Archives of European Sociology<\/em>. Recognizing that Weber\u2019s theory of secularization \u201chas greatly influenced later social theorists in their accounts of secularisation, rationalisation, and modernisation,\u201d he wanted to set Weber\u2019s theory \u201cwithin its liberal Protestant heritage.\u201d This is partly a matter of showing that Weber depended on German Protestant biblical and theological scholarship, building, for example, on Wellhausen in his account of ancient Israel and by Rudolf Sohm on early Christian eschatology. But Carroll\u2019s point is more fundamental: He argues that the framework of Weber\u2019s theory of secularization depends on liberal Protestant assumptions. Liberal Protestantism delimits \u201cthe sociological possibilities to one particular Protestant vision of modernity.\u201d Other critics have noted the theological sources of sociology. Carroll is more specific, arguing for the \u201cconfessional\u201d sources of secularization theory.<\/p>\nIn Weber\u2019s view, the \u201cdisenchantment of the world (Entzauberung der Welt<\/em>) is the gradual elimination of magic from the world. This process, which begins in ancient Judaism Protestantism of rational action. Here Weber makes little distinction between ancient Egyptian, Babylonian, and modern Catholic \u2018magical practices\u2019 as all are considered to be enchanted forms of action.\u201d This de-mythologization of the world produces a particular understanding of human action: \u201cThis anti-sacramental understanding of existence, typical of nineteenth century liberal Protestantism, represents a secularised theory of action.\u201d Worldly action is rationalized, working in terms of cause-and-effect; religious action is set aside as irrational, the \u201cother\u201d to \u201cthe purpose rationality of the world.\u201d As it becomes irrational, religion likewise becomes private, leaving the field of public action and life to \u201cimpersonal rules\u201d of rational calculation. <\/p>\nBut this entire set-up, Carroll argues, depends on the exclusion of \u201csacramental action as a rational possibility.\u201d And this in turn depends on a liberal Protestant framework. Excluding sacramental action \u201cis a reasonable hermeneutic emerging out of the liberal Protestant framework from which Weber drew his theological sources and results in him being unable to thematise the possibility of a Catholic theory of rational sacramental action.\u201d Human action loses its soteriological significance: Sacramental action is detached from salvation because God is thought to act directly on each human soul, and the purpose of virtue is separated from salvation because works have no place in the Protestant conception of Christian faith. Thus Weber sees the emergence of \u201can exclusively secular theory of action,\u201d but he sees this only because he has assumed liberal Protestant notions. <\/p>\n
Action and contemplation are Mary and Martha, each having its own distinct end: Action aims at this-worldly ethics, contemplation at union with God. Weber assumes a framework of ora aut labora<\/em>, thus excluding the possibility of ora in labora<\/em>, the Counter-Reformation paradigm especially developed by Ignatius and the Jesuit order. The only sociologically significant life is the active Protestant life, and so modernity gets framed in Protestant terms. In fact, it is narrower than that: Weber doesn\u2019t even leave room for a Lutheran origin of modernity. The Calvinist understanding of action becomes the one sociologically important stream of Western Christianity, the maker of the modern world.<\/p>\nCarroll mounts a powerful argument that dovetails nicely with Milbank\u2019s argument about the liberal Protestant metanarrative as a key framework for sociology. Yet there are confusions and missteps in Carroll\u2019s piece. It\u2019s not clear how his description of Weber\u2019s take on Calvinism (God becomes the Deus absconditus<\/em>, beyond our knowledge, and thereby freeing human action) fits with the cultural Protestantism that Weber drew from. For Barth, it was precisely the elimination of the gap between history and revelation, between God and human achievement, that constituted the great heresy of liberalism. <\/p>\nFurther, Carroll\u2019s summaries of Protestantism are distorted. He explains that sola gratia<\/em> means that \u201csalvation only comes through the free action of God, grace, and cannot be mediated to the individual by the Church. God deals directly with each person and is not bound by the need for His grace to be mediated through the institution of the church.\u201d This would be news indeed to Luther and Calvin and to many of their followers. And Carroll is not describing Weber\u2019s own liberal Protestant biases here, but \u201cthe foundational principles of Protestantism.\u201d Weber (or Carroll or both) is wrong to claim that good works are eliminated from Protestantism, and that Protestantism has no resources to develop an ora in labora<\/em> model of \u201ccontemplative action.\u201d To say, as Carroll does, that this is a Catholic model that opens the possibility of a distinctively Catholic modernity is to indulge a variation of the Weberian duality that Carroll\u2019s article intends to expose.<\/p>\n(Carroll, \u201cThe Importance of Protestantism in Max Weber\u2019s Theory of Secularisation,\u201d Archives of European Sociology<\/em> 50:5 [2009] 61\u201395.)<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber\u2019s theory of secularization \u201chas greatly influenced later social theorists in their accounts of secularisation, rationalisation, and modernisation,\u201d he wanted to set Weber\u2019s theory \u201cwithin its liberal Protestant heritage.\u201d This is partly a matter of showing that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1556,1300,127],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-max-weber","category-secularization","category-sociology"],"yoast_head":"\n
Weber's Liberal Protestantism<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber's theory of\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Weber's Liberal Protestantism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber's theory of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Leithart\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-27T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PLeithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/\",\"name\":\"Weber's Liberal Protestantism\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-27T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-27T00:00:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\"},\"description\":\"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber's theory of\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Weber’s Liberal Protestantism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\",\"name\":\"Leithart\",\"description\":\"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\",\"name\":\"Peter Leithart\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Peter Leithart\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Weber's Liberal Protestantism","description":"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber's theory of","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Weber's Liberal Protestantism","og_description":"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber's theory of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/","og_site_name":"Leithart","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-27T00:00:00+00:00","author":"Peter Leithart","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PLeithart","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Leithart","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/","name":"Weber's Liberal Protestantism","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-04-27T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-27T00:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d"},"description":"Anthony Carroll summarizes his Protestant Modernity in a 2009 article in the Archives of European Sociology. Recognizing that Weber's theory of","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/04\/webers-liberal-protestantism-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Weber’s Liberal Protestantism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/","name":"Leithart","description":"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d","name":"Peter Leithart","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Peter Leithart"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3021"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}