privatio <\/em> is deeply inadequate. <\/p>\n In response, Milbank relativizes totalitarianism by arguing that \u201cEuropean and American liberal democracy has also engendered a continuous horror almost as grave as the Holocaust, and a more troublingly sustainable mode of nihilism, appropriately disguised by an unparalleled reign of kitsch <\/em> . . . : this is the sequence of deliberate terror and extermination employed against civilian populations as a primary instrument of war and neo-colonial power from the Congo to teh Philippines through Hiroshima, Palestine, Kenya, Algeria and Vietnam to the Gulf War and Afghanistan.\u201d <\/p>\n What characterizes the evil of modern power is not totalitarianism as such, but \u201cthe emptiness of secular power as such,\u201d or \u201csecular immanence\u201d which cannot be anything but \u201ctotalizing and terroristic because it acknowledges no supra-human power beyond itself by which it might be measured and limited.\u201d Guided by no religious, social, or political telos <\/em> , except to protect the non-teleological pursuit of happiness, modern uses of power are, Milbank argues, inherently nihilistic. There is something \u201cunprecendently sinister\u201d about twentieth-century evil, but it is because it is immanent\/secular, and directionless because secular. <\/p>\n For \u201cprivation theory,\u201d Milbank explains, being is good and \u201csince all power in order to be effective manifests the actuality of being, all power, as power, is good.\u201d Evil, then, is not power as such, but rather \u201cweakness and impotence,\u201d a point he draws from Pseudo-Dionysius. He draws from this the conclusion that the will \u201cis only actual and effective when it wills the good.\u201d Evil cannot be willed as such; when someone chooses evil, it shows that his will is not in fact willing, not making a choice in freedom, but is captive to something prior to the will. Thus \u201cno one, as willing, wills anything but the good, and evil only affects the will to the extent that a deficient good is being willed.\u201d <\/p>\n
This is disturbing for proponents of radical evil, since it seems to exonerate the will. Besides, since privation theory also says that \u201cBeing in its pure self-origination is infinite, and if Being as such is good, then, also, the infinite as such is good, indefeasibly good, beyond the possibility of swerving.\u201d But this means that finite being is alone open to the possibility of evil, and that again seems to exonerate evil deeds by rooting them in the fact of finitude. Milbank admits that this appears to be what privation theory does, noting that Paul in Romans 7 \u201cappears entirely to exonerate the will\u201d by distinguishing between the good he desires and the evil he actually does. At least, it seems, the \u201cI\u201d remains perfectly innocent. (Milbank does not accept that inference, however, and suggests here and elsewhere that it rests on a prior Kantian notion of evil that locates evil in motivation and intention rather than in act.) <\/p>\n
Ultimately, it seems that God Himself is responsible for evil: \u201csince evil is rooted in finitude, and the finite is caused by the infinite, the infinite is the real ultimate source of lack, the ontological of the meontologicl.\u201d If the infinite is construed as imperonal, then there is, in privation theory, an ontological cause of evil. A theory that seemed to deprive evil of all ontological weight seems to end up ontologizing evil. <\/p>\n
Milbank\u2019s riposte is to note that radical evil also rests on an ontological scenario. \u201cGood\/evil\u201d is, for Kantian theory, \u201centirely prior to the distinction between infinite and finite,\u201d and this means that the \u201cinfinite can manifest the extreme of evil.\u201d This is a purely, and disturbingly, voluntarist theory. In Schelling, \u201cthe good will of God is the result of a radical decision within the dark indifferent ground of the infinite, and this alone ensures that God really <\/em> is good.\u201d <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light of the Holocaust and twentieth-century totalitarianism, they argue, the traditional Augustinian privatio is deeply inadequate. In response, Milbank relativizes totalitarianism by arguing that \u201cEuropean and American liberal democracy has also engendered a continuous horror […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theology"],"yoast_head":"\n
Privatio and Radical Evil<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Privatio and Radical Evil\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Leithart\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-22T14:44:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-06T18:03:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=leithartcom-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0415305241\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PLeithart\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Leithart\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/\",\"name\":\"Privatio and Radical Evil\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-22T14:44:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-06T18:03:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\"},\"description\":\"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Privatio and Radical Evil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/\",\"name\":\"Leithart\",\"description\":\"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d\",\"name\":\"Peter Leithart\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Peter Leithart\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Privatio and Radical Evil","description":"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Privatio and Radical Evil","og_description":"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/","og_site_name":"Leithart","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-22T14:44:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-06T18:03:59+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=leithartcom-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0415305241"}],"author":"Peter Leithart","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PLeithart","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Leithart","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/","name":"Privatio and Radical Evil","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-22T14:44:04+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-06T18:03:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d"},"description":"Milbank opens Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (Radical Orthodoxy) with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/2009\/06\/privatio-and-radical-evil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Privatio and Radical Evil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/","name":"Leithart","description":"My blog is a public notebook, featuring essays, notes, and explorations on Scripture, theology, literature, politics, culture.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/6bb7113e4dd45fe26045622aa56f891d","name":"Peter Leithart","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1033df9cd7263d2e0408cf9ee92ee4d?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Peter Leithart"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Leithart\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/PLeithart"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/author\/pleithart\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4837","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3021"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/leithart\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=leithartcom-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0415305241\")
with a discussion of neo-Kantian arguments concerning radical evil. In the light of the Holocaust and twentieth-century totalitarianism, they argue, the traditional Augustinian privatio <\/em> is deeply inadequate. <\/p>\n