{"id":14925,"date":"2016-12-26T08:00:46","date_gmt":"2016-12-26T16:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/?p=14925"},"modified":"2016-12-26T08:35:27","modified_gmt":"2016-12-26T16:35:27","slug":"looking-alternative-christianities-recalling-jesus-brother-james","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2016\/12\/looking-alternative-christianities-recalling-jesus-brother-james.html","title":{"rendered":"Looking at Alternative Christianities: Recalling Jesus’ brother, James"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"St-James-the-Just\"<\/a>
\nIn Eastern Orthodox circles today is the feast of James the Just<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I usually mark it out as a particularly special day. In fact I notice that a couple of years ago I even shared a little reflection I called \u201cmy personal conspiracy theory about the origins of the Christian church.\u201d Actually my understanding about James the Just, also called James the Brother of Jesus is in fact a pretty mainstream view within the academic community, or, at least it isn\u2019t contradicted by the available evidence.<\/p>\n

First, the celebration of James is quite literally a movable feast. While this feastival is celebrated today in the Eastern Christian church, in the Roman calendar it is observed on the 3rd of May, while the Anglicans like the 1st of May, except for the American ones, as well as Lutherans and some Orthodox who prefer the 23rd of October.<\/p>\n

So, what\u2019s the conspiracy? It is my contention that James, sometimes called the Just, at other times the Great, and is also called the brother of Jesus, was in fact Jesus\u2019 biological brother, and that when Jesus was killed, inherited the church. Not the apostles. Certainly not Paul. James.<\/p>\n

In Paul\u2019s various letters where he references his raising money for the \u201cpoor\u201d in Jerusalem, he is actually raising money for the central organization, which appears to have called itself the Poor, as in Ebionites<\/a>. The Wikipedia article on this lost sect summarized them as a \u201cJewish Christian movement that existed during the early centuries of the Christian Era. They regarded Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah while rejecting his divinity and insisted on the necessity of following Jewish law and rites. The Ebionites used only one of the Jewish Gospels, revered James the Just, and rejected Paul the Apostle as an apostate from the Law. Their name suggests that they placed a special value on voluntary poverty.\u201d<\/p>\n

The article goes on to observe \u201cSince historical records by the Ebionites are scarce, fragmentary, and disputed, much of what is known or conjectured about the Ebionites derives from the Church Fathers, who wrote polemics against the Ebionites, whom they deemed heretical Judaizers.\u201d And so as the article states any opinions about them are ultimately conjecture, there can, however, be educated conjecture. And what we do know is there is a person named James, who is called Jesus\u2019 brother, who is the head of the organization in Jerusalem until he is killed. If one does not assume Paul\u2019s religion that he built up among converts away from Jerusalem and environs, was anything more than one of a number of ideas and organization, then the hints are tantalizing, and do incline a reasonable person in certain directions.<\/p>\n

I have to admit how I also like that James is the putative author of the Epistle given his name, much hated by Luther and others for stating that without actually doing something, one\u2019s faith is worthless. To the degree the epistle reflects James\u2019 actual teachings it must have been a royal annoyance to Paul who put all his eggs in the faith only basket. That it survives in a document dominated by follower\u2019s of Paul suggests its importance as maybe representing the original teachings of the original organization. Now, sadly, gone. Replaced by, well, you know what is called Christianity today.<\/p>\n

My belief is pretty strong that James, the natural brother of Jesus, inherited the organization when Jesus was murdered. And that while he consulted with the apostles, he was the final arbiter until his own death. Even then the organization passed to another blood relative, a cousin<\/a>. However, not long after James\u2019 death Jerusalem was sacked and those not killed were dispersed, and in the chaos that followed, the Jewish Christian Ebionites fell apart and the gentile communities founded by Paul filled the void and became normative Christianity.<\/p>\n

Not, in my opinion, a move for the better.<\/p>\n