{"id":109,"date":"2010-10-25T16:55:27","date_gmt":"2010-10-25T20:55:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/community\/philosophicalfragments\/?p=109"},"modified":"2010-10-25T16:55:27","modified_gmt":"2010-10-25T20:55:27","slug":"teapartyspending","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/","title":{"rendered":"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending &#8212; Or Is It?"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at <em>Mother Jones<\/em>.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he\u2019s clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0 About a week ago I came across <a href=\"http:\/\/motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2010\/10\/bailouts-deficits-and-spending-oh-my\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">this from Drum<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There\u2019s  little evidence that extreme conservatives are any more concerned about  spending now than they\u2019ve ever been, and over the past 30 years <em>they\u2019ve never been concerned about spending.<\/em> They didn\u2019t cut it under Reagan, they didn\u2019t cut it under Bush Sr., and  when they finally controlled the government completely under Bush Jr.,  they didn\u2019t cut it then either. Hell, Social Security privatization  never got anywhere even within the Republican caucus despite the fact  that it was sold relentlessly and dishonestly as a free lunch. Actual  cuts in spending were never on the radar.<\/p>\n<p>The tea partiers are angry not over spending, but because a Democrat  is in the White House. Rick Santelli\u2019s rant, which kicked off the whole  movement, occurred <em>one month<\/em> after Obama took office. That was  before the auto bailout, before health care reform, before financial  reform, before the Iraq drawdown, before cap-and-trade, and before  extension of the Bush tax cuts was even on the horizon. The only thing  that had happened at that point was the stimulus bill, but even as big  as that was, everyone knew it was a one-time shot, not a permanent  change in spending levels.<\/p>\n<p>Really, there\u2019s just no evidence at all to suggest that tea partiers  are any more upset about the level of spending and deficits than they  ever have been. Rather, they\u2019re upset because the spending is currently  being done by a Democrat. As soon as Republicans are doing it, they  won\u2019t really care anymore.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Several points here:<\/p>\n<p>(1) One must always remember that Presidents cannot pass budgets by themselves.\u00a0 Congress controls the purse-strings.\u00a0 So when we talk about Presidents increasing or decreasing spending, it\u2019s actually more complicated than that.<\/p>\n<p>(2) Entitlement spending has been increasing steadily due to factors that are (absent legislative change) largely outside the control of Presidents.\u00a0 It\u2019s best to pay attention to \u201cdiscretionary\u201d spending.\u00a0 Also, what is spent, or what has to be spent, in relation to national defense is not always under a President\u2019s control either.<\/p>\n<p>(3) Reagan was the most forceful proponent of small-government conservatism in recent memory, and he succeeded in some respects and failed in others.\u00a0 Reagan increased spending on defense from the Carter years \u2014 and that spending was arguably worth it, as it helped bring about the collapse of the Soviet Union \u2014 but he <em>decreased <\/em>non-defense discretionary spending by nearly 10% in his first term.\u00a0 In his second term, the same spending stayed flat.<\/p>\n<p>(4) After Reagan, Bush the Elder and Bush the Younger departed progressively further and further from the small-government principles of Reaganite conservatism.\u00a0 They may have been right to do so, or they may have been wrong.\u00a0 But, as I am arguing in a piece to be published at Patheos today, it is demonstrably false to say that no conservatives objected to the big-spending ways of the second Bush administration.\u00a0 In the article I will point to some of the thousands of examples, but let me point to one more here.\u00a0 The Independent Institute in 2004 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.org\/newsroom\/news_detail.asp?newsID=31\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">complained<\/a> about the massive spending increases under Bush (with a nice graphic):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>President George W. Bush is now on his way to becoming the first  full-term president since John Quincy Adams (1825-1829) to not veto a <em>single<\/em> bill. The result is a congress that has been completely unconstrained  in satiating its appetite for pork and corporate welfare. In response,  Democratic challenger John Kerry has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sfgate.com\/cgi-bin\/article.cgi?f=\/news\/archive\/2004\/04\/09\/politics1407EDT0571.DTL\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">maligned alleged spending cuts<\/a> and called for even <em>higher<\/em> taxes and spending. The consequence is that we now have two parties competing to see which can grow government faster.<\/p>\n<p>From the massive increases in agricultural subsidies in the  farm bill of 2002, to the new Medicare prescription drug entitlement of  2003; from the 47% increase in the defense budget, to the 80% increase  in education spending, George W. Bush has demonstrated that \u201climited  government\u201d is not part of his political vocabulary.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Things would change to some extent.\u00a0 Bush II did not grow the government nearly as much in his second term, and he sought immediately after his reelection to move social security money (at least partly) out of government control and under private control.\u00a0 Bush was dramatically reducing the deficit year to year, and, if it were not for the economic collapse, probably would have handed over a government with roughly a balanced budget.<\/p>\n<p>(5) Kevin Drum points to how quickly Santelli\u2019s rant followed after Obama\u2019s inauguration.\u00a0 But this only goes to show that the anger had already been building under Bush.\u00a0 It was a response to TARP and the stimulus bill and the mortgage bailouts, and many of the things Drum mentions that had <em>not yet <\/em>come to pass were nevertheless already under discussion, such as Obama\u2019s new budget and the auto bailouts, as well as financial market regulation reform, cap and trade, and even the health insurance reform.\u00a0 It was already becoming clear that we were dealing with precisely what Obama had declared (at least in the general election) that he was not: a very, very big spender.\u00a0 It was hard to see how there would not be significant tax increases coming down the pipe, and, along with them, sluggish economic growth and high rates of unemployment.<\/p>\n<p>Plus, it\u2019s taken time to build a broader Tea Party movement, so the cause of the objection at the time of Santelli\u2019s rant is not the only important thing.\u00a0 As time has gone on, and the government and deficit spending have grown and grown and grown, so too have the ranks of the Tea Party.<\/p>\n<p>Drum wants to say, of course, that since the Tea Party <em>could not have been <\/em>motivated by strictly economic concerns, <em>therefore it must be <\/em>motivated by blind hatred of a Democrat or a black or whatever.\u00a0 But economic concerns are a sufficient cause and a sufficient explanation for the Tea Party movement, both in its beginnings and as it has evolved over time.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he\u2019s clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0 About a week ago I came across this from Drum: There\u2019s little evidence that extreme conservatives are any more concerned about spending now than they\u2019ve ever been, and over the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tea-party"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending - Or Is It? - Philosophical Fragments<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he&#039;s clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending - Or Is It? - Philosophical Fragments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he&#039;s clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Philosophical Fragments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-25T20:55:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Timothy Dalrymple\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Timothy Dalrymple\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/\",\"name\":\"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending - Or Is It? - Philosophical Fragments\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-25T20:55:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-10-25T20:55:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310\"},\"description\":\"I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he's clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending &#8212; Or Is It?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/\",\"name\":\"Philosophical Fragments\",\"description\":\"Daily Thoughts on Faith, Culture and Politics from Timothy Dalrymple\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310\",\"name\":\"Timothy Dalrymple\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Timothy Dalrymple\"},\"description\":\"Timothy Dalrymple was raised in non-denominational evangelical congregations in California. The son and grandson of ministers, as a young boy he spent far too many hours each night staring at the ceiling and pondering the afterlife. \u00a0 In all his work he seeks a better understanding of why people do, and do not, come to faith, and researches and teaches in religion and science, faith and reason, theology and philosophy, the origins of atheism, Christology, and the religious transformations of suffering\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/author\/tdalrymple\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending - Or Is It? - Philosophical Fragments","description":"I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he's clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending - Or Is It? - Philosophical Fragments","og_description":"I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he's clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/","og_site_name":"Philosophical Fragments","article_published_time":"2010-10-25T20:55:27+00:00","author":"Timothy Dalrymple","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Timothy Dalrymple","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/","name":"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending - Or Is It? - Philosophical Fragments","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-25T20:55:27+00:00","dateModified":"2010-10-25T20:55:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310"},"description":"I must confess that I like Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.\u00a0 I almost never agree with him.\u00a0 But he's clearly an intelligent, earnest, thoughtful commentator.\u00a0","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/10\/25\/teapartyspending\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Tea Party Isn&#039;t Really About Spending &#8212; Or Is It?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/","name":"Philosophical Fragments","description":"Daily Thoughts on Faith, Culture and Politics from Timothy Dalrymple","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310","name":"Timothy Dalrymple","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Timothy Dalrymple"},"description":"Timothy Dalrymple was raised in non-denominational evangelical congregations in California. The son and grandson of ministers, as a young boy he spent far too many hours each night staring at the ceiling and pondering the afterlife. \u00a0 In all his work he seeks a better understanding of why people do, and do not, come to faith, and researches and teaches in religion and science, faith and reason, theology and philosophy, the origins of atheism, Christology, and the religious transformations of suffering","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/author\/tdalrymple\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}