{"id":80559,"date":"2011-01-14T13:56:32","date_gmt":"2011-01-14T20:56:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/?p=80559"},"modified":"2012-10-03T14:53:55","modified_gmt":"2012-10-03T20:53:55","slug":"looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Looking Closer&#8217;s Favorite Films of 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at <em>Image<\/em>\u2018s blog Good Letters. You can read the original series <a href=\"http:\/\/imagejournal.org\/page\/blog\/strongest-impressions-of-2010-part-one\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/imagejournal.org\/page\/blog\/strongest-impressions-of-2010-part-two\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">here<\/a>.]<\/p>\n<p>\u2022<\/p>\n<p>2010 was a year full of unforgettable movies.<\/p>\n<p>And I still have many on my must-see list. For example, <em>Carlos<\/em> (by Olivier Assayas, who directed my favorite 2009 film), <em>The Kids Are All Right, Animal Kingdom, Get Low, 127 Hours, Another Year, Mother, White Material, Somewhere,<\/em> and <em>Vincere<\/em>, to name a few.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, here are my most memorable moviegoing experiences of 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022<\/p>\n<p>First I\u2019ll list six impressive movies that I wanted to love, but couldn\u2019t. Feel free to try and change my mind.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Then, some \u201crunners-up\u201d\u2014films I thoroughly enjoyed and happily recommend.<\/p>\n<p>And finally, I\u2019ll applaud my ten favorites that I\u2019d love to explore, share, and enjoy again and again.<\/p>\n<p>A few of these played in 2008 or 2009 elsewhere in the world, but became available in my neighborhood in theaters or on DVD only this year.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Six Disappointments (alphabetical)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Black Swan<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What a trip! Darren Aronofsky\u2019s much-lauded mix of classical ballet, psychological turmoil, and grisly horror features wild, emotional performances by Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis.<\/p>\n<p>But I grew increasingly frustrated with the movie, and eventually started checking my watch. Why?<\/p>\n<p>The relentless, overbearing energy. Heavy-handed storytelling. Flamboyant cinematography. Continuous horror-movie jolts. Abrasive behavior from self-absorbed characters. Simplistic, soap-opera dialogue. Gratuitous girl-on-girl action. A bounty of horror-movie clich\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>Aronofsky is always intense, but here he feels like a show-off, following his film\u2019s climactic image with title cards that shout \u201cDIRECTED BY DARREN ARONOFSKY\u201d and \u201cA FILM BY DARREN ARONOFSKY.\u201d I\u2019ve retitled it<\/p>\n<p><em>Blecch Swan.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Read my full review <a href=\"http:\/\/lookingcloser.org\/2010\/12\/black-swan-2010\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Blue Valentine<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is a persuasive, lifelike depiction of a couple\u2019s relationship from first infatuation through marriage to disintegration.<\/p>\n<p>The implosion is brought to vivid life in exceptional, whole-hearted performances from Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams. In scene after scene, Derek Cianfrance\u2019s film feels true-to-life, even in its rather graphic scenes of a failing sexual relationship.<\/p>\n<p>But ultimately, I wanted to ask, \u201cSo what?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s an actors\u2019 showcase that runs high on emotion without giving us much to discuss after the credits roll.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>I Am Love<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>My compliments to director Luca Guadagnino for the sumptuous cinematography, the gorgeous cast, the elaborate style, and the breathtaking architecture of this ambitious, operatic Italian drama.<\/p>\n<p>But despite the film\u2019s visual extravagance, I\u2019m frustrated by its narrative. As the patriarch of the Recchi family\u2014an Italian textile-mill dynasty\u2014hands control of the family business over to the next generation, we can see the world changing. As globalism and individualism spread, so do cracks in the foundation of this aristocracy.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s no surprise when some begin to rebel against its unspoken laws, following secret passions and risking the family\u2019s wrath. The new patriarch\u2019s daughter is openly gay. And the new matriarch\u2014Emma (Tilda Swinton), a Russian who seems dissatisfied among Milan\u2019s wealthy elite\u2014has fallen into an all-consuming extramarital affair with a cook.<\/p>\n<p>While it\u2019s easy to pity Emma for her imprisonment in this hard-hearted family, I reject the film\u2019s suggestion that true freedom comes by a surrender to sensual impulses.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Inception<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>See <a href=\"http:\/\/imagejournal.org\/page\/blog\/inception-part-1-mind-over-what-matters\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">my previous two-part Good Letters post. <\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>A Prophet<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Jacques Audiard\u2019s film is an immersive epic about a prisoner who descends into hell, dragged unwillingly into the sordid dealings of a criminal network behind bars. He\u2019ll either become a devil to survive, or die for resisting.<\/p>\n<p>As the emperor of this underworld, Niels Arestrup gives one of the year\u2019s most incredible performances.<\/p>\n<p>But this story is so soul-crushingly bleak and nihilistic that I felt suffocated. Audiard paints a world without any glimpse of God, grace, or hope.<\/p>\n<p>I really wish I hadn\u2019t invited my pastor to join me for this one; I felt compelled to apologize afterward.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The White Ribbon<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Michael Haneke\u2019s study of how German society became susceptible to Hitler\u2019s violent agenda is one of the year\u2019s most harrowing films, but also one of the most beautiful. He captures the slow devolution of a community as mysterious acts of violence kindle fear and suspicion in the residents\u2019 hearts.<\/p>\n<p>How should a family, a neighborhood, or a nation respond to grievous violence? These are important questions, and timely.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps I\u2019ll come to a greater appreciation of how this film grapples with them. But on a first viewing, I was exhausted by this onslaught of stories about heartlessness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Runners-Up (listed alphabetically)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>How to Train Your Dragon<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This animated epic from Dreamworks surprised me with impressive characterizations, an unexpectedly thoughtful plot, and 3D flight sequences that were more exciting than Avatar\u2019s much-hyped aerial adventure. We watch a young Viking named Hiccup learn to consider his enemies with thoughtfulness instead of knee-jerk violence. And Hiccup\u2019s father Stoick, a gargantuan Viking warrior, makes a slow journey to appreciating his not-so-warlike son. I\u2019d recommend this film just for the sight of Stoick\u2019s magnificent red thicket of a beard.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Never Let Me Go<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Mark Romanek adapts Yasujiro Ishiguro\u2019s beautiful science fiction novel, drawing delicate performances from Carey Mulligan and Andrew Garfield, and gives Kiera Knightley her most complicated character. <a href=\"http:\/\/imagejournal.org\/page\/blog\/the-actor-in-question\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Read more about this film in my Good Letters post about \u201cThe Actor in Question.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ondine<\/p>\n<p>What a delight: Without a flicker of self-importance, <em>Ondine<\/em> brings back to the screen something that has been missing lately: good old-fashioned storytelling. It\u2019s a modest romance, a charming fairy tale, a showcase for the talents of its wonderful cast, and a film that is beautiful to look at without ever being show-offy. Colin Farrell gives one of his finest performances as Syracuse, a fisherman who catches a beautiful woman (Alicja Bachleda) in his nets. Is she a selkie \u2013 a mythological creature who is part seal, part seductress? Or was she really drowning when he caught her? Syracuse\u2019s daughter Annie (Alison Barry) is certain that she\u2019s a magical creature. And as they are both enchanted by her beauty and tenderness, a dark shadow from her past looms, threatening to drag her back to where she came from.<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019ve seen <em>The Secret of Roan Innish<\/em>, then you have some sense of just how special <em>Ondine<\/em> really is.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Rabbit Hole<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>As this husband (Aaron Eckhart) and wife (Nicole Kidman) struggle to go on after an accident claims their young boy\u2019s life, we get just the sort of shouting matches and crying jags that critics call \u201cOscar bait.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, it\u2019s a refreshingly honest film that makes no false promises. This is a story about learning to live with loss, not how to recover from it.<\/p>\n<p>Kidman\u2019s turn as Becca is her finest in many years, but it\u2019s the supporting characters who stay with me. Dianne Wiest is wonderful as Nat, Becca\u2019s mother, whose Christian faith helps her live with her own heavy losses. And newcomer Miles Teller almost steals the show as the broken-hearted young man responsible for Becca\u2019s loss. His delicate conversations with Kidman suggest that healing is possible through confession, forgiveness, and grace.<\/p>\n<p>Becca may reject Christian faith in the film, but she\u2019s stepping onto \u201cthe Way\u201d that Christ represents.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Scott Pilgrim vs. The World<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Shaun of the Dead<\/em> director Edgar Wright packs this adaptation of the popular Scott Pilgrim comics with playful inspiration and big laughs. Forget <em>Tron: Legacy<\/em>\u2014this was 2010\u2019s best big-screen video game.<\/p>\n<p>Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera) is an uninspiring romantic lead, and he\u2019s surrounded by young women who are more interesting than his goth-girl crush Ramona Flowers. So it\u2019s hard to care much about his duels with Ramona\u2019s seven evil exes\u2026 unless you ever did foolish things in the fever of a crush.<\/p>\n<p>Alas, I\u2019ve been that idiot. And I have a warm spot in my heart for Mr. Pilgrim.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The Secret in Their Eyes<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/lookingcloser.org\/2010\/05\/the-secret-in-their-eyes-2010\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">Read my review of last year\u2019s Oscar-winning foreign language film here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Shutter Island<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong> <\/strong><\/em>2010 introduced two films in which Leonardo DiCaprio was caught between reality and delusion. I prefer <em>Shutter Island<\/em> over <em>Inception<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Martin Scorsese cooks up a spooky stew full of spicy allusions to other psychological thrillers like <em>The Shining<\/em> and <em>Vertigo<\/em>. And it cleverly includes actors who have played other psychos, like Ted Levine, Jackie Earle Haley, and John Carrol Lynch.<\/p>\n<p>Its breathtaking design suggests Dante\u2019s <em>Inferno<\/em> imagined by M.C. Escher. Watch carefully\u2014if you blink, you might miss important details. While <em>Inception<\/em>\u2019s Christopher Nolan shouts, \u201cLook! I\u2019m bending a city in half!\u201d, Scorsese makes watchful moviegoers gasp with something as simple as a vanishing water glass.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, <em>Shutter Island<\/em> asks why our cultural imagination is so obsessed with stories about investigators and criminals. Do we turn to thrillers so we can face our fears? Or are we fooling ourselves, trying to numb the pain of our losses, or absolve ourselves from any responsibility?<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Waste Land<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong> <\/strong><\/em>Read my review of this inspiring documentary in a previous Good Letters post\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/imagejournal.org\/page\/blog\/trash-transformed\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cTrash Transformed.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>And now, here are my ten favorites in order of preference:<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Top Ten<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>10. <em>Babies<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.spu.edu\/depts\/uc\/response\/exclusives\/onscreen-Babies.asp\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Read my review of this delightful, one-of-a-kind documentary at the website for SPU\u2019s <em>Response<\/em>.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>9. <em>The King\u2019s Speech<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Tom Hooper\u2019s movie is made of close-ups, and that makes sense. It\u2019s about a speech impediment, one that almost prevented the Duke of York from fulfilling his duties when he became King George IV.<\/p>\n<p>Colin Firth, playing the reluctant ruler known to his family as \u201cBertie\u201d, is a joy to watch. Fighting his \u201cbloody stammer,\u201d his despondent, pulpy face balloons, deflates, clenches, and explodes like he\u2019s trying to start the engine of a junkyard car.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, his therapist\u2014Lionel Logue, played with magnificent expressiveness and wit by Geoffrey Rush\u2014patiently questions, teases, and teaches him.<\/p>\n<p>Much will be written about the film\u2019s period-piece elegance, its physical comedy, the endearing supporting turn by Helena Bonham Carter, and its exquisite script. But for me, its shining virtue is its depiction of a heroic teacher who guides a stubborn student with patience, force, cleverness, love, and grace. <em>The King\u2019s Speech<\/em> is a tribute to the work of dedicated teachers everywhere.<\/p>\n<p><strong>8. <em>The Sun<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In <em>The Sun<\/em>, a 2005 film that finally reached the U.S. in this year\u2019s DVD release, Issey Ogata plays the Japanese Emperor Hirohito at the turning point of World War II. It\u2019s a performance of extraordinary control and wit.<\/p>\n<p>We watch as Hirohito, knowing that the Allied forces are closing in, struggles to cope with the pressure of imminent defeat, knowing that his people believe he is an infallible deity. We watch his attention shift restlessly during those terrible hours. He listens to his officials\u2019 rising panic. He struggles to sustain the nation\u2019s pride by refusing to call down his troops. And he distracts himself with his real passion\u2014the study of marine biology.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to director Alexander Sokurov\u2019s compassionate storytelling, we care about this emperor. He seems to be a victim of circumstances more than a devilish tyrant. With a curious physical manner that recalls Charlie Chaplin, Ogata impersonates a man in a state of arrested development, an overgrown child disabled by lifelong isolation, striving to fulfill the expectations of a history he does not understand.<\/p>\n<p>I found <em>The Sun<\/em>\u2019s conclusion deeply moving, for the defeat seems to liberate Hirohito like a child released from school for summer vacation. He\u2019s giddy at the future\u2019s possibilities, as if he can finally wade out into an ocean full of wonders.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7. <em>The Secret of the Grain<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This 2007 film reached U.S. moviegoers this year thanks to a Criterion Collection DVD. <a href=\"http:\/\/imagejournal.org\/page\/blog\/heartbreaking-couscous\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">My review was published previously at Good Letters.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>6. <em>Four Lions <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I didn\u2019t want to watch a comedy about Jihadists plotting a terror attack. But I\u2019m so glad I did. Just as Monty Python brilliantly satirized Arthur\u2019s Knights of the Round Table, and the folly of crowds seeking a Messiah, so Chris Morris makes sharp satire from details he learned about real terrorist activities.<\/p>\n<p>The film\u2019s \u201cfour lions\u201d are would-be terrorists who know just enough about Islamic extremism to be dangerous. As they fumble from one bad plan to another, they desire only to join Al-Qaeda and become martyrs for their cause. But they\u2019re living contradictions, casually embracing the very culture they claim to despise. Hatred and ignorance have turned them into paranoid buffoons, so that they shake their heads in public to avoid being clearly photographed, and they blame their troubles\u2014even their car troubles\u2014on their perceived enemies. \u201cIt\u2019s the parts\u2026 they\u2019re Jewish.\u201d \u201cWhat parts in a car are Jewish?\u201d \u201cSpark plugs. \u2026 Jews invented spark plugs to control global traffic.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s all hilarious, but the truth of it stings. Hatred makes fools of the haters in any culture or religion. Morris might just as easily have made a satire about what hate might do to Christian fundamentalists. Maybe he should.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. <em>The Secret of Kells<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>My review is published in SPU\u2019s Response, and my conversation with film critic Steven Greydanus is at Good Letters (Part One, Part Two).<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <em>The Social Network<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>My review of this year\u2019s most celebrated movie was featured in a Good Letters post called \u201cEverybody Wants to Rule the World.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. <em>Winter\u2019s Bone<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Every single scene of Debra Granik\u2019s haunting thriller has been smoldering in my memory since I first saw the film several months ago. I reviewed it in a previous Good Letters post\u2014\u201cWinter\u2019s Bone: A Fully Human Hero.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. <em>True Grit<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Is the new True Grit better than the original film? In every way. The Coen Brothers are known for feeding great actors the best dialogue they\u2019ll ever chew. And their faithful adaptation of Charles Portis\u2019s novel serves up plenty in this, their first Western.<\/p>\n<p>As if he\u2019s never even seen John Wayne in action, Jeff Bridges creates a spectacular new version of Rooster Cogburn. Looking and sounding like a disgruntled walrus, this aging gunslinger is so inebriated and temperamental that you\u2019re not sure if he\u2019ll end up shooting his target, his companions, himself, or all of the above. When his burning chimney of a throat isn\u2019t making his lines unintelligible, he\u2019s as quotable as Bridges\u2019 previous Coen Brothers character\u2014The Dude.<\/p>\n<p>In a supporting role as LaBoeuf, a Texas Ranger, Matt Damon is more playful than usual, showing that he\u2019s a natural for bringing the Coens\u2019 singular screenwriting to life.<\/p>\n<p>And how about newcomer Hailie Steinfeld? Her debut performance as young Mattie Ross equals the work of her seasoned colleagues. Mattie\u2019s a girl who will stop at nothing to outwit shrewd businessmen and bring justice to killers, but she\u2019s also capable of giving grace to human wreckage. She might as well be the great grandmother of Fargo\u2019s Marge Gunderson.<\/p>\n<p>Mattie\u2019s story tells us that justice is costly, and vengeance costlier still. But the pursuit of killers is not True Grit\u2019s primary story. The central thread is a story filled with moments of nobility and heroism quite unique in the Coen Brothers\u2019 canon. It\u2019s about two broken people who form an unlikely bond. Having lost her father, Mattie finds in Cogburn a friend, a mentor, and a protector in a lawless wilderness. And Cogburn finds something he needed too\u2014someone to love so much that he\u2019ll stand up and become her champion, even if it means risking his rapidly collapsing life.<\/p>\n<p>Shot through with sweat, shootouts, cigarettes, Scripture, and delicious dialogue, True Grit is a film I\u2019ll savor for decades to come.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. <em>Toy Story 3<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Fifteen years ago, I approached <em>Toy Story<\/em> with skepticism. A full-length feature animated on computers? I feared it would look fake and robotic, a poor substitute for the hand-drawn brilliance of Disney classics.<\/p>\n<p>But <em>Toy Story<\/em> won me over in its first five minutes. It had colorful characters, an adventurous spirit, and a big, warm, thrumming heart. It entertained kids and their parents equally, without a trace of the cynicism that sours most \u201ccartoons for grownups.\u201d I actually cared about that pull-string gunslinger, his spaceman friend, and their circus of strangely familiar supporting characters.<\/p>\n<p>Pixar had raised the standard for G-rated entertainment\u2026 and then they raised it again. <em>Toy Story 2<\/em> still stands as one of the only sequels in movie history to surpass the strengths of its predecessor.<\/p>\n<p><em>Toy Story 3<\/em> completes what is arguably the finest American trilogy ever made. Can you think of another one that doesn\u2019t have a weak link? It\u2019s a surprisingly harrowing conclusion. After the first act, which takes Woody, Buzz, and the gang far from home and traps them in a frightening daycare, the movie becomes a celebration of prison-break conventions. Then, in its apocalyptic finale, it achieves an intensity that reminds me of another three-quel\u2019s fiery finale\u2014<em>The Return of the King<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>This story about abandoned toys might cause some of us to consider how we respond to our own betrayals and heartbreaks. It raises questions about how we discern our true purpose in life. And when Buzz, Jessie, and the gang are sentenced to a period of torment and abuse for the benefit of more powerful toys, we might wonder what this suggests about our own society\u2019s luxuries and what they might be costing others.<\/p>\n<p>For all of its memorable thrills (including an Indiana Jones-style runaway train caper), its inspired humor (Mr. Potato Head momentarily becomes the Picasso-like Mr. Tortilla Head), and its hilarious tangents (Ken\u2019s fashion show may be the year\u2019s most inspired montage), director Lee Unkrich\u2019s film has one remarkable distinction: it is, shot for shot, scene for scene, the year\u2019s most beautiful movie, alive with colors and shadows and textures that move critics to use words like painterly and sumptuous.<\/p>\n<p>2010 gave us three films that I highly recommend for all ages\u2014<em>The Secret of Kells, Babies,<\/em> and <em>Toy Story 3<\/em>. That\u2019s more than usual. American television and cinema feeds American children a steady diet of junk food. But art and entertainment are formative forces, and children need great stories. Pixar\u2019s films continue to reward adults and children alike, giving them something they can enjoy together again and again. And their Toy Story trilogy sets a gold standard for all-ages moviemaking.<\/p>\n<p>We need a whole generation of filmmakers to learn from Pixar\u2019s example.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image\u2018s blog Good Letters. You can read the original series here and here.] \u2022 2010 was a year full of unforgettable movies. And I still have many on my must-see list. For example, Carlos (by Olivier Assayas, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1051,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[387],"class_list":["post-80559","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","tag-top-10-or-20"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Looking Closer&#039;s Favorite Films of 2010<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image&#039;s blog Good Letters. You can read the\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Looking Closer&#039;s Favorite Films of 2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image&#039;s blog Good Letters. You can read the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Looking Closer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-14T20:56:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-10-03T20:53:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeffrey Overstreet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeffrey Overstreet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/\",\"name\":\"Looking Closer's Favorite Films of 2010\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-14T20:56:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-10-03T20:53:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e\"},\"description\":\"This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image's blog Good Letters. You can read the\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Looking Closer&#8217;s Favorite Films of 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/\",\"name\":\"Looking Closer\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e\",\"name\":\"Jeffrey Overstreet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Jeffrey Overstreet\"},\"description\":\"Visit Looking Closer for Jeffrey Overstreet's latest writing on art, faith, and film. Jeffrey teaches writing and film at Seattle Pacific University. He left the Patheos network in 2015.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/author\/jeffreyoverstreet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Looking Closer's Favorite Films of 2010","description":"This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image's blog Good Letters. You can read the","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Looking Closer's Favorite Films of 2010","og_description":"This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image's blog Good Letters. You can read the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/","og_site_name":"Looking Closer","article_published_time":"2011-01-14T20:56:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-10-03T20:53:55+00:00","author":"Jeffrey Overstreet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeffrey Overstreet","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/","name":"Looking Closer's Favorite Films of 2010","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-14T20:56:32+00:00","dateModified":"2012-10-03T20:53:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e"},"description":"This is a revised, expanded version of a commentary that was originally published as a two-part series at Image's blog Good Letters. You can read the","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2011\/01\/looking-closers-favorite-films-of-2010-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Looking Closer&#8217;s Favorite Films of 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/","name":"Looking Closer","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e","name":"Jeffrey Overstreet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","caption":"Jeffrey Overstreet"},"description":"Visit Looking Closer for Jeffrey Overstreet's latest writing on art, faith, and film. Jeffrey teaches writing and film at Seattle Pacific University. He left the Patheos network in 2015.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/author\/jeffreyoverstreet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1051"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80559"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80559\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}