{"id":267,"date":"2011-09-15T11:59:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-15T15:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds\/"},"modified":"2012-08-10T00:22:38","modified_gmt":"2012-08-10T04:22:38","slug":"a-complementarian-responds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html","title":{"rendered":"A Complementarian Responds"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>A  few days ago I received the following comment in response to my <a href=\"http:\/\/lovejoyfeminism.blogspot.com\/2011\/09\/masters-and-slaves-are-men-and-women.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Men and  Women in Christian Patriarchy<\/a> post, and I thought it illustrated an  excellent point. Growing up, I was taught that men and women are equal  but have different roles. My point in my Men and Women post was that  \u201cdifferent but equal\u201d is a lie. I used an article by Debi Pearl to  illustrate this point. The following commenter took issue with what Debi  said, but tried to back up the \u201cdifferent but equal\u201d party line.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>BrianMI6 said\u2026<\/p>\n<p>If Debbi Pearl\u2019s book left off as you say, (and I don\u2019t know because  I\u2019ve not read the book yet) then you were fed a half-truth concerning  the roles of men and women in the Bible.<\/p>\n<p>The concept of having equal significance but different roles is accurate, if portrayed accurately.\u00a0The  context of the section of scripture in Ephesians where women are  instructed to obey their husband comes AFTER Eph 5:21 where both the  husband and wife are instructed to submit to one another.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ah, so the husband and wife submit to each other. That actually sounds equal.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Furthermore,  the Holy Spirit chose to spill more in on the pages of the New  Testament outlining the HUSBANDS role in the marriage, the defining  characteristic of which is the requirement to love his wife as Christ  loved the Church.  That\u2019s a lot of love.  His form of submission, then,  is to submit to the NEEDS of his wife as an act of life.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now  wait a minute. There are two different \u201cforms of submission,\u201d one for  men and one for women? Suddenly I\u2019m seeing equality flying out the  window here.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This  being the case, all husbands need to filter family decisions through the  love of their wife.  No husband who is fulfilling his responsibility to  God if he does not take his wife\u2019s feelings on any family directive  into consideration.  Period.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well  of course, both husband and wife should always consider each other\u2019s  needs, that\u2019s called being a good spouse. Wait a minute. What is  this about the man taking a \u201cfamily directive into consideration?\u201d Why  the emphasis on husbands dealing with \u201cfamily decisions?\u201d Shouldn\u2019t that  be a cooperative effort if we\u2019re talking about equality? Shouldn\u2019t the  husband and wife take a family directive (whatever that is) into  consideration together?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>That  being the case, the Bible is  clear that there is a chain of command.  The husband is to lead.  There  can be no democracy in a home where there are two people, each of whom  have a single vote, and both vote for their own position on an issue.  The frame of your writing indicates that, perhaps through proper  communication techniques, an agreement should ALWAYS be able to be made.   This is, of course, idealistic\u2026a mere fairy tale.  These types of  situations will arise, even if they are not often.<\/p>\n<p>This being  the case, it would seem that your position would be that if no agreement  could be struck, then no decision would be made.  The issue would just  fade away.  This is impossible.  NOT taking any definite action on an  issue is just as much a decision and has consequences just the same as  taking some form of action.<\/p>\n<p>It is for this reason that God  decided to assign a chain of command.  For better or worse, when a  breach is reached, one party must submit to the other.  God has deemed  that it be the wife that submits to her husband.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oh, I get it! The man submits by lovingly leading and  the woman submits by lovingly submitting. No wait. That doesn\u2019t make any  sense at all. This is the same exact line of reasoning I got as a  child. Men and women are equal. They just have different roles. Men are  to lead and women are to submit. I mean, Brian goes so far as to  endorse a \u201cchain of command\u201d and say that \u201cthere can be no democracy in  the home.\u201d Where\u2019s the equality in that? It\u2019s all a smoke screen.  No matter how they say it, it always amounts to the same thing: men are  to be in charge and women are to follow. These roles are NOT equal. Brian simply proves my point.<\/p>\n<p>Let  me ask a question. If I said that whites and blacks are different but  equal, that whites are created to be leaders and blacks to be followers,  what would you call me? If I said there is an ordained chain of  command, and that whites are to lead while blacks submit, but that in  their leadership they must lovingly take into account the needs of  blacks, what would that make me? If I said there could be no democracy  in a nation that was made up equally of whites and blacks, where each  would vote for their own needs, and that therefore whites must make the  decisions and choose the direction for society while blacks acquiesce,  what would I be? A RACIST. And, when you make the same exact arguments on the basis of gender rather than race, you are a SEXIST. This isn\u2019t equality. Let me say that again: this is absolutely and positively NOT equality.<\/p>\n<p>Brian  laughs derisively at the idea that a husband and wife can make  decisions as a team, and that they will always be able to reach an  agreement, is \u201cidealistic\u2026a mere fairy tale.\u201d I disagree. My husband  and I have been married for years now, and our marriage is a partnership between two equals. We have  never had a time when we couldn\u2019t come to an agreement. I would contend  that if you have two people who love each other and want what\u2019s best for  the family, there will be no situation in which they can\u2019t come to an  agreement. It\u2019s about teamwork and cooperation, not about a competition  where one partner must win and the other must lose. Brian may call this  an idealistic fairy tale, but actually,  it\u2019s my life, and it\u2019s very very real.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If you say that this  is demeaning and ridiculous, then by the same logic the man could say  that it is demeaning and ridiculous that he submit to God.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Actually, I think the idea that submission is a good thing or should be valued is antiquated and backward. Sure, you should obey the laws, and obey your parents when you\u2019re a kid, but you have reasons for those things. I value love, I value compassion, but I don\u2019t value submission.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It then  becomes clear that you simply wish that the Bible was written  differently than it was.  You wish that it said that both the man and  the woman were to submit to God in the same way that the man alone is  told to right now.  We might all want to rewrite the Bible.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Brian must not have read much of my site. I have no need to disprove  this or that passage, or cut something out, because I don\u2019t see the  Bible as divine. I see it as man made. Yes, a lot of  passages of the Bible treat women like property, but to me this makes perfect sense given that the Bible was written by ordinary men within a culture where sexism and misogyny were the norm. Brian\u2019s accusation that I am trying to rewrite the Bible makes it clear that he knows there are Christians who interpret these passages differently from how he interprets them; it\u2019s just that, personally, I don\u2019t see the Bible as inspired or valuable or something I  should base my life on, so his accusation that I\u2019m rewriting it falls rather short. While we\u2019re at it, I should mention that I don\u2019t believe in God either.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Lots  of people take scissors to it now.  They usually start with the idea of  hell and move on from there.  Your writing reveals that you have  decided to fashion a god to your own liking in your heart.  This is just  as much idolatry as fashioning one of wood or stone.  You are guilty of  breaking the second of the Ten Commandments.<\/p>\n<p>Hebrews tells us  that its is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.   It\u2019s not really fearful to fall into the hands of the (non)god that  you\u2019ve created because he\u2019s totally accepting of you and would never  judge you as the God of the Bible promises to do.<\/p>\n<p>The good news  is that, you\u2019re right\u2026your god won\u2019t pitch you into hell for your  unrighteous actions and attitudes.  The bad news is that your god  doesn\u2019t exist and the God who DOES exist is keeping tabs for the Day of  Judgement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Classy.  Brian finishes by damning me to hell. Believe it or not, this is the  first time I have been damned to hell. I want to thank Brian for at  least being straightforward about his belief in an evil, twisted God who  sends  people to burn in eternal torture for \u201cunrighteous actions and  attitudes.\u201d You know, a God who is so narcissistic as  to punish people with a fate millions of times worse than the holocaust  for not worshiping him. I really don\u2019t think such a God exists, or any  God at all, but if I die  and find myself in the grips of the twisted, evil God Brian describes, I  will be the first to lead a rebellion.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent point. Growing up, I was taught that men and women are equal but have different roles. My point in my Men and Women post was that \u201cdifferent but [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":845,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[106,62],"class_list":["post-267","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christian-patriarchy","tag-marriage-2","tag-submission"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>A Complementarian Responds<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Complementarian Responds\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Love, Joy, Feminism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-15T15:59:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-08-10T04:22:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html\",\"name\":\"A Complementarian Responds\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-15T15:59:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-08-10T04:22:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\"},\"description\":\"A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Complementarian Responds\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/\",\"name\":\"Love, Joy, Feminism\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\",\"name\":\"Libby Anne\",\"description\":\"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \\\"purity culture,\\\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Complementarian Responds","description":"A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Complementarian Responds","og_description":"A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html","og_site_name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","article_published_time":"2011-09-15T15:59:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-08-10T04:22:38+00:00","author":"Libby Anne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Libby Anne","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html","name":"A Complementarian Responds","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-15T15:59:00+00:00","dateModified":"2012-08-10T04:22:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2"},"description":"A few days ago I received the following comment in response to my Men and Women in Christian Patriarchy post, and I thought it illustrated an excellent","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2011\/09\/a-complementarian-responds.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Complementarian Responds"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/","name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2","name":"Libby Anne","description":"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \"purity culture,\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.","sameAs":["http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/845"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}