<\/p>
Keil and Delitzsch argue that the phrasing of Job 19:25-26 doesn\u2019t directly point to a hope for bodily resurrection. When his flesh is cut off (like a tree; the piel <\/em> of the same verb is in Isaiah 10:34), he will see God \u201cfrom ( min <\/em> ) his flesh.\u201d <\/p>\n But, as they also note, \u201cflesh\u201d carries with it connotations of weakness, frailty, mortality, and so Job\u2019s hope is perfectly consistent with the NT insistence that \u201cflesh and blood do not inherit the kingdom of God.\u201d Job wants to put off this skin and this flesh, but that doesn\u2019t mean he expects to put off body <\/em> . <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Keil and Delitzsch argue that the phrasing of Job 19:25-26 doesn\u2019t directly point to a hope for bodily resurrection. When his flesh is cut off (like a tree; the piel of the same verb is in Isaiah 10:34), he will see God \u201cfrom ( min ) his flesh.\u201d But, as they also note, \u201cflesh\u201d carries […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bible-ot-job"],"yoast_head":"\n