![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp.patheos.com\/community\/sites\/40\/2010\/08\/Mountainsclouds.jpg\" "\\"Mountainsclouds\\"")
<\/a>Test of re-use\u2026<\/p>\nNothing like the beauty of creation to wake us up on a Saturday morning. I hope your coffee tastes better looking at God\u2019s world.<\/p>\n
This will be our last Weekly Meanderings at Beliefnet. Next week it will be at our new site at\u00a0Patheos<\/a><\/strong>, and that move has been consuming some of my blog-reading time but here\u2019s a few links\u2026<\/div>\n
Jay Phelan<\/a><\/strong> has some insightful words about the internet and civility.<\/div>\n
Anne Farley-Roll\u00e9<\/a>,<\/strong> who pointed me at Jay\u2019s post, jumps from my parables series into some concerns of her own.<\/div>\n
Some parallel\u00a0evangelical trajectories among Messianic Jews<\/a><\/strong>.<\/div>\n
Jamie Arpin Ricci<\/a><\/strong> has a helpful analogy and set of reflections on \u201cwhere do we draw the line, or do we?\u201d<\/div>\n
Karen writes a letter to the President about \u2026 well, here\u2019s the link<\/a><\/strong>, you read it: \u201cBecause it seems that these days, name dropping only counts if you\u2019ve had your own reality TV show like the Gosselins. I wish somebody would explain to me how it is two people who can\u2019t get along any better than these two people do, end up becoming authors of books on how to be a better baby mama or baby daddy. As far as I\u2019m concerned that would be like Tiger Woods writing a book on faithfulness.\u201d<\/div>\n![\"NeffSleep.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/jesuscreed\/assets_c\/2010\/08\/NeffSleep-thumb-333x509-17548.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\nWhere do I place\u00a0LaVonne Neff\u2019s post<\/a><\/strong> on the split infinitive? Right here will do. LaVonne, what did Fowler say? EB White? \u00a0OK,\u00a0her review of Love Eat Drink Be Merry<\/a><\/strong> or whatever the movie\u2019s name is is a nice review. LaVonne said no one was sleeping at the theater, but David was sleeping somewhere. Looks like in church.<\/div>\n
My friend\u00a0Allan Bevere<\/a><\/strong> asks this: What would you do if a mosque were coming to your community? He answers that question with freshness.<\/div>\n
And another friend,\u00a0Bill Donahue<\/a><\/strong>, on building a learning community.<\/div>\n
This may be the funniest piece of open theology<\/a><\/strong> I\u2019ve ever seen.<\/div>\n
Sarah Pulliam Bailey<\/a><\/strong> has covered this story admirably, and I\u2019m very pleased that Jim Wallis backed off his accusations of Olasky, and now I hope they keep this exchange behind closed doors.<\/div>\n
Meanderings in the News<\/div>\n
1.\u00a0Wedge issues and the political process<\/a><\/strong>: \u201cThe current ruckus over building an Islamic center and mosque near ground zero, calls to change the 14th Amendment and other so-called \u201cwedge\u201d issues are roiling up each party\u2019s base, but they\u2019re turning off independents, analysts say. This is party politics as usual with respect to all of these wedge issues,\u201d said Jacqueline Salit, president of independentvoting.org, a national strategy and organizing center for independents. \u201cI think there\u2019s more and more of a steady recognition that these kind of wedge issues and political manipulation, sensationalism and opportunism is exactly what is degrading the American political process and our democracy.\u201d Salit, who is also the executive editor of The Neo-Independent magazine, said that people are having a hard time understanding what\u2019s happening with the economy because of partisanship. \u201cI think people can\u2019t tell what\u2019s going on because the political environment is so polluted by partisanship,\u201d she said. \u201cThe parties are trying to change the subject from things they think can inflame voters on and win elections on. How does that help the country? That hurts the country. And that\u2019s what independents are deeply concerned about.\u201d<\/div>\n
2.\u00a0Reading material at Gitmo<\/a><\/strong>.<\/div>\n![\"PhoneTalk.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/jesuscreed\/assets_c\/2010\/08\/PhoneTalk-thumb-333x250-17528.jpg\")
<\/a>3. On the mysteries of consciousness by\u00a0David B. Hart<\/a><\/strong>: \u201cMost attempts to describe the mind entirely as an emergent quality of the brain,<\/strong> or as another name for the brain\u2019s machinery, not only fail convincingly to bridge the qualitative distance between sensory impression and coherent thought, but invariably bracket out of consideration a great deal of what any scrupulous phenomenology of consciousness reveals. Certainly they do not seem to explain the \u201ctranscendental\u201d conditions by which consciousness is organized: that primordial act within and prior to all our other acts of mind and will; that constant mediation between thought and world that we both perform and suffer in advance of all experience or volition.\u201d<\/div>\n
<\/a>3. On the mysteries of consciousness by\u00a0David B. Hart<\/a><\/strong>: \u201cMost attempts to describe the mind entirely as an emergent quality of the brain,<\/strong> or as another name for the brain\u2019s machinery, not only fail convincingly to bridge the qualitative distance between sensory impression and coherent thought, but invariably bracket out of consideration a great deal of what any scrupulous phenomenology of consciousness reveals. Certainly they do not seem to explain the \u201ctranscendental\u201d conditions by which consciousness is organized: that primordial act within and prior to all our other acts of mind and will; that constant mediation between thought and world that we both perform and suffer in advance of all experience or volition.\u201d<\/div>\n4. I agree with\u00a0Karl Giberson<\/a><\/strong> in his criticism of Al Mohler, but this article is a classic example of overkill: all we needed was three paragraphs. Here\u2019s all he needed to say: \u201cIn this talk Mohler made false statements about Darwin. He apparently wanted to undermine evolution by suggesting that it was \u201cinvented\u201d to prop up Darwin\u2019s worldview, rather than developed to explain observations in the natural world. He said, \u201cDarwin did not embark upon the Beagle having no preconceptions of what exactly he was looking for or having no theory of how life emerged in all of its diversity, fecundity, and specialization. Darwin left on his expedition to prove the theory of evolution.\u00a0Because Darwin was constantly journaling, keeping careful notebooks, and writing letters, historians have established beyond all doubt that Mohler\u2019s summary is simply false.\u201d<\/div>\n
5.\u00a0New kind of honeymoon<\/a><\/strong>: \u201c(CNN)<\/strong> \u2014 It\u2019s common for newlyweds to honeymoon abroad. It\u2019s less common for them to fix kids\u2019 bikes during their trip \u2014 but Aaron and Kristen Berlin did just that two days after saying their vows.The Massachusetts twentysomethings got married in October and spent five days volunteering at an orphanage in southern Thailand before exploring Bangkok, northern Thailand and Cambodia.\u201d<\/div>\n
6.\u00a0Wowzers, this guy\u2019s incredible<\/a><\/strong>: \u201cKhan has his skeptics in the education business. They don\u2019t doubt he means well and is helping students, but they question the broad impact of any tutorial that doesn\u2019t test performance or allow student-teacher discussion. \u201cIt\u2019s a solid supplemental resource, particularly for motivated students,\u201d says Jeffrey Leeds, president of Leeds Equity Partners, the largest U.S. private equity firm specializing in for-profit education. \u201cBut it\u2019s not an academy \u2014 it\u2019s more of a library.\u201d<\/div>\n
7. And\u00a0David Brooks<\/a><\/strong> on mental flabbiness: \u201cThe ensuing mental flabbiness is most evident in politics. Many conservatives declare that Barack Obama is a Muslim because it feels so good to say so. Many liberals would never ask themselves why they were so wrong about the surge in Iraq while George Bush was so right. The question is too uncomfortable.\u00a0There\u2019s a seller\u2019s market in ideologies that gives people a chance to feel victimized. There\u2019s a rigidity to political debate. Issues like tax cuts and the size of government, which should be shaped by circumstances (often it\u2019s good to cut taxes; sometimes it\u2019s necessary to raise them), are now treated as inflexible tests of tribal purity.\u00a0To use a fancy word, there\u2019s a metacognition deficit. Very few in public life habitually step back and think about the weakness in their own thinking and what they should do to compensate.\u201d<\/div>\n