<\/p>
Stephen McKnight points out in his recent The Religious Foundations of Francis Bacon\u2019s Thought <\/em> (University of Missouri, 2006) that Bacon dismissed classical Greek thought in favor of a knowledge both more ancient and more recent: \u201cBacon introduces another memorable image when he likens classical philosophy to an adolescent boy: both are sterile and incapable of producing or generating. This is, of course, an inversion of the Renaissance reverence for the classical age as a period of maturity and excellence, which must be recovered and emulated if humanity is to advance. Bacon, by contrast, portrays the classical period as humanity\u2019s childhood and disparages his contemporaries, who hold such a vaulted opinion of the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. According to Bacon, the wisdom \u2018which we have derived principally from the Greeks is but like the boyhood of knowledge, and has the characteristic property of boys: it can talk, but it cannot generate.\u2019\u201d <\/p>\n Bacon proposed to move beyond classical thought and into generative maturity by drawing on resources more ancient than Plato and Aristotle. <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Stephen McKnight points out in his recent The Religious Foundations of Francis Bacon\u2019s Thought (University of Missouri, 2006) that Bacon dismissed classical Greek thought in favor of a knowledge both more ancient and more recent: \u201cBacon introduces another memorable image when he likens classical philosophy to an adolescent boy: both are sterile and incapable of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-classics"],"yoast_head":"\n