![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/305\/2021\/04\/503px-Brandeisl.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nRecently, over 100 leaders of America\u2019s top corporations met<\/a> to decide on what our country\u2019s voting laws should be.\u00a0 Big businesses have also been weighing in on policies regarding abortion, transgenderism, marriage, LGBTQ issues, race, policing, and the environment.<\/p>\n Aren\u2019t those matters that the government <\/em>is supposed to deal with?\u00a0 Big business is not only taking over the functions of government, it is overruling<\/em> government actions.\u00a0 When states or local governments pass laws that the corporate leaders disagree with, they exert economic pressure to coerce those governments to change what they had enacted through the legislative process.<\/p>\n Not only that, when big corporations act like governments, they are sometimes acting like authoritarian governments.\u00a0 Whereas the government is constrained by the Constitution and its guarantees of civil liberty, the private sector operates under no such constraints.<\/p>\n Today the threats to freedom of speech are coming not so much from the government but from Big Tech.\u00a0 The nation\u2019s supreme marketplace for books, Amazon.com, will not allow books questioning transgenderism to be sold.\u00a0 Facebook and other social media platforms are likewise putting restrictions on what is allowed to be said.<\/p>\n But still, this is the private sector. \u00a0Isn\u2019t government \u201cprivatization,\u201d as in governments subcontracting tasks to businesses, a good thing?\u00a0 Why not just privatize the whole thing?\u00a0 Isn\u2019t this \u201cwithering away of the state,\u201d to appropriate Karl Marx\u2019s dream, just the triumph of capitalism?<\/p>\n First of all, we are talking about big<\/em> corporations, which are often opposed to the free market.\u00a0 The free market works through competition, and big businesses often seek to eliminate<\/em> competition, putting the little guys out of business or buying them out.\u00a0 And they tend to be very friendly to government regulation, which they are big enough to survive, but which can kill out their competitors.<\/p>\n And although the profit motive does indeed drive the business world, making money is not the only consideration of the people who run the companies.\u00a0 They also seek self-fulfillment, the approval of others, and social status.\u00a0 In fact, making lots of money is a means to those other ends.<\/p>\n While we all need a level of economic security for food, shelter, and sustenance for ourselves and our families, after a point, the accumulation of ever-greater wealth becomes a matter of other goals, such as a sense of \u201cwinning\u201d or building a legacy or pursuing other markers of success.\u00a0 These aren\u2019t necessarily bad, but the psychological motives can have be addressed in other ways.<\/p>\n Today, progressive, even leftwing views\u2014which used to be hallmarks of the working class\u2014are now class markers for our cultural and financial elite. \u00a0Marx\u2019s \u201cworkers of the world\u201d are now more likely to be Trump supporters, and, as such, are despised by their corporate masters, who might play at socialism\u2014perhaps out of guilt for their wealth and privilege\u2014while, of course, holding onto their wealth and power.<\/p>\n Yes, companies have always influenced government, through campaign contributions, lobbying, and sometimes nefarious means, such as bribery.\u00a0 But such political involvement was nearly always to advance the economic interests of the business.\u00a0 This new political power corporations are exerting is not limited to improving their bottom-lines.\u00a0 The companies, or rather the individuals who run the companies, are trying to implement a much larger social agenda.<\/p>\n The problem is that while we citizens can vote for our representatives and legislators in the government, all of whom are ultimately answerable to us, we have no<\/em> input on the political dictates of the big corporations.<\/p>\n But can\u2019t consumers just vote with their pocketbooks, refusing to buy products from companies they find oppressive?\u00a0 Well, that is not so easy when the companies are not just local merchants but global monopolies.\u00a0 Yes, if customers don\u2019t like what a company does they can take their business elsewhere, but it isn\u2019t so simple when there are no other businesses that can meet their needs.<\/p>\n The Federalist has two excellent articles on this phenomenon that you need to read:\u00a0It\u2019s Not Okay For Corporations To Take Away Our Freedom Just Because They\u2019re Not Government<\/a>\u00a0by Tristan Justice and\u00a0Is Big Business Now A Greater Threat To Free Speech Than Government?<\/a>\u00a0by Kyle Sammin.<\/p>\n Sammin, who also deals with the problem of being unable to take our business elsewhere, points out that the freedom of speech and other civil liberties were valued for their own sake, as leading to other human benefits.\u00a0 At the time of the Founding, the government was the only<\/em> power that could restrict them, so freedom-loving activists focused on limiting what the government could do.<\/p>\n But as big business got ever bigger and more all-encompassing, some activists saw how they too could be a threat to freedom.\u00a0 Sammin cites<\/a> Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis<\/a> (1856-1941):<\/p>\n Brandeis was a progressive who saw Big Government and Big Business as equally threatening to the average American. Although he focused more on the growth of corporate power in his days as a private lawyer, Brandeis saw the danger in the government becoming too powerful. His solution was to resist consolidation in both regards \u2014 keep businesses small and local, and the government could stay small, too.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n That was what progressives<\/em> used to believe!<\/p>\n What can be done about this intrusion of corporations into democratic government?\u00a0 Those two articles, excellent though they are, don\u2019t offer any easy solutions, other than the necessity of the people to stand up for their rights, no matter who is violating them.\u00a0 Do you have any ideas?<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Photo:\u00a0 Louis Brandeis, by Harris & Ewing\u00a0\u00a9 \u2013 This image is available from the United States Library of Congress's Prints and Photographs division under the digital ID ppmsca.06024. Public Domain, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=4099406<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Big corporations are increasingly taking on the functions of government, to the point of overriding legislative decisions. Sometimes this is taking on authoritarian form, as in restrictions of speech and other civil liberties. How this is different from traditional political influence and free market capitalism. And why unelected executives are doing this. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1281,"featured_media":54794,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,19,26,36],"tags":[299,372,502,585,586,875,10699,1813,2036],"class_list":["post-54614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economics","category-government","category-law","category-politics","tag-big-business","tag-capitalism","tag-civil-liberties","tag-corporations","tag-corporatism","tag-freedom-of-speech","tag-louis-brandeis","tag-progressivism","tag-social-class"],"yoast_head":"\n