<\/p>
Babel has become a key image for postmodern Western thought. A number of years ago, Princeton\u2019s Jeffrey Stout wrote Ethics After Babel <\/i> , reacting to the Babelic move of some moral philosophers (such as MacIntyre and Hauerwas), who pointed to the difficulties of translation and even conversation across the boundaries of moral traditions. Stanley Fish does not, to my recollection, use the image of Babel, but he describes a similar tribalization of moral and political discourse in The Trouble With Principle <\/i> . Derrida\u2019s project turns largely on a Babelic theme ?Ethe question of whether there is an Ur-voice or Ur-Logos behind the multiple symbolic logoi of human discourse. Derrida\u2019s project might be characterized as the argument that Babel is of the essence of language. <\/p>\n
All of which suggests this account of postmodernism: It is a recognition of Babel without a belief in Pentecost. <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Babel has become a key image for postmodern Western thought. A number of years ago, Princeton\u2019s Jeffrey Stout wrote Ethics After Babel , reacting to the Babelic move of some moral philosophers (such as MacIntyre and Hauerwas), who pointed to the difficulties of translation and even conversation across the boundaries of moral traditions. Stanley Fish […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy"],"yoast_head":"\n