here<\/a>.<\/p>\nThere are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum renders this erotic view fallacious, if not absurd!<\/p>\n
First, Gen 6.2 says \u201cthe sons of God\u201d took women \u201cas their wives.\u201d Wives necessarily presupposes a domestic life together. Yet advocates of the fallen angels interpretation ignore this concept by only positing angels having sexual intercourse with women.<\/p>\n
Second, this fallen angels interpretation is a male chauvinistic view of angels. How so? It presumes that all angels have male sexual organs that produce (physical?) sperm compatible with human procreation. Yet the Bible never says this. Moreover, the Bible repeatedly identifies \u201cangels\u201d as \u201cspirits,\u201d sometimes interchanging these two terms. And the Bible never says angels procreate their own species.<\/p>\n
Third, while the Bible often describes angels appearing visibly to humans as men, such texts likely only mean that angels appear human generically, not that they are human.<\/p>\n
Fourth, the Bible\u2019s first creation account\u2014in which God tells a select group of angels he will make human beings in \u201cour\u201d image\u2014adds that he will make them \u201cmale and female\u201d (Gen 1.26-27; 5.1-2). This suggests a contrast in which God and angels are sexless. The primary divine purpose for making humans male and female, not to mention animals, was for them to copulate and thereby reproduce their own species to populate the earth (Gen 1.27-28). Trinitarians interpreting \u201cus\u201d in these texts as support of their doctrine is eisegesis rather than exegesis.<\/p>\n
Fifth, Jesus indicated that angels are sexless when he said of God\u2019s people, \u201cin the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven\u201d (Mt 22.30; cf. Mk 12.25; Lk 20.35-36; cf. Gal 3.28). Jesus clearly meant angels cannot propagate. Many NT scholars rightly claim that this saying of Jesus is the foremost biblical text that dispels the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4<\/em>.<\/p>\nSixth, Gen 6.1-7 blames only humans, thus not angels, for this wickedness. For we read, \u201cthe wickedness of humankind was great in the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of their hearts was only evil continually\u201d (Gen 6.5). And twice the text says all flesh was \u201ccorrupt,\u201d and \u201cthe earth was filled with violence\u201d (vv. 11-13). Thus, God was going to destroy both men and women with the flood since both had sinned. This exclusive blame of humans may be the second strongest counter to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4<\/em>.<\/p>\nSeventh, it is unjust for men to suffer the judgment of the flood if they were not involved in the transgression committed, in which only women copulated with angels.<\/p>\n
Eighth, this fallen angels interpretation is presented as though the women could not resist the angels impregnating them, which makes the women blameless as well.<\/p>\n
Now, the New Testament has three mysterious texts that have rightly been connected to Gen 6.1-13. First, the Apostle Peter says in his first epistle that Jesus \u201cwas put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit, in which also he went and made a proclamation to the spirits in prison, who in former times did not obey, when God waited patiently in the days of Noah\u201d (1 Pt 3.18-20). Second, Peter similarly writes in his second epistle, \u201cGod did not spare the angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of deepest darkness to be kept until the judgment\u201d (2 Pt 2.4). (The word \u201chell,\u201d here, translates tartarosas<\/em> in the Greek text. It is a place in the underworld that Greeks called Tartarus.) Peter then connects this with Noah\u2019s Flood and mentions God\u2019s destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (vv. 5-8). Third, Jude writes of \u201cthe angels who did not keep their own position, but left their proper dwelling, he [God] has kept in eternal chains in deepest darkness for the judgment of the great day\u201d (Jude 6). Jude next mentions Sodom and Gomorrah as other examples of God\u2019s judgment against immorality (v. 7).<\/p>\nAlthough Genesis 6 only blames humans for the wickedness that caused God to destroy the earth by a flood, 1 Pt 3.18-20, 2 Pt 2.4, and Jude 6 fix the underlying cause of it on the influence of angels. It resulted in God casting them into the underworld\u2019s Tartarus to await their final judgment. These verses are obscure to us moderns since their authors treat a matter unknown to us that raises questions. This suggests that these matters were known to most first century Jews or else these authors likely would have said more about it. If so, they may have used common oral, if not written, tradition that afterwards became non-extant. This is supported by (1) the last two passages fitting the same order of the destruction of the earth with a flood and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, (2) angels deemed partly to blame for the evil, and (3) similar language or concepts are used. These texts help interpret each other, such as the spirits in prison being angels cast into hell, and these angels disobeying God since they \u201cdid not keep their own position, but left their proper dwelling.\u201d<\/p>\n
To sum, although \u201cthe sons of God\u201d in Gen 6.1-4 were men, thus not angels, who took women as wives and procreated with them to produce Nephilim, three NT texts seem to blame some angels for influencing these antediluvian humans in committing this wickedness which caused God to judge the entire world by sending a great flood that destroyed them all except for righteous Noah and his family.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum renders this erotic view fallacious, if not absurd! First, Gen 6.2 says \u201cthe sons of God\u201d took women \u201cas their wives.\u201d Wives necessarily presupposes a domestic life together. Yet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1477,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[602],"tags":[541,2612,628],"class_list":["post-2239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-old-testament","tag-fallen-angels","tag-nephilim","tag-the-sons-of-god"],"yoast_head":"\n
"The Sons of God" in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""The Sons of God" in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Kermit Zarley Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/kermit.zarley\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T07:01:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-04T00:20:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kermit Zarley\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kermit Zarley\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/\",\"name\":\"\\\"The Sons of God\\\" in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-11T07:01:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-04T00:20:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8393f2e63455a2915f7ca277bf5a5d02\"},\"description\":\"To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"“The Sons of God” in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/\",\"name\":\"Kermit Zarley Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8393f2e63455a2915f7ca277bf5a5d02\",\"name\":\"Kermit Zarley\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf8e1a5dcb179e76f0c39d3d75e849bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf8e1a5dcb179e76f0c39d3d75e849bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kermit Zarley\"},\"description\":\"Born & reared in Seattle, WA., Kermit lived 38 years in metro Houston, now in Scottsdale, AZ. He graduated from University of Houston w\/ BBA in 1963 and played on the PGA Tour full time from 1964-1982 and Senior\/Champions Tour in 1991-2001. Kermit co-founded the PGA Tour Bible Study in 1965 and was senior leader most of next 17 years. Kermit has three adult children and six grandchildren.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/kermitzarley.com\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/kermit.zarley\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/author\/kermitzarleyblog\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"The Sons of God\" in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2","description":"To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"The Sons of God\" in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2","og_description":"To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/","og_site_name":"Kermit Zarley Blog","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/kermit.zarley","article_published_time":"2016-05-11T07:01:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-04T00:20:27+00:00","author":"Kermit Zarley","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kermit Zarley","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/","name":"\"The Sons of God\" in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-05-11T07:01:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-04T00:20:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8393f2e63455a2915f7ca277bf5a5d02"},"description":"To see Part 1, click here. There are so many compelling objections to the fallen angels interpretation of Gen 6.1-4 that I think their overwhelming sum","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/2016\/05\/the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6-were-men-not-angels-part-2-of-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"“The Sons of God” in Genesis 6 Were Men, Not Angels: Part 2 of 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/","name":"Kermit Zarley Blog","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8393f2e63455a2915f7ca277bf5a5d02","name":"Kermit Zarley","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf8e1a5dcb179e76f0c39d3d75e849bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf8e1a5dcb179e76f0c39d3d75e849bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kermit Zarley"},"description":"Born & reared in Seattle, WA., Kermit lived 38 years in metro Houston, now in Scottsdale, AZ. He graduated from University of Houston w\/ BBA in 1963 and played on the PGA Tour full time from 1964-1982 and Senior\/Champions Tour in 1991-2001. Kermit co-founded the PGA Tour Bible Study in 1965 and was senior leader most of next 17 years. Kermit has three adult children and six grandchildren.","sameAs":["http:\/\/kermitzarley.com","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/kermit.zarley"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/author\/kermitzarleyblog\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1477"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/kermitzarleyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}