{"id":5632,"date":"2016-11-11T08:48:31","date_gmt":"2016-11-11T14:48:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?p=5632"},"modified":"2016-11-11T08:48:31","modified_gmt":"2016-11-11T14:48:31","slug":"repeal-and-replace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html","title":{"rendered":"Repeal and Replace?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"V0050236<\/p>\n

So that\u2019s what Trump and Congress claim they\u2019re going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean?<\/p>\n

Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates, subsidies, and the pre-existing condition exclusion prohibition. \u00a0And Obamacare is more than that: \u00a0the requirement that the differential between old and young cannot exceed a specified ratio, far less than the actual difference in claims, the requirement that a government-defined list of \u201cpreventative health benefits\u201d (including contraceptive drugs and devices) be covered, the prohibition of lifetime maximums and the addition of a maximum out-of-pocket limit, the requirement that employers and insurers cover under-26 year old adults on the same basis as they would younger dependents (with no extra charges for \u201cfamily\u201d rates), the imposition of any number of other regulations, and, of course, the expansion of Medicaid to everyone below 133% of the poverty line, rather than just for mothers and children. \u00a0Oh, and that\u2019s not to mention the various existing regulations around required benefits at the state level, and the mountain of special programs that Obamacare established.<\/p>\n

What stays? \u00a0What goes?<\/p>\n

Trump promises, \u201cwe\u2019ll keep pre-existing conditions\u201d \u2014 or, rather, I distinctly remember him saying something at one of the debates that was pretty much the opposite of what he meant, a promise to keep the prohibition on differentiated treatment of those with pre-existing conditions. \u00a0But you can\u2019t do that in isolation. \u00a0He also promises, \u201cwe\u2019re going to take care of everyone,\u201d which left everyone scratching their heads as to what he could possibly mean by that.<\/p>\n

And the anger the Trump tapped into was not, for the most part, anger at the government spending on subsidies and Medicaid (the tax hikes were largely invisible), but at the massive premium hikes. \u00a0And why were those hikes so high \u2014 or, rather, why is post-Obamacare insurance turning out to be so much more expensive than prior individual coverage people had? \u00a0Multiple reasons: \u00a0it\u2019s more expensive for the young because they\u2019re subsidizing the old. \u00a0Everyone\u2019s subsidizing the sick, who are turning out to be a larger proportion of the individual insurance population than expected because fewer healthy folks are signing up than expected, and\u00a0who are turning out to be using more health care services than expected. \u00a0The various plan design regulations are all adding to the cost: \u00a0those \u201cfree\u201d doctors\u2019 visits and breastpumps and IUDs are not free, after all, and the lifetime maximum prohibition and out-of-pocket restriction also play a role.<\/p>\n

But Obamacare has also created a very real constituency of people who get their healthcare through Medicaid or through an Obamacare-subsidized plan. \u00a0Now, I don\u2019t have the numbers at hand on how it splits out between these two groups, though I know that the largest number of newly-insured folk are Medicaid recipients who hadn\u2019t qualified when it as offered only to the disabled, mothers and children (for the most part), and some time ago, I read an article<\/a>\u00a0about the very (un)surprising fact that the newly-insured who received regular Obamacare plans, not Medicaid, were unable to pay their pre-deductible healthcare costs, and were stuck unable to use the sliding-scale health clinics they were previously accustomed to, because of existing policies that they were only for the uninsured (whether those clinics have changed their policies since then, I don\u2019t know). \u00a0Beyond this, there\u2019s a larger consistency of people who enjoy the \u201cperks\u201d \u2014 parents\u2019 health insurance to age 25, and the \u201cfree\u201d services \u2014 without really caring about how it fits into a larger whole.<\/p>\n

And most of the \u201cReplace\u201d plans proffered by Republicans include\u00a0some sort of tax credit towards the purchase of healthcare. \u00a0Of the various proposals, I wasn\u2019t too thrilled with most of them, but thought that there were some promising ideas. \u00a0Scott Walker\u2019s plan<\/a>, for instance (the link is to my prior comments, as the plan itself not appears to be offline), proposed to continue coverage for low-income adults through a reformed Medicaid, and proposed for others a tax credit. \u00a0Now, the tax credit concept was not as fully developed as it should have been: \u00a0any such credit, to be a meaningful alternative to the Obamacare subsidies, simply must sensibly reflect differences in cost for age and family size, and the Walker credit only had a small number of brackets, which at least was an improvement on plans which only had a flat amount, great for young singles, not so much for older families.<\/p>\n

Now, the Republicans have the majority in the House and Senate, as well as the presidency \u2014 but they don\u2019t have a filibuster-proof majority as the Democrats had when they passed Obamacare. \u00a0And a full-on repeal hardly seems the sort of legislation that\u2019s worth the end of the filibuster. \u00a0A better alternative: \u00a0an extended repair process.<\/p>\n

Create tax credits, or, better yet, full-on vouchers, applicable to everyone, based on individual ages of policyholders and their dependents, sufficient to buy a high-deductible plan. \u00a0(Employer-provided health insurance pricing would adjust for this.) \u00a0Eliminate the employer and employee mandate. \u00a0Integrate Medicaid and standard health insurance, perhaps by modifying Medicaid to a sliding-scale set of fees for treatments up to the deductible. \u00a0Allow insurers to price policies higher for folks with pre-existing conditions, with additional credits as needed, and\/or limit the ability of people to move into a more comprehensive policy when they become sick. \u00a0Then modify or eliminate the various other regulations as needed, piecemeal.<\/p>\n

But a single piece of legislation, that simply says, \u201cthe Affordable Care Act is hereby repealed\u201d? \u00a0That would be tremendously destructive, both to the healthcare industry and to civil society.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Image: \u00a0V0050236 A fist-fight between Lord Brougham and Lord Melbourne as Pea
\nCredit: Wellcome Library, London. Wellcome Images
\nimages@wellcome.ac.uk
\nhttp:\/\/wellcomeimages.org
\nA fist-fight between Lord Brougham and Lord Melbourne as Peachum and Lockit. Coloured lithograph by H.B. (John Doyle), 1837.
\n1837 By: John DoylePublished: 22 October 1836
\nCopyrighted work available under Creative Commons Attribution only licence CC BY 4.0 http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So that\u2019s what Trump and Congress claim they\u2019re going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates, subsidies, and the pre-existing condition exclusion prohibition. \u00a0And Obamacare is more than that: \u00a0the requirement that the differential between old and young cannot exceed a specified ratio, far less than the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2209,"featured_media":3884,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nRepeal and Replace?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"So that's what Trump and Congress claim they're going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Repeal and Replace?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"So that's what Trump and Congress claim they're going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-11T14:48:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/533\/2016\/02\/A_fist-fight_between_Lord_Brougham_and_Lord_Melbourne_as_Pea_Wellcome_V0050236.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"582\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html\",\"name\":\"Repeal and Replace?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-11T14:48:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-11T14:48:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\"},\"description\":\"So that's what Trump and Congress claim they're going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Repeal and Replace?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jane the Actuary\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Repeal and Replace?","description":"So that's what Trump and Congress claim they're going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Repeal and Replace?","og_description":"So that's what Trump and Congress claim they're going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html","og_site_name":"Jane the Actuary","article_published_time":"2016-11-11T14:48:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":582,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/533\/2016\/02\/A_fist-fight_between_Lord_Brougham_and_Lord_Melbourne_as_Pea_Wellcome_V0050236.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jane the Actuary","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jane the Actuary","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html","name":"Repeal and Replace?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-11-11T14:48:31+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-11T14:48:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a"},"description":"So that's what Trump and Congress claim they're going to do. \u00a0What do they mean? \u00a0What could they mean? Remember the three-legged stool: \u00a0mandates,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2016\/11\/repeal-and-replace.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Repeal and Replace?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/","name":"Jane the Actuary","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a","name":"Jane the Actuary","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jane the Actuary"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5632"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5632\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}