Here\u2019s a thesis Mark Biddle, in his excellent new study on sin (Missing the Mark<\/em>), defends in his last chapter: \u201cSin creates a real circumstance that lingers in the world until it comes to fruition \u2014 sometimes with the assistance of accusers and sometimes with God\u2019s \u2018permission\u2019 or even encouragement \u2014 or until it is deactivated\u201d (118). In other words, sin is an act, it is guilt and it entails consequences. It can take on a life of its own. Here\u2019s a thesis Mark Biddle, in his excellent new study on sin (Missing the Mark), defends in his last chapter: \u201cSin creates a real circumstance that lingers in the world until it comes to fruition \u2014 sometimes with the assistance of accusers and sometimes with God\u2019s \u2018permission\u2019 or even encouragement \u2014 or until it is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":197,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1744,476],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atonement","category-books"],"yoast_head":"\n
\nUnaddressed, sin matures into systemic evil, injustice, and violence.
\nBiddle shows how this notion illuminates how sins can be felt for three and four generations and how this notion helps us understand original sin. Furthermore, he moves in the direction of seeing the wrath of God as the organic outworking of God\u2019s moral order rather than simply God\u2019s invasion into the world in an act of punishment. Some today want to do away with wrath, but can only do so by erasing lots of verses in the Bible. What they want to erase, for the most part, is an unbiblical concept of wrath: which is not the external act of God but the internal workings of God\u2019s world. What needs to be maintained, in my estimation, is that wrath is still<\/em> the work of God. There is, in other words, no such thing as an \u201cimpersonal\u201d wrath but instead no such thing as an \u201cexternal\u201d expression of God\u2019s wrath. (Most of this paragraph is reflection that derives from stuff I read in Biddle\u2019s book.)
\nBiddle thinks modernity\u2019s individualism blocks it from seeing the systemic nature of sin and blocks it from taking responsibility for systemic evil; the biblical concept of sin is more organic and it describes sin as something alive and well and in need of being removed.
\nThis chp has good discussions about the various terms around the notion of removing sin and he has a good study of David and Bathsheba and Manasseh, Jeremiah, and the Babylonians.
\nThis is a good book and could be a steady textbook for seminarians in both biblical theology or systematics.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"