![\"\"](\"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_niPwTW3rBbU\/SSaotAtSCPI\/AAAAAAAAB5c\/mOoFqg0JPos\/s1600-h\/pilgrim+passing+between+worlds.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nI rather enjoy the various options there are out on the \u2018net to psychologically type oneself. There is, after all, little as much fun as looking in a mirror. And there are tons of mirrors out there. For instance one can see what is one\u2019s religion, which Winnie-the-Pooh character one is, what kind of classic movie star one is, etc. etc. What\u2019s not to love?<\/p>\n
And recently, at least for me, I\u2019ve discovered a blogger can even learn what type of various sorts their blog is. The other day I found one that determined what gender Monkey Mind is (male by eighty-two percent).<\/p>\n
Now, thanks to Kenneth Sutton<\/a>, I\u2019ve found a site that gives one\u2019s blog a Myers-Briggs<\/a> typology.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve taken the Myers-Briggs several times over the years and the read on me has shifted.<\/p>\n The first time I took it I was an INFP. (If this interests you, here\u2019s a spot<\/a> that defines these combinations of letters and what they\u2019re supposed to mean.)<\/p>\n The second time I took it I was an ENFP.<\/p>\n And the third time I took it I was an ENTP.<\/p>\n Let me be honest here. I have little faith in these instruments and their analysis. For me they are slightly more probable than astrological charts. And if you\u2019ve ever read this blog you might guess what I think of astrological charts\u2026<\/p>\n Still, that doesn\u2019t mean they aren\u2019t useful. Particularly if one holds \u2019em lightly\u2026<\/p>\n