{"id":225,"date":"2011-03-31T17:14:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-31T17:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology\/"},"modified":"2011-11-01T15:02:59","modified_gmt":"2011-11-01T19:02:59","slug":"recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html","title":{"rendered":"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>
\n
<\/a><\/div>\n

According to Wikipedia, on this day \u201cA sermon<\/a> on \u201cThe Nature of the Kingdom of Christ\u201d by Benjamin Hoadly<\/a>, the Bishop of Bangor<\/a>, provokes the Bangorian Controversy<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Seeing this sparked my heart. <\/p>\n

As a Unitarian seminarian taking a class in Eucharistic theology with the great Anglican theologian Louis Weil, I despaired until I discovered the good bishop.<\/p>\n

Now, the bishop was an unabashed careerist and unashamed Erastian<\/a>. The queen once observed the bishop would make a wonderful Archbishop of Cantebury, if only he were a Christian. Probably not a good man\u2026<\/p>\n

But he also had a powerful Eucharistic theology, declaring it a memorial service and extolling the power of memory. It worked for me & I followed where he led in a way that allowed me to honor the tradition that informed the class while also finding value in the Christian communion service.<\/p>\n

An unsigned article at the Anglican Eucharistic Theology<\/a> site says of the bishop and his understanding of the Eucharist:<\/p>\n

\n
\u201cBenjamin Hoadly, a Latitudinarian, published a work anonymously in 1735 entitled <\/span>A Plain Account of the Nature and End of the Sacrament of the Lord\u2019s Supper<\/span>.\u00a0 Hoadly\u2019s work was a response to what was seen as the exaggerated stress of many of the high church devotional manuals of the period, on the need for preparation and devotion before communion (Dugmore, 1942: 122).\u00a0 These manuals included Horneck\u2019s <\/span>The Crucified Jesus, The Christian Sacrament and Sacrifice <\/span>(see Case Stidy 1.27), and the <\/span>Week\u2019s Preparation <\/span>(see Case Study 2.1)<\/span> <\/span>(Stone, 1909: II, 495).\u00a0 Hoadly distanced himself in his work however, from any notion of realism, arguing that an act done in remembrance of Christ required that Christ be bodily absent and that a memorial could not be a sacrifice.\u00a0 He stated this as follows:<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cThe very Essence of this Institution being Remembrance of a past Transaction, and this Remembrance necessarily excluding the Corporal presence of what is remember\u2019d, it follows that, as the only Sacrifice and the only Sacrificer in the Christian Dispensation are remember\u2019d, and therefore not present in the Lord\u2019s Supper, so the only Christian Altar (the Cross upon which Christ suffer\u2019d) being also by consequence to be remember\u2019d, it cannot be present in this Rite, because that presence would destroy the very Notion of Remembrance.\u201d (Hoadly, 1735: 54).<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cHoadly is here separating sign and signified and thereby affirming a nominalist conception of the Eucharist.\u00a0 Hoadly\u2019s emphasis on a \u2018past transaction\u2019 separates the action of the Eucharist from the historic presence and sacrifice of Christ.\u00a0 Christ can only be remembered and not be present in the Eucharist in any realist way, since \u2018presence\u2019 for Hoadly has nothing to do with \u2018remembrance\u2019.\u00a0 For Hoadly the Eucharist was a \u201cmeeting together for religious worship and eating bread and drinking wine in remembrance of Christ\u2019s body and blood\u201d (Dugmore, 1942: 159).\u00a0 The status of the bread and wine therefore is that they are not to be taken \u201cas Things in themselves, in Remembrance of which They were ordained to be received\u201d (Hoadly, 1735: 29) but \u201cconsidered and taken as Memorials of the Body and Blood of Christ our Master\u201d such that they \u201clead Us, by their peculiar Tendency, to all such Thoughts and Practices, as are indeed the Improvement and Health of our Souls\u201d (Hoadly, 1735: 162).\u00a0 The Eucharist was therefore able, through its celebration, to lead the people in the growth of faith, but it was no more than this, since \u201cThe whole Tenor and Form of this Institution, is in the Figurative way of speaking\u201d (Hoadly, 1735: 17).\u00a0 The presence of Christ with people therefore was not intrinsic to the Eucharist, but rather to the activity of assembling in his name as his followers and disciples.\u00a0 Hoadly explains this by saying:<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cChristians, meeting together for religious worship, and eating bread and drinking wine in remembrance of Christ\u2019s body and blood, and in honour of Him, do hereby publicly acknowledge Him to be their Master, and themselves to be His disciples; and by doing this in an assembly own themselves, with all other Christians, to be one body or society under Him the Head; and consequently profess themselves to be under His government and influence, to have communion or fellowship with Him as Head, and with all their brethren as fellow-members of that same body of which He is the Head.\u201d (Hoadly, 1735: 58).<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cIn a fuller passage Hoadly discusses what happens in the Eucharist.\u00a0 He says:<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cAs bread and wine, taken at an ordinary meal, are the food of our bodies, so bread and wine, taken in a serious and religious remembrance of Christ as our Master, may (in a figurative, spiritual, or religious sense) be styled the food of our souls, or the nourishment of us considered as Christians; as the receiving them duly implies in it our believing and receiving the whole doctrine of Christ, which is the food of the Christian life; and leads our thoughts to all such obligations and engagements on our part, and all such promises on God\u2019s part, as are most useful and sufficient for improvement in all that is worthy of a Christian.\u00a0 And Almighty God on His part requiring and accepting our due performance of this part of our duty, does by this assure us who come to profess ourselves the disciples of Christ that we are in His favour.\u00a0 Or, in other words, the Lord\u2019s Supper, being instituted as the memorial of His goodness towards us in Christ Jesus, may justly be looked upon as a token and pledge to assure us of what it calls to our remembrance, namely, that God is ready to pardon and bless us upon the terms proposed by His Son; and consequently that we are received by Him as the disciples of Christ, members of His body the Church, and heirs of happiness promised to Christians, if we be not wanting to ourselves in other parts of our duty.\u201d (Hoadly, 1735: 130-131).<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cStone argues that Hoadly\u2019s theology of the Eucharist was Zwinglian, in that Christ\u2019s words at the institution were seen to be purely figurative, where Christ was bodily absent and that the memorial was not a sacrifice (Stone, 1909: II, 489).\u00a0 By this analysis Hoadly\u2019s\u00a0 theology of the Eucharist is nominalist, with a separation of sign and signified.\u00a0 It seems that Hoadly\u2019s theology of the Eucharist accords in general terms with Stone\u2019s analysis.\u00a0 The Eucharist for Hoadly is a meeting only, which like other religious meetings, puts people in mind of the sacrifice of Christ, which is a past and completed event, in no way present in any realist sense in the Eucharist.\u00a0 The words \u2018figurative\u2019 and \u2018spiritual\u2019 as Hoadly applies them to the Eucharist have no realist connotations, and suggest only a bringing to mind of the past and completed event of the cross, whereby those who receive become more fully aware of what Christ\u2019s death on the cross means.\u00a0 It is concluded therefore that Hoadly presents a nominalist conception of the Eucharist, with sign and signified seen as self-enclosed and separated.\u201d<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
Works for me\u2026<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

According to Wikipedia, on this day \u201cA sermon on \u201cThe Nature of the Kingdom of Christ\u201d by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian Controversy.\u201d Seeing this sparked my heart. As a Unitarian seminarian taking a class in Eucharistic theology with the great Anglican theologian Louis Weil, I despaired until I discovered the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":120,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nRecalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"According to Wikipedia, on this day "A sermon on "The Nature of the Kingdom of Christ" by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"According to Wikipedia, on this day "A sermon on "The Nature of the Kingdom of Christ" by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Monkey Mind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/james.ford.1029\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-31T17:14:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-11-01T19:02:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-q8C32JTkOJI\/TZTuQqSKBvI\/AAAAAAAADtY\/lHnHAGecsg0\/s320\/benjamin_hoadly_bischof_von_winchester.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"James Ford\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"James Ford\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html\",\"name\":\"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-31T17:14:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-11-01T19:02:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#\/schema\/person\/3f37f475fb5078d1e7faa93a63a0fddb\"},\"description\":\"According to Wikipedia, on this day \\\"A sermon on \\\"The Nature of the Kingdom of Christ\\\" by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/\",\"name\":\"Monkey Mind\",\"description\":\"Easily distracted...\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#\/schema\/person\/3f37f475fb5078d1e7faa93a63a0fddb\",\"name\":\"James Ford\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fa18971b225a3bb79f0c4c381a5fae20?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fa18971b225a3bb79f0c4c381a5fae20?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"James Ford\"},\"description\":\"James Ishmael Ford is a writer and spiritual director. He has been authorized as a teacher within two traditional Zen lineages. James has washed dishes, assisted a crab fisherman on the Florida keys, worked in bookstores up and down the California coast, and served as a Unitarian Universalist parish minister. He currently lives with his spouse Jan and her mother in Los Angeles. His next book the Intimate Way of Zen is due from Shambhala Publications in July, 2024.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.emptymoonzen.org\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/james.ford.1029\",\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_Ishmael_Ford\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/author\/jamesford\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology","description":"According to Wikipedia, on this day \"A sermon on \"The Nature of the Kingdom of Christ\" by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology","og_description":"According to Wikipedia, on this day \"A sermon on \"The Nature of the Kingdom of Christ\" by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html","og_site_name":"Monkey Mind","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/james.ford.1029","article_published_time":"2011-03-31T17:14:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2011-11-01T19:02:59+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/-q8C32JTkOJI\/TZTuQqSKBvI\/AAAAAAAADtY\/lHnHAGecsg0\/s320\/benjamin_hoadly_bischof_von_winchester.jpg"}],"author":"James Ford","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"James Ford","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html","name":"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-31T17:14:00+00:00","dateModified":"2011-11-01T19:02:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#\/schema\/person\/3f37f475fb5078d1e7faa93a63a0fddb"},"description":"According to Wikipedia, on this day \"A sermon on \"The Nature of the Kingdom of Christ\" by Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, provokes the Bangorian","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/2011\/03\/recalling-bishop-hoadly-his-eucharistic-theology.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Recalling Bishop Hoadly & His Eucharistic Theology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/","name":"Monkey Mind","description":"Easily distracted...","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#\/schema\/person\/3f37f475fb5078d1e7faa93a63a0fddb","name":"James Ford","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fa18971b225a3bb79f0c4c381a5fae20?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fa18971b225a3bb79f0c4c381a5fae20?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"James Ford"},"description":"James Ishmael Ford is a writer and spiritual director. He has been authorized as a teacher within two traditional Zen lineages. James has washed dishes, assisted a crab fisherman on the Florida keys, worked in bookstores up and down the California coast, and served as a Unitarian Universalist parish minister. He currently lives with his spouse Jan and her mother in Los Angeles. His next book the Intimate Way of Zen is due from Shambhala Publications in July, 2024.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.emptymoonzen.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/james.ford.1029","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_Ishmael_Ford"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/author\/jamesford"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/120"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/monkeymind\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}