\u2026says, \u201cShe claims to be channeling the Blessed Virgin\u201d and passes along a few quotes from her that sound like a bunch of gnostic quackery. She concludes: \u201cIf you have thoughts, I\u2019d welcome them. I know you don\u2019t chase after visions, but you also wrote a really good book about Mary (which I recommend to lots of people).\u201d<\/p>\n
First off, thanks on the books. The one volume version of Mary, Mother of the Son<\/em> is going through the typesetting phase and will be available in a few months. As to \u201cMiryam\u201d and such claims, the basic rule of thumb I use is \u201cThe burden of proof is on the \u2018visionary\u2019 to show he or she is not a quack, not on you to waste time trying to analyze her babbling and parsing through the pile of doo on the off chance there might be a diamond in it.\u201d There are plenty of approved private revelations, stick with them. There are far more quacks and cranks than there are real private revelations from Mary.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u2026says, \u201cShe claims to be channeling the Blessed Virgin\u201d and passes along a few quotes from her that sound like a bunch of gnostic quackery. She concludes: \u201cIf you have thoughts, I\u2019d welcome them. I know you don\u2019t chase after visions, but you also wrote a really good book about Mary (which I recommend to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":92,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[204],"class_list":["post-48088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-private-revelation"],"yoast_head":"\n