{"id":82612,"date":"2012-09-21T15:51:13","date_gmt":"2012-09-21T21:51:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/?p=82612"},"modified":"2012-10-22T16:08:07","modified_gmt":"2012-10-22T22:08:07","slug":"the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/","title":{"rendered":"The Master (2012) &#8211; A Long Post-Viewing Conversation"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_01843_sm.jpeg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-82634\" title=\"JOAQUIN PHOENIX and PHILIP SEYMOUR HOFFMAN star in THE MASTER\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_01843_sm-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>October 2012 Update: <em>I have written two commentaries about <\/em>The Master<em>. The first is posted below. The second (which is much shorter) was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/goodletters\/2012\/10\/wrestling-the-master\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">published later at Good Letters, the blog hosted by Image<\/a>. Both are written as conversations between moviegoers.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u2013<\/p>\n<p>Imagine three moviegoers\u00a0\u2014 Mr. Judge, Fangirl, and Mr. Long-winded\u00a0\u2014\u00a0emerging from a screening of Paul Thomas Anderson\u2019s new movie,\u00a0<em>The Master. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><\/em>They\u2019re quiet at first, as they find their way to the lobby and sit down with their friend Mrs. Yuk, a friend who walked out of the movie in the first 30 minutes. She\u2019s been waiting and grumbling for two hours.<\/p>\n<p>Full disclosure: Three of these characters are amalgams\u00a0of moviegoers\u00a0\u2014 colleagues, readers, friends\u00a0\u2014\u00a0\u00a0who have sent me messages over the years; they are not meant to represent any person in particular. I actually sympathize with all three of them to some extent. But the fourth, Mr. Long-winded, bears an embarrassing resemblance to me. He\u2019s like me in his verbosity <em>and<\/em> in his view of the movie. But I do wish I could be as mild-mannered and congenial as he is.<\/p>\n<p>The following conversation is <em>very long<\/em>. And near the end, you will encounter a major spoiler warning before these characters talk about the end of the movie.<\/p>\n<p>Ready? Okay. The\u00a0camera zooms in. And the conversation begins with Mrs. Yuk, who cannot contain her frustration any longer.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>\u2013<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mrs. Yuk:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Yuck. Just\u2026 yuck. What a perverse, disgusting movie. I should have known better. This is the guy who made <em>Boogie Nights<\/em> and <em>There Will Be Blood<\/em>. He makes movies about sick sexual perverts and horrible, violent men. I found it utterly offensive.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mr. Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I wasn\u2019t offended. I just thought it was a bad movie. Seemed like it would go on forever without anything actually, you know\u2026 <em>happening<\/em>. It was just a bunch of extreme acting and showy set design. The movie has no story.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Omigosh, you\u2019re so wrong. This is Paul Thomas Anderson we\u2019re talking about. And every movie he\u2019s made has been a bigger masterpiece than the last.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mr. Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Really? How was <em>that<\/em> a masterpiece?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It just\u2026 it just\u2026 it was just so awesome! It was the most\u2026 the most\u2026 the best\u2026<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mrs. Yuk: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Blecch. It was pornographic. I feel like my head was thrown in a sewer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mr. Long-winded: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Whoa, whoa. So may absolute statements!<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Fangirl, I know you\u2019re crazy about Anderson\u2019s films. You seem eager to give it some kind of award, but all of these accolades don\u2019t tell me anything. Why does it have to be the \u201cmost\u201d or the \u201cbest\u201d anything? Is anybody in a position to declare such a thing? I want to know what the film made you <em>think<\/em> about, what it made you <em>feel<\/em>. I want to know if it makes you see anything differently in yourself, in others, in politics or religion. Don\u2019t you think you should give it some time, think about it, and see it again before you declare that it\u2019s a masterpiece?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Mrs. Yuk, I agree that there was a lot of ugly behavior in the film. Parts of it were very unpleasant. But don\u2019t you think that the bad behavior was portrayed for a good purpose? Seemed to me that maybe we were supposed to consider <em>why<\/em> these characters behaved badly, what was missing from their lives, and what forces were influencing their behavior. If the movie\u2019s making you miserable, by all means, leave the theater. But must you condemn the artist for exploring the subject?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And Mr. Judge, I\u2019m sorry you were bored. I had some trouble with the movie too, but I thought there were two substantial stories being told at the same time. Are you really going to just declare that \u2018nothing happens\u2019 in this movie? Or are you interested in hearing some other points of view first?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What\u2019s wrong with the movie? It should win all of the Oscars.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Harumph. I defy you to find a story in that movie\u2026 or at least a story worth telling.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Well, it\u2019s a complicated movie. But this is the kind of moviegoing experience I always hope to have\u2026 something challenging and mysterious and surprising.\u00a0I don\u2019t think anybody will reach some kind of absolute, definitive description, especially after only one viewing. May I describe what I think are the two substantial stories in this film?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">If we can all be a little open-minded, maybe we can share some of our\u2014<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mrs. Yuk (interrupting, stands up): <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Here\u2019s my observation: Blecch. Horrible. Offensive. I can\u2019t believe anybody with a conscience would sit through such garbage. I\u2019m a teacher, and I would never teach material like this to my classes. We only read stuff that has morally redeeming value. We don\u2019t spend time on stuff that\u2019s full of violence and sexual perversity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What do you teach?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mrs. Yuk:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">History. Shakespeare. The Bible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Everybody blinks at Mrs. Yuk. Then, together:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><\/strong>Goodbye, Mrs. Yuk!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mrs. Yuk goes to catch the bus.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Okay, let me start with this: Do you know that Bob Dylan song \u201cGotta Serve Somebody\u201d?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Omigosh\u2026 Bob Dylan is the best! I loved it when Cate Blanchett played him in that movie <em>I\u2019m Still Here<\/em>. <strong>[<em>Long-winded and Judge exchange glances.<\/em>]<\/strong>\u00a0And I love that song! \u201c<em>It may be the devil \/ Or it may be the Lord \/ But you\u2019re gonna have to serve somebody\u2026<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I propose that this is a movie about how we all have to serve somebody, and the master we choose will either increase our joy and freedom or choke the life out of us.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Sometimes we serve masters who do us harm. They lie to us, betray us, neglect us, exploit us, abandon us. But we stay because we\u2019re seduced by charisma, or because we want something they have.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Sometimes we serve ourselves. We serve our ego, or our sex drive, or other appetites. When we do, we isolate ourselves from relationships and other sources of grace. That\u2019s called hell.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Sometimes we serve others in truth, grace, and love. When we do, we\u2019re set free from slavery to ourselves or anyone else.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Doesn\u2019t the cult leader say something like that near the end of the movie? \u201cIf you figure a way to live without serving a master\u2026 then let the rest of us know, will you? You\u2019d be the first person in the history of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Careful, we don\u2019t want to get into spoiler territory. Others may be listening.\u00a0Let\u2019s go to the beginning, when we meet the poor, troubled seafaring soldier named Freddie Quell. Who has Freddie been serving?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge (<em>guardedly<\/em>):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">He\u2019s been serving his country. In the military.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Right. He\u2019s been sailing with other soldiers. And we see them behaving like animals. They\u2019re prone to drunkenness, to crass behavior, to testosterone-driven tribalism. They fight, they wrestle, and their sexual obsessions and fantasies lead to obscene games on the beach with a naked woman that Freddie sculpted out of sand. Freddie is clearly messed up. He treats the sand-castle woman with sexual aggression and scorn, and then masturbates into the ocean.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">That\u2019s when Mrs. Yuk picked up her purse and headed for the door.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_12537_sm.jpeg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-82635\" title=\"JOAQUIN PHOENIX stars in THE MASTER\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_12537_sm-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\"><\/a>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Well, that\u2019s fine. It\u2019s pretty ugly stuff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But it\u2019s revealing of Freddie\u2019s character. Like all of us, he has self-serving fantasies and destructive impulses. But\u2026 unlike most people, Freddie has no self-control, and his conscience is drowning in alcohol.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But we also see him lie down beside the sand castle woman alone, as if he\u2019s thinking of someone, something he once. Soon the tide will wash this woman away. Maybe the sea represents the way that time can take things away from us that we\u2019ll never get back.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Like the 2 1\/2 hours I spent watching this movie.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">When Freddie returns, he\u2019s given a pep talk about how he\u2019s free to go and start life over again. He could start a business! Start a family! Put the war behind him!<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But we can see that Freddie isn\u2019t ready to just step into a normal life. He\u2019s clearly damaged. He\u2019s tortured by his experience in the war\u00a0\u2014 we get only one brief flashback, and something has clearly shaken him up. He returns a changed man, with\u00a0the physicality of someone 30 years his senior. He seems bent and burdened by memory, damage, and loss. He\u2019s hard and hollowed out, like a twisted piece of driftwood. And he has the demeanor of a battered dog\u00a0\u2014\u00a0sullen, twitchy, fearful, and explosively angry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But he\u2019s still good at three things: taking photographs, mixing dangerous cocktails, and then drinking his own concoctions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">So he gets a job as a photographer in a department store, and what does he photograph? Well-dressed, well-adjusted people. Families. Beautiful women. Successful and professional men. He\u2019s focusing and honoring all of the treasures that are out of his reach: beauty, love, success, dignity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The closest he gets to love is a few sexual thrills with a flirtatious shop girl inside his dark room. But even then he\u2019s drunk on paint thinner, which is about as corrosive a beverage as you can imagine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What happens to people who are denied love in childhood? What happens to the alienated, to the lonely? What happens to those who can\u2019t catch a break? Add post traumatic stress disorder to the mix, and Freddie is a walking time bomb. As he takes pictures, we can hear an infant\u2019s raging wail in the background, and it\u2019s hard to tell whether that\u2019s real or whether it\u2019s Freddie\u2019s state of mind, a rage of protest against a cruel world.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/the-master-freddie-the-photographer.jpeg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-82639\" title=\"the master freddie the photographer\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/the-master-freddie-the-photographer-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Soon, he\u2019s looking for another job. And there, he gets into deeper trouble. He\u2019s a disaster. And when people become that desperate for love and attention, they\u2019re vulnerable to predators.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It\u2019s a perfect setup for a story about seduction, manipulation, and abuse. This broken man who served America and was cast aside, given no help beyond a psychology test, is now lost, intoxicated, hunted, haunted, and lacking any kind of guidance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And yeah, as Bob Dylan would say\u2026 you gotta serve somebody.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Isn\u2019t Joaquin Phoenix amazing? He\u2019s going to win the Grammy for Best Actor.<\/p>\n<div><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/div>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Sure, it\u2019s the kind of performance that begs for Oscars. But damaged characters are not enough for a story.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I agree, but this story\u2019s just getting started.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Sure enough, Freddie walks right into the hands of someone who can use him.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Philip Seymour Hoffman! He\u2019s always great in Anderson films. And he was in <em>The Big Lebowski<\/em> too.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Well, okay\u2026 <em>Hoffman<\/em> isn\u2019t the monster, but he plays one in the movie. Lancaster Dodd is the monster. He\u2019s a pompous, self-satisfied philosopher who is becoming a cult leader. His book is called <em>The Cause,<\/em> and it has drawn a lot of eager believers. It involves reincarnation, a cycle of life, and an ongoing ascent toward perfection. Who wouldn\u2019t want to leave their damaged past behind and become perfect? Especially after a war!<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Don\u2019t we all want to \u201cget better\u201d and leave our troubles behind?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I just want to leave this movie behind.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Freddie can\u2019t \u201cget better\u201d without help. Dodd sees that. So what does Dodd offer Freddie that he can\u2019t get elsewhere? Respect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What\u2019s more, Dodd accepts what Freddie has to offer\u2026 his alcoholic \u201cpotion.\u201d That makes Freddie feel special, wanted, useful. From that time on, he\u2019s putty in Dodd\u2019s hands. This is a great depiction of how dangerous leaders in politics, business, and religion draw people in. I\u2019ve seen it happen in churches: \u201cWelcome! What can you do? Oh, we could use a fellow with your talents! We have a Christmas pageant coming up! And would you give your testimony on Sunday morning?\u201d <em>Flatter<\/em> them. Make them feel like they\u2019re part of the club. Put their gifts to use for you, so they feel useful.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Notice what unites these two: A beverage made with engine fuel. Remember how <em>There Will Be Blood<\/em> showed oil to be the power, like Sauron\u2019s Ring, that corrupts everyone? Here, I sense that flammable substances continue to represent the allure of capitalism, the fuel that runs America. It unites both the opportunistic and wealthy charlatan and and the desperate worker on the edge of poverty. It unites and intoxicates both the salesman and the gullible consumer, making them feel powerful.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Now, Freddie feels valued. He\u2019s been invited into a family at last. He has a respectable father figure, who shares with him, comforts him, and behaves toward him in a fatherly way.\u00a0Freddie doesn\u2019t understand Dodd\u2019s philosophies or cult, and frankly, he never will. But so what? He given what seems to be \u201ctough love.\u201d He feels like he belongs. And hey, there are some pretty girls on Dodd\u2019s boat, too.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Freddie\u2019s initiation is called \u201cinformal processing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Oh, here we go. The big scene. The over-actor\u2019s marathon.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It certainly does feel like the movie\u2019s biggest scene. I wish there was something of this magnitude later in the film, but I don\u2019t think anything ever matches it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Anyway, Dodd asks a series of questions designed to make Freddie tell the truth about himself. Little by little, Dodd breaks down Freddie\u2019s lies and feeble defenses and gets him to confess feelings, thoughts, history, and secrets. Now they have a bond of trust. Further, Dodd now has power over Freddie. But I don\u2019t think Freddie sees what he\u2019s done. He\u2019s so happy to feel safe, to feel wanted, that he pours his heart into Dodd\u2019s hands.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Dodd shows us what Freddie needs. But what does Dodd need? Why is he so drawn to Freddie?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">He likes to control people. He\u2019s a manipulator. Like you said, he\u2019s a predator.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Sure, but maybe it\u2019s more than that. Maybe Dodd is lonely too. Just look at his life. How can it be good for a person to live surrounded by yes-men?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">His wife thinks so highly of him that she\u2019ll tear down anybody who even questions him, including Dodd himself when he stumbles! Their marriage is kind of frightening. I don\u2019t see much tenderness between them. By making a god of himself, Dodd creates a standard that it will prove exhausting to fulfill. Still, his wife wants him to fulfill it. Eventually, he\u2019s going to realize that he\u2019s deprived of authentic relationships and love, trapped in a fortress he built himself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Isn\u2019t Amy Adams amazing? I\u2019ll bet she wins an Oscar. She was in <em>The Muppets<\/em> too.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Mrs. Yuk would not have liked their sex scene\u2026 if you call that a sex scene.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">That glimpse of the Dodd\u2019s sex life is a very disturbing revelation about the nature of their relationship, isn\u2019t it?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Look, I get it. Dodd and Freddie\u2026 two masturbatory monsters who are meant to be together until they destroy each other. But does the movie have anywhere to go from there? No! They just chew up the scenery in one scene after another, each scenario set up to be shocking in some way. Nothing happens.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Well, by my lights, quite a bit is happening.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">There\u2019s another chapter that\u2019s very important\u00a0\u2014 the flashback to Freddie\u2019s brush with true love. Remember Doris? We see that Freddie once fell in love with a girl who seemed like something special. But he moved on, like John Smith leaving Pocahontas behind in <em>The New World, <\/em>and now he realizes what he lost. She\u2019s out there somewhere, a loose thread in his story,\u00a0an unfulfilled dream.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Like Barry Egan in <em>Punch-drunk Love<\/em>, Freddie\u2019s probably afraid that he\u2019ll never find anybody who can love him as he is. Maybe that\u2019s why he wants to believe Dodd\u2019s promises. Maybe he wants to get better and find his way back to Doris.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I think you\u2019re reaching. I think you\u2019re finding meaning that isn\u2019t there. Like Master and his theories, you\u2019re making this stuff up as you go. Why does anybody want to follow this guy Dodd anyway? I don\u2019t think it makes sense.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Dodd\u2019s telling people what they want to hear. People like the idea of leaving the damage of their lives and starting again. A lot of them want to believe they\u2019re on a steady march toward perfection. They like a system through which they can achieve an ideal. By seducing them with this, Lancaster becomes their priest. Just listen to his language. He tells Freddie, \u201cScrub yourself and make yourself clean.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It\u2019s kind of like what Christianity promises: Salvation. But in Christianity, salvation is a free gift. It\u2019s grace. But people aren\u2019t comfortable with that kind of generosity. They don\u2019t trust it because they haven\u2019t experienced it in the world around them. So, even within the Christian church, we keep creating these systems by which we measure someone\u2019s \u201crighteousness.\u201d We come up with manmade systems so we can measure our progress\u2026 \u201cearn points,\u201d so to speak. In <em>The Master<\/em>, Dodd\u2019s system is conditional: \u201cDo what I say. Exalt me and follow my whims and instructions. Otherwise, you will be my sworn enemy.\u201d In the meantime, do Lancaster Dodd and his wife look like models of perfection? Yikes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The idea of <em>The Cause<\/em> is appealing to its creator, above all. He\u2019s so painfully aware of corruption and despair that he longs for perfection; his philosophical constructs are all about reincarnation, about leaving the past behind, beginning again, and improving. He wants to punish his own weakness, to hate his own flawed state. But he wants to achieve perfection on his own terms, without serving anyone above himself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">So he focuses his controlling energies on one who is without control. He calls Freddie a \u201csilly animal,\u201d and all kinds of demeaning names, as if Freddie represents all of the qualities of himself he wants to suppress.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">He also draws people in with the language of war, which is timely.\u00a0At his daughter\u2019s wedding, he declares,\u00a0\u201cWe fought against the day and we won.\u201d\u00a0Fighting and winning. That\u2019s language that Freddie understands. It gives him a cause to defend with his violence.\u00a0He\u2019ll fight back against anybody who dares question his Master\u2026 even though he cannot comprehend the ideas that make Dodd popular and influential.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><\/strong>You\u2019re moving into the second half of the film. Aren\u2019t you worried about spoilers?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Okay, time to shout out a spoiler-warning. We\u2019re getting into the culminating events of the story.<\/p>\n<p><strong>[WARNING: What follows contains detailed spoilers about the conclusion of The Master.]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_02628_sm.jpeg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-82633 alignnone\" title=\"uw_02628_sm\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_02628_sm-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">You might think that the story will end with Freddie falling apart. But that\u2019s not what happens.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It\u2019s Dodd who is falling apart. His own construct is crumbling, and he knows it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Listen to the interesting shift in his philosophy as he finishes Book Two \u2013 <em>The Split Sabre.<\/em> He backs away from talking about certainties and systems, and starts talking about imagination. Why?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I\u2019m not sure, but it seems to me that there\u2019s more freedom in imagination than certainty. There\u2019s more room for play and for mystery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But when the\u00a0word \u201cimagination\u201d enters into his philosophies, Dodd\u2019s followers become uncomfortable. As with so many religions, followers want answers. They want certainties. They want to know who\u2019s going to heaven and who\u2019s going to hell. They don\u2019t want to consider actual faith, which requires imagination and unknowns and mystery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But Dodd is suffocating in the smoke he\u2019s blown.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">So now we\u2019re set up for the next big turning point in the film. We\u2019ve talked about the beginning. We\u2019ve talked about the middle. And now, we\u2019re going to talk about the end\u2026 which will make it a complete story.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Your argument is getting longer than the movie.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The last part of the film wraps up\u00a0two ambitious stories: One is the story of a man in a prison of his own making, desperate for freedom, intimacy, and play. The other is about his willing prisoner who finally wakes up to the fact that he\u2019s been sold a lie. The prisoner looks at these people and realizes that there is no \u201cgetting better\u201d in this company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Do you remember when Dodd said he\u2019d found \u201cthe secret\u201d? What was the secret?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Laughter.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Exactly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And he\u2019s right. That\u2019s the secret of liberation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">In the film\u2019s opening interrogation (or \u201cprocessing\u201d) Freddie tearfully shared a memory of his family, of his mother and father around a table. What were they doing in the memory? Sharing drinks at a table and <em>laughing.<\/em> Pretty much the opposite of what he\u2019s experiencing with this family.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Near the conclusion, Dodd takes Freddie out into a wide open space, a wasteland, a void, and gets on a motorcycle with the giddiness of a boy with a new toy. He says that in this exercise he\u2019ll \u201cpick a point\u201d in the distance and travel toward it as fast as he can. And he does, laughing all the way.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">For a few moment, the Lancaster Dodd escapes himself, leaving \u201cMaster\u201d behind, rocketing into freedom and laughter. Laughter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">To me, this scene suggests a great deal. The game seems to confirm that Dodd really has been \u201cmaking this up as he goes.\u201d He takes a step, picks a destination, takes another step, then picks another destination. But at this point, he\u2019s feeling the need for speed, for sensation, for escape. He\u2019s been living in his head, in meetings, in parties, in lectures, in his book. So what\u2019s his next improvisation?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Like the U2 song goes: He wants to run, he wants to hide, he wants to tear down walls that hold him inside. He wants to go where the streets have no name.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Oh, brother.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">This is the opposite of Dodd\u2019s endeavors to this point: It\u2019s non-cerebral. It\u2019s a way of scratching an itch, the impulse that says \u201cFlee.\u201d And he rockets into the distance, to the confusion of his observers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Then comes Freddie\u2019s turn. What happens when Freddie gets on the motorcycle? He does what he\u2019s told: He picks a point. What his guardians don\u2019t realize is this: Freddie\u2019s picked a meaningful point, the one that might be a way out. So Freddie speeds off toward a\u00a0geographical point where he knows he lost his life\u2019s greatest opportunity for true love.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">On the motorbike, Dodd can only savor a few fleeting moments of freedom. But Freddie\u2026 he can keep on going. And he does.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What\u2019s left beyond that? The inevitable.\u00a0Freddie will realize what he probably feared: You can\u2019t go back. You can\u2019t turn back time. His dream girl, Doris, has moved on, taken by the surging seas of time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Then he\u2019ll come back, hanging his head, with nowhere left to go in the world. But is he welcomed back as a prodigal son? Is he shown grace? Not really.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The final meeting between Freddie and Dodd has strong connections with, and contrasts to, the scene in <em>There Will Be Blood\u00a0<\/em>when young H.W. goes to Daniel Plainview\u2019s office at the end of <em>There Will Be Blood<\/em>\u00a0and announces that he\u2019s going to live his own life. In <em>Blood<\/em>, Plainview rejects the boy in a volcanic eruption of rage, hatred, and jealousy. But Freddie\u2019s parting from Dodd is different. In desperation, Dodd tries to seduce him, using appeals to friendship <em>and<\/em> a frightful threat, a power play. Dodd\u2019s love is conditional: Obey, or become an enemy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">But Freddie knows that this is an invitation back to prison. He departs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It\u2019s a conclusion that\u2019s tragic and exhilarating at the same time. We know that this will leave Dodd alone, truly alone, in hell. And Freddie will go free into the wilderness. He may not know who to serve, but he\u2019s learned which masters to leave behind.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Is Freddie doomed? I don\u2019t think so.\u00a0We see him smiling in the midst of lovemaking with a young woman \u2014 named Winn, of all things!\u00a0\u2014\u00a0who seems to be enjoying his company. She may be a friend, she may be a prostitute\u2026 who knows? The important thing is that we see real tenderness in their play. Freddie is not flustered by a moment of sexual awkwardness; he\u2019s calm. They seem to enjoy each other\u2019s company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And what is more\u2026 <em>laughter<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">As they hold each other, Freddie begins to spout Dodd\u2019s own controlling, condescending lines, but he does so playfully, in good humor. He\u2019s free. The dark spell of charisma, persuasion, and control has been broken.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">What a compassionate conclusion. Anderson\u2019s storytelling here\u00a0\u2014 and yes, the more I think about it, the more I admire this story\u00a0\u2014 is the work of a man with a big heart. He does not judge his monstrous characters.\u00a0He finds sympathy for them even at the heights of their delusion. There is tragedy, not celebration, in Dodd\u2019s incarceration. There is no scorn or cynicism about Freddie as we leave him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And so we see the light, mostly by looking at shadows. We know the value of a nation that supports its troops by seeing what happens when there is no real support. We see the value of a loving family by seeing a man who is lost without it. We see the value of tenderness, of trust, of grace, because we see what happens when they\u2019re gone.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Judge (after a long silence):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">If that movie existed, I might like to see it. But I still think you\u2019re reaching.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long-winded:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Maybe I am. Maybe I\u2019m just making it up as I go. But these are the things I thought about as I watched the movie. And I\u2019m eager to go back to see if it adds more to these theories, or to see if it complicates them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">And I will admit, the second hour tested my patience. For the first hour, I was enthralled. I haven\u2019t been that captivated at the movies in a long time. But there\u2019s a stretch in the second hour when I felt a little bit lost. Then, after Dodd reveals his second book, things came to life gain for me.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">It\u2019s far too early for me to make any judgments about that. In art as in life, the truth must \u201cdazzle gradually.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Let\u2019s go see it again.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fangirl:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Are you kidding? It\u2019s Paul Thomas Anderson. If he made a commercial for dog food, I\u2019d pay to see it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Did you know he and Maya Rudolph are together, and they have kids?!<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of <i>The Master<\/i>. It&#8217;s a long conversation. But, well&#8230; it&#8217;s a complicated movie. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1051,"featured_media":82634,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[255,1309],"class_list":["post-82612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-paul-thomas-anderson","tag-the-master"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Master (2012) - A Long Post-Viewing Conversation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Here&#039;s an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of The Master. It&#039;s a long conversation. But, well... it&#039;s a complicated movie.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Master (2012) - A Long Post-Viewing Conversation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Here&#039;s an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of The Master. It&#039;s a long conversation. But, well... it&#039;s a complicated movie.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Looking Closer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-09-21T21:51:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-10-22T22:08:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_01843_sm.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"750\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeffrey Overstreet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeffrey Overstreet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/\",\"name\":\"The Master (2012) - A Long Post-Viewing Conversation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-09-21T21:51:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-10-22T22:08:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e\"},\"description\":\"Here's an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of The Master. It's a long conversation. But, well... it's a complicated movie.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Master (2012) &#8211; A Long Post-Viewing Conversation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/\",\"name\":\"Looking Closer\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e\",\"name\":\"Jeffrey Overstreet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Jeffrey Overstreet\"},\"description\":\"Visit Looking Closer for Jeffrey Overstreet's latest writing on art, faith, and film. Jeffrey teaches writing and film at Seattle Pacific University. He left the Patheos network in 2015.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/author\/jeffreyoverstreet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Master (2012) - A Long Post-Viewing Conversation","description":"Here's an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of The Master. It's a long conversation. But, well... it's a complicated movie.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Master (2012) - A Long Post-Viewing Conversation","og_description":"Here's an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of The Master. It's a long conversation. But, well... it's a complicated movie.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/","og_site_name":"Looking Closer","article_published_time":"2012-09-21T21:51:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-10-22T22:08:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":"750","height":"500","url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/226\/2012\/09\/uw_01843_sm.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jeffrey Overstreet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeffrey Overstreet","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/","name":"The Master (2012) - A Long Post-Viewing Conversation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-09-21T21:51:13+00:00","dateModified":"2012-10-22T22:08:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e"},"description":"Here's an imaginary conversation between four moviegoers after they emerge from a screening of The Master. It's a long conversation. But, well... it's a complicated movie.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/2012\/09\/the-master-2012-a-long-post-viewing-conversation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Master (2012) &#8211; A Long Post-Viewing Conversation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/","name":"Looking Closer","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/2675c6d9f6401acd7568e32160e5374e","name":"Jeffrey Overstreet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/14a7727373cd5b470d66842ecf5cc007?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","caption":"Jeffrey Overstreet"},"description":"Visit Looking Closer for Jeffrey Overstreet's latest writing on art, faith, and film. Jeffrey teaches writing and film at Seattle Pacific University. He left the Patheos network in 2015.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/author\/jeffreyoverstreet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1051"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82612"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82612\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/82634"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lookingcloser\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}