{"id":152,"date":"2014-12-18T09:09:00","date_gmt":"2014-12-18T15:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html"},"modified":"2015-02-24T23:28:46","modified_gmt":"2015-02-25T05:28:46","slug":"negotiations-what-negotiations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html","title":{"rendered":"“Negotiations”? What “negotiations”?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary: \u00a0a report on the president\u2019s actions to normalize relations with Cuba and a report that Sony is cancelling its planned distribution of The Interview, in reaction to terrorist threats. <\/p>\n

With respect the latter: \u00a0well, what can you say? \u00a0Or, rather, what can I<\/b><\/i> say? \u00a0It\u2019s terrible, and Sony\u2019s excuse that they don\u2019t want to have a bad Christmas earnings from fearful Americans in Everytown, USA, staying at home because they\u2019re afraid of a massive strike at all movie theatres, just doesn\u2019t cut it. \u00a0Clearly they\u2019re cowed by the threats to them as an organization (which also makes it likely that they wouldn\u2019t even release it in some digital manner, if they\u2019re afraid of retaliation for any kind of release \u2014 maybe someone needs to pirate a copy for the common good). \u00a0And that\u2019s a bad thing. <\/p>\n

But I think everyone is pretty much on the same page on this.<\/p>\n

So let\u2019s talk about Cuba. \u00a0(Not that I really have much to say on this, but it\u2019s more worthy of a conversation, rather than just a collective expression of frustration and unhappiness.) \u00a0Here\u2019s an article from the Tribune; not sure if this is behind a paywall or not: \u00a0\u201cSecret diplomacy with Cuba ends in breakthrough deal<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Now, the ironic thing is that most of the changes, in and of themselves, are hard to argue against. \u00a0China is hardly a model of diplomacy, and for all that it\u2019s adopted free-market reforms, it still imprisons people fairly frequently for political or religous reasons, compels women to have abortions even of nearly full-term babies, and so on. \u00a0Yet we still trade with them and, exept for tongue-lashings in human rights reports, don\u2019t punish them for their misdeeds.<\/p>\n

Heck, even in the midst of the Cold War, we still traded with Russia and had an embassy there.<\/p>\n

And spy exchanges were routine \u2014 or, rather, we\u2019d catch one of their spies, they\u2019d imprison a few journalists with the claim that they were also spies, and we\u2019d negotiate a swap, with the men crossing some bridge in Berlin in opposite directions.<\/p>\n

Yes, it\u2019s true that Cuba is different largely for its proximity to the United States. \u00a0But our policies are largely driven by history, and the political influence of Cuban exiles.<\/p>\n

So, the first thought experiment is this: \u00a0imagine that President Romney presented a proposal to Congress to dismantle the embargo against Cuba. \u00a0Do you think that the House and the Senate would have voted for it? \u00a0What if Obama had presented the very same legislation?<\/p>\n

One suspects that it wouldn\u2019t have passed, and that Obama knows that it wouldn\u2019t have passed, and it wouldn\u2019t even have passed earlier in his presidency when he had the numbers on his side. \u00a0Obama\u2019s actions now, in doing everything he can to \u201cnormalize\u201d relations with Cuba that doesn\u2019t directly contravene this law, are not justifiable as a \u201cthis is in accordance with the will of the people and simply done in advance of anticipated approval of Congress.\u201d \u00a0This is a matter of doing everything possible to violate the spirit of a law that is, in fact, still law, and will still be law for the foreseeable future. <\/p>\n

Here it is, from an article that generally reports on this change as a positive outcome: <\/p>\n

In addition to reopening its embassy in Havana, the administration plans to significantly ease trade and financial restrictions, as well as limits on travel by Americans to Cuba, by using its regulatory and enforcement powers to evade limits imposed by a congressionally mandated embargo.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now, the article doesn\u2019t outline what \u201cenforcement powers\u201d this refers to, but this does imply that the administration is playing the game of, again, announcing an intentional non-enforcement<\/i> of the law. \u00a0Is this all even constitutional? \u00a0Could an exile who had property expropriated by the Cuban government 50 years ago, and thus could make a claim that the administration\u2019s attempt to unilaterally lift the embargo harms them because the embargo is, after all, supposed to be pressuring the Cuban government to return their property, make a case?<\/p>\n

(Further reading turned up an article from The Hill<\/a>, which says,<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), who herself fled Cuba, suggested that Obama\u2019s decision to unilaterally normalize relations with Cuba could be unconstitutional.\u00a0<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cIt is quite possible that this unilateral action by the President without Congressional consultation is in violation of the following U.S. laws: Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, Cuban Democracy Act of 1992, and the Trading with the Enemy Act,\u201d Ros-Lehtinen, a former Foreign Affairs Committee chairwoman, said in a statement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cThe White House attempts to normalize relationships with Cuba without the approval of Congress,\u201d she said, \u201cmay be in direct violation of Helms-Burton that specifically states that all political prisoners must be released, and free and fair elections must be held before establishing a diplomatic relationship.\u201d)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What\u2019s more: \u00a0the Tribune reports,<\/p>\n

Obama and Castro \u2014 who spoke by phone Tuesday, the first such exchange between leaders of the two countries since the 1959 Cuban Revolution \u2014 thanked Pope Francis and the Vatican, which they said were instrumental in promoting their dialogue, and the government of Canada, where secret talks that began in June 2013 were held.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But what did Obama achieve?<\/p>\n

The release of Goss and a high-value Cuban spy for the U.S., in exchange for the release of \u00a0three Cuban spies, who, in addition to spying, actually were convicted of murder. <\/p>\n

That strikes me as fairly routine, in a Cold War-ish sort of way, and far more proportional than the Bergdahl exchange.<\/p>\n

But the second part? Obama gave Castro a generous basket of goodies: \u00a0primarily the opening up of all kinds of trade, travel, and banking opportunities, but also opening an embassy, a promise to \u201creview\u201d the designation of Cuba as state sponsor of terrorism, and a plan to ask Congress to lift the embargo.<\/p>\n

What did Obama get from Castro? \u00a0Squat.<\/p>\n

OK, Castro promised to release 53 political prisoners and \u201cagreed to expand Internet access and other freedoms\u201d (vaguely stated in the Trib, and I imagine just as vague in reality).\u00a0This<\/i> is the hard-won concession that took years of negotiation to achieve? \u00a0Give me a break!<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary: \u00a0a report on the president\u2019s actions to normalize relations with Cuba and a report that Sony is cancelling its planned distribution of The Interview, in reaction to terrorist threats. With respect the latter: \u00a0well, what can you say? \u00a0Or, rather, what […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2209,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[103],"class_list":["post-152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-cuba"],"yoast_head":"\n"Negotiations"? What "negotiations"?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary:  a report on the president's actions to normalize\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""Negotiations"? What "negotiations"?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary:  a report on the president's actions to normalize\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-12-18T15:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-25T05:28:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html\",\"name\":\"\\\"Negotiations\\\"? What \\\"negotiations\\\"?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-12-18T15:09:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-25T05:28:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\"},\"description\":\"The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary:  a report on the president's actions to normalize\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"“Negotiations”? What “negotiations”?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jane the Actuary\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"Negotiations\"? What \"negotiations\"?","description":"The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary:  a report on the president's actions to normalize","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Negotiations\"? What \"negotiations\"?","og_description":"The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary:  a report on the president's actions to normalize","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html","og_site_name":"Jane the Actuary","article_published_time":"2014-12-18T15:09:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-25T05:28:46+00:00","author":"Jane the Actuary","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jane the Actuary","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html","name":"\"Negotiations\"? What \"negotiations\"?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-12-18T15:09:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-25T05:28:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a"},"description":"The newspaper headlines this morning, and the online news reported yesterday, were pretty dreary:  a report on the president's actions to normalize","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/12\/negotiations-what-negotiations.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"“Negotiations”? What “negotiations”?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/","name":"Jane the Actuary","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a","name":"Jane the Actuary","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jane the Actuary"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}