{"id":28205,"date":"2016-02-02T00:22:19","date_gmt":"2016-02-02T04:22:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?p=28205"},"modified":"2016-02-02T00:22:19","modified_gmt":"2016-02-02T04:22:19","slug":"compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html","title":{"rendered":"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>In recent weeks, a Townhall.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.donotlink.com\/framed?843281\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">5 Truths You\u2019re Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America<\/a>\u2014and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article\u2019s entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a \u201csofter, gentler\u201d approach to opposing gay rights\u2014an approach that fails miserably but must\u00a0be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.<\/p>\n<p>The author, John Hawkins, begins his article as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It\u2019s hard to have an honest conversation about gay issues because liberals treat anything other than outright celebration of all things gay as \u201chate.\u201d That doesn\u2019t leave people much room to discuss a complicated issue that involves real human beings who often have to deal with a lot of challenges because of their sexual orientation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>How sad for Hawkins that\u00a0saying bigoted things about gay people is no longer socially acceptable! How hard it must be to be anti-gay in this day and age! I mean only three decades ago you could print stuff like <a href=\"homosexual%20deathstyle\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">this<\/a> with a straight face, and today you can\u2019t even equate gay people with pedophiles without people getting all upset!<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ep.tc\/problems\/28\/00a.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"579\" height=\"1013\"><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ep.tc\/problems\/28\/00b.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"460\" height=\"984\"><\/p>\n<p>Now, watch how different this rhetoric is:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If you\u2019re a compassionate person, you have to feel some sympathy when you talk to people who are closeted because they\u2019re afraid that their relatives won\u2019t accept them or someone who feels isolated and alone because his sexual orientation makes it impossible for him to have a romantic relationship with 98% of the population. Life is hard for most of us \u2014 and if you know people who are gay, chances are you recognize that it\u2019s even harder for them.<\/p>\n<p>Yet and still, you can\u2019t deny reality because there may be a few people who don\u2019t want to hear it. Sure, you don\u2019t want to unnecessarily create pain in people\u2019s lives, but ultimately, nothing creates more misery than abandoning common sense because the obvious truth might hurt someone\u2019s feelings.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This\u00a0is what bigotry looks like in the mid-2010s. It\u2019s couched in love, and even in <em>compassion<\/em>, but beyond that veneer it\u2019s comprised of the same arguments and same concerns that have been rehashed for decades\u2014the claim that being gay is a choice, that converting people back to being straight is a worthy goal, that gay people have lives that are less fulfilling, and that gay people are a threat to children. It\u2019s not the content that has changed, it\u2019s the packaging\u2014and that distinction matters.<\/p>\n<p>And now let\u2019s get into the meat of the post:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>1) You can\u2019t change your gender:<\/strong>\u00a0Have you ever heard of Body Integrity Identity Disorder? Long story short, there are people out there who believe they\u2019re \u201csupposed to\u201d have less limbs. Maybe they want to get rid of an arm or a leg. The \u201cproblem\u201d these people run into is that surgeons consider it unethical to remove a healthy, functioning body part and refuse to saw off their limbs. Instead, they just refer these people to a psychologist. That seems to make sense, doesn\u2019t it?<\/p>\n<p>Yet, when we have people who want to mutilate themselves to \u201cchange their sex,\u201d we don\u2019t treat that as a mental disorder. Instead, we take it seriously. So seriously in fact, we have\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0088cc;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rightwingnews.com\/uncategorized\/child-abuse-parents-start-hormone-treatment-for-their-9-year-old-transgender-boy\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\"><strong>9 year olds getting hormone treatments<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0so they can pretend to be another gender.<\/p>\n<p>If a client went to a doctor and said he thought he was a cow, we wouldn\u2019t send him to a surgeon to get horns and udders attached. Yet, you can no more change your sex than you can change into a cow. Even if you have a \u201csex change,\u201d your sex hasn\u2019t actually changed. A man who mutilates himself to look like a woman, still isn\u2019t female. He can\u2019t have a child. Very few men are going to knowingly date a man who\u2019s surgically mutilated himself to look like a woman. This is a terrible, horrible thing we\u2019re doing as a society to these mentally ill people. Instead of getting them the mental help they need, we\u2019re catering to their pathology. It\u2019s cruel, it\u2019s wrong, and a more compassionate society wouldn\u2019t wallow so deeply in political correctness that we\u2019d allow people to do this to themselves.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Note that bigots are still bigots, they just start their posts with platitudes to how <em>difficult<\/em> it must be to be a closeted gay person, how <em>hard<\/em> life must be for them. Without, you know, the circumspection to realize that <em>they\u00a0are the reason there are closeted gay people<\/em>. And frankly, that may be the most frustrating part of this.<\/p>\n<p>This entire section on trans people drips of an unfamiliarity with the issues that is likely born of life in an echo chamber. Look, we know that 40% of transgender people attempt suicide. We also know that transition decreases this number\u2014<em><a href=\"https:\/\/lizdaybyday.wordpress.com\/2015\/01\/02\/the-myth-of-post-op-regret-and-suicidality\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">by a lot<\/a>.<\/em>\u00a0We know that transition decreases dysphoria and improves mental health, but Hawkins throws all of this away by insisting that \u201cyou can\u2019t change your gender\u201d and that the <em>compassionate<\/em> thing to do\u2014somehow\u2014is to tell trans people they\u2019re mentally ill and need \u201chelp.\u201d And just what does this help look like, one wonders. Perhaps it looks something like gay conversion therapy? The sad thing is that Hawkins probably thinks he is <em>actually being compassionate<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>What about the nine-year-old girl Hawkins mentions? I followed the link he offered and I used this thing called google, and guess what? The child in question isn\u2019t scheduled to start hormone therapy until she\u2019s 15, and won\u2019t have gender reassignment surgery until she\u2019s 18. Yes, she\u2019s starting hormone blockers at age 9. But you know what? There is a big difference between hormone blockers (which temporarily suppress puberty by preventing the release of testosterone or estrogen) and hormone therapy (which involves taking cross-gender hormones, i.e. testosterone or estrogen).\u00a0But\u00a0you know what? The internet is full of articles on conservative news sites stating that the nine-year-old in question was starting hormone <em>therapy<\/em> when in fact the video they linked to as proof stated that she was starting hormone <em>blockers<\/em>. Nice fact checking there\u2014and again with the echo chamber.<\/p>\n<p>And now the next point:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>2) Some people do choose to be gay:<\/strong>\u00a0Most Americans tend to believe that people who are gay either choose it OR are born that way. However, the evidence suggests that there tends to more of a range of sexual behavior for people who are gay. Some people are clearly \u201cborn\u201d gay and have always been attracted to the same sex just like most heterosexuals are only interested in contact with the opposite sex. However, there are also people who are more sexually ambiguous and some of them CHOOSE to be gay.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It appears that Hawkins has never heard the term \u201cbisexual. The bi-erasure here is perhaps the most extreme I have ever seen. And it\u2019s not over.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If you want to see an actual example of that, here\u2019s\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0088cc;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rightwingnews.com\/interviews\/the-tammy-bruce-interview-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\"><strong>an excerpt of an interview I did with lesbian talk show host, Tammy Bruce<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>John Hawkins:<\/strong>\u00a0Let me ask a related question to this because I thought this was kind of fascinating because it\u2019s so different from what you often hear. In the book, you were talking about how you came to decide that you wanted to be a lesbian and you pretty much framed it in those terms. It was a choice. You were attracted to men and women and you chose to \u2014 you just liked women better \u2014 would you say that\u2019s common or\u2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Tammy Bruce:<\/strong>\u00a0Well, it\u2019s difficult to say because it\u2019s so politically incorrect to ask these questions. It\u2019s one of the reasons why \u2018 and I\u2019ve made that discussion in the epilogue \u2018 so that\u2026parents (could allow) their children (to read) at their discretion.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026There is such a variety, at least within the community itself, \u2026about why women identify as lesbians, but even what that means.<\/p>\n<p>There are a number of women who identify as lesbians, some of them, somewhat well-known, have regular liaisons with men. \u2026There are some women in the community that you could get to know\u2026who\u2019ve experienced violence at the hands of men and have turned to women for that reason. There are other women who say that they\u2019ve been gay since they\u2019ve been born and that, of course, is also politically incorrect to question or to ask them how or why they know that.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>All of this, and still no\u00a0acknowledgement that bisexual people exist.\u00a0Hawkins\u00a0even mentions a woman who was \u201cattracted to men and women\u201d and yet still he can\u2019t get wrap his head around the existence of bisexual people. It sounds like Hawkins\u2019 real beef here is with whom who are sexually attracted to both men and women choosing to identify as lesbians rather than as bisexual\u2014or at least, I\u2019d think that was his beef <em>if I actually thought he knew bisexuality was a thing<\/em>. But then, Hawkins isn\u2019t the only one to use the existence of bisexuality as a supposed \u201cproof\u201d that gay people can change, when in fact that it is nothing of the sort.<\/p>\n<p>Again\u00a0I\u2019m sensing the echo chamber, and again I get the feeling that Hawkins actually thinks he\u2019s making a big reveal here\u2014and in the process being more truthful and compassionate than those on the other side of the issue.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If that doesn\u2019t convince you, then\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0088cc;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/magazine-26089486\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\"><strong>ask yourself why so many \u201cgay\u201d Americans end up with kids<\/strong><\/a>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">In the US, around 37% of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual people have a child, about 60% of which are biological.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, there are a lot of \u201cgay\u201d Americans having enough straight sex at some point in their lives to produce a kid. Again, it\u2019s clear that there are also people who are \u201cborn that way,\u201d but there are an awful lot of gay Americans who don\u2019t fall into that category.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>First,\u00a0I have a lesbian friend who has a biological son conceived via sperm donor. She came out as a lesbian in college and has never had sex with a man, and yet she fits within Hawkins\u2019 percentages above. But second, is Hawkins aware that many gay people enter straight marriages in the vain hope that it will \u201ccure\u201d them, have biological children, and then realize they can\u2019t live a lie? And third, once again, what about bisexual people?\u00a0Hawkins seems to be lumping them in with gay and lesbian individuals, but their having children with members of the opposite sex presents no contradiction to their sexual orientation.<\/p>\n<p>But let\u2019s humor Hawkins for a moment. Let\u2019s imagine that people <em>do<\/em> choose to be gay. Let\u2019s imagine, in fact, that anyone can choose whether to be straight, bisexual, gay\/lesbian, and so on. Why, in this hypothetical world, would we insist that everyone choose to be straight? Why not let people choose their own sexual orientation and leave it at that? What possible reason can there be for deciding other people\u2019s sexual orientation for them? This is a point where we can push \u201ccompassionate\u201d bigots, forcing them to reveal the raw bigotry undergirding their positions.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>3) Conversion therapy is a good thing if people want it:<\/strong>\u00a0Let me say it as clearly as I can: No gay American should be pressured, harassed or involuntarily forced to go to therapy to try to treat their gayness. That sounds more like brainwashing than therapy and it\u2019s not something that should be going on in this country.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, if someone who\u2019s gay WANTS to be treated, why should he be stopped from seeing a therapist?\u00a0Granted, it would probably be futile for someone who has been attracted to the same sex since birth to try to change his orientation via counseling, but as we\u2019ve already noted, not everyone is in that boat.<\/p>\n<p>There are plenty of \u201cgay\u201d Americans who also feel some attraction to the opposite sex. What\u2019s wrong with letting them get therapy if they want it and think it will make them happier? As a psychology major, I can tell you that I\u2019ve read numerous old psychology books that matter-of-factly mention therapists successfully treating homosexual patients who then went on to date, marry, and have children. Does that mean it worked for every patient? Of course, not. No treatment works for everyone. But, would it work for some people who want treatment? Apparently, it does.<\/p>\n<p>So, why should this even be a political issue? Because it makes some gay people who don\u2019t believe they can change or don\u2019t want to change uncomfortable? Because it might mean they have to tell some hopeful relative that, no, that therapy isn\u2019t for them? That\u2019s certainly not a conversation anyone would want to have, but it\u2019s morally wrong to deny therapy to people who might benefit from it because it makes other people uncomfortable.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Look, no one is talking about banning a consenting adult from talking to another consenting adult. If you want to go talk to someone you call a \u201ctherapist\u201d about how to stop your same-sex attractions, fine. It\u2019s a free country. What we\u2019re talking about are\u00a0two things, really\u2014first, gay conversion therapy for minors, which is <em>inherently<\/em> coercive, and second, whether therapists can offer a discredited form of junk therapy as therapy and retain their licenses. This sort of elision\u2014acting as though banning conversion therapy for minors is somehow the same thing as banning consenting adults speaking with other consensual adults about their sexuality\u2014is common in these sorts of conversations\u2014and is something we can call out.<\/p>\n<p>And notice, again, the bi-erasure. Hawkins mentions \u201cold psychology books\u201d that speak \u201cmatter-of-factly\u201d about successful conversions of gay individuals to straight lifestyles. Look, Exodus International, a ministry that set out to \u201ccure\u201d gay people, folded a few years ago <em>because it didn\u2019t work<\/em>. Can bisexual people choose to settle down with someone of the opposite sex? Absolutely! But people with only same-sex attractions can\u2019t be \u201ccured\u201d\u2014something even Hawkins admits. But you know what? Bisexual people who settle down with someone of the opposite sex <em>are not cured gay people<\/em>. In fact, <em>they are still bisexual people<\/em>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>4) Gay bullies have become commonplace in America:<\/strong>\u00a0The biggest jerks you will ever run across are people who feel entitled to act like creeps because they believe they\u2019re victims.\u00a0A lot of gay Americans have had bad experiences with people who\u2019ve treated them poorly because they\u2019re gay. It\u2019s unfair, it\u2019s wrong, and it\u2019s something that shouldn\u2019t happen.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, a small subset of gay, liberal Americans wear their victimhood as a badge and believe it entitles them to oppress people who haven\u2019t hurt them in any way. The whole idea that an unwilling Christian baker or photographer should be forced to bake a cake or take pictures at a gay wedding is fascistic. It\u2019s similarly despicable to try to get people fired for opposing gay marriage. The people doing these things aren\u2019t victims or crusading for civil rights; they\u2019re just run-of-the-mill ***holes who happen to be waving a rainbow flag.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ohhhh this is such a perfect moment for <em>this<\/em> video!<\/p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Key &amp; Peele - Office Homophobe\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/e3h6es6zh1c?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<p>Looking carefully, though, this doesn\u2019t appear to actually be what Hawkins is getting at here. His actual argument appears to be not that gay people can be assholes just like anyone else but hater that if you\u2019re a gay person and you expect businesses to serve you the same way they would anyone else, you\u2019re a fascistic jerk. This seems to be the main thrust of Hawkins\u2019 argument here\u2014that gay people who don\u2019t want to be discriminated against are <em>assholes<\/em>. That leaves me curious. Were black people who didn\u2019t want to be discriminated against assholes too? Why is it an asshole thing to expect to be served like anyone else, but not an asshole thing to deny service based on someone\u2019s sexual orientation? Someone\u2019s priorities seem slightly askew.<\/p>\n<p>Hawkins says it\u2019s \u201cdespicable\u201d to try to get someone fired for being against marriage equality while seemingly unaware that we live in a nation\u00a0where, in many areas of the country, people are\u00a0<em>actually<\/em> be fired simply for being gay. In fact, we live in a country where an increasing number of Christian colleges are demanding the right to actively\u00a0discriminate against LGBTQ students while receiving federal funds\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/thecolu.mn\/21270\/dozens-christian-schools-win-title-ix-waivers-ban-lgbt-students\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">and getting this right<\/a>, too.\u00a0But Hawkins is concerned\u00a0that someone might be fired for being a bigot? Okay then. Those priorities are interesting, to say the least\u2014but they\u2019re also something that can be called out.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>5) Gay scoutmasters would be more likely to molest Boy Scouts:<\/strong>\u00a0There\u2019s a lot of back and forth on whether gay men are more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals, but in the end, it really doesn\u2019t matter very much when it comes to the Scouts.<\/p>\n<p>Why is that?<\/p>\n<p>Because a teenager in the Boy Scouts shouldn\u2019t be spending a lot of alone time out in the woods with someone who could potentially be attracted to him.\u00a0This is so basic we don\u2019t even think about it when teen girls are involved.\u00a0If a thirty year old, strapping male P.E. teacher took a group of 15 year old cheerleaders out in the woods, their parents would GO INSANE. Incidentally, they\u2019d be right to be upset. Similarly, a gay man has no business being in the woods with a bunch of teenage boys. In fact, if the Boy Scouts ever allowed gay Scoutmasters in their organization, it would kill them as dead as Disco because most parents don\u2019t want their child spending a lot of alone time with an adult who could be sexually attracted to him.\u00a0In fact, that is so obvious it\u2019s clear that the people pushing this idea the hardest are primarily concerned with destroying the Boy Scouts, not enabling \u201cgay rights.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>No man of any sexual orientation has any business taking a group of teenage boys into the woods <em>alone<\/em>. Look, my daughter is in Girl Scouts. She\u2019s a Daisy Scout, and is in a troop\u00a0with half a dozen other kindergarten and first graders. They meet after school. A couple of weeks ago her troop leader was going to be half an hour late to one of their meetings, and I was tapped to step in and help out even though the other leader could have easily handled half a dozen girls for half an hour. I was asked to come in\u00a0because they have a rule that you always have to have <em>two<\/em> adults. Not one, <em>two<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>This two-adult policy is considered best practices for protecting children against sexual abuse in clubs and groups that involve children. If Boy Scouts doesn\u2019t have a policy like this, they desperately\u00a0need to adopt one.\u00a0After all, without accountability measures in place, what\u2019s\u00a0to prevent a Jerry Sandusky\u2014who was straight-married, by the way\u2014from becoming a troop leader and sexually abusing the boys in his care? Oh wait, google to the rescue! It turns out Boy Scouts <em>does<\/em>\u00a0have this policy! It\u2019s listed under \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scouting.org\/Training\/YouthProtection.aspx\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Scouting\u2019s Barriers to Abuse<\/a>\u201c:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Two-deep leadership on all outings required.<\/strong> A minimum of two registered adult leaders, or one registered leader and a participating Scout\u2019s parent, or another adult is required for all trips and outings. One of these adults must be 21 years of age or older.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And actually, they have a whole <em>list<\/em> of prevention measures, including things like this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>No youth may share a tent with an adult or a person of the opposite sex other than a family member, guardian, or authorized nonrelative adult. Assigning youth members more than two years apart in age to sleep in the same tent should be avoided unless the youth are relatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Maybe if we spent more time putting policies in place to prevent sexual abuse and less time portraying gay people as the threat, our children would be safer. Actually, scratch that maybe, because there\u2019s no <em>maybe<\/em> about it. A focus on gay men\u2014or trans women\u2014as inherently a threat gets in the way of our ability to recognize <em>actual<\/em> threats. It\u2019s one of the reasons churches so frequently overlook abuse\u2014if someone pulls\u00a0off a good godly image, they\u2019re given a free pass, and no one sees any reason to create policies that focus on\u00a0accountability and abuse prevention. It\u2019s the image of the gay man as a threat that is the actual threat to our children, not the gay man.<\/p>\n<p>Also? Boy Scouts now allows for gay scoutmasters (though it leaves that decision up to the individual troop), and as far as I can see nothing has imploded.<\/p>\n<p>But what really struck me upon reading Hawkins\u2019 article were his desperate attempts to portray himself as <em>not at all<\/em> anti-gay.\u00a0Not at all! Hawkins began his article by expressing concern\u00a0for how difficult it must be to be a closeted gay person, or an out gay person looking for a partner (these are apparently hard to find), and then he went on to argue that being gay is frequently a choice, that gay conversion therapy should be defended, that gay people who expect to not be discriminated against are bullies, and that it would be totes dangerous to allow gay people to\u00a0be Boy Scout scoutmasters. NOPE. There is <em>so much<\/em> noping going on over here right now.<\/p>\n<p>Still, this is the direction in which anti-gay rhetoric appears to be going. It\u2019s the world of people who <em>totally<\/em> don\u2019t hate gay people, but you know, children just need a mother and a father. It\u2019s an expression of concern and compassion that masks a \u201cjust the facts\u201d bigotry no less painful for its deceptive sugar coating. It\u2019s a world where Focus on the Family can publish a resource titled \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.focusonthefamily.com\/parenting\/parenting-roles\/parenting-adult-children\/responding-in-love-to-an-adult-gay-child\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Responding in Love to an\u00a0Adult Gay Child<\/a>\u201d that encourages parents to state their \u201c<span style=\"color: #343434;\">concerns about the morality, health risks and potential dangers involved with the gay lifestyle.\u201d It\u2019s the future of anti-gay bigotry.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title&#8212;5 Truths You&#8217;re Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America&#8212;and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article&#8217;s entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a &#8220;softer, gentler&#8221; approach to opposing gay rights&#8212;an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":845,"featured_media":28220,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,112],"tags":[110],"class_list":["post-28205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","category-social-justice","tag-lgbtq"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title---5 Truths You&#039;re Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America---and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article&#039;s entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a &quot;softer, gentler&quot; approach to opposing gay rights---an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title---5 Truths You&#039;re Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America---and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article&#039;s entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a &quot;softer, gentler&quot; approach to opposing gay rights---an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Love, Joy, Feminism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-02T04:22:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2016\/02\/lesbians-839875_1920.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"511\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html\",\"name\":\"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-02T04:22:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-02T04:22:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\"},\"description\":\"In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title---5 Truths You're Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America---and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article's entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a \\\"softer, gentler\\\" approach to opposing gay rights---an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/\",\"name\":\"Love, Joy, Feminism\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\",\"name\":\"Libby Anne\",\"description\":\"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \\\"purity culture,\\\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric","description":"In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title---5 Truths You're Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America---and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article's entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a \"softer, gentler\" approach to opposing gay rights---an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric","og_description":"In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title---5 Truths You're Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America---and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article's entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a \"softer, gentler\" approach to opposing gay rights---an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html","og_site_name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","article_published_time":"2016-02-02T04:22:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":511,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2016\/02\/lesbians-839875_1920.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Libby Anne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Libby Anne","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html","name":"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-02-02T04:22:19+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-02T04:22:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2"},"description":"In recent weeks, a Townhill.com article from June 2014 has resurfaced. I read the article based on its title---5 Truths You're Not Allowed To Say About Gays In America---and have decided to give it a once-over here on the blog. While the article is now twenty months old, many of the themes it covers are very much at the forefront of current debates over LGBTQ rights. Further, the article's entire approach seems to me emblematic of hew rhetorics opponents of gay rights have used in recent years. These rhetorics are an attempt at a \"softer, gentler\" approach to opposing gay rights---an approach that fails miserably but must be addressed if only to be thoroughly refuted.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/compassionate-bigotry-and-the-future-of-anti-gay-rhetoric.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Compassionate Bigotry and the Future of Anti-Gay Rhetoric"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/","name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2","name":"Libby Anne","description":"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \"purity culture,\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.","sameAs":["http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/845"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28205\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28220"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}