<\/p>
Chesterton admits that Dickens\u2019s characters neither affect nor are affected by time or circumstances. This is, he says, because Dickens was constructing myths rather than novels: \u201cDickens was a mythologist rather than a novelist; he was the last of the mythologists, and perhaps the greatest. He did not always manage to make his characters men, but he always managed to make them gods. They are creatures like Punch or Father Christmas. They live statically, in a perpetual summer of being themselves. It was not the aim of Dickens to show the effect of time and circumstance upon a character; it was not even his aim to show the effect of a character on time and circumstance . . . . It was his aim to show character hung in a kind of happy void, in a world apart from time \u2013 yes, and essentially apart from circumstance.\u201d <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Chesterton admits that Dickens\u2019s characters neither affect nor are affected by time or circumstances. This is, he says, because Dickens was constructing myths rather than novels: \u201cDickens was a mythologist rather than a novelist; he was the last of the mythologists, and perhaps the greatest. He did not always manage to make his characters men, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-literature"],"yoast_head":"\n