![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/81\/2024\/11\/LuminariesofPantheism.jpg\")
<\/a>Mural by Levi Ponce
Venice, California<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>
Alan Watts died on the 16th of November. in 1973.<\/p>\n
For many reasons, some good, some less so, he continues to be a presence at that edge of North American spirituality where what has long been called East and West meet. Watts had a significant place in the earlier years of my spiritual life, and even today remains, if not so central, still significant.\u00a0 Again, for good reasons, and not so good.<\/p>\n
And, perhaps more important I believe he stands as a significant figure in the meeting of psychology and Eastern religions, as well as the introduction specifically of Zen to our popular Western imagination. For a lot of good and a lot of ill, Alan Watts cannot be ignored.<\/p>\n
In Zen Master Who?<\/em><\/a> my history of Zen Buddhism<\/a> come west I describe the first of the several times I met Alan Watts.<\/p>\n This anecdote recounts my first, it was sometime, I believe, in 1969.<\/p>\n \u201cI was on the guest staff of the Zen monastery in Oakland led by Roshi Jiyu Kennett. I was enormously excited to actually meet this famous man, the great interpreter of the Zen way. Wearing my very best robes, I waited for him to show up; and waited and waited. Nearly an hour later, Watts arrived dressed in a kimono, accompanied by a fawning young woman and an equally fawning young man. It was hard not to notice his interest in the young woman who, as a monk, I was embarrassed to observe seemed not to be wearing any underwear. I was also awkwardly aware that Watts seemed intoxicated.\u201d<\/p>\n What follows I\u2019ve mostly cobbled together from earlier reflections. I\u2019ve written about him many times over the years. This appreciation was stitched together with a few new thoughts added in here and there. I certainly continue to think about him. Given that inauspicious beginning I\u2019m surprised at both how much his influence continues, both for the spiritual seeking community writ large, and for myself.<\/p>\n He was the first person to write popular books about Zen in the West, beginning in 1937 with the Spirit of Zen<\/em>, \u00a0and more importantly in 1957 with his best selling Way of Zen<\/em>. He drew mainly on the scholarly volumes just being written by D. T. Suzuki, the first person to write authentically about Zen in European languages, through Watts engaging style made enormously readable and genuinely compelling.<\/p>\n As I summarized in my history, \u201cAn erstwhile Episcopal priest, engaging raconteur, and scandalous libertine, Alan Watts was also a prolific author whose books created an inviting sense of Zen-as-pure-experience and a do-what-you-want spirituality.\u201d These qualities both led many people to Zen while also profoundly misrepresenting what the tradition actually taught.<\/p>\n On that last note, some years later I attended a talk by an American Zen priest. At the end, during the question and answer period, someone asked about Watts. The priest sighed, and then said, \u201cI know there\u2019s a lot of controversy about Alan Watts and what he really understood about Zen.\u201d He paused. And then, added, \u201cBut, you know, without Alan Watts, I wouldn\u2019t be standing here on this platform.\u201d I have to say, in large part, that\u2019s true for me as well.<\/p>\n In the 1960s and 70s, Alan Watts opened some important doors for many of us looking for a new way. I\u2019m not really sure another version, a more accurate version of Zen would have caught the popular imagination. So, messy. Kind of like life.<\/p>\n Over these passing years I\u2019ve come to feel the title of his biography In My Own Way<\/em> and the title of the English edition of Monica Furlong\u2019s biography of him, Genuine Fake<\/em>, taken together points to the complexities of this intriguing Anglo-American Zen trickster\/ancestor of our contemporary spiritual scene.<\/p>\n There are numerous critiques, pretty much all of them deserved.<\/p>\n It\u2019s my conviction that Alan Watts was at his very best during a brief period when he tried at practice, discipline, and effort. Or, at least stood in their general neighborhood. Raised in England, his natal tradition was Anglicanism. Although he formally abandoned it by sixteen for the eclectic Buddhism of the London Buddhist<\/a> Society. In his late twenties, having come to America and desperate for an occupation that paid something, he decided to become an Episcopal priest.<\/p>\n However, he had not attended college. For most this would be an insurmountable barrier. But by providing a very long list of the books he had read and then showing a suspicious faculty he had not only read them, but profoundly absorbed them, Watts was admitted into the divinity program at Seabury-Western Theological Seminary in Evanston, Illinois.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n