{"id":34184,"date":"2012-11-06T06:14:40","date_gmt":"2012-11-06T11:14:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/?p=34184"},"modified":"2012-11-06T08:43:27","modified_gmt":"2012-11-06T13:43:27","slug":"the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/","title":{"rendered":"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/40\/2012\/11\/Job-Walton.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-34224\" title=\"Job - Walton\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/40\/2012\/11\/Job-Walton.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"216\" height=\"326\"><\/a>The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a result I am going to move rather slowly, in two or three posts, through the prologue to think about some of these issues. The commentaries by John Walton (<em><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0310214424\/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0310214424&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=musionscieand-20\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Job (The NIV Application Commentary)<\/a><\/strong><\/em>) and Tremper Longman III (<em><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0801031079\/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0801031079&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=musionscieand-20\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Job (Baker Commentary on the Old Testament Wisdom and Psalms)<\/a><\/strong><\/em>), both their agreements and their differences, provide the basis for this discussion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There are three major points:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">First, Job is not on trial, God is on trial. Although the legal metaphor is not carried through consistently in the book, it appears most strongly in the prologue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">Second, the challenger or accuser is not Satan.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">Third, Job is innocent, and he proves faithful.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The book of Job is not about Job, it is a thought experiment that explores the way God works in the world and the appropriate human response to God.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><!--more--><em><strong>The prologue opens by introducing Job<\/strong><\/em> (I am going to quote from Longman\u2019s translation of Job as the NIV used by Walton is readily available to most readers).<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There was a man in the land of Uz whose name was Job, and that man was innocent and virtuous, fearing God and turning away from evil. (Job 1:1 Longman- p. 78)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As John Walton points out, everything about Job is ideal. He has the perfect number of cattle and the perfect number of children. Job is portrayed as \u201c<em>a person who is beyond reproach and who has achieved success by the highest standards.<\/em>\u201d (p. 58 \u2013 Walton)\u00a0 Job is also a righteous God-fearing man. Longman, with his emphasis on Job as wisdom literature notes that in this introduction Job is characterized as wise as described in the book of Proverbs. There is no criticism of Job in this preamble, not of his piety, righteousness, or conduct. Both Walton and Longman agree that anyone who finds fault with Job (likely to shore up some \u201corthodox\u201d Christian theology)\u00a0 has undercut the entire thrust of the book of Job.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/40\/2012\/11\/tablet-of-shamash-ds.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-34236\" title=\"tablet of shamash ds\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/40\/2012\/11\/tablet-of-shamash-ds.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"252\" height=\"187\"><\/a>YHWH and the accuser.<\/strong> <\/em>After introducing Job the story moves on to introduce YHWH.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">One day the sons of God came to stand before Yahweh, and the accuser was also in their midst. (Job 1:6 \u2013 Longman p. 81)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The setting is a divine assembly where God as the supreme king is consulting with his court. Heaven is described in analogy with an ancient Near Eastern royal court. Most English translations translate \u201cthe accuser\u201d as Satan, capitalized to indicate a proper name. The dramatized audio I listened to cast the voice as a stereotypical diabolical Satan. Both Walton and Longman point out that this is wrong. Walton prefers to use the term \u201cChallenger\u201d while Longman calls him the accuser. Not only is the accuser not Satan, but there is nothing particularly diabolical about the exchange. The accuser is not out to destroy mankind in general or Job in particular. Rather he is challenging the policy of reward and retribution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Walton summarizes his conclusions about the Challenger (p. 74 \u2013 Walton):<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">He is one of the \u201csons of God\u201d (a member of the divine council)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">He serves as a policy watchdog.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">He uses the ambiguity of Job\u2019s motives and concept of God to challenge God\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">He does not act independently.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">He is not inherently evil.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\">He cannot confidently be identified with Satan in the New Testament.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Longman doesn\u2019t discuss the accuser as extensively as Walton, but the conclusion is the same. Both find it highly unlikely that the accuser or challenger in Job can or should be identified with Satan.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>The challenge.<\/strong><\/em> During the exchange with the accuser God brings up his servant Job, restating the opening verse lest we have any doubt of Job\u2019s innocence.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">And Yahweh said to the accuser, \u201cHave you considered my servant Job? For there is no one like him on the earth, and innocent and virtuous man, fearing God and turning away from evil.\u201d (Job 1:8 \u2013 Longman p. 83)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The accuser is not impressed \u2013 after all Job has lived a life characterized by health, wealth, prosperity, and success. He is God-fearing, but is this not simply to protect his status? Job is virtuous and innocent for his own benefit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Longman, who also wrote the volume on <em><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/080102692X\/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=080102692X&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=musionscieand-20\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Proverbs<\/a><\/strong><\/em> in the Baker Commentary on the Old Testament Wisdom and Psalms, sees echoes of Proverbs in the way the challenge is framed. As an example:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Honor the Lord with your wealth,<br>\nwith the firstfruits of all your crops;<br>\nthen your barns will be filled to overflowing,<br>\nand your vats will brim over with new wine. (Prov. 3:9-10 NIV)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Proverbs often explicitly appeals to reward to motivate right action. Why then should God care if Job\u2019s motivation is shaped by his material prosperity? Longman points out that godly behavior is expected no matter what \u2013 a theme that continues throughout scripture. Walton sees the challenge of this idea of reward for behavior as central to the story of Job. The \u201cwager\u201d that comes from the exchange between God and the accuser is not a challenge to Job <em>per se<\/em>, but a challenge of the wisdom of God\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>And now we wring our hands.<\/strong><\/em> In the next passage Job\u2019s wealth, servants, and children are wiped out as a test of his motivation for fear of God. Lest this worry us, we should remember that the book of Job is a thought experiment. Walton, doubtless from the experience of unnumbered students viewing the calamity from the point of view of the children, notes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is pointless to wring our hands over the sad fate of Job\u2019s innocent family, for the challenge does not focus on his family and their innocence, but on God\u2019s work in the world. The children simply represent the blessing of God, like Job\u2019s cattle. \u2026 Their fate is part of the challenge to God\u2019s policies, but not its focus. (p. 69 \u2013 Walton)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I also wring my hands over the poor servants \u2013 wiped out by Sabeans, Chaldeans, and the Fire of God \u2013 all to answer the accuser\u2019s challenge. (It is not just the children who die.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The book of Job is a thought experiment \u2013 a parable of sorts designed to make a point, not a historical account of a wager between God and Satan. It is pointless to plead the case of either the children or the servants; to do so, or to insist on the historicity of Job, or for that matter, the literal reality of the divine council, only misses the point.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>What features of the prologue to Job do you find the most challenging?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Where does the standard evangelical understanding of the prologue (if there is such a thing) go wrong?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>If you would like to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail[at]att.net.<\/p>\n<p>If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at <em><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/musingsonscience.wordpress.com\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Musings on Science and Theology<\/a><\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a result I am going to move rather slowly, in two or three posts, through the prologue to think about some of these issues. The commentaries by John Walton (Job [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":198,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17032],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-job"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The accuser is not Satan (RJS)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jesus Creed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-11-06T11:14:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-11-06T13:43:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/files\/2012\/11\/Job-Walton.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"RJS\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"RJS\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/\",\"name\":\"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-11-06T11:14:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-11-06T13:43:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/716551d3a3f8c156aabfd47c0bce89a0\"},\"description\":\"The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/\",\"name\":\"Jesus Creed\",\"description\":\"Scot McKnight on Jesus and orthodox faith in the 21st century\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/716551d3a3f8c156aabfd47c0bce89a0\",\"name\":\"RJS\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/author\/rjs1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)","description":"The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)","og_description":"The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/","og_site_name":"Jesus Creed","article_published_time":"2012-11-06T11:14:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-11-06T13:43:27+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/files\/2012\/11\/Job-Walton.jpg"}],"author":"RJS","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"RJS","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/","name":"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-11-06T11:14:40+00:00","dateModified":"2012-11-06T13:43:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/716551d3a3f8c156aabfd47c0bce89a0"},"description":"The prose prologue to the book of Job, found in chapters 1 and 2, introduces a number of issues that challenge standard Christian presuppositions. As a","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/2012\/11\/06\/the-accuser-is-not-satan-rjs\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The accuser is not Satan (RJS)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/","name":"Jesus Creed","description":"Scot McKnight on Jesus and orthodox faith in the 21st century","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/716551d3a3f8c156aabfd47c0bce89a0","name":"RJS","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/author\/rjs1\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/198"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34184"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34184\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}