BOB SCHIEFFER, MODERATOR: Good evening from the campus of Lynn University here in Boca Raton, Florida. This is the fourth and last debate of the 2012 campaign, brought to you by the Commission on Presidential Debates.<\/p>\n
This one\u2019s on foreign policy. I\u2019m Bob Schieffer of CBS News. The questions are mine, and I have not shared them with the candidates or their aides.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: The audience has taken a vow of silence \u2014 no applause, no reaction of any kind, except right now when we welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney.<\/p>\n
(APPLAUSE)<\/p>\n
Gentlemen, your campaigns have agreed to certain rules and they are simple. They\u2019ve asked me to divide the evening into segments. I\u2019ll pose a question at the beginning of each segment. You will each have two minutes to respond and then we will have a general discussion until we move to the next segment.<\/p>\n
Tonight\u2019s debate, as both of you know, comes on the 50th anniversary of the night that President Kennedy told the world that the Soviet Union had installed nuclear missiles in Cuba, perhaps the closest we\u2019ve ever come to nuclear war. And it is a sobering reminder that every president faces at some point an unexpected threat to our national security from abroad.<\/p>\n
So let\u2019s begin.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: The first segment is the challenge of a changing Middle East and the new face of terrorism. I\u2019m going to put this into two segments so you\u2019ll have two topic questions within this one segment on the subject. The first question, and it concerns Libya. The controversy over what happened there continues. Four Americans are dead, including an American ambassador. Questions remain. What happened? What caused it? Was it spontaneous? Was it an intelligence failure? Was it a policy failure? Was there an attempt to mislead people about what really happened?<\/p>\n
Governor Romney, you said this was an example of an American policy in the Middle East that is unraveling before our very eyes.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: I\u2019d like to hear each of you give your thoughts on that.<\/p>\n
Governor Romney, you won the toss. You go first.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Thank you, Bob. And thank you for agreeing to moderate this debate this evening. Thank you to Lynn University for welcoming us here. And Mr. President, it\u2019s good to be with you again. We were together at a humorous event a little earlier, and it\u2019s nice to maybe funny this time, not on purpose. We\u2019ll see what happens.<\/p>\n
This is obviously an area of great concern to the entire world, and to America in particular, which is to see a \u2014 a complete change in the \u2014 the structure and the \u2014 the environment in the Middle East.<\/p>\n
With the Arab Spring, came a great deal of hope that there would be a change towards more moderation, and opportunity for greater participation on the part of women in public life, and in economic life in the Middle East. But instead, we\u2019ve seen in nation after nation, a number of disturbing events. Of course we see in Syria, 30,000 civilians having been killed by the military there. We see in \u2014 in Libya, an attack apparently by, I think we know now, by terrorists of some kind against \u2014 against our people there, four people dead.<\/p>\n
Our hearts and \u2014 and minds go out to them. Mali has been taken over, the northern part of Mali by al-Qaeda type individuals. We have in \u2014 in Egypt, a Muslim Brotherhood president. And so what we\u2019re seeing is a pretty dramatic reversal in the kind of hopes we had for that region. Of course the greatest threat of all is Iran, four years closer to a nuclear weapon. And \u2014 and we\u2019re going to have to recognize that we have to do as the president has done. I congratulate him on \u2014 on taking out Osama bin Laden and going after the leadership in al-Qaeda.<\/p>\n
But we can\u2019t kill our way out of this mess. We\u2019re going to have to put in place a very comprehensive and robust strategy to help the \u2014 the world of Islam and other parts of the world, reject this radical violent extremism, which is \u2014 it\u2019s certainly not on the run.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: It\u2019s certainly not hiding. This is a group that is now involved in 10 or 12 countries, and it presents an enormous threat to our friends, to the world, to America, long term, and we must have a comprehensive strategy to help reject this kind of extremism.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the American people safe. And that\u2019s what we\u2019ve done over the last four years.<\/p>\n
We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9\/11. And as a consequence, Al Qaeda\u2019s core leadership has been decimated.<\/p>\n
In addition, we\u2019re now able to transition out of Afghanistan in a responsible way, making sure that Afghans take responsibility for their own security. And that allows us also to rebuild alliances and make friends around the world to combat future threats. Now with respect to Libya, as I indicated in the last debate, when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure that, number one, that we did everything we could to secure those Americans who were still in harm\u2019s way; number two, that we would investigate exactly what happened, and number three, most importantly, that we would go after those who killed Americans and we would bring them to justice. And that\u2019s exactly what we\u2019re going to do.<\/p>\n
But I think it\u2019s important to step back and think about what happened in Libya. Keep in mind that I and Americans took leadership in organizing an international coalition that made sure that we were able to, without putting troops on the ground at the cost of less than what we spent in two weeks in Iraq, liberate a country that had been under the yoke of dictatorship for 40 years. Got rid of a despot who had killed Americans and as a consequence, despite this tragedy, you had tens of thousands of Libyans after the events in Benghazi marching and saying America is our friend. We stand with them.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Now that represents the opportunity we have to take advantage of. And, you know, Governor Romney, I\u2019m glad that you agree that we have been successful in going after Al Qaida, but I have to tell you that, you know, your strategy previously has been one that has been all over the map and is not designed to keep Americans safe or to build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, my strategy is pretty straightforward, which is to go after the bad guys, to make sure we do our very best to interrupt them, to \u2014 to kill them, to take them out of the picture.<\/p>\n
But my strategy is broader than that. That\u2019s \u2014 that\u2019s important, of course. But the key that we\u2019re going to have to pursue is a \u2014 is a pathway to get the Muslim world to be able to reject extremism on its own.<\/p>\n
We don\u2019t want another Iraq, we don\u2019t want another Afghanistan. That\u2019s not the right course for us. The right course for us is to make sure that we go after the \u2014 the people who are leaders of these various anti-American groups and these \u2014 these jihadists, but also help the Muslim world.<\/p>\n
And how do we do that? A group of Arab scholars came together, organized by the U.N., to look at how we can help the \u2014 the world reject these \u2014 these terrorists. And the answer they came up with was this:<\/p>\n
One, more economic development. We should key our foreign aid, our direct foreign investment, and that of our friends, we should coordinate it to make sure that we \u2014 we push back and give them more economic development.<\/p>\n
Number two, better education.<\/p>\n
Number three, gender equality.<\/p>\n
Number four, the rule of law. We have to help these nations create civil societies.<\/p>\n
But what\u2019s been happening over the last couple of years is, as we\u2019ve watched this tumult in the Middle East, this rising tide of chaos occur, you see Al Qaida rushing in, you see other jihadist groups rushing in. And \u2014 and they\u2019re throughout many nations in the Middle East.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: It\u2019s wonderful that Libya seems to be making some progress, despite this terrible tragedy.<\/p>\n
But next door, of course, we have Egypt. Libya\u2019s 6 million population; Egypt, 80 million population. We want \u2014 we want to make sure that we\u2019re seeing progress throughout the Middle East. With Mali now having North Mali taken over by Al Qaida; with Syria having Assad continuing to \u2014 to kill, to murder his own people, this is a region in tumult.<\/p>\n
And, of course, Iran on the path to a nuclear weapon, we\u2019ve got real (inaudible).<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: We\u2019ll get to that, but let\u2019s give the president a chance.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Governor Romney, I\u2019m glad that you recognize that Al Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what\u2019s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not Al Qaida; you said Russia, in the 1980s, they\u2019re now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War\u2019s been over for 20 years.<\/p>\n
But Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s.<\/p>\n
You say that you\u2019re not interested in duplicating what happened in Iraq. But just a few weeks ago, you said you think we should have more troops in Iraq right now. And the \u2014 the challenge we have \u2014 I know you haven\u2019t been in a position to actually execute foreign policy \u2014 but every time you\u2019ve offered an opinion, you\u2019ve been wrong. You said we should have gone into Iraq, despite that fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction.<\/p>\n
You said that we should still have troops in Iraq to this day. You indicated that we shouldn\u2019t be passing nuclear treaties with Russia despite the fact that 71 senators, Democrats and Republicans, voted for it. You said that, first, we should not have a timeline in Afghanistan. Then you said we should. Now you say maybe or it depends, which means not only were you wrong, but you were also confusing in sending mixed messages both to our troops and our allies.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: So, what \u2014 what we need to do with respect to the Middle East is strong, steady leadership, not wrong and reckless leadership that is all over the map. And unfortunately, that\u2019s the kind of opinions that you\u2019ve offered throughout this campaign, and it is not a recipe for American strength, or keeping America safe over the long haul.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: I\u2019m going to add a couple of minutes here to give you a chance to respond.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, of course I don\u2019t concur with what the president said about my own record and the things that I\u2019ve said. They don\u2019t happen to be accurate. But \u2014 but I can say this, that we\u2019re talking about the Middle East and how to help the Middle East reject the kind of terrorism we\u2019re seeing, and the rising tide of tumult and \u2014 and confusion. And \u2014 and attacking me is not an agenda. Attacking me is not talking about how we\u2019re going to deal with the challenges that exist in the Middle East, and take advantage of the opportunity there, and stem the tide of this violence.<\/p>\n
But I\u2019ll respond to a couple of things that you mentioned. First of all, Russia I indicated is a geopolitical foe. Not\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Excuse me. It\u2019s a geopolitical foe, and I said in the same \u2014 in the same paragraph I said, and Iran is the greatest national security threat we face. Russia does continue to battle us in the U.N. time and time again. I have clear eyes on this. I\u2019m not going to wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to Russia, or Mr. Putin. And I\u2019m certainly not going to say to him, I\u2019ll give you more flexibility after the election. After the election, he\u2019ll get more backbone. Number two, with regards to Iraq, you and I agreed I believe that there should be a status of forces agreement.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Oh you didn\u2019t? You didn\u2019t want a status of\u2026<\/p>\n
OBAMA: What I would not have had done was left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. And that certainly would not help us in the Middle East.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I\u2019m sorry, you actually \u2014 there was a \u2014 there was an effort on the part of the president to have a status of forces agreement, and I concurred in that, and said that we should have some number of troops that stayed on. That was something I concurred with\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Governor\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026that your posture. That was my posture as well. You thought it should have been 5,000 troops\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Governor?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026 I thought there should have been more troops, but you know what? The answer was we got\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026 no troops through whatsoever.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: This was just a few weeks ago that you indicated that we should still have troops in Iraq.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: No, I\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026I\u2019m sorry that\u2019s a\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: You \u2014 you\u2026<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026that\u2019s a \u2014 I indicated\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: \u2026major speech.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026I indicated that you failed to put in place a status\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Governor?<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026of forces agreement at the end of the conflict that existed.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Governor \u2014 here \u2014 here\u2019s \u2014 here\u2019s one thing\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: \u2026here\u2019s one thing I\u2019ve learned as commander in chief.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Let him answer\u2026<\/p>\n
OBAMA: You\u2019ve got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean. You just gave a speech a few weeks ago in which you said we should still have troops in Iraq. That is not a recipe for making sure that we are taking advantage of the opportunities and meeting the challenges of the Middle East.<\/p>\n
Now, it is absolutely true that we cannot just meet these challenges militarily. And so what I\u2019ve done throughout my presidency and will continue to do is, number one, make sure that these countries are supporting our counterterrorism efforts.<\/p>\n
Number two, make sure that they are standing by our interests in Israel\u2019s security, because it is a true friend and our greatest ally in the region.<\/p>\n
Number three, we do have to make sure that we\u2019re protecting religious minorities and women because these countries can\u2019t develop unless all the population, not just half of it, is developing.<\/p>\n
Number four, we do have to develop their economic \u2014 their economic capabilities.<\/p>\n
But number five, the other thing that we have to do is recognize that we can\u2019t continue to do nation building in these regions. Part of American leadership is making sure that we\u2019re doing nation building here at home. That will help us maintain the kind of American leadership that we need.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Let me interject the second topic question in this segment about the Middle East and so on, and that is, you both mentioned \u2014 alluded to this, and that is Syria.<\/p>\n
The war in Syria has now spilled over into Lebanon. We have, what, more than 100 people that were killed there in a bomb. There were demonstrations there, eight people dead.<\/p>\n
Mr. President, it\u2019s been more than a year since you saw \u2014 you told Assad he had to go. Since then, 30,000 Syrians have died. We\u2019ve had 300,000 refugees.<\/p>\n
The war goes on. He\u2019s still there. Should we reassess our policy and see if we can find a better way to influence events there? Or is that even possible?<\/p>\n
And you go first, sir.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: What we\u2019ve done is organize the international community, saying Assad has to go. We\u2019ve mobilized sanctions against that government. We have made sure that they are isolated. We have provided humanitarian assistance and we are helping the opposition organize, and we\u2019re particularly interested in making sure that we\u2019re mobilizing the moderate forces inside of Syria.<\/p>\n
But ultimately, Syrians are going to have to determine their own future. And so everything we\u2019re doing, we\u2019re doing in consultation with our partners in the region, including Israel which obviously has a huge interest in seeing what happens in Syria; coordinating with Turkey and other countries in the region that have a great interest in this.<\/p>\n
This \u2014 what we\u2019re seeing taking place in Syria is heartbreaking, and that\u2019s why we are going to do everything we can to make sure that we are helping the opposition. But we also have to recognize that, you know, for us to get more entangled militarily in Syria is a serious step, and we have to do so making absolutely certain that we know who we are helping; that we\u2019re not putting arms in the hands of folks who eventually could turn them against us or allies in the region.<\/p>\n
And I am confident that Assad\u2019s days are numbered. But what we can\u2019t do is to simply suggest that, as Governor Romney at times has suggested, that giving heavy weapons, for example, to the Syrian opposition is a simple proposition that would lead us to be safer over the long term. SCHIEFFER: Governor?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, let\u2019s step back and talk about what\u2019s happening in Syria and how important it is. First of all, 30,000 people being killed by their government is a humanitarian disaster. Secondly, Syria is an opportunity for us because Syria plays an important role in the Middle East, particularly right now.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Syria is Iran\u2019s only ally in the Arab world. It\u2019s their route to the sea. It\u2019s the route for them to arm Hezbollah in Lebanon, which threatens, of course, our ally, Israel. And so seeing Syria remove Assad is a very high priority for us. Number two, seeing a \u2014 a replacement government being responsible people is critical for us. And finally, we don\u2019t want to have military involvement there. We don\u2019t want to get drawn into a military conflict.<\/p>\n
And so the right course for us, is working through our partners and with our own resources, to identify responsible parties within Syria, organize them, bring them together in a \u2014 in a form of \u2014 if not government, a form of \u2014 of \u2014 of council that can take the lead in Syria. And then make sure they have the arms necessary to defend themselves. We do need to make sure that they don\u2019t have arms that get into the \u2014 the wrong hands. Those arms could be used to hurt us down the road. We need to make sure as well that we coordinate this effort with our allies, and particularly with \u2014 with Israel.<\/p>\n
But the Saudi\u2019s and the Qatari, and \u2014 and the Turks are all very concerned about this. They\u2019re willing to work with us. We need to have a very effective leadership effort in Syria, making sure that the \u2014 the insurgent there are armed and that the insurgents that become armed, are people who will be the responsible parties. Recognize \u2014 I believe that Assad must go. I believe he will go. But I believe \u2014 we want to make sure that we have the relationships of friendship with the people that take his place, steps that in the years to come we see Syria as a \u2014 as a friend, and Syria as a responsible party in the Middle East.<\/p>\n
This \u2014 this is a critical opportunity for America. And what I\u2019m afraid of is we\u2019ve watched over the past year or so, first the president saying, well we\u2019ll let the U.N. deal with it. And Assad \u2014 excuse me, Kofi Annan came in and said we\u2019re going to try to have a ceasefire. That didn\u2019t work. Then it went to the Russians and said, let\u2019s see if you can do something. We should be playing the leadership role there, not on the ground with military.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026by the leadership role.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: We are playing the leadership role. We organized the Friends of Syria. We are mobilizing humanitarian support, and support for the opposition. And we are making sure that those we help are those who will be friends of ours in the long term and friends of our allies in the region over the long term. But going back to Libya \u2014 because this is an example of how we make choices. When we went in to Libya, and we were able to immediately stop the massacre there, because of the unique circumstances and the coalition that we had helped to organize. We also had to make sure that Moammar Gadhafi didn\u2019t stay there.<\/p>\n
And to the governor\u2019s credit, you supported us going into Libya and the coalition that we organized. But when it came time to making sure that Gadhafi did not stay in power, that he was captured, Governor, your suggestion was that this was mission creep, that this was mission muddle.<\/p>\n
Imagine if we had pulled out at that point. You know, Moammar Gadhafi had more American blood on his hands than any individual other than Osama bin Laden. And so we were going to make sure that we finished the job. That\u2019s part of the reason why the Libyans stand with us.<\/p>\n
But we did so in a careful, thoughtful way, making certain that we knew who we were dealing with, that those forces of moderation on the ground were ones that we could work with, and we have to take the same kind of steady, thoughtful leadership when it comes to Syria. That\u2019s exactly what we\u2019re doing.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Governor, can I just ask you, would you go beyond what the administration would do, like for example, would you put in no-fly zones over Syria?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I don\u2019t want to have our military involved in Syria. I don\u2019t think there is a necessity to put our military in Syria at this stage. I don\u2019t anticipate that in the future.<\/p>\n
As I indicated, our objectives are to replace Assad and to have in place a new government which is friendly to us, a responsible government, if possible. And I want to make sure they get armed and they have the arms necessary to defend themselves, but also to remove \u2014 to remove Assad.<\/p>\n
But I do not want to see a military involvement on the part of our \u2014 of our troops.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Well \u2014<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: And this isn\u2019t \u2014 this isn\u2019t going to be necessary.<\/p>\n
We \u2014 we have, with our partners in the region, we have sufficient resources to support those groups. But look, this has been going on for a year. This is a time \u2014 this should have been a time for American leadership. We should have taken a leading role, not militarily, but a leading role organizationally, governmentally to bring together the parties; to find responsible parties.<\/p>\n
As you hear from intelligence sources even today, the \u2014 the insurgents are highly disparate. They haven\u2019t come together. They haven\u2019t formed a unity group, a council of some kind. That needs to happen. America can help that happen. And we need to make sure they have the arms they need to carry out the very important role which is getting rid of Assad.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Can we get a quick response, Mr. President, because I want to\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Well, I\u2019ll \u2014 I\u2019ll be very quick. What you just heard Governor Romney said is he doesn\u2019t have different ideas. And that\u2019s because we\u2019re doing exactly what we should be doing to try to promote a moderate Syrian leadership and a \u2014 an effective transition so that we get Assad out. That\u2019s the kind of leadership we\u2019ve shown. That\u2019s the kind of leadership we\u2019ll continue to show.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: May I ask you, you know, during the Egyptian turmoil, there came a point when you said it was time for President Mubarak to go.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Right.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Some in your administration thought perhaps we should have waited a while on that. Do you have any regrets about that?<\/p>\n
OBAMA: No, I don\u2019t, because I think that America has to stand with democracy. The notion that we would have tanks run over those young people who were in Tahrir Square, that is not the kind of American leadership that John F. Kennedy talked about 50 years ago.<\/p>\n
But what I\u2019ve also said is that now that you have a democratically elected government in Egypt, that they have to make sure that they take responsibility for protecting religious minorities. And we have put significant pressure on them to make sure they\u2019re doing that; to recognize the rights of women, which is critical throughout the region. These countries can\u2019t develop if young women are not given the kind of education that they need.<\/p>\n
They have to abide by their treaty with Israel. That is a red line for us, because not only is Israel\u2019s security at stake, but our security is at stake if that unravels.<\/p>\n
They have to make sure that they\u2019re cooperating with us when it comes to counterterrorism.<\/p>\n
And we will help them with respect to developing their own economy, because ultimately what\u2019s going to make the Egyptian revolution successful for the people of Egypt, but also for the world, is if those young people who gathered there are seeing opportunities.<\/p>\n
Their aspirations are similar to young people\u2019s here. They want jobs, they want to be able to make sure their kids are going to a good school. They want to make sure that they have a roof over their heads and that they have the prospects of a better life in the future.<\/p>\n
And so one of the things that we\u2019ve been doing is, is, for example, organizing entrepreneurship conferences with these Egyptians to give them a sense of how they can start rebuilding their economy in a way that\u2019s noncorrupt, that\u2019s transparent. But what is also important for us to understand is, is that for America to be successful in this region there\u2019s some things that we\u2019re going to have to do here at home as well.<\/p>\n
You know, one of the challenges over the last decade is we\u2019ve done experiments in nation building in places like Iraq and Afghanistan and we\u2019ve neglected, for example, developing our own economy, our own energy sectors, our own education system. And it\u2019s very hard for us to project leadership around the world when we\u2019re not doing what we need to do\u2026<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Governor Romney, I want to hear your response to that, but I would just ask you, would you have stuck with Mubarak?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: No. I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the time that I supported his \u2014 his action there. I felt that \u2014 I wish we\u2019d have had a better vision of the future.<\/p>\n
I wish that, looking back at the beginning of the president\u2019s term and even further back than that, that we\u2019d have recognized that there was a growing energy and passion for freedom in that part of the world, and that we would have worked more aggressively with our friend and with other friends in the region to have them make the transition towards a more representative form of government, such that it didn\u2019t explode in the way that it did.<\/p>\n
But once it exploded, I felt the same as the president did, which is these freedom voices and the streets of Egypt, where the people who were speaking of our principles and the President Mubarak had done things which were unimaginable and the idea of him crushing his people was not something that we could possibly support.<\/p>\n
Let me step back and talk about what I think our mission has to be in the Middle East and even more broadly, because our purpose is to make sure the world is more \u2014 is peaceful. We want a peaceful planet. We want people to be able to enjoy their lives and know they\u2019re going to have a bright and prosperous future, not be at war. That\u2019s our purpose.<\/p>\n
And the mantle of leadership for the \u2014 promoting the principles of peace has fallen to America. We didn\u2019t ask for it. But it\u2019s an honor that we have it.<\/p>\n
But for us to be able to promote those principles of peace requires us to be strong. And that begins with a strong economy here at home. Unfortunately, the economy is not stronger. When the \u2014 when the president of Iraq \u2014 excuse me, of Iran, Ahmadinejad, says that our debt makes us not a great country, that\u2019s a frightening thing.<\/p>\n
Former chief of the \u2014 Joint Chiefs of Staff said that \u2014 Admiral Mullen said that our debt is the biggest national security threat we face. This \u2014 we have weakened our economy. We need a strong economy.<\/p>\n
We need to have as well a strong military. Our military is second to none in the world. We\u2019re blessed with terrific soldiers, and extraordinary technology and intelligence. But the idea of a trillion dollar in cuts through sequestration and budget cuts to the military would change that. We need to have strong allies. Our association and connection with our allies is essential to America\u2019s strength. We\u2019re the great nation that has allies, 42 allies and friends around the world.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: And, finally, we have to stand by our principles. And if we\u2019re strong in each of those things, American influence will grow. But unfortunately, in nowhere in the world is America\u2019s influence will grow. But unfortunately, in \u2014 nowhere in the world is America\u2019s influence greater today than it was four years ago.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: And that\u2019s because we\u2019ve become weaker in each of those four\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: \u2026you\u2019re going to get a chance to respond to that, because that\u2019s a perfect segue into our next segment, and that is, what is America\u2019s role in the world? And that is the question. What do each of you see as our role in the world, and I believe, Governor Romney, it\u2019s your chance to go first.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well I \u2014 I absolutely believe that America has a \u2014 a responsibility, and the privilege of helping defend freedom and promote the principles that \u2014 that make the world more peaceful. And those principles include human rights, human dignity, free enterprise, freedom of expression, elections. Because when there are elections, people tend to vote for peace. They don\u2019t vote for war. So we want to promote those principles around the world. We recognize that there are places of conflict in the world.<\/p>\n
We want to end those conflicts to the extent humanly possible. But in order to be able to fulfill our role in the world, America must be strong. America must lead. And for that to happen, we have to strengthen our economy here at home. You can\u2019t have 23 million people struggling to get a job. You can\u2019t have an economy that over the last three years keeps slowing down its growth rate. You can\u2019t have kids coming out of college, half of them can\u2019t find a job today, or a job that\u2019s commensurate with their college degree. We have to get our economy going.<\/p>\n
And our military, we\u2019ve got to strengthen our military long-term. We don\u2019t know what the world is going to throw at us down the road. We \u2014 we make decisions today in the military that \u2014 that will confront challenges we can\u2019t imagine. In the 2000 debates, there was no mention of terrorism, for instance. And a year later, 9\/11 happened. So, we have to make decisions based upon uncertainty, and that means a strong military. I will not cut our military budget. We have to also stand by our allies. I \u2014 I think the tension that existed between Israel and the United States was very unfortunate.<\/p>\n
I think also that pulling our missile defense program out of Poland in the way we did was also unfortunate in terms of, if you will, disrupting the relationship in some ways that existed between us.<\/p>\n
And then, of course, with regards to standing for our principles, when \u2014 when the students took to the streets in Tehran and the people there protested, the Green Revolution occurred, for the president to be silent I thought was an enormous mistake. We have to stand for our principles, stand for our allies, stand for a strong military and stand for a stronger economy.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?<\/p>\n
OBAMA: America remains the one indispensable nation. And the world needs a strong America, and it is stronger now than when I came into office.<\/p>\n
Because we ended the war in Iraq, we were able to refocus our attention on not only the terrorist threat, but also beginning a transition process in Afghanistan.<\/p>\n
It also allowed us to refocus on alliances and relationships that had been neglected for a decade.<\/p>\n
And Governor Romney, our alliances have never been stronger, in Asia, in Europe, in Africa, with Israel, where we have unprecedented military and intelligence cooperation, including dealing with the Iranian threat.<\/p>\n
But what we also have been able to do is position ourselves so we can start rebuilding America, and that\u2019s what my plan does. Making sure that we\u2019re bringing manufacturing back to our shores so that we\u2019re creating jobs here, as we\u2019ve done with the auto industry, not rewarding companies that are shipping jobs overseas.<\/p>\n
Making sure that we\u2019ve got the best education system in the world, including retraining our workers for the jobs of tomorrow.<\/p>\n
Doing everything we can to control our own energy. We\u2019ve cut our oil imports to the lowest level in two decades because we\u2019ve developed oil and natural gas. But we also have to develop clean energy technologies that will allow us to cut our exports in half by 2020. That\u2019s the kind of leadership that we need to show.<\/p>\n
And we\u2019ve got to make sure that we reduce our deficit. Unfortunately, Governor Romney\u2019s plan doesn\u2019t do it. We\u2019ve got to do it in a responsible way by cutting out spending we don\u2019t need, but also asking the wealthiest to pay a little bit more. That way we can invest in the research and technology that\u2019s always kept us at the cutting edge.<\/p>\n
Now, Governor Romney has taken a different approach throughout this campaign. Both at home and abroad, he has proposed wrong and reckless policies. He\u2019s praised George Bush as a good economic steward and Dick Cheney as somebody who\u2019s \u2014 who shows great wisdom and judgment. And taking us back to those kinds of strategies that got us into this mess are not the way that we are going to maintain leadership in the 21st century.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Governor Romney, \u201cwrong and reckless\u201d policies?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I\u2019ve got a policy for the future and agenda for the future. And when it comes to our economy here at home, I know what it takes to create 12 million new jobs and rising take-home pay. And what we\u2019ve seen over the last four years is something I don\u2019t want to see over the next four years.<\/p>\n
The president said by now we\u2019d be a 5.4 percent unemployment. We\u2019re 9 million jobs short of that. I will get America working again and see rising take-home pay again, and I\u2019ll do it with five simple steps. Number one, we are going to have North American energy independence. We\u2019re going to do it by taking full advantage of oil, coal, gas, nuclear and our renewables.<\/p>\n
Number two, we\u2019re going to increase our trade. Trade grows about 12 percent year. It doubles about every \u2014 every five or so years. We can do better than that, particularly in Latin America. The opportunities for us in Latin America we have just not taken advantage of fully. As a matter of fact, Latin America\u2019s economy is almost as big as the economy of China. We\u2019re all focused on China. Latin America is a huge opportunity for us \u2014 time zone, language opportunities.<\/p>\n
Number three, we\u2019re going to have to have training programs that work for our workers and schools that finally put the parents and the teachers and the kids first, and the teachers\u2019 unions going to have to go behind.<\/p>\n
And then we\u2019re going to have to get to a balanced budget. We can\u2019t expect entrepreneurs and businesses large and small to take their life savings or their company\u2019s money and invest in America if they think we\u2019re headed to the road to Greece. And that\u2019s where we\u2019re going right now unless we finally get off this spending and borrowing binge. And I\u2019ll get us on track to a balanced budget.<\/p>\n
And finally, number five, we\u2019ve got to champion small business. Small business is where jobs come from. Two-thirds of our jobs come from small businesses. New business formation is down to the lowest level in 30 years under this administration. I want to bring it back and get back good jobs and rising take-home pay.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Well, let\u2019s talk about what we need to compete. First of all, Governor Romney talks about small businesses. But, Governor, when you were in Massachusetts, small businesses development ranked about 48th, I think out of 50 states in Massachusetts, because the policies that you are promoting actually don\u2019t help small businesses.<\/p>\n
And the way you define small businesses includes folks at the very top. And they include you and me. That\u2019s not the kind of small business promotion we need. But let\u2019s take an example that we know is going to make a difference in the 21st century and that\u2019s our education policy. We didn\u2019t have a lot of chance to talk about this in the last debate.<\/p>\n
You know, under my leadership, what we\u2019ve done is reformed education, working with governors, 46 states. We\u2019ve seen progress and gains in schools that were having a terrible time. And they\u2019re starting to finally make progress.<\/p>\n
And what I now want to do is to hire more teachers, especially in math and science, because we know that we\u2019ve fallen behind when it comes to math and science. And those teachers can make a difference.<\/p>\n
Now, Governor Romney, when you were asked by teachers whether or not this would help the economy grow, you said this isn\u2019t going to help the economy grow.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: When you were asked about reduced class sizes, you said class sizes don\u2019t make a difference.<\/p>\n
But I tell you, if you talk to teachers, they will tell you it does make a difference. And if we\u2019ve got math teachers who are able to provide the kind of support that they need for our kids, that\u2019s what\u2019s going to determine whether or not the new businesses are created here. Companies are going to locate here depending on whether we\u2019ve got the most highly skilled workforce.<\/p>\n
And the kinds of budget proposals that you\u2019ve put forward, when we don\u2019t ask either you or me to pay a dime more in terms of reducing the deficit, but instead we slash support for education, that\u2019s undermining our long-term competitiveness. That is not good for America\u2019s position in the world, and the world notices.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Let me get back to foreign policy.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Can I just get back\u2026<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well \u2014 well, I need to speak a moment\u2026<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: OK.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026 if you\u2019ll let me, Bob, just about education\u2026<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: OK.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026 because I\u2019m \u2014 I\u2019m so proud of the state that I had the chance to be governor of.<\/p>\n
We have every two years tests that look at how well our kids are doing. Fourth graders and eighth graders are tested in English and math. While I was governor, I was proud that our fourth graders came out number one of all 50 states in English, and then also in math. And our eighth graders number one in English and also in math. First time one state had been number one in all four measures.<\/p>\n
How did we do that? Well, Republicans and Democrats came together on a bipartisan basis to put in place education principles that focused on having great teachers in the classroom.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Ten years earlier\u2026<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: And that was \u2014 that was \u2014 that was what allowed us to become the number one state in the nation.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: But that was 10 years before you took office.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: And then you cut education spending when you came into office.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: The first \u2014 the first \u2014 the first \u2014 and we kept our schools number one in the nation. They\u2019re still number one today.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: And the principles that we put in place, we also gave kids not just a graduation exam that determined whether they were up to the skills needed to \u2014 to be able compete, but also if they graduated the quarter of their class, they got a four-year tuition- free ride at any Massachusetts public institution of higher learning.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: That happened before you came into office.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Governor\u2026<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: That was actually mine, actually, Mr. President. You got that fact wrong.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Let me get \u2014 I want to try to shift it, because we have heard some of this in the other debates.<\/p>\n
Governor, you say you want a bigger military. You want a bigger Navy. You don\u2019t want to cut defense spending. What I want to ask you \u2014 we were talking about financial problems in this country. Where are you going to get the money?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, let\u2019s come back and talk about the military, but all the way \u2014 all the way through. First of all, I\u2019m going through from the very beginning \u2014 we\u2019re going to cut about 5 percent of the discretionary budget, excluding military. That\u2019s number one.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: But can you do this without driving deeper\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
ROMNEHY: The good news is (inaudible). I\u2019d be happy to have you take a look. Come on our website. You look at how we get to a balanced budget within eight to 10 years. We do it by getting \u2014 by reducing spending in a whole series of programs. By the way, number one I get rid of is Obamacare.<\/p>\n
There are a number of things that sound good, but frankly, we just can\u2019t afford them. And that one doesn\u2019t sound good and it\u2019s not affordable. So I\u2019d get rid of that one from day one. To the extent humanly possible, we get that out. We take program after program that we don\u2019t absolutely have to have, and we get rid of them.<\/p>\n
Number two, we take some programs that we are doing to keep, like Medicaid, which is a program for the poor; we\u2019ll take that healthcare program for the poor and we give it to the states to run because states run these programs more efficiently.<\/p>\n
As a governor, I thought please, give me this program. I can run this more efficiently than the federal government and states, by the way, are proving it. States like Arizona, Rhode Island have taken these \u2014 these Medicaid dollars; have shown they can run these programs more cost-effectively. I want to do those two things and get this \u2014 get this to a balanced budget with eight \u2014 eight to 10 years.<\/p>\n
But the military \u2014 let\u2019s get back to the military, though.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK) SCHIEFFER: That\u2019s what I\u2019m trying\u2026<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
OBAMA: He should have answered the first question.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Look, Governor Romney\u2019s called for $5 trillion of tax cuts that he says he\u2019s going to pay for by closing deductions. Now, the math doesn\u2019t work, but he continues to claim that he\u2019s going to do it. He then wants to spend another $2 trillion on military spending that our military is not asking for.<\/p>\n
Now, keep in mind that our military spending has gone up every single year that I\u2019ve been in office. We spend more on our military than the next 10 countries combined; China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, you name it. The next 10. And what I did was work with our joint chiefs of staff to think about, what are we going to need in the future to make sure that we are safe?<\/p>\n
And that\u2019s the budget that we\u2019ve put forward. But, what you can\u2019t do is spend $2 trillion in additional military spending that the military is not asking for, $5 trillion on tax cuts. You say that you\u2019re going to pay for it by closing loopholes and deductions, without naming what those loopholes and deductions are. And then somehow you\u2019re also going to deal with the deficit that we\u2019ve already got. The math simply doesn\u2019t work. But when it comes to our military, what we have to think about is not, you know just budgets, we\u2019ve got to think about capabilities.<\/p>\n
We need to be thinking about cyber security. We need to be talking about space. That\u2019s exactly what our budget does, but it\u2019s driven by strategy. It\u2019s not driven by politics. It\u2019s not driven by members of Congress, and what they would like to see. It\u2019s driven by, what are we going to need to keep the American people safe? That\u2019s exactly what our budget does, and it also then allows us to reduce our deficit, which is a significant national security concern. Because we\u2019ve got to make sure that our economy is strong at home so that we can project military power overseas.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I\u2019m pleased that I\u2019ve balanced budgets. I was on the world of business for 25 years. If you didn\u2019t balance your budget, you went out of business. I went into the Olympics that was out of balance, and we got it on balance, and made a success there. I had the chance to be governor of a state. Four years in a row, Democrats and Republicans came together to balance the budget. We cut taxes 19 times and balanced our budget. The president hasn\u2019t balanced a budget yet. I expect to have the opportunity to do so myself.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I\u2019m going to be able to balance the budget.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s talk about military spending, and that\u2019s this.<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Thirty seconds.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Our Navy is old \u2014 excuse me, our Navy is smaller now than at any time since 1917. The Navy said they needed 313 ships to carry out their mission. We\u2019re now at under 285. We\u2019re headed down to the low 200s if we go through a sequestration. That\u2019s unacceptable to me.<\/p>\n
I want to make sure that we have the ships that are required by our Navy. Our Air Force is older and smaller than at any time since it was founded in 1947.<\/p>\n
We\u2019ve changed for the first time since FDR \u2014 since FDR we had the \u2014 we\u2019ve always had the strategy of saying we could fight in two conflicts at once. Now we\u2019re changing to one conflict. Look, this, in my view, is the highest responsibility of the President of the United States, which is to maintain the safety of the American people.<\/p>\n
And I will not cut our military budget by a trillion dollars, which is a combination of the budget cuts the president has, as well as the sequestration cuts. That, in my view, is making \u2014 is making our future less certain and less secure.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Bob, I just need to comment on this.<\/p>\n
First of all, the sequester is not something that I\u2019ve proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed. It will not happen.<\/p>\n
The budget that we are talking about is not reducing our military spending. It is maintaining it.<\/p>\n
But I think Governor Romney maybe hasn\u2019t spent enough time looking at how our military works.<\/p>\n
You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military\u2019s changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: And so the question is not a game of Battleship, where we\u2019re counting slips. It\u2019s what are our capabilities. And so when I sit down with the Secretary of the Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we determine how are we going to be best able to meet all of our defense needs in a way that also keeps faith with our troops, that also makes sure that our veterans have the kind of support that they need when they come home.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: And that is not reflected in the kind of budget that you\u2019re putting forward because it just doesn\u2019t work.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: And, you know, we visited the website quite a bit and it still doesn\u2019t work.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: A lot to cover. I\u2019d like \u2014 I\u2019d like to move to the next segment: red lines, Israel and Iran.<\/p>\n
Would either of you \u2014 and you\u2019ll have two minutes \u2014 and, President Obama, you have the first go at this one \u2014 would either of you be willing to declare that an attack on Israel is an attack on the United States, which, of course, is the same promise that we give to our close allies like Japan.<\/p>\n
And if you made such a declaration, would not that deter Iran? It\u2019s certainly deterred the Soviet Union for a long, long time when we made that \u2014 we made \u2014 we made that promise to our allies.<\/p>\n
Mr. President?<\/p>\n
OBAMA: First of all, Israel is a true friend. It is our greatest ally in the region. And if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel. I\u2019ve made that clear throughout my presidency. And\u2026<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: So you\u2019re \u2014 you\u2019re saying we\u2019ve already made that declaration.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: I will stand with Israel if they are attacked. And this is the reason why, working with Israel, we have created the strongest military and intelligence cooperation between our two countries in history.<\/p>\n
In fact, this week we\u2019ll be carrying out the largest military exercise with Israel in history, this very week. But to the issue of Iran, as long as I\u2019m president of the United States Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: We then organized the strongest coalition and the strongest sanctions against Iran in history, and it is crippling their economy. Their currency has dropped 80 percent. Their oil production has plunged to the lowest level since they were fighting a war with Iraq 20 years ago. So their economy is in a shambles.<\/p>\n
And the reason we did this is because a nuclear Iran is a threat to our national security, and it is a threat to Israel\u2019s national security. We cannot afford to have a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the world.<\/p>\n
Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. And for them to be able to provide nuclear technology to non-state actors, that\u2019s unacceptable. And they have said that they want to see Israel wiped off the map.<\/p>\n
So the work that we\u2019ve done with respect to sanctions now offers Iran a choice. They can take the diplomatic route and end their nuclear program or they will have to face a united world and a United States president, me, who said we\u2019re not going to take any options off the table.<\/p>\n
The disagreement I have with Governor Romney is that, during the course of this campaign, he\u2019s often talked as if we should take premature military action. I think that would be a mistake, because when I\u2019ve sent young men and women into harm\u2019s way, I always understand that that is the last resort, not the first resort.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Two minutes.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, first of all, I want to underscore the same point the president mad,e which is that if I\u2019m President of the United States, when I\u2019m President of the United States, we will stand with Israel.<\/p>\n
And if Israel is attacked, we have their back, not just diplomatically, not just culturally, but militarily. That\u2019s number one.<\/p>\n
Number two, with regards to Iran and the threat of Iran, there\u2019s no question but that a nuclear Iran, a nuclear-capable Iran is unacceptable to America. It presents a threat not only to our friends but ultimately a threat to us to have Iran have nuclear material, nuclear weapons that could be used against us or used to be threatening to us.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: It is also essential for us to understand what our mission is in Iran, and that is to dissuade Iran from having a nuclear weapon through peaceful and diplomatic means. And crippling sanctions are something I called for five years ago, when I was in Israel, speaking at the Herzliya Conference. I laid out seven steps, crippling sanctions were number one. And they do work. You\u2019re seeing it right now in the economy. It\u2019s absolutely the right thing to do, to have crippling sanctions. I would have put them in place earlier. But it\u2019s good that we have them.<\/p>\n
Number two, something I would add today is I would tighten those sanctions. I would say that ships that carry Iranian oil, can\u2019t come into our ports. I imagine the E.U. would agree with us as well. Not only ships couldn\u2019t, but I\u2019d say companies that are moving their oil can\u2019t, people who are trading in their oil can\u2019t. I would tighten those sanctions further. Secondly, I\u2019d take on diplomatic isolation efforts. I\u2019d make sure that Ahmadinejad is indicted under the Genocide Convention. His words amount to genocide incitation. I would indict him for it. I would also make sure that their diplomats are treated like the pariah they are around the world. The same way we treated the apartheid diplomats of South Africa.<\/p>\n
We need to increase pressure time, and time again on Iran because anything other than a \u2014 a \u2014 a solution to this, which says \u2014 which stops this \u2014 this nuclear folly of theirs, is unacceptable to America. And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is something one would only \u2013 only consider if all of the other avenues had been \u2014 had been tried to their full extent.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Let me ask both of you, there \u2014 as you know, there are reports that Iran and the United States a part of an international group, have agreed in principle to talks about Iran\u2019s nuclear program. What is the deal, if there are such talks? What is the deal that you would accept, Mr. President?<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Well, first of all those are reports in the newspaper. They are not true. But our goal is to get Iran to recognize it needs to give up its nuclear program and abide by the U.N. resolutions that have been in place. Because they have the opportunity to reenter the community of nations, and we would welcome that.<\/p>\n
There \u2014 there are people in Iran who have the same aspirations as people all around the world for a better life. And we hope that their leadership takes the right decision, but the deal we\u2019ll accept is they end their nuclear program. It\u2019s very straightforward. And I\u2019m glad that Governor Romney agrees with the steps that we\u2019re taking. You know, there have been times, Governor, frankly, during the course of this campaign, where it sounded like you thought that you\u2019d do the same things we did, but you\u2019d say them louder and somehow that \u2014 that would make a difference.<\/p>\n
And it turns out that the work involved in setting up these crippling sanctions is painstaking. It\u2019s meticulous. We started from the day we got into office. And the reason is was so important \u2014 and this is a testament to how we\u2019ve restored American credibility and strength around the world \u2014 is we had to make sure that all the countries participated, even countries like Russia and China. Because if it\u2019s just us that are imposing sanctions \u2014 we\u2019ve had sanctions in place a long time. It\u2019s because we got everybody to agree that Iran is seeing so much pressure. And we\u2019ve got to maintain that pressure.<\/p>\n
There is a deal to be had, and that is that they abide by the rules that have already been established. They convince the international community they are not pursuing a nuclear program. There are inspections that are very intrusive. But over time, what they can do is regain credibility. In the meantime, though, we\u2019re not going to let up the pressure until we have clear evidence that that takes place.<\/p>\n
And one last thing \u2014 just \u2014 just to make this point. The clock is ticking. We\u2019re not going to allow Iran to perpetually engage in negotiations that lead nowhere. And I\u2019ve been very clear to them. You know, because of the intelligence coordination that we do with a range of countries, including Israel, we have a sense of when they would get breakout capacity, which means that we would not be able to intervene in time to stop their nuclear program.<\/p>\n
And that clock is ticking. And we\u2019re going to make sure that if they do not meet the demands of the international community, then we are going to take all options necessary to make sure they don\u2019t have a nuclear weapon.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Governor?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I think from the very beginning, one of the challenges we\u2019ve had with Iran is that they have looked at this administration, and felt that the administration was not as strong as it needed to be.<\/p>\n
I think they saw weakness where they had expected to find American strength. And I say that because from the very beginning, the president in his campaign four years ago, said he would meet with all the world\u2019s worst actors in his first year, he\u2019d sit down with Chavez and Kim Jong-il, with Castro and President Ahmadinejad of Iran.<\/p>\n
And I think they looked and thought, well, that\u2019s an unusual honor to receive from the President of the United States. And then the president began what I have called an apology tour, of going to various nations in the Middle East and criticizing America. I think they looked at that and saw weakness.<\/p>\n
Then when there were dissidents in the streets of Tehran, a Green Revolution, holding signs saying, is America with us, the president was silent. I think they noticed that as well.<\/p>\n
And I think that when the president said he was going to create daylight between ourselves and Israel, that they noticed that as well.<\/p>\n
All of these things suggested, I think, to the Iranian mullahs that, hey, you know, we can keep on pushing along here, we can keep talks going on, we\u2019re just going to keep on spinning centrifuges.<\/p>\n
Now there are some 10,000 centrifuges spinning uranium, preparing to create a nuclear threat to the United States and to the world. That\u2019s unacceptable for us, and it\u2019s essential for a president to show strength from the very beginning, to make it very clear what is acceptable and not acceptable.<\/p>\n
And an Iranian nuclear program is not acceptable to us. They must not develop nuclear capability. And the way to make sure they understand that is by having, from the very beginning, the tightest sanctions possible. They need to be tightened. Our diplomatic isolation needs to be tougher. We need to indict Ahmadinejad. We need to put the pressure on them as hard as we possibly can, because if we do that, we won\u2019t have to take the military action.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Bob, let me just respond.<\/p>\n
Nothing Governor Romney just said is true, starting with this notion of me apologizing. This has been probably the biggest whopper that\u2019s been told during the course of this campaign. And every fact checker and every reporter who\u2019s looked at it, Governor, has said this is not true.<\/p>\n
And when it comes to tightening sanctions, look, as I said before, we\u2019ve put in the toughest, most crippling sanctions ever. And the fact is, while we were coordinating an international coalition to make sure these sanctions were effective, you were still invested in a Chinese state oil company that was doing business with the Iranian oil sector.<\/p>\n
So I\u2019ll let the American people decide, judge, who\u2019s going to be more effective and more credible when it comes to imposing crippling sanctions.<\/p>\n
And with respect to our attitude about the Iranian revolution, I was very clear about the murderous activities that had taken place and that was contrary to international law and everything that civilized people stand for.<\/p>\n
And \u2014 and so the strength that we have shown in Iran is shown by the fact that we\u2019ve been able to mobilize the world.<\/p>\n
When I came into office, the world was divided. Iran was resurgent. Iran is at its weakest point, economically, strategically, militarily, then since \u2014 then in many years. And we are going to continue to keep the pressure on to make sure that they do not get a nuclear weapon. That\u2019s in America\u2019s national interest and that will be the case so long as I\u2019m president.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: We\u2019re four years closer to a nuclear Iran. We\u2019re four years closer to a nuclear Iran. And \u2014 and \u2014 we should not have wasted these four years to the extent they \u2014 they continue to be able to spin these centrifuges and get that much closer. That\u2019s number one.<\/p>\n
Number two, Mr. President, the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East and you flew to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq. And by the way, you skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations.<\/p>\n
And by the way, they noticed that you skipped Israel. And then in those nations, and on Arabic TV, you said that America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated to other nations.<\/p>\n
Mr. President, America has not dictated to other nations. We have freed other nations from dictators.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Bob, let me \u2014 let me respond.<\/p>\n
If we\u2019re going to talk about trips that we\u2019ve taken \u2014 when I was a candidate for office, first trip I took was to visit our troops. And when I went to Israel as a candidate, I didn\u2019t take donors. I didn\u2019t attend fundraisers. I went to Yad Beshef (ph), the Holocaust museum there, to remind myself the nature of evil and why our bond with Israel will be unbreakable.<\/p>\n
And then I went down to the border towns of Storok (ph), which had experienced missiles raining dowm from Hamas. And I saw families there who showed me there where missiles had come down near their children\u2019s bedrooms. And I was reminded of what that would mean if those were my kids. Which is why as president, we funded an Iron Dome program to stop those missiles.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: So that\u2019s how I\u2019ve used my travels, when I travel to Israel and when I travel to the region. And the \u2014 the central question at this point is going to be: Who is going to be credible to all parties involved? And they can look at my track record, whether it\u2019s Iran sanctions, whether it\u2019s dealing with counterterrorism, whether it\u2019s supporting democracy, whether it\u2019s supporting women\u2019s rights, whether it\u2019s supporting religious minorities.<\/p>\n
And they can say that the President of the United States and the United States of America has stood on the right side of history. And that kind of credibility is precisely why we\u2019ve been able to show leadership on a wide range of issues facing the world right now.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: What if \u2014 what if the prime minister of Israel called you on the phone and said, \u201cOur bombers are on the way. We\u2019re going to bomb Iran.\u201d<\/p>\n
What do you \u2014<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Bob, let\u2019s not go into hypotheticals of that nature. Our relationship with Israel, my relationship with the prime minister of Israel is such that we would not get a call saying our bombers are on the way, or their fighters are on the way. This is the kind of thing that would have been discussed and thoroughly evaluated well before that kind of \u2014<\/p>\n
(CROSSTALK)<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: So you\u2019d say it just wouldn\u2019t happen?<\/p>\n
That\u2019s \u2014<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: OK. Let\u2019s see what \u2014<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: But let me \u2014 let me come back \u2014 we can come back. Let\u2019s come back to what the president was speaking about, which is what\u2019s happening in the world and the president\u2019s statement that things are going so well.<\/p>\n
Look, I look at what\u2019s happening around the world, and i see Iran four years closer to a bomb. I see the Middle East with a rising tide of violence, chaos, tumult. I see jihadists continuing to spread, whether they\u2019re rising or just about the same level, hard to precisely measure, but it\u2019s clear they\u2019re there. They\u2019re very strong.<\/p>\n
I see Syria with 30,000 civilians dead, Assad still in power. I see our trade deficit with China, larger than it\u2019s \u2014 growing larger every year, as a matter of fact.<\/p>\n
I look around the world and I don\u2019t feel that you see North Korea, continuing to export their nuclear technology, Russia said they\u2019re not going to follow Nunn-Lugar any more. They\u2019re back away from a nuclear proliferation treaty that we had with them.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: I look around the world, I don\u2019t see our influence growing around the world. I see our influence receding, in part because of the failure of the president to deal with our economic challenges at home; in part because of our withdrawal from our commitment to our military in the way I think it ought to be; in part because of the \u2014 the \u2014 the turmoil with Israel.<\/p>\n
I mean, the president received a letter from 38 Democrat senators saying the tensions with Israel were a real problem. They asked him, please repair the tension \u2014 Democrat senators \u2014 please repair the tension\u2026<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: \u2026 the damage in his \u2014 in his own party.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: Governor, the problem is, is that on a whole range of issues, whether it\u2019s the Middle East, whether it\u2019s Afghanistan, whether it\u2019s Iraq, whether it\u2019s now Iran, you\u2019ve been all over the map.<\/p>\n
I mean, I\u2019m \u2014 I\u2019m pleased that you now are endorsing our policy of applying diplomatic pressure and potentially having bilateral discussions with the Iranians to end their nuclear program. But just a few years ago you said that\u2019s something you\u2019d never do.<\/p>\n
In the same way that you initially opposed a timetable in Afghanistan, now you\u2019re for it, although it depends. In the same way that you say you would have ended the war in Iraq, but recently gave a speech saying that we should have 20,000 more folks in there. The same way that you said that it was mission creep to go after Gadhafi.<\/p>\n
When it comes to going after Osama bin Laden, you said, well, any president would make that call. But when you were a candidate in 2008, as I was, and I said if I got bin Laden in our sights I would take that shot, you said we shouldn\u2019t move heaven and earth to get one man.<\/p>\n
OBAMA: And you said we should ask Pakistan for permission. And if we had asked Pakistan permission, we would not have gotten him. And it was worth moving heaven and earth to get him.<\/p>\n
You know, after we killed bin Laden I was at ground zero for a memorial and talked to a young women who was four years old when 9\/11 happened. And the last conversation she had with her father was him calling from the twin towers, saying \u201cPeyton (ph), I love you and I will always watch over you.\u201d And for the next decade, she was haunted by that conversation. And she said to me, \u201cYou know, by finally getting bin Laden, that brought some closure to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
And when we do things like that \u2014 when we bring those who have harmed us to justice, that sends a message to the world and it tells Peyton (ph) that we did not forget her father. And I make that point because that\u2019s the kind of clarity of leadership, and those decisions are not always popular. Those decisions generally \u2014 generally are not poll-tested. And even some in my own party, including my current vice president, had the same critique as you did.<\/p>\n
But what the American people understand is that I look at what we need to get done to keep the American people safe and to move our interests forward, and I make those decisions.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: All right, let\u2019s go. And that leads us \u2014 this takes us right to the next segment, Governor, America\u2019s longest war, Afghanistan and Pakistan\u2026<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Bob\u2026<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Governor, you get to go first.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: You can\u2019t \u2014 but you can\u2019t have the president just lay out a whole series of items without giving me a chance to respond.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: With respect, sir, you had laid out quite a program\u2026<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, that\u2019s probably true.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: We\u2019ll give you \u2014 we\u2019ll catch up.<\/p>\n
The United States is scheduled to turn over responsibility for security in Afghanistan to the Afghan government in 2014. At that point, we will withdraw our combat troops, leave a smaller force of Americans, if I understand our policy, in Afghanistan for training purposes. It seems to me the key question here is: What do you do if the deadline arrives and it is obvious the Afghans are unable to handle their security? Do we still leave?<\/p>\n
And I believe, Governor Romney, you go first?<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: Well, we\u2019re going to be finished by 2014, and when I\u2019m president, we\u2019ll make sure we bring our troops out by the end of 2014. The commanders and the generals there are on track to do so.<\/p>\n
We\u2019ve seen progress over the past several years. The surge has been successful and the training program is proceeding apace. There are now a large number of Afghan Security Forces, 350,000 that are ready to step in to provide security and we\u2019re going to be able to make that transition by the end of 2014.<\/p>\n
So our troops will come home at that point.<\/p>\n
I can tell you at the same time, that we will make sure that we look at what\u2019s happening in Pakistan, and recognize that what\u2019s happening in Pakistan is going to have a major impact on the success in Afghanistan. And I say that because I know a lot of people that feel like we should just brush our hands and walk away.<\/p>\n
And I don\u2019t mean you, Mr. President, but some people in the \u2014 in our nation feel that Pakistan is being nice to us, and that we should walk away fro mthem. But Pakistan is important to the region, to the world and to us, because Pakistan has 100 nuclear warheads and they\u2019re rushing to build a lot more. They\u2019ll have more than Great Britain sometime in the \u2014 in the relatively near future.<\/p>\n
They also have the Haqqani Network and the Taliban existent within their country. And so a Pakistan that falls apart, becomes a failed state, would be of extraordinary danger to Afghanistan and to us.<\/p>\n
And so we\u2019re going to have to remain helpful in encouraging Pakistan to move towards a more stable government and rebuild the relationship with us. And that means that our aid that we provide to Pakistan is going to have to be conditioned upon certain benchmarks being met.<\/p>\n
ROMNEY: So for me, I look at this as both a need to help move Pakistan in the right direction, and also to get Afghanistan to be ready, and they will be ready by the end of 2014.<\/p>\n
SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?<\/p>\n
OBAMA: When I came into office, we were still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan had been drifting for a decade. We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on Afghanistan, and we did deliver a surge of troops. That was facilitated in part because we had ended the war in Iraq.<\/p>\n
And we are now in a position where we have met many of the objectives that got us there in the first place.<\/p>\n
Part of what had happened is we\u2019d forgotten why we had gone. We went because there were people who were responsible for 3,000 American deaths. And so we decimated Al Qaida\u2019s core leadership in the border regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.<\/p>\n
We then started to build up Afghan forces. And we\u2019re now in a position where we can transition out, because there\u2019s no reason why Americans should die when Afghans are perfectly capable of defending their own country.<\/p>\n
Now, that transition has to take place in a responsible fashion. We\u2019ve been there a long time, and we\u2019ve got to make sure that we and our coalition partners are pulling out responsibly and giving Afghans the capabilities that they need.<\/p>\n
But what I think the American people recognize is after a decade of war it\u2019s time to do some nation building here at home. And what we can now do is free up some resources, to, for example, put Americans back to work, especially our veterans, rebuilding our roads, our bridges, our schools, making sure that, you know, our veterans are getting the care that they need when it comes to post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, making sure that the certifications that they need for good jobs of the future are in place.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
BOB SCHIEFFER, MODERATOR: Good evening from the campus of Lynn University here in Boca Raton, Florida. This is the fourth and last debate of the 2012 campaign, brought to you by the Commission on Presidential Debates. This one\u2019s on foreign policy. I\u2019m Bob Schieffer of CBS News. The questions are mine, and I have not […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1118,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[48],"class_list":["post-997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-election-2012"],"yoast_head":"\n