menu

It’s not a good sign when the Third Reich is More Tolerant than the US Government

It’s not a good sign when the Third Reich is More Tolerant than the US Government April 9, 2012

A reader writes:

I was doing some research the other day, was reading the 1933 concordat between the Nazis and the Holy See, and realized they had a broader definition of church activity than the HHS mandate’s religious exemption. Blogged it here.

I thought you might find it intriguing. Also, there’s the quote that Mark Steyn pointed out where a Washington Post person said, “Maybe the Founders were wrong to guarantee free exercise of religion in the First Amendment, but they did…” Blogged here (with video):

Anyway–we really do live in interesting times.

Yeah, the burning itch of the lefty to crush free speech and the rankling resentment of things like the first amendment is one of the perennial facts of American politics. When you know what’s best for everybody, it galls you to hear unanointed people spouting off.

"I also think netflix is more evil than good, the things they have and support ..."

A reader struggles with scruples about ..."
"I am pretty sure remote cooperation is evil unless with proportionate reasons..."

A reader struggles with scruples about ..."
"Just one nit - the Dickey Amendment (the bit of law that supposedly "forbids" the ..."

Heresy of the Day: Antinomianism

Browse Our Archives