{"id":9422,"date":"2012-10-11T05:29:43","date_gmt":"2012-10-11T09:29:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?p=9422"},"modified":"2012-10-05T18:24:10","modified_gmt":"2012-10-05T22:24:10","slug":"sex-men-and-giving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html","title":{"rendered":"Sex, men, and “giving”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Yesterday we talked about what it means when evangelicals and fundamentalists speak of a woman \u201cgiving\u201d in the context of sex \u2013 namely, that it involves a woman \u201cgiving\u201d sex to her husband in order to fulfill his sexual needs. Well, I was recently pointed to an article called Necessities for God-Glorifying Sex<\/a>\u00a0which speaks of the man<\/em> \u201cgiving.\u201d It made me realize that this is something I\u2019ve seen before<\/a>. Let\u2019s take a look, shall we?<\/p>\n

First, note that the title of the article \u2013 \u201cNecessities for God-Glorifying Sex\u201d \u2013 suggests that sex should glorify God. In fact, I\u2019ve heard it said before that sex should be an act of worship \u2013 not worship of each other or of hedonistic pleasure, but worship of God<\/em>. (Personally, I always found that idea unsettling.)<\/p>\n

Anyway, I\u00a0want to focus on the article\u2019s second point (the first is that sex should only occur within marriage, because that is the only time when sex is glorifying to God \u2013 outside of marriage sex makes a lie, because it is taking something that is a sign of the marriage covenant and performing it where no such covenant exists), \u201cthe necessity of complementarity.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

2. The necessity of complementarity:<\/h3>\n

God\u2019s story is about the union of two complementary entities who fit together like pieces of a puzzle. God-glorifying sex requires the coming together of one male body and one female body. Physical complementarity is a necessity.\u00a0The parallel images I sketched out in my last post<\/a>\u00a0demonstrate why.<\/p>\n

Which brings up a critical point: Complementarians believe that the physical differences between male and female speak to who God created us to BE. They address our core ontological identities. Complementarity is more about who you ARE than it is about what you DO. If you try to reduce complementarity to a \u201che-does-this-and-she-does-that\u201d list, you will get it wrong.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Parenthetically, if you\u2019ve been hearing the word \u201ccomplementarianism\u201d and wondering what it means, the above is a decent explanation. Complementarianism holds that men and women are fundamentally different and that those differences both affect one\u2019s role in life and should be celebrated rather than minimized. They often use the puzzle analogy. Note that the author of this article is trying to distance herself from straight-up patriarchy (and honestly, the difference is only a slight rhetorical one) by saying she\u2019s not talking about a list of who does what, but rather about who you are<\/em>. As we\u2019ll see in a moment, this distinction is pointless.<\/p>\n

Both man and woman bring the totality of who they are into the marriage bed. In the act of sex they connect as counterparts on every possible level\u2014physical, emotional, and spiritual. God designed the two pieces to fit. It\u2019s the complementarity that facilitates a perfect union.<\/p>\n

Though I hesitate to state the obvious, all heterosexual sex is fundamentally \u201ccomplementary\u201d in nature.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

You can see how gay sex makes no sense in this paradigm.<\/p>\n

So, is authority and submission an erotic necessity for God-honoring sex? No. Absolutely not, if you\u2019re defining those terms as something a husband and wife \u201cdo\u201d (for example, he\u2019s on top\/she\u2019s on the bottom)\u2014but in a way, yes, if you\u2019re alluding to the essence of who they \u201care\u201d as male and female.<\/p>\n

Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially\u00a0bestow<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0give<\/em>, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully\u00a0welcome<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0receive<\/em>. \u201cAuthority\u201d and \u201csubmission\u201d are flat-lettered, black-and-white words that hint at, but are woefully inadequate to express the color, depth, wonder, and mystery of who God has created us to be as male and female.<\/strong><\/p>\n

A man is at no time more \u201cmanly\u201d and woman is at no time more \u201cwomanly\u201d than in the act of sex. (Sex as God intended it, that is.) His body \u201cgives\u201d in a way that hers can\u2019t. Her body \u201creceives\u201d in a way that his can\u2019t. Sex is where complementarity reaches its apex and is eclipsed by the \u201coneness\u201d that ensues at the joining of the counterparts. It is the place where complementarity and mutuality kiss.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Remember how I said that emphasizing that complementarianism is about who you are rather than what you do is a sort of pointless distinction? Well, here we see why: because they believe who you are dictates what you do<\/em>. Saying that men and women are to perform different roles in sex isn\u2019t a check list, they insist; rather, men and women perform these different roles in sex as a reflextion of who men and women are<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Anyway, what you see here is a nod to Doug Wilson\u2019s writing on dominance and submission in the marriage bed<\/a>. Not merely a nod, really; it\u2019s\u00a0more of an endorsement. It\u2019s a welcome embrace of the words \u201cauthority\u201d and \u201csubmission,\u201d and an attempt to explain any negative connections with this away by suggesting that these words are simply \u201cflat-lettered, black-and-white words\u201d that are \u201cwoefully inadequate to express the color, depth, wonder, and mystery of who God has created us to be as male and female.\u201d You see all those words. Those are all just fancy words that say \u201cI know evoking words like authority and submission in marriage and in life in general sounds bad, but it really really really isn\u2019t we promise!\u201d<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s look back at how this passage uses the word \u201cgive\u201d:<\/p>\n

Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially\u00a0bestow<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0give<\/em><\/strong>, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully\u00a0welcome<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0receive<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In other words, this passage suggests that in the act of sex it is men<\/em> who give and women<\/em> who\u00a0receive. This is interesting because it seems on face value to be opposite to all of the other voices saying that men need sex and that wives have an obligation and duty to provide it. I mean, it\u2019s saying that men<\/em> are the ones who give! But just what does \u201cgive\u201d mean here?<\/p>\n

His body \u201cgives\u201d in a way that hers can\u2019t. Her body \u201creceives\u201d in a way that his can\u2019t.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Oh. I see. \u201cGive\u201d means \u201cpenetrate.\u201d I suppose you could take it a step further and say that the man is giving the woman his seed, and that she receives it. This reminds me of the (fake) Bible verse Saffron quotes in Firefly:<\/p>\n

On the night of their betrothal, the wife shall open to the man as the furrow to the plow,<\/strong> and he shall work in her, in and again, till she bring him to his fall, and rest him then upon the sweat of her breast.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I\u2019m not completely sure what to make of this. When evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about women \u201cgiving\u201d in the context of sex, it generally means a woman choosing to sublimate her own desires and have sex with her husband (out of a desire to meet his needs) even if she\u2019s not especially in the mood. And yet when they talk about men \u201cgiving\u201d in the context of sex, they mean penetrating. When men \u201creceive\u201d that means they\u2019re being given the pleasure of sex by their wives. When women \u201creceive\u201d in the context of sex that means they\u2019re being penetrated.<\/p>\n

I want to be clear here that I know I am talking in generalizations. It\u2019s much more common to hear evangelicals and fundamentalists talking about a woman \u201cgiving\u201d her husband sex than to hear them use the terms \u201cgive\u201d and \u201creceive\u201d to refer to penetration. And it\u2019s also true that there is being more emphasis on female pleasure in evangelical and fundamentalist circles than in the past. Hopefully in the future evangelicals and fundamentalists will move towards seeing sex as being about egalitarian mutual pleasure.<\/p>\n

But that doesn\u2019t negate the reality of this talk of penetrating as giving and being penetrated as receiving. It\u2019s not just this one blog, it\u2019s the same sort of language that Doug Wilson and his supporters used. Interestingly, they seem to see it as very natural. The man penetrates and the woman is penetrated, the man bestows and the woman welcomes, the man leads and the woman submits, all flowing into each other.<\/p>\n

What I don\u2019t understand is, why can\u2019t we speak of the woman enveloping the male? The language need not be one way, but I don\u2019t think these particular individuals realize that.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive.” Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man’s role “giving” in sex. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":845,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[106,105],"class_list":["post-9422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-purity","tag-marriage-2","tag-sex-2"],"yoast_head":"\nSex, men, and "giving"<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\""Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive." Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man's role "giving" in sex.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sex, men, and "giving"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\""Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive." Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man's role "giving" in sex.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Love, Joy, Feminism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-10-11T09:29:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-10-05T22:24:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Libby Anne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html\",\"name\":\"Sex, men, and \\\"giving\\\"\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-10-11T09:29:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-10-05T22:24:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\"},\"description\":\"\\\"Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive.\\\" Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man's role \\\"giving\\\" in sex.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sex, men, and “giving”\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/\",\"name\":\"Love, Joy, Feminism\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2\",\"name\":\"Libby Anne\",\"description\":\"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \\\"purity culture,\\\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sex, men, and \"giving\"","description":"\"Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive.\" Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man's role \"giving\" in sex.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sex, men, and \"giving\"","og_description":"\"Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive.\" Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man's role \"giving\" in sex.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html","og_site_name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","article_published_time":"2012-10-11T09:29:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-10-05T22:24:10+00:00","author":"Libby Anne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Libby Anne","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html","name":"Sex, men, and \"giving\"","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-10-11T09:29:43+00:00","dateModified":"2012-10-05T22:24:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2"},"description":"\"Sex is the union of two complementary beings\u2014a male, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to lovingly and self-sacrificially bestow and give, and a female, who God created with a physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual bent to actively and joyfully welcome and receive.\" Come along as I dissect this and more in an effort to look at how evangelicals and fundamentalists talk about the man's role \"giving\" in sex.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/2012\/10\/sex-men-and-giving.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sex, men, and “giving”"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/","name":"Love, Joy, Feminism","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/#\/schema\/person\/fae465c1bbb5cbdf26c9e73bfd1b73d2","name":"Libby Anne","description":"Libby Anne grew up in a large evangelical homeschool family highly involved in the Christian Right. College turned her world upside down, and she is today an atheist, a feminist, and a progressive. She blogs about leaving religion, her experience with the Christian Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements, the detrimental effects of the \"purity culture,\" the contradictions of conservative politics, and the importance of feminism.","sameAs":["http:\/\/patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/author\/libby"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/845"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9422"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9422\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/lovejoyfeminism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}