As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally respond to it first. We don\u2019t, as we noted, phone the White House demanding that the library parking-lot pothole be fixed. Work done by ordinary people close to the situation is preferred, not intrusions by large, fat-fingered bureaucracies 3,000 miles away. Therefore, says the Compendium of Catholic Social Teaching, the principle of subsidiarity is opposed to \u201ccertain forms of centralization, bureaucratization and welfare assistance and to the unjustified and excessive presence of the state in public mechanisms.\u201d<\/p>\n
Note, however, the all-important word \u201ccertain,\u201d not \u201call.\u201d The Church is as keenly aware as the most ardent libertarian that, \u201cby intervening directly and depriving society of its responsibility, the social-assistance state leads to a loss of human energies and an inordinate increase of public agencies, which are dominated more by bureaucratic ways of thinking than by concern for serving their clients and which are accompanied by an enormous increase in spending.\u201d It really gets that.<\/p>\n
But it also gets something else: Sometimes the people and institutions closest to the problem can\u2019t handle the problem. Suppose the library board is locked in chaos because the head of the library suspects the treasurer is having an affair with her husband. She vengefully refuses to fix the pothole because she is scheming to make the treasurer look incompetent. The pothole gets bigger. Patrons are having severe tire damage. Nothing gets done. Then what?<\/p>\n
Then you go up the ladder of authority by \u201cgoing over the heads\u201d of the squabbling library board. That still doesn\u2019t mean you phone the White House, of course. But maybe you go to the city council and ask them to make the library get it in gear and fix the pothole (and replace the incompetents running the library). The point remains the same: Stay as close to the local and the small as you can to get the job done. Only go up the ladder of authority when you really need to. Small is beautiful. Keep it simple; keep it local. Keep as much of the work and love to be done in the hands of real people, with faces and hearts, and only call on an increasingly faceless upper-echelon bureaucracy when you absolutely have to.<\/p>\n
Again, this doesn\u2019t mean there\u2019s no place for the state and even the huge state of a world power such as the United States, or a super-state, in Catholic political thought. Recall that the Church was born in a world that was controlled by a super-state called the Roman Empire. And even when that empire was ruled by a demented maniac called Nero, who butchered Christians and slaughtered apostles, the apostle he slaughtered, St. Paul, said:<\/p>\n
\u201cLet every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore, he who resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of him who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God\u2019s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain; he is the servant of God to execute his wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore, one must be subject, not only to avoid God\u2019s wrath, but also for the sake of conscience. For the same reason you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay all of them their dues, taxes to whom taxes are due, revenue to whom revenue is due, respect to whom respect is due, honor to whom honor is due\u201d (Romans 13:1-7).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Paul thought the common good and civil peace so important that, like Jesus, he urges believers to pay their taxes and pay their respects to the state \u2014 even when the state is run by a psychopath like Nero.<\/p>\n
This does not, of course, mean that we are obliged to endure tyranny when we can change the state. Its rights are not absolute. But it does mean that theories that tell us that the state has, effectively, no role in the common good are bunk. The purpose of the higher authority and power is to protect the lower powers, and all exist in order to serve the greatest good:\u00a0the dignity of each and every human person.<\/em><\/p>\n\n
This explains how the Church organizes herself, too. There is not only the universal Church. There is also the particular Church: that is, each diocese in the world. This is normatively ruled, not by the pope, but by the local bishop. The pope doesn\u2019t micromanage the new paint job your parish needs. Indeed, even the local bishop doesn\u2019t do that, unless the parish budget is such a mess that your priest can\u2019t get it together and get the job done. Normally, the bishop would only step in if the local parish was bankrupting itself on the paint job. And, normally, the pope only steps into a diocese if the bishop is letting things go to utter rack and ruin. Again, problems are handled by those close to the problem, and problems only get bumped upstairs when those at lower levels of authority can\u2019t deal with them.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
That said, the Church does, in fact, say that the nation-state and even some kind of super-state can well have real roles to play:<\/p>\n
\u201cVarious circumstances may make it advisable that the state step in to supply certain functions. One may think, for example, of situations in which it is necessary for the state itself to stimulate the economy because it is impossible for civil society to support initiatives on its own. One may also envision the reality of serious social imbalance or injustice where only the intervention of the public authority can create conditions of greater equality, justice and peace. In light of the principle of subsidiarity, however, this institutional substitution must not continue any longer than is absolutely necessary, since justification for such intervention is found only in the\u00a0exceptional nature\u00a0of the situation\u201d (Compendium, 188).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The instinct, then, is always toward giving as much responsibility and power to the smallest rather than the mighty.\u00a0Indeed, the mighty have power, in such a vision, precisely for the sake of little<\/em>. For the entire purpose of the greater power is not to acquire more power, but to ensure that the little and weak are able to participate to the extent they are able in the good of the earth, the work of human beings and, ultimately, in the life of the Blessed Trinity.<\/p>\nThat\u2019s really what subsidiarity is all about: participation. Therefore, the Church tends to favor systems that are democratic. This is nothing new, by the way. The oldest democratic institution on the face of the earth is the Dominican order, which makes its decisions with the full participation of all its members. It was medieval Catholic Europe that invented both the Magna Carta (written by a Catholic cardinal) and the English Parliamentary system, not to mention the guilds in which common folk increasingly ordered their own affairs. The Church\u2019s habit is not to micromanage, but to leave people to figure out how to organize their own lives according to their best light, in the assumption that the Holy Spirit really will provide us with the wits and resources to do it ourselves.<\/p>\n
Therefore, the Church speaks with hostility of totalitarian regimes: \u201cwhere the fundamental right to participate in public life is denied at its origin, since it is considered a threat to the state itself. In some countries where this right is only formally proclaimed, while in reality it cannot be concretely exercised; while, in still other countries the burgeoning bureaucracy\u00a0de facto\u00a0denies citizens the possibility of taking active part in social and political life\u201d (Compendium, 191).<\/p>\n
In the end, the Church, in the overwhelming number of cases, wants people to have the freedom to work out their own affairs and exercise maximum creativity and love personally, rather than leave it to some bureaucracy or corporation to do it for us \u2014 yet to be cognizant of the fact that those who are weak, poor or wounded will need the help and protection of both the private sector and the state at times.<\/p>\n
To this rule, there is one major exception, illustrated by a friend of mine from New York City. My friend had a chum. One day, as they were leaving work, my friend overheard his chum talking to his roommate on the phone. As he hung up, he said to his roomie, \u201cAnd don\u2019t forget to feed the burglar.\u201d<\/p>\n
Intrigued, my friend asked what he meant. The chum explained that he and his roommate had come home and surprised a burglar in their apartment. Reasoning that the city of New York wouldn\u2019t punish him to their satisfaction, they decided to hold court in their apartment and mete out a punishment they felt was appropriate. So they found him guilty of burglary and sentenced him to 30 days in their closet. They figured, \u201cWho will believe him once we let him out?\u201d So there he stayed, with a mattress, a bucket, some books and three squares a day for a month, at which point they let him go. According to the chum, the robber was an impressive trophy for women they brought back to the apartment and always gamely waved \u201chi\u201d when they opened the closet and showed him off.<\/p>\n
An intensely New York story, to be sure. But here\u2019s the thing: The technical term for what the roommates did is \u201ckidnapping,\u201d and they would have rightly gone to prison for years, had they been caught. The reason for that is simple: Subsidiarity tends to hold true with one huge exception \u2014 the use of force and violence. In that case, the Church\u2019s teaching tends to kick things as far up the ladder of subsidiarity as it can. Roommates don\u2019t get to lock up burglars. Only the state gets to do that. Similarly, only the state is permitted to go around arresting, cuffing and (if necessary) beating or even killing people. Hatfields and McCoys are not allowed to inflict death penalties on each other. Lynch mobs are not enterprising individuals with pluck and self-starting initiative: They are criminals taking the law into their own hands, and they should themselves be punished by the state.<\/p>\n
Moreover, the bigger the act of violence, the more difficult the Church makes it, even for the state to commit. If Kobe, Japan, police are corrupt and beat up poor people, the mayor of Seattle \u2014 Kobe\u2019s sister city \u2014 doesn\u2019t have the right to launch missiles in reprisal. If Korean trade policies injure Seattle\u2019s business, the state of Washington cannot assemble an invading armada and attack Korea. The authority to inflict the violence of war gets kicked even higher up the ladder to the federal government.<\/p>\n
And if the Church had its way, war would get kicked up the ladder even further. We saw this, for instance, in the ramp-up to the war in Iraq, when Rome consistently urged the nation-state called the United States to concede to the United Nations the authority on whether or not to declare war. The U.S., for its part, wobbled on this, simultaneously invoking U.N. Resolution 1441 (and, therefore, the U.N. as a competent authority) in making the case for war, yet denying the U.N.\u2019s authority when it said, \u201cDon\u2019t attack Iraq.\u201d<\/p>\n
The point is simply this: Precisely because the infliction of violence tends to wreak havoc on the dignity of the human person, the common good and solidarity, the Church\u2019s habit is to make the infliction of violence as hard as possible by taking away from individuals the right to inflict it, except in very rare cases of justifiable self-defense, etc.\u00a0The purpose of subsidiarity is to make us saints who \u201ctake things into our own hands\u201d as much as possible in the work of loving God and neighbor<\/em>, not in the work of joining a vigilante mob. It is ordered toward helping us use our powers to love our neighbors to the fullest extent of our abilities \u2014 and therefore to grow in solidarity with all the other sons and daughters of Adam and Eve.<\/p>\nOf which more on Monday.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/71\/2019\/08\/Washing_of_the_Feet.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally respond to it first. We don\u2019t, as we noted, phone the White House demanding that the library parking-lot pothole be fixed. Work done by ordinary people close to the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":92,"featured_media":112872,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[40],"class_list":["post-112839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-catholic-social-teaching"],"yoast_head":"\n
Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Catholic and Enjoying It!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-08-07T07:35:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-30T00:09:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/71\/2019\/08\/Washing_of_the_Feet.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"737\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mark Shea\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mark Shea\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html\",\"name\":\"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-08-07T07:35:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-30T00:09:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#\/schema\/person\/c1a9ac1e557d3c626974fd6692818ad5\"},\"description\":\"As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/\",\"name\":\"Catholic and Enjoying It!\",\"description\":\"Mark Shea's Blog: So That No Thought of Mine, No Matter How Stupid, Should Ever Go Unpublished Again!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#\/schema\/person\/c1a9ac1e557d3c626974fd6692818ad5\",\"name\":\"Mark Shea\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f287911f45adc932ad24ddbae3597ed5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f287911f45adc932ad24ddbae3597ed5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mark Shea\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/author\/markshea\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2","description":"As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2","og_description":"As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html","og_site_name":"Catholic and Enjoying It!","article_published_time":"2019-08-07T07:35:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-30T00:09:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":737,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/71\/2019\/08\/Washing_of_the_Feet.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Mark Shea","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mark Shea","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html","name":"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-08-07T07:35:49+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-30T00:09:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#\/schema\/person\/c1a9ac1e557d3c626974fd6692818ad5"},"description":"As we saw last time, the principle of subsidiarity means that, as a general rule, the people closest to a particular need or problem should generally","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/2019\/08\/part-5-of-my-series-on-catholic-social-teaching-subsidiarity-part-2.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Part 5 of my series on Catholic Social Teaching: Subsidiarity, Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/","name":"Catholic and Enjoying It!","description":"Mark Shea's Blog: So That No Thought of Mine, No Matter How Stupid, Should Ever Go Unpublished Again!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#\/schema\/person\/c1a9ac1e557d3c626974fd6692818ad5","name":"Mark Shea","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f287911f45adc932ad24ddbae3597ed5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f287911f45adc932ad24ddbae3597ed5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mark Shea"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/author\/markshea"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/92"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112839\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/112872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/markshea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}