<\/p>
In his new book Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross <\/i> , Hans Boersma offers this insightful and devastating criticism of Girard\u2019s construct of a non-violent atonement: <\/p>\n
\u201cOne of the main reasons that [Girard\u2019s] theory continues to increase in popularity is that he helps Christians avoid the embarrassment of having to acknowledge that God is involved in violence, even as he expresses his most hospitable self on the cross. This gain carries the cost, however, of the denial of a good creation. Desire, as something underlying all cultural endeavor, is inherently mimetic and thus must lead to violence, Girard insists. But is it true that mimetic contagion explains all desire and that it accounts for all violence? Girard fails to acknowledge that we often desire certain objects because of their inherent value rather than simply because other models desire them. A theology of creation that affirms its inherent goodness will insist that desire can function in wholesome ways and stems not first of all from imitation but from the positive value of the created order. Girard\u2019s atonement theology is built on an ontology of violence that leads to a negative view of culture and is thus unable to function as a solid foundation for a positive politics of hospitality. Not only does Girard regard violence as the basis of human culture, but he also finds much of the Old Testament unworthy of the nonviolent God that we have come to know in Jesus Christ. The continuity between the two Testaments gets stretched to the breaking point.\u201d <\/p>\n
Boersma\u2019s book is an attempt to rehabilitate traditional substitutionary, sacrificial atonement theology, and his main thesis is that divine hospitality DEMANDS divine violence. <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In his new book Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross , Hans Boersma offers this insightful and devastating criticism of Girard\u2019s construct of a non-violent atonement: \u201cOne of the main reasons that [Girard\u2019s] theory continues to increase in popularity is that he helps Christians avoid the embarrassment of having to acknowledge that God is involved in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3021,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theology-soteriology"],"yoast_head":"\n