{"id":652,"date":"2014-01-22T21:29:00","date_gmt":"2014-01-22T21:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html"},"modified":"2014-01-22T21:29:00","modified_gmt":"2014-01-22T21:29:00","slug":"what-about-all-the-26-year-olds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html","title":{"rendered":"What about all the 26 year olds?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents\u2019 health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as a potential cause of the small number of health young\u2019uns in the individual insurance risk pools, on the expectation that the kiddies are all in the group insurance market, what with all the real grown-ups having employer-provided healthcare. <\/p>\n

And I think both points miss the issue. Employers, so far as I can tell, have just held to the status quo and, by and large, kept to the usual simplified brackets of employee, employee + spouse, employee + children, employee + family. But their subsidies for dependents are, on average, decreasing, and many employers are now charging extra to cover a spouse who has coverage available elsewhere. There\u2019s no magic here, nothing\u2019s \u201cfree\u201d \u2014 depending on the level of employer subsidies, the cost for the 26 year olds\u2019 coverage is either coming out of the overall compensation budget or being directly paid for by the employees. <\/p>\n

And there\u2019s nothing fixed about this. Employers could move to charging employees per kid, and slim down their subsidies. The law requires employees to make coverage available to \u201cadult children\u201d but doen\u2019t require the coverage be subsidized. Can employers differentiate between, say, under 18s and those older, in terms of the subsidy level? I\u2019m not sure. In any case, emploeyrs can charge more for spouses who have coverage available elsewhere, so I would imagine that, at a minimum, the same would be true of those young adults to elect to stay on their parents\u2019 plan and decline coverage offered through their own jobs. (Some details here, in a fall WSJ article on the topic<\/a> \u2014 if the direct link is behind a paywall, I found it through a google search: employer health insurance age 26 charge.)<\/p>\n

The point is, though, employers could, in principle, offer health insurance to anyone: domestic partner coverage is now fairly prevalent. In some Asian countries, employers cover the employees\u2019 parents. The difference in the US is that tax law limits who employers can cover without the subsidy being taxable for the employee. Spouse and dependent children, yes. Roommate, no. <\/p>\n

Is there something fixed about age 26? Why is the government in the business of telling employers the conditions under which they can offer employee benefits? <\/p>\n

Fundamentally, I think enough changes are afoot (consider the \u201cprivate exchanges\u201d) in employer-sponsored health insurance that the notion that Sally\u2019s 26-year old son should receive health insurance with the same subsidy level as Jack\u2019s two year old will ultimately feel unfair to those employees, when they see their insurance premiums escalating. Rather than the 26-year old \u201cadult children\u201d being unassailable, it\u2019ll be hard to defend.<\/p>\n

As far as the individual insurance market goes, if young people are insured via their parents\u2019 individual insurance policy, then it\u2019s all the same risk pool, right? Or is the idea that ACA-backers want disproportionately-many young adults insured in exchange-based individual policies, for the cross-subsidies they bring?<\/p>\n

UPDATE:
I found some material on this in my company intranet. \u00a0And apparently, the regulations are very limiting: \u00a0employers must cover all \u201cdependent children\u201d identically, and cannot change extra for children above age 18, for instance, and (on this point the material I\u2019m looking at isn\u2019t entirely clear) it\u2019s also not permitted to charge extra for someone who is employed with alternate coverage available. \u00a0This was surprising, and seems pretty hard to support. <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents\u2019 health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as a potential cause of the small number of health young\u2019uns in the individual insurance risk pools, on the expectation that the kiddies are all in the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2209,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nWhat about all the 26 year olds?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents' health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What about all the 26 year olds?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents' health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-01-22T21:29:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jane the Actuary\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html\",\"name\":\"What about all the 26 year olds?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-01-22T21:29:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-22T21:29:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\"},\"description\":\"The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents' health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What about all the 26 year olds?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a\",\"name\":\"Jane the Actuary\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jane the Actuary\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What about all the 26 year olds?","description":"The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents' health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What about all the 26 year olds?","og_description":"The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents' health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html","og_site_name":"Jane the Actuary","article_published_time":"2014-01-22T21:29:00+00:00","author":"Jane the Actuary","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jane the Actuary","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html","name":"What about all the 26 year olds?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-01-22T21:29:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-22T21:29:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a"},"description":"The fact that ObamaCare allows 26 year olds to stay on their parents' health insurance is cited both as a fixed and unalterable aspect of the law, and as","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/2014\/01\/what-about-all-the-26-year-olds.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What about all the 26 year olds?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/","name":"Jane the Actuary","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/ed9b99e0bd58c5eeeebae6b82fa5a77a","name":"Jane the Actuary","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8d6a493d380e87d49599d5487691c9fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jane the Actuary"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/author\/actuaryjane"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/janetheactuary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}