{"id":1696,"date":"2005-12-23T17:30:03","date_gmt":"2005-12-23T17:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/leithart.level2d.com\/?p=1696"},"modified":"2017-09-06T22:53:11","modified_gmt":"2017-09-06T16:53:11","slug":"derrida-and-metaphor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/","title":{"rendered":"Derrida and metaphor"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n<\/head>

<\/p>

In his essay, \u201cWhite Mythology,\u201d Derrida <\/a> \"\" offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: \u201cThis is the difference between animals and man: according to Aristotle both can emit indivisible sounds, but only man can make of them a letter . . . Aristotle does not analyze this difference; he interprets it by teleological retrospection. No internal characteristic distinguishes the atom of animal sound and the letter. Thus, it is only on the basis of the signifying phonic composition, on the basis of meaning and reference, that the human voice should be distinguished from the call of an animal. Meaning and reference: that is, the possibility of signifying by means of a noun. What is proper to nouns is to signify something, an independent being identical to itself, conceived as such. It is at this point that the theory of the name, such as it is implied by the concept of metaphor, is articulated with ontology. Aside from the classical and dogmatically affirmed limit between the animal without logos and man as zoon logon ekhon, what appears here is a certain systematic indissociability of the value of metaphor and the metaphysical chain holding together the values of discourse, voice, noun, signification, meaning, imitative representation, resemblance; or, in order to reduce what these translations import or deport, the values of logos, phone semantike, semainein, onoma, mimesis, homoiosis . . . . <\/p>\n


\u201cMimesis is never without the theoretical perception of resemblance or similarity, that is, of that which will always be posited as the condition for metaphor. Homoiosis is not only constitutive of the value of truth (aletheia) which governs the entire chain; it is that without which the metaphorical operation is impossible: \u2018To produce a good metaphor is to see a likeness\u2019. The condition for metaphor (for good and true metaphor) is the condition for truth.\u201d <\/p>\n

Christopher Norris <\/a> \"\" comments that, although this is not a straightforward affirmation of Aristotle\u2019s position, it is \u201cequally unjustified \u2013 here as elsewhere in Derrida\u2019s work \u2013 to suppose that a deconstructive reading is a priori committed to the disarticulation of all truth-claims and the undoing of any theory (such as Aristotle\u2019s) predicated on values of truth, reason, logical form, conceptual adequacy, empirical warrant, and so forth.\u201d <\/p>\n

To read Derrida in this fashion, Norris argues, ignores the purpose of the essay, which involves a \u201ccritical questioning of such values in a manner that itself maintains the highest standards of analytical consistency and rigour while not taking anything for granted in the way that those standards have hitherto or traditionally been applied. In other words deconstruction carries on the critique of established (commonsense, naturalised, or consensus-based) modes of perception or conceptualization which has characterized philosophy in the tradition from Aristotle to Descartes, Kant, and Husserl. No doubt it does so through a method of analysis \u2013 the rhetorical close-reading of various cardinal texts in that tradition \u2013 which departs very markedly from other, more conventional ideas of what constitutes a proper philosophical critique. No doubt it raises issues \u2013 about truth, representation, the extent to which metaphors can be \u2018adequately\u2019 conceptualized or intuitions brought under \u2018adequate\u2019 concepts \u2013 that have provoked consternation (or outright dismissal) among many philosophers. Yet the above passage should at least give pause to anyone who is tempted to regard \u2018White Mythology\u2019 as a mere exercise in \u2018textualist\u2019 mystification or an argument devoted to such simplified (pseudo-deconstructive) slogans as that \u2018all concepts are metaphors,\u2019 \u2018reality just a fictive or rhetorical construct,\u2019 or \u2018truth just a product of the will-to-power vested in figural language.\u2019\u201d <\/p>\n

Further, \u201cDerrida is not for one moment suggesting that just because Aristotle has recourse to metaphor \u2013 or to metaphor-related notions like resemblance, mimesis, the \u2018perception of similarity\u2019, etc. \u2013 at crucial points in his argument, therefore his entire ontology and epistemology (along with his logic, metaphysics, and conception of enquiry in the natural or physical sciences) comes down to nothing more than a series of figural tropes and substitutions, indifferent with regard to their truth-content or capacity for conceptual elucidation and critique. Nor is he committed to the absurd view that truth and reality just are what we make of them according to this or that favoured rhetoric, language-game, discourse, vocabulary, or whatever.\u201d <\/p>\n

Derrida does challenge the way metaphor has been viewed in philosophy: \u201cmetaphor . . . is determined by philosophy as a provisional loss of meaning, an economy of the proper without irreparable damage, a certainly inevitable detour, but also a history with its sights set on, and within the horizon of, the circular reappropriation of literal, proper meaning.\u201d And he highlights the paradox that philosophy depends on the very metaphorical modes of language that it subordinates: \u201cthe philosophical evaluation of metaphor has always been ambiguous: metaphor is dangerous and foreign as concerns intuition (vision or contact), concept (the grasping or proper presence of the signified), and consciousness (proximity or self-presence); but it is in complicity with what it endangers, is necessary to it in the extent to which the de-tour is a re-turn guided by the function of resemblance (mimesis or homoiosis), under the law of the same.\u201d <\/p>\n

But if this is taken to imply a \u201cmetaphorization\u201d of philosophy, Norris argues, \u201cthere could then be no accounting for that other (often strongly counter-intuitive) process of conceptual \u2018rectification\u2019 that enables scientific metaphors, models, and analogies to bring about genuine advances in our knowledge of physical objects, processes, and events.\u201d <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In his essay, \u201cWhite Mythology,\u201d Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: \u201cThis is the difference between animals and man: according to Aristotle both can emit indivisible sounds, but only man can make of them a letter . . . Aristotle does not analyze this difference; he interprets it by teleological retrospection. No internal characteristic […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy"],"yoast_head":"\nDerrida and metaphor<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In his essay, “White Mythology,” Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: “This is the difference between animals and man:\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Derrida and metaphor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In his essay, “White Mythology,” Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: “This is the difference between animals and man:\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Leithart\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-12-23T17:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-06T16:53:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=leithartcom-20&l=ur2&o=1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PLeithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/\",\"name\":\"Derrida and metaphor\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-12-23T17:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-06T16:53:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\"},\"description\":\"In his essay, “White Mythology,” Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: “This is the difference between animals and man:\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Derrida and metaphor\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\",\"name\":\"Leithart\",\"description\":\"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\",\"name\":\"Peter Leithart\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Peter Leithart\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Derrida and metaphor","description":"In his essay, “White Mythology,” Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: “This is the difference between animals and man:","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Derrida and metaphor","og_description":"In his essay, “White Mythology,” Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: “This is the difference between animals and man:","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/","og_site_name":"Leithart","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","article_published_time":"2005-12-23T17:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-06T16:53:11+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=leithartcom-20&l=ur2&o=1"}],"author":"Peter Leithart","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PLeithart","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Leithart","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/","name":"Derrida and metaphor","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-12-23T17:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-06T16:53:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d"},"description":"In his essay, “White Mythology,” Derrida offers this critical discussion of Aristotle: “This is the difference between animals and man:","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2005\/12\/derrida-and-metaphor\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Derrida and metaphor"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/","name":"Leithart","description":"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d","name":"Peter Leithart","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Peter Leithart"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3021"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}