![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/81\/2013\/12\/laotzu.gif\" "\\"laotzu\\"")
<\/a>\nThere\u2019s a Facebook meme going around inviting people to list their favorite ten books \u2013 or, rather ten books that feel significant in one\u2019s life without deeply thinking about it.<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve noticed among my friends the larger majority list as one of those most important the Tao Te Ching<\/a>, that lovely little book of aphorisms from the mists of Chinese antiquity. Attributed to Laozi (or, from my generation Lao Tzu), putatively a librarian in the royal court. The biggest problem is Laozi simply translates as \u201cold man,\u201d and, well, is an unlikely real name. The oldest texts seem to date from the fourth century before the common era. A very old book.<\/p>\n Like so many of my friends I counted it as one of my first thought ten really important books.<\/p>\n And, even as I sit with the wonderment of books that have profoundly influenced me, it remains on the short and even the shortest lists.<\/p>\n Powerful document.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve read it in maybe a dozen of the hundred plus translations available in English. (Here are eleven English versions<\/a>) I\u2019m very much aware there is something of an eye of the beholder quality to these various translations, the text is oblique and open to wide interpretation, ranging from vacuous to profound.<\/p>\n Another of the things I noticed in the lists my friends posted was a specific reference to the \u201ctranslation\u201d by Stephen Mitchell. I use scare quotes here, recalling a Taoist scholar friend who nearly collapsed in horror when I once mentioned Mitchell\u2019s version as my own favorite. The truth of the matter is, as I understand it, Mitchell barely reads Chinese & even I can tell how he takes liberties with the text.<\/p>\n For me these limitations are balanced by his competence as a poet as well as his years as a Zen monk and his obvious integration of those perspectives with his presentation of a very powerful adaptation of this document, venerable, dynamic, adaptable, it would appear, to every generation. <\/p>\n (Another example of his skill at bringing a cross-spiritual analysis to difficult documents is Mitchell\u2019s introductory essay to his translation of the Book of Job<\/a>. It took my breath away. And it continues to inform my spirituality in a profound way. But I digress\u2026)<\/p>\n As a first read Mitchell\u2019s Tao Te Ching can be just what the doctor ordered.<\/p>\n If your heart is caught by it, I would then move on to both scholarly translations<\/a> and other poetic versions<\/a>.<\/p>\n It\u2019s short. It is one of the foundational spiritual documents of our common human inheritance.<\/p>\n Give it a try.<\/p>\n You probably won\u2019t regret it\u2026<\/p>\n