Text reads: \u201cDating without the intent of getting married is like going to the grocery store with no money. You either leave unsatisfied or take something that isn\u2019t yours.\u201d \u2014 Anonymous<\/em><\/p>\nWhaaaaat. Let\u2019s deconstruct this, shall we?<\/p>\n
Why is it wrong to steal food from a grocery store? Because that food belongs to someone else\u2014namely, the owner of the grocery store. What if the grocery store owner decides to give away produce for free, either to certain customers or on certain days? Then it\u2019s not stealing. Who makes those decisions? The owner of the grocery store.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s try to make this tortured analogy work. What is meant to stand in for the produce at the grocery store? Presumably things like making out or having sex, as well as companionship, emotional support, and memories. Note, though, that within a relationship these are things that are shared<\/em>, not given or purchased. In other words, making out with a partner is not a good I am giving him, it is a shared experience we are having. Note, too, that these things are not finite, like the goods in a grocery store. Making out with a\u00a0current partner does not diminish one\u2019s\u00a0capacity\u00a0to make out with a future partner.<\/p>\nBut I said I was going to try to make this analogy work, didn\u2019t I? So let\u2019s look at this aspect: Who owns the goods\u00a0in a grocery store? The owner of the grocery store. Do you know who doesn\u2019t own them? Someone who might come along and buy them in the future. If you steal goods from a grocery store, you are not stealing them from a future shopper, you are stealing them from the owner. Why does this matter? Because the analogy speaks of taking \u201csomething that isn\u2019t yours.\u201d No, the analogy isn\u2019t talking about rape, it\u2019s promoting the idea that a person\u2019s \u201cgoods\u201d (primarily their body, but also their companionship, etc.) belong to their future spouse,\u00a0not to them<\/em>.<\/p>\nIn case it\u2019s not quickly becoming clear, the grocery store analogy is falling apart all over the place. The things one shares in a relationship are not finite and exhaustible the way groceries are; if the owner of a grocery store decides to give away some of their goods, the person they give them too isn\u2019t stealing; and the things one shares in a relationship are not goods to begin with, but rather shared experiences. As for leaving unsatisfied, that is why expectations should be clear up front\u2014if one partner expects sex in a relationship form the very beginning, and the other only expects to have sex if the relationship is serious, there will be discord. Problems like this are best solved through communication.<\/p>\n
But let\u2019s look at another problem here, and that is the vilification of \u201cdating without the intent of getting married.\u201d I\u2019ve personally never done this, as I was raised to take dating so seriously\u00a0that asking a girl out was little different from asking her to marry you. But you know what? I don\u2019t think it deserves to be vilified. Provided that both parties communicate and are open about expectations, I don\u2019t see anything at all wrong with dating without the intent of getting married\u2014and I can see some benefits.<\/p>\n
For instance, companionship. We benefit from friendships with others, and in our day and age (with our modern ideas about love) a partner is typically a good friend with whom one cohabitates\u2014someone you can lean on for support, and make memories and share life experiences with. We have this idea that a relationship that isn\u2019t permanent\u2014one that doesn\u2019t last until death\u2014is somehow subpar or not worth considering. I think this is unfortunate. I tell my young daughter that some friends are forever and that some are just for a time, but that friends who are just for a time aren\u2019t any less valuable, because we learn things from them and make memories with them and leave our marks on each other\u2019s lives. The same ought to apply to romantic relationships as well.<\/p>\n
There are other things we gain through romantic partnerships that aren\u2019t\u00a0(or were never intended to be) longterm, too. Namely, we learn more about what we want in a potential longterm partner (or even in a future short-term partner) and we hone our relationship skills (and learn what works, and what doesn\u2019t). I met my husband, Sean, when we were both very young, but he had had a previous girlfriend and had learned things about communication through the way that relationship fell apart. At first I was upset that he\u2019d dated someone before me, because of the sort of analogy in the meme above\u2014I felt his ex-girlfriend had somehow stolen something from me\u2014but over time I came to see that she actually gave me a gift. She didn\u2019t detract from Sean, she improved him.<\/p>\n
This isn\u2019t to say that there aren\u2019t bad relationships or partners who do damage. There are. As my children grow I plan to teach them about the characteristics of a healthy relationships and warning signs of an abusive one. I want to both teach them how to interact in a healthy way with a parter and how to recognize abusive patterns a partner may engage in. In some cases, having previously had an\u00a0abusive partner may help give a person the tools to recognize signs of abuse in a future partner. In other cases, a person may go from abusive relationship to abusive relationship, without the tools to discern the patterns. In either case, past abusive partners may leave scars, or hurts that have to be worked through over time. But the issue here isn\u2019t having short-term relationships or relationships not intended to end in marriage, it\u2019s abuse, which can occur in any relationship.<\/p>\n
At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you\u2014your body, your companionship, your experiences\u2014belong to you future spouse, even if you won\u2019t meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to\u2014yourself<\/em>. This opposition is\u00a0also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life.\u00a0Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage,\u00a0it\u2019s worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you—your body, your companionship, your experiences—belong to you future spouse, even if you won’t meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to—yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it’s worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":845,"featured_media":28309,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40,6],"tags":[106,579],"class_list":["post-28308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-evangelicalism-fundamentalism","category-feminism","tag-marriage-2","tag-relationsships"],"yoast_head":"\n
What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you---your body, your companionship, your experiences---belong to you future spouse, even if you won't meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to---yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it's worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you---your body, your companionship, your experiences---belong to you future spouse, even if you won't meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to---yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it's worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Love, Joy, Feminism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-16T09:00:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-14T18:02:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2016\/02\/10494582_10152580958934410_2407775447786337400_n.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"534\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html\",\"name\":\"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-16T09:00:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-14T18:02:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\"},\"description\":\"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you---your body, your companionship, your experiences---belong to you future spouse, even if you won't meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to---yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it's worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/\",\"name\":\"Love, Joy, Feminism\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\",\"name\":\"Libby Anne\",\"description\":\"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \\\"purity culture,\\\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?","description":"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you---your body, your companionship, your experiences---belong to you future spouse, even if you won't meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to---yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it's worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?","og_description":"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you---your body, your companionship, your experiences---belong to you future spouse, even if you won't meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to---yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it's worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html","og_site_name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","article_published_time":"2016-02-16T09:00:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-14T18:02:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":534,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2016\/02\/10494582_10152580958934410_2407775447786337400_n.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Libby Anne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Libby Anne","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html","name":"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-02-16T09:00:30+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-14T18:02:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2"},"description":"At its core, opposition to forming romantic relationships without the intent of marriage is rooted in the idea that you---your body, your companionship, your experiences---belong to you future spouse, even if you won't meet them for a decade or more. Note who you do not belong to---yourself. This opposition is also rooted in a perception of relationships that focuses on giving and taking rather than on sharing experiences and life. Next time you hear conservatives talking about the importance of marriage, it's worth remembering that their entire conception of relationships may differ fundamentally from yours.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2016\/02\/what-do-dating-and-grocery-stores-have-in-common.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What Do Dating and Grocery Stores Have in Common?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/","name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2","name":"Libby Anne","description":"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \"purity culture,\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.","sameAs":["http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/845"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28308\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"10494582_10152580958934410_2407775447786337400_n\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2016\/02\/10494582_10152580958934410_2407775447786337400_n.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n