![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp.patheos.com\/community\/sites\/40\/2011\/01\/Screen-shot-2011-01-20-at-6.32.26-PM.jpg\" "\\"Screen")
<\/a><\/p>\nAlan Jacobs<\/strong><\/a> has a good suggestion \u2014 or more than one. JR Briggs<\/strong><\/a> has a good story.<\/p>\n The Intruder<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n LaVonne\u2019s ten wishes<\/strong><\/a> for the health care plan.<\/p>\n Justin Topp<\/strong><\/a> brings this discussion into one paragraph: \u201cThe public portion of the discussion started in June when Mohler, at the Ligonier Ministries 2010 National Conference (transcript\u00a0here<\/a>) spoke on the apparent old age of the earth and labeled evolution as the great destroyer of meaning. It seems that his decision to go public against BioLogos and its fellows is because they had begun to question Biblical inerrancy. This led Karl Giberson to respond on the\u00a0BioLogos site<\/a>(other fellows did as well), and then months later, on the\u00a0Huffington Post<\/a>. Mohler thenresponded, BioLogos did in <\/a>turn<\/a>, and the war was off. Most recently, BioLogos posted a year in summary and look ahead of sorts written by\u00a0Darrel Falk<\/a>, which in turn elicited a response from\u00a0Mohler<\/a>. Mohler\u2019s last response has set off a relative firestorm\u00a0first<\/a>,second<\/a>,\u00a0third<\/a>, and there are likely many others\u2026\u201d Like this one by Rachel<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n News alert<\/strong>: Justin Topp<\/strong><\/a> adds to the discussion.<\/p>\n Real good story by Mike Mercer<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n On building a toaster from scratch<\/strong><\/a>, and if you aren\u2019t interested you actually are.<\/p>\n Christine<\/strong><\/a> interviews Phil Yancey, and I\u2019ll be doing something about Phil\u2019s new book (What Good Is God?: In Search of a Faith That Matters<\/a><\/em><\/strong>) on this blog soon.<\/p>\n If Dawkins came to Sunday School<\/strong><\/a>, quick read John Stackhouse. Speaking of apologetics \u2026 Can\u2019t say I\u2019m crazy about this site, but it\u2019s worth keeping your eye on it: The Ehrman Project <\/strong><\/a> (responses to Bart Ehrman).<\/p>\n Michael Thompson<\/strong><\/a> encounters a common pastoral experience. And Mike Glenn<\/strong><\/a> comments on the constant experience \u2014 moving: with the on-the-move-God.<\/p>\n Bob Hyatt responds to David Fitch<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n If you haven\u2019t seen this by Andy Johnson<\/strong><\/a>, it\u2019s a must \u2026 print it out and refer to it when you have questions about justification.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Meanderings in the News<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. This on your bucket list<\/strong><\/a>?<\/p>\n 2. George Will<\/strong><\/a>: \u201cJames Q. Wilson, America\u2019s preeminent social scientist, has noted that until relatively recently, \u201cpolitics was about only a few things<\/a>; today, it is about nearly everything.\u201d Until the 1930s, or perhaps the 1960s, there was a \u201clegitimacy barrier\u201d to federal government activism: When new policies were proposed, the first debate was about whether the federal government could properly act at all on the subject. Today, there is no barrier to the promiscuous multiplication of programs, because no program is really new. Rather, it is an extension, modification or enlargement of something government is already doing.\u201d<\/p>\n 4. David Brooks<\/strong><\/a>: \u201cAt first, Harold found the talk a little chilling: it seemed that the revolution the scientist was describing was bound to lead to cold, mechanistic conclusions. If everything could be reduced to genes, neural wiring, and brain chemistry, what happened to the major concepts of life\u2014good and evil, sin and virtue, love and commitment? And what about the way Harold made sense of his life as he lived it, the everyday vocabulary of morals, moods, character, aspirations, temptations, values, ideals? The scientist described human beings as creatures driven by deep mechanisms, almost like puppets on strings, not as ensouled human beings capable of running their own lives.\u201d But this:<\/p>\n \u201cHarold concluded that it might be time for a revolution in his own consciousness\u2014time to take the proto-conversations that had been shoved to the periphery of life and put them back in the center. Maybe it was time to use this science to cultivate an entirely different viewpoint.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n 5. Maya MacGuineas<\/strong><\/a>: \u201cThe facts are ugly. The federal debt, which has averaged less than 40% of the total economy, now represents more than 60%. It\u2019s likely to hit 100% in a little over a decade.\u00a0 You want more? Here\u2019s more. Pretty much every impartial analyst has declared the situation unsustainable. And many European countries have already been hit by nervous credit markets worried about their debt levels. Bottom line: If Congress and the president fail to make changes to current policies, the United States will experience some form of a fiscal crisis. Not a pretty picture. And yet policymakers continue to drag their feet.\u201d<\/p>\n 6. Scott W. Atlas<\/strong><\/a>: \u201cConstitutional questions aside, a whole host of concerns about specific impacts of the PPACA underlie the opposition to it, including the fact that the law fails to control costs as calculated by the government itself. The major objections to Obamacare rest on four of its fundamental features, all of which represent a marked shift of authority and control of health-care decisions to the government: 1) mandating insurance coverage while eliminating insurance options such as high-deductible plans with health savings accounts (HSAs), which people increasingly prefer; 2) shifting millions more into already unsustainable public health-insurance programs; 3) directly or indirectly limiting access to technology by reducing payments for specialty\u00a0medical care<\/a> and limiting patient-driven options on available care; and 4) significantly increasing taxes to pay for the plan. While stopping short of the overt single-payer system openly desired by our president and many Democratic congressional leaders, the PPACA inarguably moves dramatically toward many of those same endpoints.\u201d<\/p>\n 7. Good-bye Jimmy John\u2019s?<\/strong><\/a> \u201cSouth Florida may have a chance to take a bite out of business from Illinois.The founder of the 1,000-store Jimmy John\u2019s sandwich chain is threatening to move his company\u2019s headquarters from Illinois to Florida.\u201d<\/p>\n Comment: a decade or two of recklessness in Springfield.<\/p>\n 8. The Stieg Larsson mystery about the mysteries<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n 9. Clifford May on gun control<\/strong><\/a>, and he\u2019s only for minor restrictions (not enough in my view), but he created a firestorm and here\u2019s his final excellent paragraph: \u201cThe moral of this story is demoralizing. Despite what Obama called \u201cthe challenges of our nation,\u201d too many people remain locked in ideological boxes. Why should so many NRO readers be outraged by an occasional item that does not reinforce their pre-existing opinions? Why should NPR, in part financed by taxpayers from across the political spectrum, allow only left-of-center voices access to what we used to call the public airways? If President Obama is serious about establishing \u201ca more civil and honest public discourse\u201d \u2014 and one speech does not demonstrate that beyond a reasonable doubt \u2014 he has his work cut out for him.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/a>Comment<\/em>: I see no reason for BioLogos to fan that flame with Al Mohler. The whole debate is getting us nowhere. Mohler, and while I can appreciate his desire to hold firm to theological beliefs, does not represent the SBC nor does he represent evangelicalism in these matters. Nor does he need to fan this flame.<\/p>\n<\/a>3. The great State of Illinois is making some decision<\/strong><\/a>s that are increasing the desire of its business owners to move north to cheese-head land, home of the Packers and Brewers and all, but this is no light issue in our neck of the woods: \u201cAs Wisconsin\u2019s governor aggressively seeks Illinois businesses following a hefty corporate income tax increase here, leaders in some Lake County towns near the border are voicing concern.\u201d<\/p>\n