![\"william-of-ockham-2\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/81\/2017\/05\/william-of-ockham-2.jpg\")
<\/a>\n\u201cIt has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence which could support this.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n
Bertrand Russell<\/p>\n
It was on this day in 1328 that the minister general of the Franciscan order and three other friars, including William of Occam, fled the papal court at Avignon. They were reasonably confident if they stayed they would be condemned as heretics and executed at the order of the pope.<\/p>\n
As it turned out that feared condemnation indeed followed, but without a body to burn, there was no death sentence.\u00a0The issue at that moment was the extent of papal authority. While of importance to the development of the relationship between church and state, this is not what makes me interested in the medieval friar, William.<\/p>\n
The reason I care, and I really care, is that William, throwing a couple of wrinkles into scholastic thought, would be critical in the advance of both philosophy and science.<\/p>\n
Wikipedia\u2019s article on William states the important point with moderate clarity.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne important contribution that he made to modern science and modern intellectual culture was efficient reasoning with the principle of parsimony in explanation and theory building that came to be known as Occam\u2019s Razor. This maxim, as interpreted by Bertrand Russell, states that if one can explain a phenomenon without assuming this or that hypothetical entity, there is no ground for assuming it, i.e. that one should always opt for an explanation in terms of the fewest possible causes, factors, or variables. He turned this into a concern for ontological parsimony; the principle says that one should not multiply entities beyond necessity \u2013 Entia non sunt multiplicanda sine necessitate \u2013 although this well-known formulation of the principle is not (actually) to be found in any of Ockham\u2019s extant writings.\u201d<\/p>\n
So, he\u00a0did he not actually write the formula we understand as the Razor. The rule we have come to call the Razor is in fact much older than William. Aristotle warned that postulates should be \u201cas few as possible, consistently with proving what has to be proved.\u201d Aquinas touched on it as well. And also before William Duns Scotus famously wrote, \u201cPlurality is not to be posited without necessity.\/What can be done with few would in vain be done with more.\u201d<\/p>\n
It appears William Hamilton coined the term \u201cOccam\u2019s Razor\u201d in 1852. He also introduced the term parsimony into the deal, as in philosophical parsimony. This second William wrote:<\/p>\n
\u201cThere exists a primary presumption of philosophy. This is the law of Parcimony: which prohibits, without a proven necessity, the multiplication of entities, powers, principles or causes; above all, the postulation of an unknown force where a known [force] can account for the phaenomenon. We are, therefore, entitled to apply \u2018Occam\u2019s Razor\u2019 to this theory of causality\u201d<\/p>\n
So, maybe the person who gives us this amazing tool wasn\u2019t actually William of Occam (or Ockham). But. Still. He carries the name. And, possibly equally important to the principal is the story. Stories capture our hearts. We think at least as much through story as through reason.<\/p>\n
And so there needs to be a story. And this is the story of philosophical parsimony, of Occam\u2019s wondrous razor. For me Occam is a prophet guiding us toward the holy land. Even if he doesn\u2019t himself get to cross over the river. Still, his rejection of essences, of platonic ideals, his relentless looking into the matter as it actually presents as cleaning with as few additions as necessary is breath taking. And I\u2019m so grateful.<\/p>\n
For our lived lives, both in the scientific endeavor and in our personal and spiritual lives, Occam\u2019s razor cuts through a great deal of nonsense and points us toward the real thing.\u00a0The thing in itself. And this is of enormous value both for knowing the world, and for knowing our own hearts and minds.<\/p>\n
We need to flourish\u00a0that razor with close to the same abandon as Sweeney Todd making his meat pies.\u00a0And tasty though they may be, allowing us to see they\u2019re just meat pies. Leaving us to see what is left with clarity, or, at least, a lot more clarity.<\/p>\n
For me the razor has been a way to sort through the many truth claims presented by the religions of the world, and allowing me to set aside the larger majority of their assertions as somewhere in the highly unlikely area, and to instead focus on those that by their simplicity and clarity have a better chance of being true.<\/p>\n
Of course, the simplest explanation is not always the right one. Of course. But, if someone multiplies the universe in suggesting the reason something happens the onus is on that person to justify the more complex explanation.<\/p>\n
In my life, this has give me the space to focus on the more likely.\u00a0And, for my life this has led me to a great feast, for which I will never cease to be grateful. My path has been greatly helped by the wisdom of Occam\u2019s razor.<\/p>\n
And so, I, for one, am glad the friar fled the clutches of the pope and continued his work.<\/p>\n