Here is a letter passed on to me; I\u2019ll respond next week.
\n\u201cI have to admit, I\u2019ve been very discouraged in the past few years with the whole polarization of Evangelical Christianity between those of us who want to gently challenge some filters and habits of the mind, and those who want to retreat to fundamentalism. Is it getting worse or was it always this bad and I\u2019ve only lately noticed it?
\nFor example, in the latest issue of CT:
\n1. Several letters slamming Stan Guthrie for even thinking about ways of integrating some aspects of Evolution with the Christian faith. Unless you hold to a literal seven day creation you\u2019re a heretic!
\n2. The article by Ted Olsen on p. 20 noting how frequently Conservative Christians conflate Christianity with American patriotism and\/or the Republican party. One commentator says Jim Wallis can\u2019t call himself an Evangelical because he\u2019s a \u201cleft- leaning socialist\u201d who made a speech on the Democrats\u2019 weekly radio address!
\n3. The editorial on pp. 22-23 describing the latest from Dobson & company, attacking a member of the NAE for daring to suggest that global warming might actually be a problem. I guess if you\u2019re not making an anti-abortion or anti-gay marriage statement, or if you seem at odds with the Bush administration, you don\u2019t have a right to speak out as a self-identified Evangelical.
\nI find myself constantly making caveats when I call myself an Evangelical to separate myself from a whole segment of the religious right. I might be an Evangelical in the tradition of John Stott or Mark Noll, but increasingly I feel like they\u2019re in the minority. Maybe I should stop calling myself an Evangelical and just say that I generally have an Evangelical understanding of doctrine, but I don\u2019t subscribe to much of the baggage that comes with the label.
\nOk, this one is just a quirk, but it bothered me nonetheless: on the very first page of this CT issue there is an ad for a published edition of the 1599 Geneva Bible. I just got done reading a good, interesting book by Alister McGrath about the King James Bible in which he talks at length about its predecessors, including the Geneva Bible. I thought to myself: \u201cthat would be interesting to browse through, from a historical perspective\u2026\u201d
\nThen I read the quote from D. James Kennedy, a pastor and seminary leader in Florida: \u201cThe publication and promulgation of the 1599 Geneva Bible will help restore America\u2019s rich Christian heritage and reclaim the culture for Christ.\u201d What!? A 1599 Bible which, incidentally, comes with a middle-English glossary to help you understand what the heck they were saying, is the answer that will reclaim the culture for Christ??? The implications of that statement are just staggering. Apparently the NIV and The Message are on the wrong path in trying to translate the Bible into everyday language. We need to go back to a way of speaking that is over 400 years old so that we can give it to our youth and the un-churched among us. Then, they can read what the Puritans read and in no time our culture will be reclaimed for Christ. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
\nI\u2019m so sick of dealing with the mentality of conservative Christians\u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Here is a letter passed on to me; I\u2019ll respond next week.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":197,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1736],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2483","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emerging-movement"],"yoast_head":"\n