Conservatives are fond of saying that one shouldn\u2019t \u201cimmanentize the eschaton.\u201d What else, I ask, is one to do with an eschaton?<\/p>\n
What they mean by this, of course, is that we should not use violent means to bring about a utopian society. Of course we shouldn\u2019t. But the violent means used by Marxists and other secular seekers of the Eschaton are themselves decidedly means of \u201cthis age.\u201d Marxists justify totalitarianism precisely because the perfect classless society isn\u2019t here yet. When it is, coercion will be unnecessary. People will work joyfully and painlessly for a few hours every day and then sit around and make art, or whatever. But the road to this utopia is a winding one and leads through a grim and joyless land where party apparatchiks drive around in fancy cars while everyone else goes without. In the utopia, people will happily care for each other and everyone will be equal. But on the road to it, concentration camps and firing squads are a constant presence.<\/p>\n
This is not, actually, treating the eschaton as immanent. It is trying to make<\/i> it immanent. Of course the phrase \u201cimmanentizing the eschaton\u201d can mean either of these things. But those who use the term scornfully don\u2019t make that distinction. They argue, in fact, for something that looks much more like the Marxist approach (we can\u2019t live, right now, by the values that will prevail when the utopia comes) in the name of rejecting Marxism and similar ideologies. They argue for supporting corrupt dictatorships, for waging ruthless war when necessary, for accepting inequality and social deprivation, in the name of a proper respect for the transcendence of the Eschaton. And if anyone suggests that may be we ought to be living more like citizens of the kingdom, they cry \u201cImmanentizing the eschaton,\u201d and conjure up images of concentration camps. This is bogus.<\/p>\n
To try to bring about by force the state of affairs we imagine to be characteristic of the Kingdom is indeed a demonic delusion. But that\u2019s precisely because force isn\u2019t a characteristic of the Kingdom in the first place. The Kingdom should be immanent in our practices. Se should strive to do the kinds of things that make the Kingdom present, while knowing that the Kingdom will never come in its fullness through our efforts.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Conservatives are fond of saying that one shouldn\u2019t \u201cimmanentize the eschaton.\u201d What else, I ask, is one to do with an eschaton? What they mean by this, of course, is that we should not use violent means to bring about a utopian society. Of course we shouldn\u2019t. But the violent means used by Marxists and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2366,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christianity","category-politics"],"yoast_head":"\n