This was the readign in the BCP hours this morning. I really enjoy this part of the online liturgy of the hours from Mission St. Claire<\/a>. They include a reading about a saint of the church for almost every morning. Read this article if you get a chance \u2013 at least the first couple of paragraphs. There are two things that stuck out to me:<\/p>\n First<\/strong>: an analogy from Martin Luther. He that human nature is like a drunkard trying to ride a horse. He gets on and falls off on the left side. He resolves not to make that mistake again, so he remounts, careful to avoid falling off on the left, and promptly falls off on the right<\/p>\n Second<\/strong>: A quote from William Law\u2019s A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life<\/em>.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you will here stop and ask yourself why you are not as pious as the primitive Christians were, your own heart will tell you that it is neither through ignorance nor inability, but because you never thoroughly intended it.\u201d<\/p>\n Here\u2019s the short article:<\/p>\n William Law 9 April 1761<\/span> The 9th day of April is the anniversary of the deaths of <\/span>William Law<\/span><\/a> and of <\/span>Dietrich Bonhoeffer<\/span><\/a>, theologians and scholars, one Anglican and one Lutheran. This was the readign in the BCP hours this morning. I really enjoy this part of the online liturgy of the hours from Mission St. Claire. They include a reading about a saint of the church for almost every morning. Read this article if you get a chance \u2013 at least the first couple of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1118,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n
written by James Kiefer<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span>
Some Christians have fallen into the trap of supposing that their salvation depends on their being sufficiently virtuous, and they need to be reminded that salvation is the gift of God and cannot be earned or deserved. Other Christians have fallen into the opposite error of supposing that the infinite mercy of God means that we are not called on to inconvenience ourselves. (<\/span>Martin Luther<\/span><\/a> has said that human nature is like a drunkard trying to ride a horse. He gets on and falls off on the left side. He resolves not to make that mistake again, so he remounts, careful to avoid falling off on the left, and promptly falls off on the right.) Law and Bonhoeffer both saw this latter error \u2014 that of complacency and presumption \u2014 as the chief danger in their own times. They undertook to remind their fellow Christians of the importance of both halves of the saying of Our Lord to a sinner (John 8:11): \u201cI do not condemn you; go and sin no more.\u201d Both were men whose consciences brought them into conflict with their governments, and both (though in very unequal degree) paid a price for it.
Some traditions commemorate them jointly. I here follow the custom of giving each his own day, with Law on 9 April and Bonhoeffer on the day following.
<\/span>
William Law, born in 1686, became a Fellow of <\/span>Emmanuel College<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Cambridge<\/span><\/a> in 1711, but in 1714, at the death of <\/span>Queen Anne<\/span><\/a>, he became a non-Juror: that is to say, he found himself unable to take the required oath of allegiance to the Hanoverian dynasty (who had replaced the Stuart dynasty) as the lawful rulers of the United Kingdom, and was accordingly ineligible to serve as a university teacher or parish minister. He became for ten years a private tutor in the family of the historian Edward Gibbon (who, despite his generally cynical attitude toward all things Christian, invariably wrote of Law with respect and admiration), and then retired to his native King\u2019s Cliffe. Forbidden the use of the pulpit and the lecture-hall, he preached through his books. These include Christian Perfection, The Spirit Of Love, The Spirit Of Prayer, and, best-known of all, <\/span>A Serious Call To A Devout And Holy Life<\/span><\/a>, published in 1728. The thesis of this last book is that God does not merely forgive our disobedience, he calls us to obedience, and to a life completely centered in Him. He says: \u201cIf you will here stop and ask yourself why you are not as pious as the primitive Christians were, your own heart will tell you that it is neither through ignorance nor inability, but because you never thoroughly intended it.\u201d
The immediate influence of the book was considerable.
<\/span>
Dr. Samuel Johnson<\/span><\/a> said (<\/span>Boswell<\/span><\/a>\u2018s Life Of Johnson, ch. 1): \u201cI became a sort of lax talker against religion, for I did not think much against it; and this lasted until I went to Oxford, where it would not be suffered. When at Oxford, I took up Law\u2019s Serious Call, expecting to find it a dull book (as such books generally are), and perhaps to laugh at it. But I found Law quite an overmatch for me; and this was the first occasion of my thinking in earnest of religion after I became capable of rational inquiry.\u201d<\/span>
<\/span>Gibbon<\/span><\/a> (as mentioned above) said: \u201cIf Mr. Law finds a spark of piety in a reader\u2019s mind, he will soon kindle it into a flame.\u201d<\/span>
<\/span>John Wesley<\/span><\/a> calls it one of three books which accounted for his first \u201cexplicit resolve to be all devoted to God.\u201d Later, when denying, in response to a question, that Methodism was founded on Law\u2019s writings, he added that \u201cMethodists carefully read these books and were greatly profitted by them.\u201d In 1744 he published extracts from the Serious Call, thereby introducing it to a wider audience than it already had. About eighteen months before his death, he called it \u201ca treatise which will hardly be excelled, if it be equalled, either for beauty of expression or for depth of thought.\u201d<\/span>
<\/span>Charles Wesley<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>George Whitefield<\/span><\/a>, Henry Venn, <\/span>William Wilberforce<\/span><\/a>, and Thomas Scott each described reading the book as a major turning-point in his life. All in all, there were few leaders of the English Evangelical movement on whom it did not have a profound influence.
<\/span>
Some Christians have considered Law\u2019s work inadequate, as not sufficiently concerned with <\/span>Justification by Faith<\/span><\/a>, to which objection Law would doubtless have replied: \u201cBut I never offered it as a complete presentation of the Gospel, only as a reminder of the words, \u2018Go and sin no more,\u2019 which are surely a part of the Gospel.\u201d
For surely they mistake the whole nature of religion, who can think any part of their life is made more easy, for being free from it. They may well be said to mistake the whole nature of wisdom, who do not think it desirable to be always wise. \u2014 A Serious Call
<\/span>
Prayer
O God, by whose grace your servant William Law, kindled with the fire of your love, became a burning and shining light in your Church: Grant that we also may be aflame with the spirit of love and discipline, and may ever walk before you as children of light; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"