Do We Have a Leadership Problem? Or a Follower Problem? Or Both?

Do We Have a Leadership Problem? Or a Follower Problem? Or Both? June 13, 2012


“I don’t know if America has a leadership problem;

it certainly has a followership problem.”


So writes New York Times columnist David Brooks in his recent column, “The Follower Problem.” According to Brooks, “To have good leaders you have to have good followers — able to recognize just authority, admire it, be grateful for it and emulate it.” But we don’t have good followers today, and this is a significant problem.

Brooks gets into his subject from a most unexpected direction: the changing “feel” of monuments in Washington D.C. That’s right, monuments:

If you go to the Lincoln or Jefferson memorials in Washington, you are invited to look up in admiration. Lincoln and Jefferson are presented as the embodiments of just authority. They are strong and powerful but also humanized. Jefferson is a graceful aristocratic democrat. Lincoln is sober and enduring. Both used power in the service of higher ideas, which are engraved nearby on the walls.

The monuments that get built these days are mostly duds. That’s because they say nothing about just authority. The World War II memorial is a nullity. It tells you nothing about the war or why American power was mobilized to fight it. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. memorial brutally simplifies its subject’s nuanced and biblical understanding of power. It gives him an imperious and self-enclosed character completely out of keeping with his complex nature.

A group of students at the FDR memorial. Don't miss the dog statue.

As Michael J. Lewis of Williams College has noted, the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial transforms a jaunty cavalier into a “differently abled and rather prim nonsmoker.” Instead of a crafty wielder of supreme power, Roosevelt is a kindly grandpa you would want to put your arm around for a vacation photo.

Our squeamishness about monuments that celebrate leadership reflects, according to Brooks, a strong anti-authoritarian current in our culture:

Why can’t today’s memorial designers think straight about just authority?

Some of the reasons are well-known. We live in a culture that finds it easier to assign moral status to victims of power than to those who wield power. Most of the stories we tell ourselves are about victims who have endured oppression, racism and cruelty.

Then there is our fervent devotion to equality, to the notion that all people are equal and deserve equal recognition and respect. It’s hard in this frame of mind to define and celebrate greatness, to hold up others who are immeasurably superior to ourselves.

But the main problem is our inability to think properly about how power should be used to bind and build. Legitimate power is built on a series of paradoxes: that leaders have to wield power while knowing they are corrupted by it; that great leaders are superior to their followers while also being of them; that the higher they rise, the more they feel like instruments in larger designs. The Lincoln and Jefferson memorials are about how to navigate those paradoxes.

Brooks suggests that we need to “relearn the art of following”:

Democratic followership is also built on a series of paradoxes: that we are all created equal but that we also elevate those who are extraordinary; that we choose our leaders but also have to defer to them and trust their discretion; that we’re proud individuals but only really thrive as a group, organized and led by just authority.

I agree with Brooks. But I wonder how we do this. I don’t think it’s a matter of simply deciding to be good followers. It seems to me that good followership can only be nurtured in the context of institutions, institutions that value leadership and that are led by honorable leaders. But, I suppose a case could be made for the power of a different kind of monuments to shape our broader cultural understanding of power and authority.

"Happy birthday USA you are 243 years old today. Like in a marriage, a lot ..."

Astounding Freedom: A Reflection for Independence ..."
"Great article on Thanksgiving. More of us should be thankful to those who work hard. ..."

A Simple “Thank You” That Makes ..."
"Thank You, I hope our paths will cross again. Till next time, make it a ..."

How to Make Your Job So ..."
""For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God's sight, ..."

Grace Will Find You Out

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Stephen Pollock

    Interesting.  I think our culture aches for good leadership.  However, I think we fail to recognize those leaders when we have them – partially due to our short attention span – flaky folks that we are.  The crowds seem to stay restless.

  • The celebrity players are always hardest to coach. I worry that we are turning into a culture of celebrity players. And none of us want to listen to our coaches.

  • Brings to mind MacIntyre’s observation that, “in our culture we know of no organized movement towards power which is not bureaucratic and managerial in mode and we know of no justifications for authority other than those couched in terms of instrumental effectiveness.”

    If power, especially institutional power, is based on suppressed Nietzschean premises (and in our current politics, it almost always is), then the types of memorials lauded by Brooks are simply no longer possible.

    I believe the local church is truly the hope of the world. And to be that hope, the local church must clearly demonstrate what properly constituted authority looks like.

  • Evan

    It seems to me that a trend began in the late 1960s in Academia and the Media to do away with “heroes.” Anyone previously revered in American culture would at the bare minimum have every wart exposed and magnified, and in some cases, they were held up for scorn instead of admiration. Washington and Lincoln are two examples out of many I could cite. Not surprisingly, Jesus Christ is usually reduced to a Woodstock-style hippie who had no thought of claim to deity, and the notion of following Him as God Almighty is ridiculed. So part of the problem cited by Brooks is how Academia and the Media now treat leaders in general.

    But there is an even larger factor at work. Human beings are, by their very nature, non-followers. We all shake our fists at the Godhead and say, “You can’t tell me what to do!” and eat the fruit we were told to avoid, and the consequences we were warned about come into play. We all go our own way and refuse to follow the greatest leader of all. The best citizen followers turn out to be godly people… IF the leader is operating within the proper boundaries. If the choice comes down to following God or following Caesar, then godly people become very intractible about following Caesar, so much so that many Caesars attempted to eliminate them.