is at least one being\u2014God\u2014that transcends those laws.<\/p>\n Of greater interest is her claim that \u201cthe question is settled to my satisfaction,\u201d because this raises the threshold of conviction question. Just how convinced does someone have to be of the truth of something before further investigation is stopped? Is the threshold of conviction different from person to person? And if so, how can a person with a low threshold of conviction fruitfully converse with the doubter or skeptic whose threshold is significantly higher?<\/p>\n Gutting and Antony\u2019s conversation shifts in this direction when it moves its focus from scientific to experiential evidence. Gutting asks What do you make of the claim from many theists that the best evidence for the existence of something greater than us is direct religious experience? After denying that she has had such experiences, Antony offers a connective bridge that many atheists refuse to consider.<\/p>\n O.K., if you hold my feet to the fire, I\u2019ll admit that I believe I know what sort of experiences the theists are talking about, that I\u2019ve had such experiences, but I don\u2019t think they have the content the theists assign to them. I\u2019ve certainly had experiences I would call \u201cprofound.\u201d . . . I\u2019ve been tremendously moved by demonstrations of personal courage (not mine!), generosity, sympathy. I\u2019ve had profound experiences of solidarity, when I feel I\u2019m really together with other people working for some common goal. These are very exhilarating and inspiring experiences, but they are very clearly about human beings\u2014human beings at their best.<\/strong><\/p>\n Shifting the conversation from the ways in which we describe our experiences to the content of those experiences offers an opportunity for new understanding.<\/p>\n Antony\u2019s comments remind me of a long-standing problem that I had with my father well into my adulthood. From my earliest memories, he peppered his conversations with phrases like \u201cGod told me that . . .,\u201d \u201cthe Lord directed me to . . .,\u201d and \u201cI was going to do ___, but God told me not to,\u201d giving the impression that he and the Divine had a direct line of communication others did not have access to. Knowing that I had no such direct line, I had no idea what the experience of talking directly to God was like.<\/p>\n After many years of first thinking I was my father\u2019s spiritual inferior, then thinking that he was simply nuts, one day in my early thirties in response to yet another \u201cGod told me that\u201d pronouncement I confronted him. \u201cYou say that all the time\u2014what exactly does it feel or sound like when God says something to you?\u201d<\/p>\n Taken aback by what he perceived as an attack from his passive, introverted son he grew a bit defensive. \u201cWell, you know, it\u2019s a strong feeling, an intuition, a sense that I should do this rather than that.\u201d \u201cIt\u2019s not a voice?\u201d I asked. \u201cNo\u2014it hasn\u2019t been yet, at least,\u201d he replied. \u201cI know what those sorts of experiences are like,\u201d I sputtered\u2014\u201cI just don\u2019t call them God talking to me!\u201d And for the first time we had come to at least a partial truce. Our failure to communicate was the result of vastly different language, not vastly different experiences.<\/p>\n In a moment of the sort that is all too rare in conversations between atheists and theists, Antony suggests that we focus our attention on the experiences that all human beings share, not on the various sorts of descriptions and explanations that divide them. Because after all, just how important is it, in the larger scheme of things, to be absolutely right about something that is ultimately beyond the reach of our usual sorts of evidence?<\/p>\n Why do theists care so much about belief in God? [And, I might add, why do atheists care so much about not believing in God?] Disagreement over that question is really no more than a difference in philosophical opinion. Specifically, it\u2019s just a disagreement about ontology\u2014about what kinds of things exist. Why should a disagreement like that bear any moral significance? Why shouldn\u2019t theists just look for allies among us atheists in the battles that matter\u2014the ones concerned with justice, civil rights, peace, etc.\u2014and forget about our differences with respect to such arcane matters as the origins of the universe?<\/strong><\/p>\n This strikes me as wise advice. As Anne Cavidge says in Iris Murdoch\u2019s\u00a0Nuns and Soldiers<\/em>,<\/p>\n What do my thoughts matter, what do their\u00a0details\u00a0matter, what does it matter whether Jesus Christ redeemed the world or not, it doesn\u2019t matter, our minds can\u2019t grasp such things, it\u2019s all too obscure, too vague, the whole matrix shifts and we shift with it. What does anything matter except helping one or two people who are nearby, doing what\u2019s obvious? We can see so little of the great game.<\/strong><\/p>\n At the very least, Louise Antony suggests, theists and atheists should practice basic charity when involved in their seemingly interminable debates.<\/p>\n I believe I have reasons for my position, and I expect that theists believe they have reasons for theirs. Let\u2019s agree to pay each other the courtesy of attending to the particulars.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One of the texts that I regularly use in my ethics classes is a collection of essays and interviews that have been posted over the past decade on\u00a0 The New York Times\u2019 \u201cOpinionator\u201d blog.\u00a0 In several of these interviews Gary Gutting, a professor of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, explores the topic of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2938,"featured_media":18480,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,7,9,14,21,30,35,36,40,48,61,73,91,94,98],"tags":[169,221,222,242,275,1032,383,463],"class_list":["post-25503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atheism-2","category-baptists","category-belief","category-books","category-christianity","category-ethics","category-faith","category-family","category-god","category-human-nature","category-literature","category-philosophy","category-stories","category-teaching","category-tolerance","tag-christianity","tag-faith","tag-family","tag-god","tag-iris-murdoch","tag-louise-antony","tag-philosophy","tag-teaching"],"yoast_head":"\n