It is understandable during the present era for people to change churches and whole denominations without so much as a glance from someone else. If a person prefers attending a new church rather than the one in\u00a0which he or she has been brought up, then there is little or no controversy. After all church membership and attendance are matters of personal preference today.
\nThis attitude changes to some degree if one\u2019s new church differs significantly in religious practice or theological outlook from one\u2019s previous church. A person who is in an independent church joins the Roman Catholic Church or the Unitarian Universalist Church may raise some eyebrows back home. The leaders of the independent church may grouse a little just as it would happen if the membership move went the other direction. But, for the most part, Christian believers would shrug and ask, \u201cwhat does it matter?\u201d Now I can reveal the question I am most often asked.
\n\u201cWhy (or how) did you go from being a minister in the churches of Christ to being a United Methodist pastor?\u201d I have had several joking replies to this question over the years. But, it is truly a serious question because implied within it are multiple questions about leadership, prejudice, theology, and practice. The question itself forgets the present era\u2019s attitude. It does not allow me to say, \u201cI like it better\u201d which is what most people could say without further inquiry. I do not get away with it. Sometimes my answer is a biographical one. I tell the story of my faith journey. I do not wish to do that here.
\nI want to say that I changed because I looked for meaning in my life. What does it mean to be a Christian? This is the question I ask myself and God. My own faith journey is bent on answering that question if only for my own edification. There are pitfalls to answering this question that take us away from the issue of meaning.
\nThe first pitfall is fundamentalism. The churches of Christ practice a form of Christian fundamentalism that allows a believer to assume he or she has arrived to truth. All forms of religious fundamentalism are essentially anti-religious and anti-spirituality because of the intention to provide answers without giving any sense of meaning to a person\u2019s life. There is a \u201cdo this and that\u201d or \u201cbelieve this and not that\u201d attitude that divorces the believer from reality and the collective human experience. The other day I was told about an argument a fundamentalist christian began with an educator at the Tennessee Aquarium over whether or not a species of fish could be 350,000,000 years old if the earth is only a few thousand years old. The Christian fundamentalist considers it an article of faith to avoid being connected to the world of reason and experience. Therefore there is no true meaning for such a person in this life. A psychology of total fantasy about the world that because of some doctrines leads a person into dark fantasies that are always at odds with other people and destructive. Such a believer must have the world fit into the framework and therefore bends not only natural science but history, sociology, psychology, medicine, theology, and philosophy to fit the fantasy. Even the Bible cannot be read in any way other than an approved method that fits the doctrine. So no meaning comes from such an attitude.
\nThe second pitfall is the doctrine of christian history being little more than the story of abuse and apostasy. This doctrine holds that the true church disappeared from history with (one assumes) a few pockets of faithful resistance in some places (no one is quite sure where). Ironically, this is that actual beginning of all christian heresy. When the Christian Church is viewed as a monolithic entity in this world, it is easy to point to times of lax moral standards, theological insight, and little Biblical compassion as though these are proofs that the Church is somehow false. Yet, when we view the Christian Church as saved sinners we can understand without condoning the human and sinful actions that happen. Therefore, there is no meaning for the believer because his or her connection to the spiritual and moral development of the faith is lost.
\nThe third pitfall is the lack of understanding of real working theology. By this I mean \u201cknowing God.\u201d If God is an eternal being, then we mortal beings cannot hope to fully define God. Even when we try to characterize God as \u201comni- something\u201d we fall short of the glory that belongs to God. Biblical writers knew they would never get God defined. Phrases applied to Jesus that reflect divinity are titles human rulers gave themselves. \u201cKing of Kings and Lord of Lords, the Son of God, Savior of the World, My Lord and My God, are all absolute terms that are more applicable to the Divine nature of the Messiah than to all the human pretenders who were\/are mortal and finite.
\nThe true meaningful Christianity we need goes far beyond the notion of personal preference and the pitfalls I have described toward a life that is really working with God, the Bible, and the Christian Church as it exists. So the answer to the question I am often asked, is that I am searching for the answer of what it means to be a Christian.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It is understandable during the present era for people to change churches and whole denominations without so much as a glance from someone else. If a person prefers attending a new church rather than the one in\u00a0which he or she has been brought up, then there is little or no controversy. After all church membership […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4332,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n