{"id":90599,"date":"2026-04-22T06:00:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T10:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/?p=90599"},"modified":"2026-04-17T15:54:22","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T19:54:22","slug":"why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/","title":{"rendered":"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

One of the puzzles of contemporary religion is why liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the \u201cmodern mind,\u201d gain so little traction with people who have modern minds.\u00a0 There is little difference between what is taught among mainline liberal Protestants and the beliefs of secularists.\u00a0 And yet mainline liberal Protestant churches have been diminishing almost to the point of extinction, while conservative theologies keep attracting adherents.\u00a0 Why is that?\u00a0 The Christian historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues.<\/p>\n

He is currently writing a book about American religion in the late 19th century, a period that he thinks is especially revealing about our religious climate today.\u00a0 He has written a post<\/a> at the Patheos blog Anxious Bench<\/em> about one of his primary sources, a novel published in 1890 by Helen H. Gardener (1853\u20131925) entitled Is This Your Son, My Lord?\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Gardener was a social reformer and crusader for the rights of women.\u00a0 To her credit, she fought against the sexual double standard that was tolerant of extra-marital sex by men, while condemning the women they \u201cruined\u201d for their sexual pleasure, many of whom were reduced to prostitution.\u00a0 One of Gardener\u2019s legacies was getting lawmakers to increase the age of consent, which Jenkins tells us was as low as ten in most states!\u00a0 Unlike other reformers and suffragists of her day, many of whom were Christians, Gardener was a \u201cfreethinker<\/a>\u201c; that is, a religious skeptic.<\/p>\n

Her novel, the title of which is from a line in King Lear<\/a> (Act I, scene 1, line 8), in which\u00a0Kent is boasting about his sexual prowess in conceiving his illegitimate son Edmund, making light of a moral transgression that will result in Edmund\u2019s putting out his father\u2019s eyes and being the catalyst for the other tragedies that unfold.<\/p>\n

The novel explores these sexual double standards, doing so in ways that we do not usually associate with Victorian literature.\u00a0 She is also satirizing the Episcopal Church, especially the \u201cbroad church\u201d liberal faction, which has so little to say about such matters.\u00a0 Read the entirety of what\u00a0 Jenkins says about the book.<\/p>\n

Here I\u2019d just like to focus on her critique of the broad church Episcopalians.\u00a0 One of her characters, Fred, decides to go into the ministry, encouraged by his mother.\u00a0 Gardener writes,<\/p>\n

His mother believed that the Episcopal Church held the highest ideals in morals, religion, art, and music, to be found in this world. Fred believed that it was the organization of greatest power and influence to which a gentleman of culture could belong, and that it was a social lever and a moral screen that no man in his senses could afford to ignore.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But neither Fred nor his mother actually believe in Christianity.\u00a0 But that\u2019s no problem for them.\u00a0 His mother writes Fred a letter, in which she says,<\/p>\n

I do not, myself, believe in those unpleasing religious notions expressed in the creed of our beloved church. You must remember that the progressive Churchmen explain them all quite satisfactorily. The ethical beauty and exquisite taste of Dr. Broadchurch\u2019s explanation of the crucifixion, you surely have not forgotten. I cannot reproduce it, of course, but I know it was most charming. My nerves were soothed and my artistic nature warmed for days afterward. Ask him, some day, to explain these points about the vicarious atonement theory, as you call, it (quite vulgarly, I think. You must have gotten that form of expression from young Ball. Be very careful not to use it again). Give up looking at it in this literal way, and accept it as the Broad Churchmen hold it, if you cannot take the High Church view. Its justice and harmony with natural laws ; its appeal to one\u2019s higher nature and ideals ; its display of tenderness, are all quite a poem as Dr. Broadchurch presents it. You can close your eyes and drift into a realm of spiritual exaltation where questions and doubts are impossible; where the dear Christ touches your heart and illumines your understanding.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But Fred\u2019s fianc\u00e9, Maude, tells him why he should not<\/em> become an Episcopal priest:<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd then, Fred,\u201d Maude added, quite seriously, \u201d you say, yourself, that you don\u2019t believe the Creed and the Thirty-Nine Articles, and you believe that Christ was the son of Joseph, and you don\u2019t believe in the justice of the vicarious atonement, and \u2014 oh, I\u2019m sure, Fred, from what you said to father that night on the veranda, that a man who had the least self-respect, couldn\u2019t be an Episcopal clergyman and think as you do. Why, Fred, there weren\u2019t three grains difference between your belief and father\u2019s, and he isn\u2019t even a Unitarian. He\u2019s an Agnostic.\u201d \u00a0Fred beheld the vision of his mother again, horrified and indignant. According to her belief Agnostics and Anarchists were about the same thing, and neither were persons one would ever care to meet out on a dark night.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Finally, Maude\u2019s father, an actual freethinking Agnostic, weighs in, and he is even more dismissive of broad church Christianity:<\/p>\n

\u201cI should not object, if you were an Episcopalian, mind you, or any other sort of a Christian, if you were honest in it ; but I have no use for the layman who holds his creed for revenue only ; and for the clergyman who accepts a salary from honest believers for mystifying and explaining away all there is of real meaning in the plan of salvation, my contempt is simply unbounded.\u201d\u00a0 This was a new theory to Fred, and it struck him as worthy of some thought ; but he smiled as he\u00a0thought how this man of uncouth speech expressed what he had been taught to call \u201cthe higher criticism of progressive theology.\u201d Obtaining money by false pretenses, indeed !<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Comments Jenkins, Maude\u2019s father sees \u201cthe skeptical approaches of liberal theology as deliberately deceptive and hypocritical.\u201d\u00a0 And his \u201ccontempt is simply unbounded\u201d for clergymen who obtain money by false pretenses, accepting a salary from \u201chonest believers\u201d while undermining their beliefs.<\/p>\n

As someone who grew up in mainline liberal Protestantism, I remember a seminarian telling me that one of his professors who taught against the truth of the Bible warned the class that they probably shouldn\u2019t tell their future congregations about what he had taught them, lest they get upset and cause problems.<\/p>\n

A secularized religion gives secularists nothing that they do not already have.\u00a0 Secularists feel they do not need religion, so it\u2019s hard for them to be attracted to a version of their secularism dressed up as religion.\u00a0 If they ever come to the point in their lives when they realize that they do need religion, they are going to prefer the real thing.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Photo:\u00a0 Helen H. Gardener by Unknown author \u2013 File:A_woman_of_the_century.djvuhttps:\/\/archive.org\/stream\/americanwomenfif01live#page\/312\/mode\/2up, Public Domain, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=58726730<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the “modern mind,” gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1281,"featured_media":90653,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,11,20,28,35,37,39,47],"tags":[18308,18305,18299,1290,4891,18302],"class_list":["post-90599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-apologetics","category-church","category-history","category-literature","category-philosophy-2","category-psychology","category-religions","category-theology","tag-broadchurch-episcopalians","tag-freethinkers","tag-helen-h-gardener","tag-liberal-theology","tag-secularists","tag-sexual-double-standard"],"yoast_head":"\nWhy a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the "modern mind," gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the "modern mind," gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cranach\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-22T10:00:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-17T19:54:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/305\/2026\/04\/HELEN_H._GARDENER.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"748\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1046\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gene Veith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gene Veith\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/\",\"name\":\"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T10:00:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-17T19:54:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1\"},\"description\":\"Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the \\\"modern mind,\\\" gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/\",\"name\":\"Cranach\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1\",\"name\":\"Gene Veith\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gene Veith\"},\"description\":\"Gene Edward Veith, Jr. is a writer and retired literature professor, serving as Provost Emeritus at Patrick Henry College. He has authored over 25 books on Christianity and culture, literature, classical education, and theology. Dr. Veith previously held academic and editorial roles at Concordia University Wisconsin and WORLD Magazine. A respected voice in Lutheran and classical education circles, he holds a Ph.D. in English and several honorary doctorates. He and his wife, Jackquelyn, live in St. Louis and have three children and twelve grandchildren.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/\",\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gene_Edward_Veith\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/author\/geneveith\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology","description":"Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the \"modern mind,\" gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology","og_description":"Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the \"modern mind,\" gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/","og_site_name":"Cranach","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-22T10:00:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-17T19:54:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":748,"height":1046,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/305\/2026\/04\/HELEN_H._GARDENER.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gene Veith","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gene Veith","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/","name":"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T10:00:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-17T19:54:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1"},"description":"Why do liberal theologies, designed to appeal to the \"modern mind,\" gain so little traction with people who have modern minds? Historian Philip Jenkins gives us some clues in his discussion of a novel published in 1890 by the suffragist and freethinker Helen H. Gardener.\u00a0","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/2026\/04\/why-a-nonbeliever-scorns-liberal-theology\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why a Nonbeliever Scorns Liberal Theology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/","name":"Cranach","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/f9ca8670bcc51908a78994c0484dbfa1","name":"Gene Veith","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/054d79faea5d476edd8f99e5f14fb17f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gene Veith"},"description":"Gene Edward Veith, Jr. is a writer and retired literature professor, serving as Provost Emeritus at Patrick Henry College. He has authored over 25 books on Christianity and culture, literature, classical education, and theology. Dr. Veith previously held academic and editorial roles at Concordia University Wisconsin and WORLD Magazine. A respected voice in Lutheran and classical education circles, he holds a Ph.D. in English and several honorary doctorates. He and his wife, Jackquelyn, live in St. Louis and have three children and twelve grandchildren.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cranachblog\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gene_Edward_Veith"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/author\/geneveith\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1281"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90599\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/geneveith\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}