Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-07T15:17:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-07T15:20:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html\",\"name\":\"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-07T15:17:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-07T15:20:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\"},\"description\":\"Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jane the Actuary\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system","description":"Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system","og_description":"Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html","og_site_name":"Jane the Actuary","article_published_time":"2016-03-07T15:17:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-07T15:20:33+00:00","author":"Jane the Actuary","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jane the Actuary","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html","name":"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-03-07T15:17:03+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-07T15:20:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a"},"description":"Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/","name":"Jane the Actuary","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a","name":"Jane the Actuary","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jane the Actuary"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4057"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4057\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

{"id":4057,"date":"2016-03-07T09:17:03","date_gmt":"2016-03-07T15:17:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?p=4057"},"modified":"2016-03-07T09:20:33","modified_gmt":"2016-03-07T15:20:33","slug":"trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/03\/trumpism-if-nothing-else-exposes-the-weakness-of-the-two-party-system.html","title":{"rendered":"Trumpism, if nothing else, exposes the weakness of the two-party system"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Yeah, not an elegant post title, but if you were creating a political system from scratch, would you design a two-party system as it exists in the U.S. today?<\/p>\n

Imagine that Donald Trump was not an uncouth promiser of war crimes, but instead had a coherent and reasonable policy platform that (a) inspired large swathes of the American public and (b) did not fit neatly, or even at all, into either party\u2019s platform. \u00a0Not hard to imagine, really, considering that there are far more than two\u00a0potential ideologies; after all, as it is, in the GOP, pro-free enterprise sits in uneasy alliance with the crony capitalists, both supporting global trade, who make common cause with social conservatives and libertarians, defense hawks, and those who aren\u2019t easily pigeon-hole-able but fear that too generous a welfare state will produce unintended consequences and weaken society rather than strengthening it. \u00a0And the Democrats have as big a challenge pulling together activists who are primarily concerned about advancing the interests of their ethnic or other social group, union supporters, supporters of high social welfare spending, social liberals, environmentalists, protectionists, isolationists, and those who want to rein in business out of a basic distrust.<\/p>\n

Trump is (if you believe him) a protectionist, a social conservative (or maybe not), a defender of big business, a supporter of The Little Guy. \u00a0If it weren\u2019t necessary, in our system, to make one\u2019s way to the general election via the primaries, he wouldn\u2019t. \u00a0In many respects, he fits more with Ross Perot, except that, of course, Perot\u2019s share of the vote was limited to 20% because, as a third-party candidate, he didn\u2019t really have a chance. \u00a0But this notion that Trump is destroying the Republican Party \u2014 it\u2019s all a result of the fact that \u00a0Trump doesn\u2019t really belong in the Republican Party in the first place, but our political system forces him there.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s more, while I haven\u2019t seen any polling that indicates what percentage of his votes come from non-Republicans, there are pieces that suggest that he is drawing from independents and Democrats: \u00a0the fact that he does much better in open primaries than closed primaries\/caucuses, the fact that he\u2019s bringing substantially increased turnout, from folks who don\u2019t typically vote in (GOP) primaries.<\/p>\n

And the storyline could just as well be the opposite \u2014 there could just as easily have been a similar candidate making his way through the Democratic Party primaries and caucuses and rattling everyone. \u00a0To a certain extent, that is<\/em> happening, with Sanders, but he doesn\u2019t disrupt the meaning of what a Democrat is in quite the same way as if he had more pronounced GOP-like positions than his support (which he\u2019s now reinventing) of gun rights. \u00a0If, for instance, he drew his crowds while preaching a (Ted Seeber!) message of extensive social supports AND pro-life-ism, that would be more disruptive of the system. \u00a0As it is, Sanders just takes existing Democratic positions to their logical end.<\/p>\n

Even so, the campaigns of Sanders and Clinton demonstrate that divisions in the Democratic Party. \u00a0I didn\u2019t watch the debate last night but read through the Jaltcoh live-blog<\/a> and saw snippets and quotes elsewhere. \u00a0Sanders managed (presumably unintentionally) to say that white Americans \u201c don\u2019t know what it\u2019s like to be poor.<\/a>\u201d \u00a0Clinton and Sanders both promised to end fracking (not so good for the workers employed in the industry), they spar over free trade and NAFTA and bailouts, and, though I don\u2019t have a good sense of this, there certainly seems to be a significant degree to which the analysis of the two candidates presumes each has various demographic groups lined up in support of them, and angles to draw supporters on interest group at a time, rather than each tussling for support from Democrats in general.<\/p>\n

And when you think about it: \u00a0this constellation of issues that makes a Republican, a Republican and a Democrat, a Democrat, is not really that old. \u00a0Was there really any reason why positions on abortion fell so uniformly into party lines? \u00a0It seems to me that in the immediate aftermath of Roe v. Wade, this partisan alignment didn\u2019t exist, and a number of Democrats were pro-life until it became untenable to hold this position in the Democratic Party.<\/p>\n

And once this alignment was there, it was natural that the \u201csexual minority\u201d interest groups would be a part of the Democratic coalition.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s more, it\u2019s my understanding that in other countries, not only have issues around abortion been defused\u00a0by legislative compromises, but the political parties do not require adherence to a party line in those votes, but explicitly declare that members of parliament may vote their consciences.<\/p>\n

As to the parties\u2019 stand on Civil Rights, as long as it was a matter of which party supported basic rights, in the 60s, the Republicans were the go-to party; only when the Democrats ultimately came around and the issues turned to matters of the extent to which the government should take an activist role (e.g., busing, affirmative action, etc.), did the Democratic Party become the party of and for minorities. \u00a0(See \u201c The Party of Civil Rights<\/a>,\u201d which turned up in a google search.)<\/p>\n

Which means, in the end, for\u00a0Donald Trump to be\u00a0destroying the Republican Party, isn\u2019t so much about Trump himself, or weaknesses of the GOP specifically, but the real and inherent weaknesses in the two-party system we have in the United States.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"