It\u2019s interesting to see Roman Catholics appropriating Luther\u2019s doctrine of vocation.\u00a0 Traditionally, Catholics have used the term to refer only<\/em> to the calling to be a priest, a monk, or a nun.\u00a0 Matthew Cantirino here discusses a prominent Catholic thinker who says that we have a \u201cbaptismal vocation\u201d to participate in the political process. It\u2019s not quite as clear as Luther\u2019s point that we have a vocation as citizens.\u00a0 Still, at a time when many Christians are giving up on civic engagement and many others are misinterpreting what that means (NOT to take over so as to Christianize the government), the doctrine of vocation can help sort out our responsibilities, namely, to love and serve our neighbors in our civic life and political duties.<\/p>\n Harvard Law professor (and longtime First Things<\/em> contributor and supporter) Mary Ann Glendon offers advice to young Christians inclined to politics in a recent interview with the National Catholic Register. Her main point is one especially worth noting in an election year: that while an obsession with the contemporary political scene can often distract us from more enduring truths, it still must be taken seriously and engaged thoughtfully. Glendon even goes as far as asserting that:<\/p>\n \u201cNearly everyone who takes his or her baptismal vocation seriously has some form of calling to participate in that process [ie, politics broadly understood], as he or she is able. If we Christians truly believe we are called to be a transformative presence in the world \u2014 to be salt, light and leaven \u2014 we have to do our best to improve the conditions under which we live, work and raise our children. Even our cloistered contemplatives are not merely meditating on the mystery of the universe \u2014 they are praying for the world.\u201d<\/p>\n This is helpful advice for Christians in the public square today, where a sense of defeat can become overwhelming. Indeed, in recent years, there has been a movement among some on the \u2018religious right\u2019 towards shunning\u2014even disdaining\u2014politics altogether. This attitude has enjoyed a resurgence as something of a reaction to the previous decades of alliance between Christian leaders and partisan figures, especially in more fundamentalist circles. And, and Glendon notes with concern, many of today\u2019s brightest and most devout students scarcely consider a political career at all, often believing it to be a certain path to corruption.<\/p>\n Ultimately, however, as Glendon points out, this retreat impulse is misguided, overwrought, and even dangerous, as it allows others very hostile to religious faith to step in and have free reign. It is, as the ironic title of her lecture and interview alludes to, an implicit agreement with Max Weber\u2019s thesis that \u201che who lets himself in for politics \u2026 contracts with diabolical powers.\u201d So, she concedes, while \u201cculture\u201d may indeed more important than \u201cpolitics\u201d narrowly construed, there is a larger sense in which the latter is a constitutive element in the former. Referencing the example of Vaclav Havel, she calls the two part of a \u201ctwo-way street\u201d and notes that the two are, to a significant extent, inseparable. Especially in today\u2019s America, where (national) politics occupies an admittedly bloated position, Christians really don\u2019t have much of a choice in the matter.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n