{"id":18348,"date":"2016-09-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-09-06T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/leithart.level2d.com\/?p=109"},"modified":"2016-09-06T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2016-09-06T00:00:00","slug":"past-for-futures-sake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/","title":{"rendered":"Past for Future\u2019s Sake"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>In an extended review of my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Delivered-Elements-World-Atonement-Justification\/dp\/0830851267\/?tag=firstthings20-20\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Delivered from the Elements of the World<\/a>, Brad Littlejohn <a href=\"https:\/\/bradlittlejohn.com\/2016\/07\/18\/on-theological-novelty-and-atonement-theory-delivered-from-the-elements-review-pt-ii\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">argues<\/a> that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so it seems to Brad, \u201cnewness is prized above all.\u201d I am a Protestant primitivist yet at the same time a Protestant futurist, \u201csomehow simultaneously putting us back in touch the original primitive Christianity even while rocketing us into the Christian future.\u201d If I\u2019m not actually guilty of these charges, Brad worries that I haven\u2019t done enough to protect myself against them.<\/p>\n<p>I say it with all affection (Brad is a friend and former student): Brad is one to talk. During his time at New St Andrews College, he started new clubs and organizations left and right, and wrote a book-length study of Romans 13 on the side. During his PhD studies on Hooker at Edinburgh he found time to be serve as founding editor of a new collection of volumes on the Mercersburg theology and, more recently, he has become one of the principals at the freshly formed Davenant Trust. He wears me out.<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\">We respond though we shall be changed, Rosenstock-Huessy had it, and every day brings something new to respond do. We might try to arrest time, but we\u2019re kicking against the way the world is. We become new because we are alive. Even in death we begin the change of decomposition.<\/span> We\u2019re rocketing into the past whether we like it or not. If Brad has forgotten that, he need only take a close look in the mirror.<\/p>\n<p>Brad\u2019s complaint is a methodological one, having to do with the relation of past and future in theological work. What role does theological work of the past play in theological work of the present? To what extent should theologians aim at novelty?<\/p>\n<p>What follows isn\u2019t the kind of treatise on old and new that answers those questions once and for all, as if such a thing were possible. Rather, I offer a few quick strokes to trace the opening of a path.<\/p>\n<p>First, theologians <em>do<\/em> sometimes discover new things. In a recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Song-Songs-Eros-God-Intertextuality\/dp\/0199577242\/?tag=firstthings20-20\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">book on the Song of Songs<\/a>, Edmee Kingsmill said she had discovered a hidden gematria in the text. \u201cDodi\u2014\u201cmy beloved,\u201d the bride\u2019s pet name for the bridegroom\u2014is used twenty-six times in the poem, which is the gematria of \u201cYahweh.\u201d Kingsmill thus provided some astonishing support for allegorical interpretations of the Song. She claims she\u2019s the first ever to see it. Maybe she\u2019s wrong. Perhaps she missed some obscure rabbi who made precisely this observation. But having noticed this, what\u2019s Kingsmill to do? She did what every theologian would do: She published her findings to the world. <\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\">Second, Kingsmill\u2019s example highlights the dynamic of past and future that characterizes good theology. <\/span>Her observation (so far as she or I know) is novel, but it\u2019s novelty arising from the study of very old texts. Some theologians try to stay trendy, attentive to nothing but the latest of the latest. Novelty for its own sake is, of course, foolish, not least because novelty doesn\u2019t stand still: What seems cutting edge today is on the cutting-room floor tomorrow. My \u201caddiction\u201d to the future inoculates me from the comic belief that the future is a predictable extrapolation of the present. <\/p>\n<p>Finally, and this is the big point: Theology reaches back into the past not to repristinate it but to find resources to edify the church of the present, which is, even while you\u2019re reading this, rapidly becoming the church of the future. When we\u2019re doing our jobs, theologians necessarily straddle old and new. We might reach back to Hooker or the Reformers or the scholastics, or further back to Paul, or even further to Genesis and Leviticus, but always for the sake of meeting the challenges of the moment and the perceived challenges beyond the horizon.<\/p>\n<p>Brad mocks it, but reform movements in the church have always attempted to reach back and rocket forward at the same time. Whether reformers clearly recognize it or not, that\u2019s the dynamic of reform. That\u2019s what the <em>nouvelle theologie<\/em> did. It\u2019s what the Reformers did, when they talked about the \u201csounder\u201d scholastics and proposed the earlier medieval and apostolic church as models for their own churches. They may have <em>thought<\/em> they were simply restoring the past; what they <em>did<\/em> was draw on the past to remake the church for the future.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a biblical pattern: David takes a role as a quasi-priestly king, an innovation with regard to the Mosaic order but one that takes its cues from a Melchizedekan priestly order older than Moses (Psalm 110). Paul\u2019s critique of Torah\/<em>nomos<\/em> often appeals beyond Torah to Yahweh\u2019s promise to Abraham, and Hebrews\u2019s warnings about returning to Judaism are framed in terms of the pre-temple order of the tabernacle.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s what (I assume) Brad and his friends at the Davenant Trust want to do: Bring old books back into currency to edify Christians of this and later generations.<\/p>\n<p>Back of this is my conviction that Christianity is an eschatological faith. Time in Christian faith is not the persistence of the origin (which is always a supplemented origin in any case) but about the faithfulness of God, a faithfulness that will finally be demonstrated by the entire fulfillment of His promises at the end of all things. Christianity isn\u2019t unique in having ancient origins or in having a present corporate presence. Islam and Judaism have all that. Christianity is unique because the Spirit of the age to come inhabits the church and believers, coming from the Risen Jesus to begin conforming us, even now, to what we shall be.<\/p>\n<p>We are always hurtling into an uncharted future, but there are times when the darkness in the tunnel ahead becomes palpable. I believe we live in such a time. What used to be dependable (e.g., bride <em>and<\/em> groom at a wedding) is no longer so. If I\u2019m right, then a church that adopts a steady-as-she-goes attitude won\u2019t be able to minister effectively in the world that is taking form around us. So we reach back, taking the risk of being mistaken for primitivists, so that we can serve our Lord in a future that, dark as it is to us, is all light to Him.<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\"><\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so it seems to Brad, \u201cnewness is prized above all.\u201d I am a Protestant primitivist yet at the same time a Protestant futurist, \u201csomehow simultaneously putting us back in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1661,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-innovation","category-theology"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Past for Future\u2019s Sake<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Past for Future\u2019s Sake\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Leithart\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-09-06T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PLeithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/\",\"name\":\"Past for Future\u2019s Sake\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-06T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-06T00:00:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\"},\"description\":\"In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Past for Future\u2019s Sake\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\",\"name\":\"Leithart\",\"description\":\"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\",\"name\":\"Peter Leithart\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Peter Leithart\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Past for Future\u2019s Sake","description":"In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Past for Future\u2019s Sake","og_description":"In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/","og_site_name":"Leithart","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","article_published_time":"2016-09-06T00:00:00+00:00","author":"Peter Leithart","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PLeithart","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Leithart","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/","name":"Past for Future\u2019s Sake","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-09-06T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-06T00:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d"},"description":"In an extended review of my Delivered from the Elements of the World, Brad Littlejohn argues that I\u2019m addicted to novelty. I write theology in which, so","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2016\/09\/past-for-futures-sake\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Past for Future\u2019s Sake"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/","name":"Leithart","description":"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d","name":"Peter Leithart","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Peter Leithart"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3021"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18348\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}