2020-01-08T11:03:35-05:00

LCMS pastor Peter Burfeind has published a terrific article in The Federalist entitled How Our Age’s Melancholy Stems From Loving Ourselves Too Much.  The problem, he says, is our particular “cult of self,” which can be traced back through the Middle Ages.  And the remedy is that proposed by Martin Luther.

You need to read the whole thing, but I’ll give you an overview.  After citing the plague of depression that hits so many people today, as well as other examples of “melancholy” that lead to substance abuse and other problems, Pastor Burfeind takes us on a tour of the Middle Ages and the new ideas about the Self that arose in the 1200’s.

He notes, for example, the influence of technology, namely, the invention of the mirror (!).  But that wasn’t the only reason people began concentrating on their individual selves, at the expense of their lives in the objective world.  Scholasticism along with Neoplatonism played a role.  Then came the “cult of Eros,” found first in the Cathar heretics and then in the troubadours of Romantic Love.  Another influence was the mystical millennialist Joachim of Fiore.  Then came the Hermeticists, the major figure of whom was Giordano Bruno, also hailed as one of the originators of modern science.  Melancholy, said Bruno, was a necessary experience for the self when it realizes that nothing in the world can satisfy its longings.  The Hermeticists emphasized vacatio, when the self leaves its body behind, drifting away in its own thoughts and fantasies.

All of this, says Pastor Burfeind, amounted to a recovery of Gnosticism, that ancient heresy that rejects the physical realm in the pursuit of an interior, hidden knowledge, a quest into the self.  You can see this mindset today practically everywhere you look–in pop psychology, New Age mysticism, the virtual reality of our information technology, postmodernism, and in the lives of individuals who have never heard of these movements but who are lost on an endless quest for “self-fulfillment” that leads to divorce, instability, isolation, and unhappiness.

No, this isn’t saying that cases of depression are the sufferer’s fault or are tied to sin or a false world view.  There are all kinds of reasons for depression, many of them quite justified.  Pastor Burfeind’s point is that our culture has a view of self, one that goes far back, that cultivates a sense of alienation from reality and that encourages our proclivity to withdraw from the outside world into ourselves.  You don’t have to be depressed to do that–you can be quite cheerful about it–but doing so has negative consequences for everybody, including the culture as a whole.

So how does Luther offer a remedy for this?  I’ll let Pastor Burfeind explain:

During Melanchthon’s bouts of depression, Luther would direct him extra nos, or “outside of himself,” toward Christ and everything Christ implied, including his church, the sacraments, and the Scriptures. . . .

Luther would say in rising rates of suicide and depression occur because people “curve in” on themselves, wallowing in a narcissistic pursuit of self-fulfillment, something no different than the mystical Neoplatonic program of the old monks. In a strange way, we have a new monasticism, the isolation of self through media, which can only result in the same pathologies Luther recognized in himself. . . .

Returning to Luther’s counsel to Melanchthon: “Get outside yourself!” For Luther, this meant getting out of the monastery, getting married, and being “other”-directed. His doctrine of vocatio was the answer to vacatio. That is, one’s vocation — as a father, mother, child, employee, pastor, lay person, etc. — directed one’s attention away from self toward neighbor.

Vocatio as the answer to vacatio!  Vocation as opposed to escaping the world into oneself!  Vocation draws us away from ourselves into involvement with physical reality, so that our love is directed not just to ourselves but to our neighbors!

Pastor Burfeind concludes with these applications:

Our culture suffers from lack of attention to external reality. Younger generations don’t know how to garden, work on cars, engage in basic conversation, or care for others. The trades suffer from the younger generation’s lack of interest, despite the promise of huge incomes. These problems arise because young people mainly engage the world through an internalized, two-dimensional, manufactured reality.

Christians especially should consider the implications of a God who became flesh, who sanctifies the glorious and distinct beings comprising external reality. He, after all, is the “Logos,” or Being, who brought about and secures the “logoi,” or beings, of the created external order. Because of him, our “neighbor” becomes an object of love, not a character in our own psychic dramas. He draws us out of ourselves and into himself, the glorious “other.”

Get outside yourself! For the Christian, reclaim the historic, orthodox, non-gnostic understanding of Christ, and heed the call away from self and the media-manufactured fantasy world. Turn to your neighbors and the external world. Perhaps you’ll also find that joyful draw toward the Logos which, with genuine catechesis, can save your soul.

 

Illustration:  “Melancholy” (1893) by Edvard Munch [Public domain] via Wikimedia Commons

2020-01-08T07:40:17-05:00

We have automated lots of jobs and human tasks.  Could we automate the pastoral ministry?  As people put their faith in technology–to the point of hailing post-singularity Artificial Intelligence as a god–it is little wonder that the idea has arisen of robot priests and robot pastors.

Augustana philosophy professor David O’Hara has written an article at OneZero entitled How Robot Priests Will Change Human Spirituality.

Already, he says, a robot in Japan has been programmed to do the chanting at Buddhist funerals.  A German church is using a robot to give blessings.*  In the Islamic nation of Dubai, a machine uses Artificial Intelligence to pronounce fatwas.  “Other groups,” O’Hara says, “have experimented with machines that can hear confessions, offer prayers, or even offer sacraments.”

O’Hara then contemplates the possibilities of Robot Priests.

Ursula Le Guin once wrote that “a machine is more blameless, more sinless even than any animal. It has no intentions whatsoever but our own.”. . .

Maybe we could use machines that do the best things clergy do for us. A machine that resembles a human could chat all night with a lonely person, and might make a very good counselor. It could offer comforting words at the bedside of someone who suffers from dementia, or who needs a listening ear. It could read stories or sing songs. Why not automate the singing of hymns, the reciting of scripture, the chanting of prayer, the pronouncement of blessings? All of those things are desirable, at least to some people.

He concludes, though, that there are some things Robot clergy could not and should not do.  “A machine can repeat ritualized ‘hatch, match, and dispatch’ words for us, but can it share our experience as an empathetic companion? And if it can’t, does that diminish the meaning of the ritual?”

He also sees dangers, and offers a terrific quotation with many applications:

Paul Virilio puts a finer point on this: “When you invent the ship, you also invent the shipwreck; when you invent the plane you also invent the plane crash; and when you invent electricity, you invent electrocution… Every technology carries its own negativity, which is invented at the same time as technical progress.”

Whether we believe in gods or not, our technologies can begin to function like gods, or like the priests that tell us how to behave. Even if we don’t intend them to, our machines can become our oracles, and where there are oracles, there are people ready to profit from those oracles.

 But there is a deeper issue at stake.  Though the talk about robot ministers is only theoretical at this point, the misconception it demonstrates about the office of the holy ministry is real.  This robotic view of ministry has done great damage to the relationship between congregations and their pastors and to the church as a whole.

This is the functional view of the ministry.  What defines a pastor is the actions that he carries out:  preaching, counseling, praying, presiding at services, dispensing the sacraments.  Theoretically, a robot might carry out these functions, though whether that would be appropriate depends on how effective it would be in doing so.  (How good are the robot’s sermons?  Is it increasing church attendance?  Maybe it would fall short in the empathy department, so we might still need a human being for counseling.)

But even in the current absence of robot clergy, the technology being not quite ready for that, many pastors today are assessed in exactly the same way!

 Being a pastor is not just fulfilling functions.  It is a vocation from God.  A man is called by God to be a pastor.  And then the church ordains him.  Thereafter, God works through that pastor as he carries out the duties of his office.

The pastor operates, in the words of the traditional absolution liturgy, “by virtue of my office, as a called and ordained servant of the Word. . . .”  A newer version says, “As a called and ordained servant of Christ, and by His authority. . . .”  (Lutheran Service Book, Divine Service settings three and one).

God brings the forgiveness of sins through the pastor; God proclaims His word through the pastor’s preaching and teaching; Christ performs the sacraments that the pastor enacts in His name; the Holy Spirit cares for us through acts of pastoral care.

The question is not whether or not a robot can be programmed to preach, pray, and preside at services.  The questions are, can a robot be called?  Can a robot be ordained? 

These give rise to other questions:  Does God call robots to be pastors?  If you think that He might, what would be the Scriptural basis for that belief?  Has the church ever ordained robots?  What would be the theological basis for doing so?

The answers would indicate that, no, there can be no such thing as robot pastors.  Your smart phone can play back a recorded sermon, but that doesn’t make the smart phone your pastor.

Discussions of robot ministers should ask the related questions:  Can there be a congregation consisting only of machines?  Could churches increase their membership by filling their pews with laptop computers, smart phones, and electronic appliances?  What if they all could be programmed to repeat the responses and play the assigned music?  If the functions of people in the congregation would be replicated–such as saying words to God and listening receptively–would that be worship?  If those machines, as Ursula LeGuin says, cannot sin, how can they repent, be evangelized, and grow in sanctification?  Why would they need to go to church?

If you are worried about Artificial Intelligence actually developing to the point of being human-like or God-like, put your mind at rest by reading these posts:

The Brain is NOT a Computer

Why Artificial Intelligence Won’t Conquer Humanity

Artificial Intelligence and Religion

*I looked up that German robot pastor, and it is even worse than I imagined.  The blessed-spouting robot is called BlessU-2.  It was installed by the Lutheran state church of Hesse and Nassau at Wittenberg!  In honor of the anniversary of the Reformation!

Here is a YouTube video, showing the worshipper using a touch screen on the robot’s chest to choose her blessing, including whether she wants it in a male or female voice!  Whereupon the robot pastor intones the blessing and lifts up his hands, which emit a beam of light!  Then you can print out your blessing!  Note the expressive eye-brow, programmed, I assume, to express empathy.  You have got to watch this video, which will make you laugh and cry at the very same time:

 

Illustration:  YouTube screen shot

2019-12-17T12:47:03-05:00

The United States has the world’s highest rates of children who live with only one parent.  The U.S. also leads the world or is among the leaders in other marks of family breakdown.  And Christians have the same rates of single parenthood as the “unaffiliated.”

These are the findings of a Pew Research Study that examined family arrangements in 130 countries.  In the United States, nearly one out of four children (23%) live in a household with only one parent and no other adults.  Worldwide, the percentage is 7%.  In China, this is true of only 3% of children.  In Nigeria, 4%.  In Canada, 15%.  In France, 16%.  In Denmark, 17%.

So nations that are rich, poor, Communist, Muslim, conservative, liberal, secularist, and sexually permissive all agree that children should be raised by both their mother and their father.  The United States, not so much.

To see this particular example of American exceptionalism as a bad thing is not to put down single mothers. (Women vastly outnumber men as single parents, 9% to 2%.)   I respect those who refused to get an abortion and decided instead to raise her baby.  There are lots of reasons for single parenthood, not all of them under the parent’s control. Often the man who abandoned his own children is to blame.

And, on one level, I am not surprised or scandalized that Christians have such a big share of single parents.  Contrary to how it is often portrayed, Christianity is not for the morally perfect.  Rather, it is for sinners, the broken, those with messed up lives, the desperate.  As Jesus Himself said, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but sinners” (Mark 2:17).  It is hard to raise children by oneself, an emotional drain that also usually involves major financial hardship.  No wonder stressed-out single parents turn to the Lord, who promises to step in and be “Father of the fatherless and protector of widows” (Psalm 68:5).

But why is there so much single parenthood in the United States as compared to everywhere else in the world?

The study shows other reasons to think that the institution of the family in the United States is not functioning as it should.  The United States also is among the world’s leaders in the percentage of folks over 60 who live alone (27%, compared to a world average of 16%).  And yet, on the other side of the age spectrum, the U.S. is also among the world’s leaders in the percentage of young adults 18-34 who still live with their parents (20%).  And the U.S. also trails most of the world in its reliance on the extended family.  Worldwide, 38% of children live in extended families, with grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc., something true of only 8% of American children.

Though Christianity is for casualties of difficult family situations, the Church has surely done too little in building up the institution of the family, both for its own members and indirectly–in its role as salt and light–for society as a whole.

It seems to me that, judging from most “Christian” books on the family and on pastoral counseling materials that I have seen, the Church has adopted the contemporary world’s paradigm for families, which is a psychological model emphasizing self-fulfillment.  OR, when it tries to be religiously distinctive, it emphasizes a Law-oriented approach, requiring obedience and questions of who has to (or does not have to) obey whom.  Since the self is inherently unstable and since human beings cannot fulfill the Law, both approaches will tend to bear fruit in unhappy marriages, frustrated parents, and rebellious children.

What is needed instead is a vocational paradigm for marriage, parenting, childhood, and the extended family.  This is the Biblical approach and brings to bear the Christian distinctive that can actually transform and motivate; namely, the Gospel.  The vocational approach to family issues sees Christ’s presence in marriage, God the Father’s presence in parenthood, and God the Son’s presence in childhood.   The purpose of each of the family callings–husband & wife, father & mother, son & daughter, and everyone in the extended family–is to love and serve the corresponding neighbor in that relationship.  And to bear the Cross in that vocation:  that is, to deny (not fulfill) one’s self in love for the neighbor (husbands for wives; wives for husbands; parents for children; children for parents).  Such self-sacrificial love, in turn, is the key to genuine self-fulfillment (Luke 9:23-24).

My daughter Mary Moerbe and I collaborated on a book that explores these issues, entitled Family Vocation:  God’s Calling in Marriage, Parenting, and Childhood We didn’t make this stuff up.  It’s all from the Bible and the Reformation teaching about vocation.  I commend it to you not because we wrote it, but because I think you will find the concept as illuminating and as practically helpful as we have.

I think that if you pastors use the vocational paradigm rather than the psychological paradigm in your counseling and teaching, you will help form strong families–good, mutually supporting marriages; satisfying, effective parenting; happy, cared for children–as opposed to families that are dysfunctional, frustrating, and disposable.

In doing so, the Church can help fulfill the Advent prophecy about John the Baptist in the last verse of the Old Testament: “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the Lord comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction” (Malachi 4:6).

 

HT:  Mary

 

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay 

2019-12-16T08:35:19-05:00

My fellow Patheos blogger Scott McKnight has posted Ruth Tucker’s essay “Martin Luther and Christmas,” which considers both the myths and the realities of Luther’s contributions to this holiday.  She quotes these moving lines from his Nativity sermon of 1530:

If Christ had arrived with trumpets and lain in a cradle of gold, his birth would have been a splendid affair. But it would not be a comfort to me. He was rather to lie in the lap of a poor maiden and be thought of little significance in the eyes of the world. Now I can come to him. Now he reveals himself to the miserable in order not to give any impression that he arrives with great power, splendor, wisdom, and aristocratic manners.

 

Illustration:  “Adoration of the Shepherds” by Gerard van Honthorst (1622) [Public domain] via Wikimedia Commons

2019-12-12T20:09:31-05:00

The Church Growth Movement of a few decades ago promoted the use of marketing techniques to attract as many people as possible to form a “mega-church.”  But today’s marketing philosophy, enabled by online technology, focuses not on reaching vast numbers but on identifying individuals with highly specific interests and targeting them with tailor-made appeals.  So the Church Growth Movement is now trying to adapt the “niche marketing” approach by creating not “mega-” but “micro-churches.”

These are not to be confused with small traditional congregations. Micro-churches are built around their targets’ common interests.  Where I live, I have seen Cowboy churches and Biker churches.  But, it turns out, the possibilities go far beyond those:  Warrior Church.  Taco Church. Coloring Church.

Christianity Today has published an approving article on the trend.  From Kara Bettis, Carving Out a Niche for Micro-Congregations:

On any given Sunday at 7:30 a.m., a visitor to Schlitte Boxing & Fitness may find two dozen or so men and women hitting punching bags, cranking out pushups, or congratulating one another after a particularly tough bench press. It’s not CrossFit. It’s Sunday morning worship at Warrior Church.

To the side of the gym, there’s a stack of milk crates that form a makeshift altar. Before the workout starts, Sean Steele, founder of Warrior Church, kicks off the hour with a 15-minute prayer and discussion from a lectionary. Founded in 2017, Warrior Church is one of four—soon to be six—communities aimed at military veterans and others experiencing trauma that help compose the network of St. Isidore Episcopal Church in and around Spring, Texas.

The St. Isidore network also includes—along with a few house churches—Taco Church, where men gather for prayer at Taco Bell, and Coloring Church, dedicated to “dialogue and artistic expression.” But if you’re hoping to visit St. Isidore’s main building to attend their gathered Sunday service, you will be disappointed. These gatherings aren’t just small groups and outreach programs; they are the church’s primary venues. According to its website, St. Isidore is “a church without walls.”. . .

Leaders of these gatherings feel that the attractional model, in which churches use outreach programs to draw visitors to their Sunday morning services, is less effective in a secularizing culture. Instead of assuming visitors will voluntarily walk through their doors, these leaders take a proactive stance by starting smaller, localized communities where unchurched people live and work.

Reggie McNeal, missional leadership specialist for Leadership Network, views these contextualized communities as a “harbinger that something really big is underfoot” that will undo the Western church’s “single modality church expression” in the congregational model.

[Keep reading. . .]

What do you think of this?  Do any of you have any experience with these sorts of churches?

Though there may be some cases that justify a congregation tailored to specific groups–for example, the deaf, or particular language groups, or a chaplain’s services on a military base–in general, I do not approve.

Both Micro-Churches and Mega-Churches share the Church Growth technique that the founder of the movement, Donald McGavran brought from the mission field:  the homogenous unit principle.  That is, the notion that, in the words of the Wikipedia article, “individuals are more likely to convert to Christianity en masse when they share similar demographics.”

Whether you have a big group of middle class white suburbanites with families, or small groups of Cowboys, Bikers, Weightlifters, or Colorers, the congregation will consist of similar people who do similar things.

Whereas traditional congregations typically consist of elderly folks, young families, and children; people of all income levels and social classes; individuals with different interests, educational backgrounds, and vocations.  (Also, historically, people of different ethnicities, though American congregations need to work on that.)

This is in accord with the Biblical principle that the Church is a unity of diverse individuals, as different from each other as eyes and ears and hands:

12 For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. 13 For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves[d] or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit.

14 For the body does not consist of one member but of many. 15 If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. 16 And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. 17 If the whole body were an eye, where would be the sense of hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell? 18 But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose. 19 If all were a single member, where would the body be? 20 As it is, there are many parts,[e] yet one body.

21 The eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” 22 On the contrary, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, 23 and on those parts of the body that we think less honorable we bestow the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty, 24 which our more presentable parts do not require. But God has so composed the body, giving greater honor to the part that lacked it, 25 that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. 26 If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together.

27 Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it.  (1 Corinthians 12)

Also the Bible says much about evangelism, grace, the Gospel, the means of grace.  But I don’t see anything in there about marketing.

 

Photo: Northeast Texas Biker Church Paris Texas by Amy Claxton via Flickr, Creative Commons License

2019-12-08T18:13:45-05:00

One of the most successful Christmas presents–in the sense of being truly surprising and appreciated–that I have ever given was a work of art.  We had just moved to the snowy tundra of Wisconsin and were missing our native Oklahoma.  An art professor at Concordia Wisconsin where I was teaching, Gaylund Stone, had come there from a stint at a college in Oklahoma, where he had painted some landscapes.  One of them was just of a tractor in a field, but he perfectly captured Oklahoma’s red dirt, big blue sky, and intense bright light of a hot summer day.  That was Oklahoma!  I bought the painting off Gaylund–who is still at Mequon, by the way–and gave it to my wife for Christmas.  The gift was a big hit, and the painting became a treasured icon of our old home at our new home.
Works of art–whether paintings or literature or crafts–make outstanding Christmas presents.  They are unique.  They are personal.  They are meaningful.  And they typically show much more appreciation of the person you are getting them for than the typical electronic gadgets, fashion accessories, or gift cards that have become the norm.
Also, buying art–especially good art, Christian art–is a way to build up our culture.  Christians interested in improving the aesthetic dimension of our increasingly ugly society tend to focus on the supply side:  We need more Christian artists (filmmakers, entertainers, authors, painters, etc.).  This is true.  But we also need to focus on the demand side, and this is where all of us non-artistic types can make a major contribution.  Ugliness, lack of creativity, and decadence pervade–in Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and Main Street–because this is what the public is buying.  If the public were to hold out for something better, something better would appear.  We do need Christian artists, but Christian artists need a market for their work.
In that spirit, I here offer you a very partial list of suggestions for your Christmas shopping consideration.  These are all contemporary Christian artists of a Lutheran persuasion.  I’m sure I am leaving out some good ones–please supplement this list with your own recommendations in the comments–but here are a few to get us started.

Literature

Obviously, books are always a great present.  Check out Concordia Publishing House for some wonderful theological, Bible Study, and devotional resources.  But I am emphasizing here literary art, including novels that are primarily to be read for pleasure and delight, though you will find them edifying as well.  And while you should read and give classics, such as Bo Giertz’s Hammer of God, I want to introduce you to some contemporary Lutheran writers.

 Mary J. Moerbe.   I begin with my daughter!  She has put out a volume of devotional verse entitled Ecclesial Poetry.
  Poetry, tragically, is in a state of decline, with modern writers reducing our highest literary art to a set of formless, obscure puzzles.  Mary’s poetry, though, is classic in form and as clear as a bell on a cold night.  Her poetry is devotional, meditative, Biblical, and churchly.  They are filled with penetrating insights and beautiful expressions.
And for the kids, get them one of Mary’s children books, such as How Can I Help?:  God’s Calling for Kids, which teaches children about their vocations.  Also, her blog Meet, Write, and Salutary will alert you to other Lutheran writers in addition to the few I list here.
Lars Walker.  Lars is a longtime reader and sometimes commenter on this blog.  And he is an extremely gifted novelist.  I think of him as a Christian magical realist.  He combines historical elements with high fantasy to great effect.  He has written a saga of novels about Erling Skjalgsson, one of the first Vikings to embrace Christianity, and the stories are exciting and wondrous.  I also like his novels about Epsom, Minnesota, especially Wolf Time, involving strange doings at a Lutheran college that has drifted to the liberal dark side.  Another of his novels that combines realism, fantasy, and social satire is Death’s Door.  Check out his website.
Frederic W. Baue.  “Fritz” is a Renaissance man:  An LCMS pastor.  A notable guitarist and songwriter (note his recordings and YouTube presence–he composed What Is This Bread in the Lutheran Service Book).  A fiction writer of highly textured stories.  Try The Pilgrim, which is about Perry County, the Sixties, music, baseball, and saving faith.  (Caution:  This book is realistic when it comes to sin.  It’s also realistic when it comes to God’s grace.)  Here is his website.
 There are lots more, from the symbolic tales of Michael L. McCoy to the thrillers of Ray Keating (imagine James Bond becoming a pastor).  For a comprehensive list of contemporary Lutheran authors, see this list and follow the links.  Also, you should know that Concordia Publishing House now has a whole line of fiction.  One of their most popular authors is Katie Schuermann, whose Anthem of Zion series explores the dramas of small town parish life.

Visual Artists

Ad Crucem.  This website is a treasure trove of, as they say, “Christian gifts, art, and collectibles.”  You may recall a  blog post I wrote about this collaboration of a number of Lutheran artists.  In addition to Christian paintings and prints, you can find unique jewelry, cards, and  Christmas decorations.  See the Collections for various seasons of the church year and the works drawn from various Lutheran Christian artists, including the multi-media works of Kelly Klages, Judy Greenlees with her contemporary illuminated manuscripts, and Jonathan Mayer‘s liturgical arts.

 Agnus Dei Liturgical Arts.  A project of artist Kelly Schumacher, this site offers a wealth of original, magnificent work, particularly for churches.  See the altarpieces, paintings, and sculptures.  Some of them are breathtaking.  Here, though, are some prints, some already framed, that are quite inexpensive and that would make great gifts.
Edward Riojas.  An artist and illustrator of considerable chops, Ed Riojas has a substantial and wide-ranging body of work that you can see at his website.  His prints are quite affordable (available through Ad Crucem, above).  Notice that he, as well as other artists listed here, take commissions.  So if you would like a particular kind of piece for your sanctuary, they would collaborate with you to create an original installation.  (But before buying a Christmas present for your church, check with your pastor first.)
 Cary Schwarz.  He is a leatherworker whose saddles are exhibited like the fine art they are in places like the National Cowboy and Western Heritage Museum.  The intricacy of these designs is staggeringly beautiful.  Functional art is art too.  He also makes items that are smaller than saddles that would make cool gifts.
There are lots more, Lutherans being more open to the arts than some other Christian traditions.  For a more comprehensive list , go to Confessional Lutheran Ecclesiastical Art Resources.
Another useful list, which includes crafts–woodwork, clothing, vestments, etc.–as well we fine arts, is here.
Illustration from the Ad Crucem website.
Follow Us!



Browse Our Archives