{"id":39240,"date":"2018-10-12T05:00:24","date_gmt":"2018-10-12T09:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?p=39240"},"modified":"2018-10-09T16:19:42","modified_gmt":"2018-10-09T20:19:42","slug":"forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html","title":{"rendered":"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Forbid Them Not, pp. 270-285<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

It is now June 20th. The book opened with Nora Stoddard staking out Laura\u2019s Sunday school class on March 20th. The papers were served to Deanna on April 19th; Cooper met Laura that evening. The first hearing was April 29th, followed by the Depositions. Cooper told Peter that he was in love with Laura on May 19th; Laura got engaged on May 20th. The second hearing on May 23rd. Peter kissed Jody in New York City on May 27th, and the Today Show was June 2nd.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m going to try to speed through some relatively boring parts.<\/p>\n

We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall\u2019s lawyer telling him that anyway. At least, I do. I won\u2019t make you sit through it. The only thing that confuses me is why Randall was so tight-lipped about everything to begin with.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe New York Times reached Mr. Wasson\u2019s brother at home. And his brother called and yelled at my client, demanding to know the truth. Mr. Wasson told him that he refused to answer the question unless his bother was willing to disclose what charities he supports with his own personal funds. But even so, the matter has erupted, and Mr. Wasson feels led to terminate the relationship. Too many other goals are jeopardized.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This confuses me because rich right-wing donors aren\u2019t usually so concerned about people finding out what causes they support. Why doesn\u2019t Randall tell his brother that that\u2019s his own business, and to go deal, and go on funding Cooper?<\/p>\n

Regardless, Cooper next calls the Center for Constitutional Litigation and sets up a time for them to meet with his clients. I\u2019m upset that we\u2019re not given any reason for Cooper not calling Concerned Women for America, which was Peter\u2019s initial suggestion. Why mention CWA at all only to drop it? Farris actually worked for CWA early on in his career. His name-dropping isn\u2019t confusing. It\u2019s his dropping<\/em> of the organization afterwards that\u2019s confusing.<\/p>\n

Next Cooper calls Peter. He engages in some banter with Sally, Peter\u2019s secretary who first invited him onto the chatroom he\u2019s been frequently. Sally tells Cooper that she loves that in the chatroom, all that matters is what you say, not what you look\u2014but when lets drop that he went on the chat room under the name Rocky, she says they already have a Rocky: \u201cHe\u2019s twice divorced and keeps asking every woman if she is single.\u201d What you say is not<\/em> all that matters.<\/p>\n

Cooper finally gets through to Peter, and lets him know that he has lost his funding. Peter is sorry about the situation, but does not bring up Concerned Women for America or any similar potential funding source. Instead, he suggests that Cooper finish the brief and argue the case before the Virginia Supreme Court using what funds he has, and then turn the case over to the Center for Constitutional Litigation for the appeal to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The question of the emails comes up, and I swear that this is all\u2014literally all\u2014that is said:<\/p>\n

\u201cMan, that\u2019s too bad. Do you have any idea how the reporter found out?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cNone. Unless someone is reading my e-mail or tapping my phone.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cOh yeah, I talked to my friend, Aaron, the computer whiz. He said that there are a number of ways to intercept e-mails, and that you shouldn\u2019t put anything truly sensitive through an account they know about.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThanks. But I probably won\u2019t be on the case much longer anyway.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That\u2019s literally it.<\/p>\n

Nothing about trying to find out how to figure out who hacked his email, or even whether it\u2019s possible to find out. This exchange is curious too, given that Cooper just told Randall\u2019s lawyer that he didn\u2019t send anything via email, and given that, at Randall\u2019s bequest, Cooper never talked to Randall about the business on the phone (they met at his office before hours).<\/p>\n

All I can think is that they\u2019re both really, really tired. Or something. If this were an interesting book, they might be being slowly drugged or something, such that they\u2019re forgetting things they\u2019re supposed to check, or remember.<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s the end of the chapter. Really! I told you it had a lot of filler. I\u2019m going to keep going anyway.<\/p>\n

It is now June 21, and we\u2019re going on the chatroom. At least, that\u2019s what I assume. Peter is not on the chat, and nor is Sally, but we enter the chatroom with \u201cYou are entering Mars Hill\u201d nevertheless. Cool. Exciting!<\/p>\n

Contentlady: I don\u2019t believe we should give up on our country just because of the current bunch in DC.
\nSancty-fried: Are you saying that our government is bananas?
\nFiremomma: Courtesy laugh to Sancty. Ha.
\nAbba4JC: They may not be bananas but they are nuts if they think I am going along with this one.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I don\u2019t buy that their language on the subject would be this \u2026 tame. I\u2019d expect to hear more about the Antichrist, or about libtards. And maybe something about armed insurrection, and guns.<\/p>\n

Angelic: Has something new happened in America? I am in Canada and I don\u2019t hear everything that is going on.
\nNotreally: Our newly elected president has decided to eliminate tax deductions for more than three children in a family. So if you have a big family like me, you are toast.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Oh! Oh! This is interesting, because it\u2019s so early 2000s!<\/p>\n

Notreally: They think like China does. Too many kids. Have only one. It\u2019s Thursday. Time to eat rice again.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there was a lot of concern on the Right about China\u2019s one-child policy, and the potential that the Left might try something similar in the U.S. The irony is that its was conservatives, not liberals, who introduced the bills that came the closest to this. A 2012 Pennsylvania bill<\/a> would have barred women from receiving TANF assistance if they had another child well already receiving assistance. (Conservatives draw a distinction between tax deductions and credits for people with large families, and welfare assistance for large families, but the two are not that dissimilar.)<\/p>\n

Anyway, back to the chat. There is a whole lot of back and forth that consists primarily of chatroom members cracking jokes, and then laughing at each other\u2019s jokes. Sally comes on and more hilarity ensues. Ultimately, she tells them about Cooper\u2019s financial situation\u2014which means either that she listened in on her boss\u2019s call, or that he told her about it\u2014and she tells them she has an idea. She suggests that they each send Peter a check for $25, and then email everyone in their \u201cemail directory\u201d with a request that they do the same, and pass it on.<\/p>\n

Because it\u2019s predictable at this point, I\u2019ll go ahead and let you know that this works, and that it fixes Cooper\u2019s funding problem, and that\u00a0no one ever circles back around to Concerned Women for America.\u00a0<\/em>In case you haven\u2019t noticed, I hate loose ends! Don\u2019t throw it out there and then completely forget it was ever a thing!<\/p>\n

That is my summary of six straight pages of chat logs. Really. All they do is banter. And not in an interesting manner. Notreally tries to one-up everyone else by donating $27.50, and Sally says she\u2019ll hold him to it, and then latter after they iron out the details Notreally says \u201cwe will send our $25\u201d and Sally says \u201cNotreally, you gotta send $27.50.\u201d Ha! Ha! Ha!<\/p>\n

Ok enough chat room. That\u2019s the end of a second<\/em> chapter and I still<\/em> don\u2019t feel like we have a lot of meat here. I mean really, what has happened in these chapters? Cooper got the call we all knew was coming from Randall\u2019s lawyer. Cooper then called the secular lawyers to set up an appointment, and then Peter, who basically had nothing for him. I\u2019m starting to think that call was just an excuse, to let Sally know he\u2019s financially strapped, cue the chat room.<\/p>\n

Whatever. I\u2019m going to keep going. Onward and upward!<\/p>\n

He couldn\u2019t help but look back as he walked away from the parking area near the bike trail. That salesman was<\/em> right. The paint on his GMC Jimmy really did seem to change color in direct sunlight, albeit early morning sunlight.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Or downward<\/em>, I guess.<\/p>\n

But how was he going to make the insurance payments? He had been so focus ed on the UN case that he had started turning down other clients. His uncle had warned him bout that, but the money seemed so certain.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Definitely<\/em> downward.<\/p>\n

Cooper is having a very moody run. He\u2019s so upset by the knowledge that he\u2019ll soon be off the case\u2014and about \u201cthe lost cause with Laura\u201d\u2014that he\u2019s having trouble concentrating on the brief he\u2019s supposed to be writing. The Thomases and Garvises met with the lawyers from the Center for Constitutional Litigation, Farris lets us know, and while \u201cneither Deanna or Jeanne wanted to switch attorneys,\u201d they were swayed by their husbands, who \u201cconvinced them that the financial realities left them no choice.\u201d No one, it seems, mentioned Concerned Women for America.<\/p>\n

He thinks about jogging off the track to Laura\u2019s elementary school, but then realizes that staring at an empty building (it\u2019s summer) would make him feel \u201crather ridiculous,\u201d so he doesn\u2019t. Melancholy Cooper is melancholy.<\/p>\n

But then! Then! Good news!<\/p>\n

Well, sort of good news.<\/p>\n

The Washington Times<\/em> calls him on his cell. He pauses his jog to take the call, only to find that it\u2019s his lucky break!<\/p>\n

\u201cWe hear that you are stepping down from the UN case. I\u2019m calling to verify that and ask why, if it is true.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cooper started to laugh incredulously. \u201cWho told you that?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWell, I suppose I can tell you. He didn\u2019t say it was confidential. Someone named Terry Pipkin. Is he connected with the case? He claimed to be on the inside somehow.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI see,\u201d Cooper said, the blood running hot through his veins.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Yes! Yes! You have him now Cooper, you have him!<\/p>\n

On second thought, maybe I should have stopped after the second chapter. I think this book is making me loopy.<\/p>\n

Cooper doesn\u2019t want to say anything to the\u00a0Washington Times\u00a0<\/em>reporter, but promises her an exclusive when he has something to say. Then he hangs up.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019ll also give you the exclusive story on how I am going to beat the tar out of a creep named Terry Pipkin,\u201d he promised, not into his cell phone but in the general direction of the cornfield.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Cool<\/em>.<\/p>\n

And I\u2019m going to leave it there.<\/p>\n

I have a <\/b>Patreon<\/b><\/a>! Please support my writing!<\/b><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall’s lawyer telling him that anyway. At least, I do. I won’t make you sit through it. The only thing that confuses me is why Randall was so tight-lipped about everything to begin with.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Click through to read more!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":845,"featured_media":39246,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[719],"class_list":["post-39240","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-forbid-them-not"],"yoast_head":"\nForbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall's lawyer telling him that anyway.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall's lawyer telling him that anyway.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Love, Joy, Feminism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T09:00:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-09T20:19:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2018\/10\/jogger-1379443_1920.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"516\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html\",\"name\":\"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-12T09:00:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-09T20:19:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\"},\"description\":\"We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall's lawyer telling him that anyway.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/\",\"name\":\"Love, Joy, Feminism\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\",\"name\":\"Libby Anne\",\"description\":\"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \\\"purity culture,\\\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger","description":"We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall's lawyer telling him that anyway.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger","og_description":"We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall's lawyer telling him that anyway.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html","og_site_name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","article_published_time":"2018-10-12T09:00:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-09T20:19:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":516,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/166\/2018\/10\/jogger-1379443_1920.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Libby Anne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Libby Anne","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html","name":"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-12T09:00:24+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-09T20:19:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2"},"description":"We all knew that the funding from Randall was toast after the New York Times called Peter to ask him about it, but we have to sit through a long phone conversation between Cooper and Randall's lawyer telling him that anyway.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2018\/10\/forbid-them-not-the-eager-chatter-and-the-angry-jogger.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Forbid Them Not: The Eager Chatter and the Angry Jogger"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/","name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2","name":"Libby Anne","description":"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \"purity culture,\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.","sameAs":["http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/845"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39240"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39240\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39240"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}