<\/p>
In his 1987 book on Thomas\u2019s ecclesiology, George Sabra argues that Thomas does not teach that the church is a continuing incarnation. He definitely rejects any notion that the church is deified. If the notion of \u201ccontinuing incarnation\u201d simply means that the church continues the work of the incarnation, it comes closer to Thomas. But even here, Sabra says, Thomas is too conscious of the once-for-all character of Jesus\u2019 work to use language of continuation or prolongation. Instead, he uses the language of \u201ccommunication\u201d: Christ communicates the effects of His work to the church, the Head infusing His own life into the body. <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In his 1987 book on Thomas\u2019s ecclesiology, George Sabra argues that Thomas does not teach that the church is a continuing incarnation. He definitely rejects any notion that the church is deified. If the notion of \u201ccontinuing incarnation\u201d simply means that the church continues the work of the incarnation, it comes closer to Thomas. But […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theology-ecclesiology"],"yoast_head":"\n