The Bias that Divides Us.<\/a><\/p>\nIn his extensive research into the phenomenon, which is being published in a forthcoming book of the same title from MIT Press, Prof. Stanovich finds that, unlike other kinds of bias, virtually everyone\u00a0<\/em>displays myside bias.\u00a0 It is evident in both liberals and conservatives.\u00a0 It can be found among rationalists and scientists, as well as less-sophisticated folks.<\/p>\n\n
Prof. Stanovich summarizes some of the research:<\/div>\n
Research has shown that myside bias is displayed in a variety of experimental situations: people evaluate the same virtuous act more favourably if committed by a member of their own group and evaluate a negative act less unfavourably if committed by a member of their own group; they evaluate an identical experiment more favourably if the results support their prior beliefs than if the results contradict their prior beliefs; and when searching for information, people select information sources that are likely to support their own position. Even the interpretation of a purely numerical display of outcome data is tipped in the direction of the subject\u2019s prior belief. Likewise, judgments of logical validity are skewed by people\u2019s prior beliefs. Valid syllogisms with the conclusion \u201ctherefore, marijuana should be legal\u201d are easier for liberals to judge correctly and harder for conservatives; whereas valid syllogisms with the conclusion \u201ctherefore, no one has the right to end the life of a fetus\u201d are harder for liberals to judge correctly and easier for conservatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Not only do highly-intelligent and highly-educated people exhibit myside bias, they are especially susceptible to it:<\/p>\n
If you are a person of high intelligence, if you are highly educated, and if you are strongly committed to an ideological viewpoint, you will be highly likely to think you have thought your way to your viewpoint. And you will be even less likely than the average person to realize that you have derived your beliefs from the social groups you belong to and because they fit with your temperament and your innate psychological propensities.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Identity politics and the rise of critical theory have accelerated and given a justification for myside bias.\u00a0 \u201cIf myside bias is the fire that has set ablaze the public communications commons in our society, then identity politics is the gasoline that is turning a containable fire into an epic conflagration. By encouraging people to view every issue through an identity lens, it creates the tendency to turn simple beliefs about testable propositions into full-blown convictions that are then projected onto new evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
Prof. Stanovich shows how myside bias is rampant in academia, to the point of undermining the public\u2019s trust in universities and making some kinds of research impossible:<\/p>\n
Identity politics advocates have succeeded in making certain research conclusions within the university\u00a0verboten<\/em>. They have made it very hard for any university professor (particularly the junior and untenured ones) to publish and publicly promote any conclusions that these advocates dislike. . . .<\/p>\nUniversity research on all of the charged topics where identity politics has predetermined the conclusions\u2014immigration, racial profiling, gay marriage, income inequality, college admissions biases, sex differences, intelligence differences, and the list goes on\u2014is simply not believable anymore by anyone cognizant of the pressures exerted by the ideological monoculture of the university. Whether or not some cultures promote human flourishing more than others; whether or not men and women have different interests and proclivities; whether or not culture affects poverty rates; whether or not intelligence is partially heritable; whether or not the gender wage gap is largely due to factors other than discrimination; whether or not race-based admissions policies have some unintended consequences; whether or not traditional masculinity is useful to society; whether or not crime rates vary between the races\u2014these are all topics on which the modern university has dictated the conclusion before the results of any investigation are in. . . .<\/p>\n
For research evidence to scientifically support a proposition, that proposition must itself be \u201cfalsifiable\u201d\u2014capable of being proven false. However, the public is increasingly aware that, in universities, for many issues related to identity politics, preferred conclusions are now dictated in advance and falsifying them in open inquiry is no longer allowed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
It appears that Prof. Stanovic is not criticizing myside bias, as such.\u00a0 Rather, he presents it as a \u201cgiven.\u201d\u00a0 If he is right, we do not, in fact, come to our beliefs purely by reasoning or by assembling evidence.<\/p>\n
He does say that there is a sense in which myside bias has a rational basis, in that building on what we already know allows us to go forward, rather than going back all the time and starting from scratch.\u00a0 And yet, myside bias can be corrected for by, for example, the scientific method, with its blind and double-blind studies, its insistence on replicability, and, again, \u201cfalsifiability\u201d (that is, to be meaningful, a hypothesis must at least theoretically be capable of being proven false, that some kind of evidence could conceivably disprove it).\u00a0 The problem is that some lines of inquiry and research are not allowed.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>The social pressures in academia\u2013the desire to be accepted by one\u2019s peers\u2013make them unthinkable.<\/p>\nHow does myside bias apply in the church?\u00a0 Well, it is certainly true that a Lutheran, a Calvinist, and a Baptist can read the same Bible and find their distinctive doctrines.\u00a0 Is their disagreement, despite the same Biblical evidence, a matter of insufficient scholarship?\u00a0 Maybe, at least to a point.\u00a0 And yet, our religious convictions are not usually a matter simply of a logical chain of thought.\u00a0 Apologetics have an important role to play, and thinking through what we believe should be more common than it is.\u00a0 But faith is a gift.\u00a0 It comes to us from the outside.\u00a0 We do not figure it out for ourselves.\u00a0 Rather, God reveals Himself to us, through His Word and (Lutherans believe) His sacraments, thus forming our Christian identity and convictions.\u00a0 That the social group we belong to shapes our thinking need not undermine the concept of truth.\u00a0 But it does show us why the church\u2013the local congregation, the particular theological tradition it is a part of, and the historic church going back through the ages\u2013is important.<\/p>\n
Perhaps Prof. Stanovich in his upcoming book will tell us how to break out of myside bias.\u00a0 I would think that simply being aware of the phenomenon can help us to be more objective in our thinking, more self-critical, and less dismissive of other sides.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Image by\u00a0Szil\u00e1rd Szab\u00f3<\/a>\u00a0from\u00a0Pixabay<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The reason we can’t agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays “myside bias.” That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1281,"featured_media":51704,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,37,42],"tags":[80,285,10121,1745,10124,2436],"class_list":["post-51697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-education","category-psychology","category-social-science","tag-academia","tag-bias","tag-myside-bias","tag-political-correctness","tag-reasoning","tag-relativism"],"yoast_head":"\n
Not Relativism but "Myside Bias"<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The reason we can't agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays "myside bias." That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Not Relativism but "Myside Bias"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The reason we can't agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays "myside bias." That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cranach\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-14T10:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-11T21:26:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/305\/2020\/10\/portrait-3138140_1280.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gene Veith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gene Veith\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/\",\"name\":\"Not Relativism but \\\"Myside Bias\\\"\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-14T10:00:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-11T21:26:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1\"},\"description\":\"The reason we can't agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays \\\"myside bias.\\\" That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Not Relativism but “Myside Bias”\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/\",\"name\":\"Cranach\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1\",\"name\":\"Gene Veith\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gene Veith\"},\"description\":\"Gene Edward Veith, Jr. is a writer and retired literature professor, serving as Provost Emeritus at Patrick Henry College. He has authored over 25 books on Christianity and culture, literature, classical education, and theology. Dr. Veith previously held academic and editorial roles at Concordia University Wisconsin and WORLD Magazine. A respected voice in Lutheran and classical education circles, he holds a Ph.D. in English and several honorary doctorates. He and his wife, Jackquelyn, live in St. Louis and have three children and twelve grandchildren.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/\",\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gene_Edward_Veith\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/author\/geneveith\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Not Relativism but \"Myside Bias\"","description":"The reason we can't agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays \"myside bias.\" That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Not Relativism but \"Myside Bias\"","og_description":"The reason we can't agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays \"myside bias.\" That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/","og_site_name":"Cranach","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/","article_published_time":"2020-10-14T10:00:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-11T21:26:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/305\/2020\/10\/portrait-3138140_1280.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gene Veith","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gene Veith","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/","name":"Not Relativism but \"Myside Bias\"","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-14T10:00:23+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-11T21:26:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1"},"description":"The reason we can't agree with or persuade each other is not relativism, irrationalism, or the rejection of objective truth. Rather, according to a psychologist of cognition, everyone of all persuasions displays \"myside bias.\" That is, accepting ideas only if they correspond to our prior beliefs and those of our social group.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2020\/10\/not-relativism-but-myside-bias\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Not Relativism but “Myside Bias”"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/","name":"Cranach","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1","name":"Gene Veith","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gene Veith"},"description":"Gene Edward Veith, Jr. is a writer and retired literature professor, serving as Provost Emeritus at Patrick Henry College. He has authored over 25 books on Christianity and culture, literature, classical education, and theology. Dr. Veith previously held academic and editorial roles at Concordia University Wisconsin and WORLD Magazine. A respected voice in Lutheran and classical education circles, he holds a Ph.D. in English and several honorary doctorates. He and his wife, Jackquelyn, live in St. Louis and have three children and twelve grandchildren.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gene_Edward_Veith"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/author\/geneveith\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1281"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51697\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/305\/2020\/10\/portrait-3138140_1280.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n