{"id":367,"date":"2014-07-17T18:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-07-18T00:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html"},"modified":"2016-08-16T09:51:33","modified_gmt":"2016-08-16T15:51:33","slug":"we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html","title":{"rendered":"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get employers out of the business of providing healthcare to their employees. \u00a0After all, in any reasonable world, it sounds more than a little preposterous to say, \u201cemployers must provide contraception to their female employees and the wives of their male employees.\u201d <\/p>\n

And this morning I was listening to a training session on the latest trends in Defined Contribution plan consulting. \u00a0Much as we actuarial consultants try to convince our clients that if they don\u2019t step up, their employees are going to be unwilling to retire \u201con time,\u201d because they\u2019ve frozen\/terminated\/never had in the first place DB plans and participants don\u2019t have enough saved in their 401(k) accounts, the clients\u2019 primary concern is with compliance and with their fiduciary liability. \u00a0And to the extent that they\u2019re looking to increase their employees\u2019 nest eggs, it\u2019s not by increasing the employer contribution but by getting employees to contribute more, or by seeking out the \u201cfree money\u201d of reduced provider fees or getting their employees to invest in ways that produce greater returns.<\/p>\n

Why don\u2019t employers get out of the healthcare business, and just give their employees a fixed sum of money with which to buy insurance? \u00a0Because of the employer mandate, to start with, but also because employer-purchased health insurance is tax-deductible, but not individual insurance purchases, so employees would take a financial hit if employers did this.<\/p>\n

If that weren\u2019t the case \u2014 if Obama executive-ordered the mandate out of existence and decreed that individual premiums were deductible (he could do it if he wanted to, based on his prior justifications: \u00a0he\u2019d just announce that the IRS would not prosecute anyone who claimed that as a deductible medical expense, and ignored the 10% threshold, when they calculated their taxes), would employers still provide healthcare? <\/p>\n

And once we move past that question, here\u2019s the follow-up: \u00a0why don\u2019t employers get out of the 401(k) business, and just provide bonuses that are paid directly to a payroll-deduction IRA?<\/p>\n

To begin with, because Congress has designed the system with significant limits to individual retirement savings. \u00a0Here\u2019s one of many descriptions<\/a> of the IRA limits online: \u00a0a limit of $5,500 in annual contributions, which is only tax-deductible if you don\u2019t have a 401(k) plan available at work, or if your income is less than $60,000 (for singles, partially deductible up to $70,000; for couples the figures are $96,000 and $116,000).<\/p>\n

A 401(k), on the other hand, allows up to $17,500 in employee contributions, and up to $52,000 in employer contributions, as found on the IRS site<\/a>. \u00a0(These maximums may be reduced for high-income individuals impacted by what\u2019s called \u201cnon-discrimination testing,\u201d which is fairly technical.)<\/p>\n

Why aren\u2019t these limits the same? \u00a0Wouldn\u2019t that be an easy solution to the difficulties people experience in saving for retirement when their employers don\u2019t offer a 401(k) or offer one with unsatisfactory investment choices or too-high fees? \u00a0Yes, to be sure, for a low earner, the IRA limits might not make much difference \u2014 after all, if your income is as high as $55,000, the limit is still 10% of your income, which is a tolerable savings rate. \u00a0But if IRA savings were an option for upper-earners as well, then it would become more likely for employers to move to a payroll-deduction process of contributing to employee-selected IRAs. <\/p>\n

Would this be a suitable direction for retirement savings to move towards? \u00a0Do employees need their employers to nag them, not just to invest in the first place (which could happen via direct deposit, if nothing else \u2014 splitting your paycheck into two pieces, with the lion\u2019s share to your regular bank account and a smaller portion to an IRA), but to invest properly? \u00a0And has Congress kept these different limits for the very reason of effectively mandating that every responsible employer offers a 401(k)?<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get employers out of the business of providing healthcare to their employees. \u00a0After all, in any reasonable world, it sounds more than a little preposterous to say, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2209,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[450],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actuarial"],"yoast_head":"\nWe should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-07-18T00:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-16T15:51:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html\",\"name\":\"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-07-18T00:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-16T15:51:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\"},\"description\":\"Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jane the Actuary\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business","description":"Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business","og_description":"Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html","og_site_name":"Jane the Actuary","article_published_time":"2014-07-18T00:11:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-16T15:51:33+00:00","author":"Jane the Actuary","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jane the Actuary","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html","name":"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-07-18T00:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-16T15:51:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a"},"description":"Those of us who have not gone into an apocalyptic panic at the Hobby Lobby court decision have observed that the obvious solution to the issue is to get","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/07\/we-should-get-employers-out-of-the-fill-in-the-blank-business.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"We should get employers out of the [fill in the blank] business"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/","name":"Jane the Actuary","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a","name":"Jane the Actuary","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jane the Actuary"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}