\n<\/li><\/ul>\nDefendants.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Randall T. Coyne*\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Gregory W. Gardner**<\/p>\n
Attorney at Law\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Attorney at Law<\/p>\n
MBA # 549013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 P.O. Box 2366<\/p>\n
300 Timberdell Road\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Boulder, Colorado 80306<\/p>\n
Norman, Oklahoma 73019\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (202) 553-1651 (telephone)<\/p>\n
(405) 834-9317 (telephone)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 gardnerlegal@gmail.com<\/p>\n
(405) 325-0398 (facsimile)<\/p>\n
rcoyne@ou.edu<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
*Counsel of Record<\/p>\n
**Application for Admission Forthcoming<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
INTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
Let this be recorded for a generation to come, so that<\/p>\n
a people yet to be created may praise the LORD:<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
to hear the groans of the prisoners, to set free those who<\/p>\n
were doomed to die<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
PSALMS 120: 18, 20.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- Plaintiff Scott Eizember is a prisoner incarcerated at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, Oklahoma. His Oklahoma DOC number is 497824.<\/li>\n
- The Department of Corrections (\u201cDOC\u201d) is incarcerating Mr. Eizember under a sentence of death and intends to execute him by lethal injection on Thursday, January 12, 2023, at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, Oklahoma.<\/li>\n
- Eizember is a practicing Catholic.<\/li>\n
- Plaintiff Jeffrey K. Hood is a Catholic Priest in the Old Catholic Church. Att. A. His religious beliefs are a mixture of ministry and advocacy. The Reverend Doctor Hood ministered this religious philosophy to Mr. Eizember, and Mr. Eizember accepted this philosophy as his own. Att. C.<\/li>\n
- Hood is Mr. Eizember\u2019s chosen spiritual advisor. Dr. Hood agreed to serve in this capacity and to minister to Mr. Eizember until and including performing religious services in the execution chamber.<\/li>\n
- On Wednesday, January 4, 2023, the Oklahoma DOC rejected Dr. Hood\u2019s and Mr. Eizember\u2019s efforts for Dr. Hood to be in the execution chamber with Mr. Eizember during his execution.<\/li>\n
- Through the required Oklahoma DOC channels, Mr. Eizember has filed a grievance requesting that Dr. Hood be his spiritual advisor in the execution chamber. Due to the late date of Dr. Hood\u2019s rejection, Mr. Eizember\u2019s grievance could not be submitted earlier. Indeed, he submitted it quickly given the circumstances. And for the same reasons, the Defendants have not been able to respond, preventing Mr. Eizember from filing an appeal if applicable and necessary.<\/li>\n
- Relief is necessary for both Plaintiffs. Mr. Eizember will be executed in violation of the United States Constitution\u2019s First Amendment Free Exercise Clause and when substantially burdening the exercise of his religion under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIP).<\/li>\n
- Hood requires relief too. He is being excluded from the execution chamber in violation of his religious beliefs and practice. Upon information and belief, the Defendants are excluding Dr. Hood due to his activism outside the prison system. Because this activity is an integral part of Dr. Hood\u2019s religious beliefs, Att. E, the DOC\u2019s actions based on these religious practices also violate Dr. Hood\u2019s First Amendment Free Exercise Clause rights.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
JURISDICTION<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- The Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 4200cc-1, 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1343, 1651, 2201, and 2202, and 42 U.S.C. \u00a71983.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
VENUE<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- Venue lies in the Western District under 28 U.S.C. 1391 because the judicial district is the home of the headquarters of the Oklahoma Department of Correction (3400 N Martin Luther King Ave, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 7311), where \u201ca substantial part of the events or omissions\u201d occurred that resulted in the denial of Mr. Eizember\u2019s rights to have his chosen spiritual advisor with him in the execution chamber. And Mr. Eizember resides at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, Oklahoma, which is overseen by the Oklahoma Department of Corrections. Furthermore, the Defendants intend to execute Mr. Eizember in a prison run by the Oklahoma Department of Corrections.<\/li>\n
- And the venue lies in the Western District for Dr. Hood because a substantial part of the activities resulting in the denial of his religious rights occurred in that district.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
PARTIES<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- Plaintiff Scott Eizember is a prisoner on death row at Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, Oklahoma. He is under a sentence of death and scheduled to be executed on Thursday, January 12, 2023.<\/li>\n
- Plaintiff Rev. Dr. Jeffrey K. Hood is a priest in the Old Catholic Church. Dr. Hood is Mr. Eizember\u2019s spiritual advisor. And he is being excluded from the execution chamber for Mr. Eizember\u2019s execution and presumably other executions as well.<\/li>\n
- Defendant Steven Harpe is the Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections. He oversees the agency that seeks to execute Mr. Eizember. He is being sued in his official capacity.<\/li>\n
- Defendant Jim Farris is the warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. This prison is the one where Mr. Eizember is housed and where prisoners are executed. He is being sued in his official capacity.<\/li>\n
- Defendant Justin Farris is the Chief of Operations of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections. He is the advisor to Director Harpe with regard to the day-to-day operation of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections. He is being sued in his official capacity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
FACTUAL BACKGROUND<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- Hood and Mr. Eizember met in the Fall of 2022. Dr. Hood\u2019s ministry reaches out to death-row prisoners who are approaching execution, so he contacted Mr. Eizember toward the end of his legal case and shortly before execution.<\/li>\n
- Since September of 2022, the DOC has allowed Dr. Hood into Oklahoma State Penitentiary to visit 4 different prisoners as a spiritual advisor, including Mr. Eizember. Permission was granted for these visits after a series of phone conversations, submission of clergy documents, and an extensive background check. Dr. Hood apparently was not enough of a security concern to prevent him from entering the prison and interacting with prisoners such as Mr. Eizember. In fact, Dr. Hood visited the prison multiple occasions over a period of multiple months without incident (as recently as a few weeks ago).<\/li>\n
- Eizember was eager to meet Dr. Hood. He quickly steered the conversation toward developing a spiritual-advisor relationship with Dr. Hood after a brief period of skepticism brought on by previous negative relationships with other spiritual advisors. Att. C.<\/li>\n
- Hood agreed to be Mr. Eizember\u2019s spiritual advisor. Att. B.<\/li>\n
- During their relationship, Dr. Hood prayed with Mr. Eizember, read scripture with Mr. Eizember, taught ethical methods to Mr. Eizember, listened to Mr. Eizember\u2019s innermost thoughts, heard confession from Mr. Eizember, spoke at the clemency hearing for Mr. Eizember, reconnected Mr. Eizember with an estranged child, provided spiritual guidance to Mr. Eizember, led a clemency campaign for Mr. Eizember, cried with Mr. Eizember, spoke out for Mr. Eizember, laughed with Mr. Eizember, and a whole host of other things. In short, Dr. Hood is Mr. Eizember\u2019s pastor.<\/li>\n
- At Mr. Eizember\u2019s request, Dr. Hood agreed to accompany him into the execution chamber to minister to him at that critical hour.<\/li>\n
- To do so, Dr. Hood went through a thorough application process, including a background check. Att. B, D. In response, Dr. Hood submitted a plethora of documents and submitted to numerous interviews. Att. B, D.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- Hood and Mr. Eizember incorporate by reference and re-allege the allegations contained in the previous paragraphs of this Complaint.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
CLAIM ONE: FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION: Plaintiffs Scott Eizember and Dr. Jeffrey K. Hood`\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- The First Amendment to the United States Constitution requires States to \u201cmake no law . . . prohibiting the free exercise of\u201d religion. U.S. Const. amend. I. See also<\/em> Cantwell v. Connecticut<\/em>, 310 U.S. 296, 303 (1940) (holding that the Free Exercise Clause is applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution).<\/li>\n
- After a period of precluding clergy from the execution chamber, the DOC now allows them into that chamber. To gain access to their parishioners, clergy must submit to a background check and interviews.<\/li>\n
- When the DOC receives the combined results, the Defendants decide whether a spiritual advisor will be allowed into the execution chamber. Their decision is final as far as the DOC is concerned.<\/li>\n
- Eizember is scheduled to be executed on Thursday, January 12, 2023. According to United States Supreme Court precedent, Mr. Eizember is entitled to a spiritual advisor with him in the execution chamber. E.g.<\/em>, Dunn v. Smith<\/em>, 141 S. Ct. 175, 175 (2021). While prison security is a valid concern, the Defendants must connect their actions excluding spiritual advisors to that security. Ibid<\/em>.<\/li>\n
- When State actors hinder a person\u2019s ability to practice his religion, courts first must determine if the action is neutral and generally applicable. Church of the Lukumi Balbao Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah<\/em>, 508 U.S. 520, 531 (1993).<\/li>\n
- If it is neutral and generally applicable, the State action can have an \u201cincidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice.\u201d Ibid<\/em>.<\/li>\n
- If the State action is not neutral and generally applicable, it must survive strict scrutiny. Governments survive strict scrutiny when they show a \u201ccompelling governmental interest\u201d that is \u201cnarrowly tailored to advance that interest.\u201d Ibid<\/em>.<\/li>\n
- Here, the DOC\u2019s actions are not neutral. They are hostile toward religion. Indeed, they deny a prisoner his chosen spiritual advisor at the most critical juncture of his life: his death. Because it is not neutral, the DOC\u2019s actions must survive strict scrutiny. They cannot. The DOC has allowed Dr. Hood to visit the prison to minister to Mr. Ezimber. In fact, Dr. Hood has visited four prisoners in recent months. The DOC has not stopped him or limited his activities more than usual. And the DOC is even allowing Dr. Hood to visit Mr. Eizember in the days before his execution, recognizing the importance of a chosen spiritual advisor ministering to a condemned prisoner.<\/li>\n
- Other, less severe measures are available to the DOC. Most obviously, it could ensure that its employees are trained properly to secure the execution chamber against one person. Similarly, it can add an employee or two to ensure security. Either solution presents a less onerous impact on Mr. Eizember\u2019s and Dr. Hood\u2019s religious practice, and they are more narrowly tailored to protect prison security.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
CLAIM TWO: <\/strong>THE RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT (\u201cRLUIPA\u201d): Plaintiff Scott Eizember<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n- Hood and Mr. Eizember incorporate by reference and re-allege the allegations contained in the previous paragraphs of this Complaint.<\/li>\n
- Even if this Court determines that the DOC\u2019s rejection of Dr. Hood\u2019s presence in the execution chamber does not violate the First Amendment, it should find that this State action violates RLUIPA.<\/li>\n
- RLUIPA states in part that \u201c[n]o government shall impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution,\u201d unless the burden furthers \u201ca compelling governmental interest,\u201d and does so by \u201cthe least restrictive means.\u201d RLUIPA \u201calleviates exceptional government-created burdens on private religious exercise.\u201d Cutter v. Wilkinson<\/em>, 544 U.S. 709, 720 (2005).<\/li>\n
- RLUIPA provides more \u201cexpansive protection\u201d for religious liberty than the United States Supreme Court First Amendment case law. Holt v. Hobbs<\/em>, 574 U.S. 352, 358 (2015). \u201cIn RLUIPA, in an obvious effort to effect a complete separation from the First Amendment case law, Congress deleted reference to the First Amendment and defined the \u2018exercise of religion\u2019 to include \u2018any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.\u2019\u201d Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores<\/em>, 573 U.S. 682, 696 (2014) (quoting 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000cc-5(7)(A)).<\/li>\n
- State actions that stop Dr. Hood from ministering to Mr. Eizember at the time of his death violates their religious practice at the most vital moment of his life: his transition from life to the afterlife. See, e.g.<\/em>, Holt<\/em>, 135 S. Ct. at 862 (determining that where a prisoner shows the exercise of religion \u201cgrounded in a sincerely held religious belief,\u201d enforced prohibition \u201csubstantially burdens his religious exercise\u201d). It, thus, substantially burdens the practice of his religion.<\/li>\n
- Because the Defendants\u2019 actions do substantially burden the Plaintiffs\u2019 religious beliefs and practices, the Defendants must satisfy the strict-scrutiny test. In other words, the Defendants must prove the State action is \u201cthe least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest.\u201d 42 U.S.C. \u00a72000cc-1(a).<\/li>\n
- The strict scrutiny standard is \u201cexceptionally demanding.\u201d Holt<\/em>, 574 U.S. at 353 (quoting Hobby Lobby Stores<\/em>, 573 U.S. at 728). And the Defendants have the burden to show they can meet this difficult test. at 357, 362.<\/li>\n
- Here, the Defendants cannot show a compelling government interest. As discussed above, prison security is a concern and government interest. In this case, however, it is not compelling. To be compelling, the governmental interest must be a necessity and not a matter of discretion. The Defendants\u2019 actions are a matter of discretion. Given the security measures the Defendants can easily take, this decision is largely discretionary.<\/li>\n
- Likewise, the Defendants cannot prove they have employed the least restrictive way to further that governmental interest. Also as discussed above, the Defendants have multiple ways to ensure the security of the prison. They can better train their execution-team employees, for example. They can also order more employees into the execution chamber to guard Dr. Hood. These are only two examples.<\/li>\n
- And the Defendants\u2019 action is further complicated by the fact that they have allowed Dr. Hood into the prison multiple times to minister to multiple prisoners. More specifically, they have allowed Dr. Hood to visit Mr. Eizember multiple times. Even after rejecting Dr. Hood\u2019s efforts to be in the execution chamber, they have allowed Dr. Hood to continue ministering to Mr. Eizember and he is scheduled to meet with Mr. Eizember in person in the days leading up to his execution. Dr. Hood clearly is not a security concern.<\/li>\n
- Accordingly, if the Court concludes that the DOC\u2019s revised policy does not violate the First Amendment, it should decide that the policy violates RLUIPA.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
PRAYER FOR RELIEF<\/strong><\/p>\nWHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Scott Eizember and the Reverend Doctor Jeffrey K. Hood prays that this Honorable Court provide relief as follows:<\/p>\n
\n- A declaratory judgment that the Defendants\u2019 action to preclude Dr. Hood from Mr. Eizember\u2019s execution chamber violates Mr. Eizember\u2019s First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise Clause;<\/li>\n
- A declaratory judgment that the Defendants\u2019 action to preclude Dr. Hood from Mr. Eizember\u2019s execution chamber violates Dr. Hood\u2019s First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise Clause;<\/li>\n
- A declaratory judgment that the Defendant\u2019s preclusion of Dr. Hood violates Mr. Eizember\u2019s rights under RLUIPA;<\/li>\n
- A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting the Defendants from executing Mr. Eizember until they can do so in a way that does not violate his rights; and<\/li>\n
- A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting the Defendants from executing Mr. Eizember until they allow Dr. Hood into the execution chamber during Mr. Eizember\u2019s execution.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Respectfully submitted,<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\/s\/ Randall T. Coyne<\/u>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \/s\/ Gregory W Gardner<\/u><\/p>\n
Randall T. Coyne*\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Gregory W. Gardner**<\/p>\n
Attorney at Law\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Attorney at Law<\/p>\n
MBA # 549013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 P.O. Box 2366<\/p>\n
300 Timberdell Road\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Boulder, Colorado 80306<\/p>\n
Norman, Oklahoma 73019\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (202) 553-1651 (telephone)<\/p>\n
(405) 834-9317 (telephone)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 gardnerlegal@gmail.com<\/p>\n
(405) 325-0398 (facsimile)<\/p>\n
rcoyne@ou.edu<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
*Counsel of Record<\/p>\n
**Application for Admission Forthcoming<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
VERIFICATION<\/strong><\/p>\nI, Gregory W. Gardner, attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above-titled action, state that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the facts set forth in this Complaint are true.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Executed on Sunday, January 8, 2023.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\/s\/ Gregory W. Gardner<\/u><\/p>\n
Gregory W. Gardner<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: \u00a0 Scott Eizember is scheduled to be executed on January 12, 2023.\u00a0\u00a0Like every other prisoner on death row in the United States, Eizember was given the opportunity to choose a minister to accompany him during his […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2509,"featured_media":10116,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[1799,6825,6472,6822],"class_list":["post-10113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-freshwritings","category-thoughts","tag-jeff-hood","tag-oklahoma-department-of-corrections","tag-scott-eizember","tag-western-district-of-oklahoma"],"yoast_head":"\n
Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: Scott Eizember is\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: Scott Eizember is\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jeff Hood\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-09T14:23:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/751\/2023\/01\/Screen-Shot-2023-01-09-at-8.23.37-AM.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"736\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"740\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeff Hood\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff Hood\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/\",\"name\":\"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-09T14:23:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-09T14:23:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#\/schema\/person\/7520c1e5a6c2879d78536396c58007de\"},\"description\":\"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: Scott Eizember is\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/\",\"name\":\"Jeff Hood\",\"description\":\"Exploring Radical Orthodoxy\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#\/schema\/person\/7520c1e5a6c2879d78536396c58007de\",\"name\":\"Jeff Hood\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54ebe6683fcc2aa8526866c4ce7b921c?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54ebe6683fcc2aa8526866c4ce7b921c?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jeff Hood\"},\"description\":\"The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is a Catholic priest (Old Catholic), theologian, and nationally recognized activist based in North Little Rock, Arkansas. A spiritual advisor to death row inmates across the country, Dr. Hood has accompanied more people to their executions than any other advisor in the U.S., including the first-ever nitrogen hypoxia execution in 2024. His work sits at the intersection of justice, radical compassion, and public theology. Dr. Hood holds advanced degrees from Auburn, Emory, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, University of Alabama, Creighton, and Brite Divinity School, among others. He also earned a PhD in metaphysical theology and founded The New Theology School, where he serves as Dean and Professor of Prophetic Theology. Author of over 100 books\u2014including the award-winning The Courage to Be Queer\u2014Dr. Hood\u2019s writings and activism have been featured in The New York Times, Rolling Stone, NPR, CNN, and more. A frequent collaborator with men on death row, he sees theology as a shared, liberative act. Dr. Hood has served on the leadership teams of organizations like the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Fellowship of Reconciliation. His activism has earned multiple awards, including recognition from PFLAG and the Next Generation Action Network. On July 7, 2016, Dr. Hood led the Dallas protest against police brutality that ended in tragedy. His actions that night saved lives, and his story is now archived in the Dallas Public Library. A father of five, husband to Emily, and friend to the incarcerated, Dr. Hood rejects institutionalism in favor of a theology rooted in people, presence, and prophetic witness.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/author\/jeff-hood\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections","description":"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: Scott Eizember is","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections","og_description":"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: Scott Eizember is","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/","og_site_name":"Jeff Hood","article_published_time":"2023-01-09T14:23:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":736,"height":740,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/751\/2023\/01\/Screen-Shot-2023-01-09-at-8.23.37-AM.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Jeff Hood","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff Hood","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/","name":"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-01-09T14:23:24+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-09T14:23:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#\/schema\/person\/7520c1e5a6c2879d78536396c58007de"},"description":"Scott Eizember & Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue OK Department of Corrections for Violation of Religious Freedom \u00a0 Background: Scott Eizember is","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/religious-liberty-on-trial-scott-eizember-rev-dr-jeff-hood-sue-the-oklahoma-department-of-corrections\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Religious Liberty on Trial: Scott Eizember\/Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood Sue the Oklahoma Department of Corrections"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/","name":"Jeff Hood","description":"Exploring Radical Orthodoxy","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#\/schema\/person\/7520c1e5a6c2879d78536396c58007de","name":"Jeff Hood","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54ebe6683fcc2aa8526866c4ce7b921c?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54ebe6683fcc2aa8526866c4ce7b921c?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Jeff Hood"},"description":"The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is a Catholic priest (Old Catholic), theologian, and nationally recognized activist based in North Little Rock, Arkansas. A spiritual advisor to death row inmates across the country, Dr. Hood has accompanied more people to their executions than any other advisor in the U.S., including the first-ever nitrogen hypoxia execution in 2024. His work sits at the intersection of justice, radical compassion, and public theology. Dr. Hood holds advanced degrees from Auburn, Emory, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, University of Alabama, Creighton, and Brite Divinity School, among others. He also earned a PhD in metaphysical theology and founded The New Theology School, where he serves as Dean and Professor of Prophetic Theology. Author of over 100 books\u2014including the award-winning The Courage to Be Queer\u2014Dr. Hood\u2019s writings and activism have been featured in The New York Times, Rolling Stone, NPR, CNN, and more. A frequent collaborator with men on death row, he sees theology as a shared, liberative act. Dr. Hood has served on the leadership teams of organizations like the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Fellowship of Reconciliation. His activism has earned multiple awards, including recognition from PFLAG and the Next Generation Action Network. On July 7, 2016, Dr. Hood led the Dallas protest against police brutality that ended in tragedy. His actions that night saved lives, and his story is now archived in the Dallas Public Library. A father of five, husband to Emily, and friend to the incarcerated, Dr. Hood rejects institutionalism in favor of a theology rooted in people, presence, and prophetic witness.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/author\/jeff-hood\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2509"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10113\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jeffhood\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/751\/2023\/01\/Screen-Shot-2023-01-09-at-8.23.37-AM.png\")
<\/p>\n